Someone posted up the tweets from the man in the know from sky.
Basically...
Lille president said off camera he would prefer United to a United fan.
Eden Hazard | "I am signing for Chelsea"
- Thread starter jdmufc
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
- Status
Someone posted up the tweets from the man in the know from sky.
Basically...
Lille president said off camera he would prefer United to a United fan.
Darren Can is pretty much the only so called 'itk' guy that I actually believe. He is usually correct when he says something will/won't happen. Doesn't pretend to know stuff he doesn't either.
Darren Can't
If moses and WeeDong say it's on then it's on.
I'm ordering my Hazard 7 shirt tomorrow. And getting a tattoo. AND naming my not yet conceived first son Eden.
Beat that, cnuts.
I'm ordering my Hazard 7 shirt tomorrow. And getting a tattoo. AND naming my not yet conceived first son Eden.
Beat that, cnuts.
Copycat
Yeah, you win.
Yes, that's right, but I'm getting a shirt AND a tattoo as well. It's called upping the ante.
Perhaps the two of you should have the kid together to avoid any arguments.
I'll ask the missus if she'd mind. I'm not a Ginger though, so that might be a problem.
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereve...united-over-the-new-money-at-city-and-chelsea
The choice is obvious. Maximise your earnings or maximise your talent.
The choice is obvious. Maximise your earnings or maximise your talent.
not sure if this has already been posted..
Www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/...lsea-over-his-200000-a-week-wage-demands.html
Basically it s saying that City are refusing to fork out 200 k / week for Hazard and they are offering him 110 k.
Www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/...lsea-over-his-200000-a-week-wage-demands.html
Basically it s saying that City are refusing to fork out 200 k / week for Hazard and they are offering him 110 k.
You can hardly blame an agent for wanting to take his time to feel out City and Chelsea, any big agent has to be looking at these days of insane wages as their gold rush, get it while you can. I'm sure any big agent would give both those teams several chances to offer 200,000 a week, they've done much more financially irresponsible things before.
I just hope Hazard moves in the next few weeks and doesn't drag it out to the last second.
I just hope Hazard moves in the next few weeks and doesn't drag it out to the last second.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Who knows, maybe this will be the transfer window when we finally see FFP concerns bringing down wages a bit. If we get Hazard it may well be for that reason.
Don't like him.
Don't want.
Lets sign Kagawa and a Box -to -Box mid.
Don't want.
Lets sign Kagawa and a Box -to -Box mid.
If it's down to this, then shouldn't it be a fairly obvious choice?
City and Chelsea certainly don't fulfil all three criteria.
Good morning muppets, any new information this morning?
Much the same as the last four summers here sparkles, none !
Damn, oh well we can f.ap at the thought of it today as per normal.
I'm up early and ready for more developments today on Eden. Come on twitter 
You don't want arguably the most talented youngster in Europe?
Strange.
Hell, at this stage I'd even want him purely to beat City and Chelsea to it, a sign of intent from the club that we can still attract the big names here.
Well transfer muppets, no more news on Eden but a little tidbit of info to keep you all at fever pitch.
As of yesterday evening the only bookies taking bets on Eden Hazard and Shinji Kagawa next club were Betvictor, who had...
Hazard 9/4 Chelsea, City 5/2 United 6/1
Kagawa 8/11 United, Arse 4/1 the rest nowhere.
As of writing Victorbet have removed odds on both players, however, Paddy Power have now taken up the challenge but only on Hazard as there are now no bookies taking bets on Kagawa.
The odds on Hazard are now
Hazard evens United, City 5/2, Chelsea 9/4
Make of this what you will.
As of yesterday evening the only bookies taking bets on Eden Hazard and Shinji Kagawa next club were Betvictor, who had...
Hazard 9/4 Chelsea, City 5/2 United 6/1
Kagawa 8/11 United, Arse 4/1 the rest nowhere.
As of writing Victorbet have removed odds on both players, however, Paddy Power have now taken up the challenge but only on Hazard as there are now no bookies taking bets on Kagawa.
The odds on Hazard are now
Hazard evens United, City 5/2, Chelsea 9/4
Make of this what you will.
I suppose it shows the bookies have no idea. Hopefully City pull out as has been suggested leaving us vs. Chelsea to sign him. Whoever he doesn't sign for can get Lucas. Not a bad second prize
I won't make anything of it, because bookies basically go in the same info as we do.
I'd suggest that all that means is that people with too much money have been following this thread and were hanging on moses' every post!
Bookies are setting odds based on the bets they're taking, the vast majority of which I would assume are from punters with no better idea than we have.
I dont gamble, is this good or bad for us?
Yeah, I seem to remember bookies stop taking bets with Sneijder.
This thread is fast becoming one of the best. 
That Moses fella isn't coming across as honest as his namesake but he has definitely started something that has hooked a lot of people. Hilarious.
That Moses fella isn't coming across as honest as his namesake
but he has definitely started something that has hooked a lot of people. Hilarious.Strange indeed. I'm sure keeping Hazard away from our 2 main rivals is one of the main reasons we're in for him. Make no mistake, this lad can do a Ronaldo, and do we really want City or Chelsea getting a player like him?
We didn't really "need" Keane when we got him either, but keeping him away from a rival was too important.
I don't understand this "Chelsea now being an attractive club" business after their UCL win. That can mean only one thing - he wouldn't consider a team without UCL qualification. Other than that they are a team that is set to lose 3 or 4 of the players who have been key to them this last 3+ years, finished 6th in the league, have no permanent manager and while no team has ever defended the UCL trophy, it's blindingly obvious Chelsea won't be doing that either.
Money and UCL football must be the attraction.
Money and UCL football must be the attraction.
We didn't need Jones either, or Rooney.
Like I said already, SAF doesn't do 'need' when it comes to exceptional young players. If he feels they are THAT good then he'll go and buy them.
Like I said already, SAF doesn't do 'need' when it comes to exceptional young players. If he feels they are THAT good then he'll go and buy them.
We needed him very much; Robson turned 36 that year and for a big part of the 1992/93 season we kept playing McClair in central midfield. Hardly an ideal solution and Keane was a massively superior player to him.
Try Googling:
'eden hazard manchester united'
Seems to suggest it's all a hoax...
'eden hazard manchester united'
Seems to suggest it's all a hoax...
I just wish he felt that at central midfield now; another summer of signing players for each and every position except, you know, addressing our biggest weakness will drive many United fans insane. Myself included.
'Tis a bit worrying that we are strongly linked with Hazard and Lewandowski and whatnot; strikers, wingers again. Kagawa seems to be the closest to what we actually need and even if we get him we should sign a CM.
I agree. Said all along that a deep lying CM is what we need. But that's for another thread.
- Status