Cina
full member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2007
- Messages
- 50,912
Still think he's are overall best midfielder, most complete.
More complete than Scholes and Carrick?
Still think he's are overall best midfielder, most complete.
More complete than Scholes and Carrick?
I don't think Jake is saying anything very controversial here. Anderson is the most complete midfielder we have.
Doesn't necessarily mean he's the best or most consistent.
He said he was the best
Anyway, he's far from complete, his passing is erratic, his positioning is poor, his stamina and fitness are generally not great, he's not great in the air, his goalscoring isn't the best (though improving), his tackling is lacking.
There's only so long the potential tag can apply. He's no longer 19 or 21.
So which of our other midfielders has all of these?
Anderson is as strong as an ox, fast, excellent running with the ball, can defend and attack. I seriously think he's the most complete of our midfielders as an all-rounder when fit, but he's far from the best just yet. He'll need a full season in form and injury free first.
Carrick is basically the epitome of being very good at most things whilst not great at anything. You've listed a few things there that Anderson is excellent at (or can be) but he's weak in a lot of other areas still.
I seriously think people are overreacting after last night, it wasn't too long ago that people were complaining about his ridiculous Hollywood balls and lack of positional discipline, and one lovely strike isn't enough to convince me he can be a goalscorer either.
Of course his potential is higher but he isn't at Carrick's standard yet anyway.
I can't really understand how someone can conjure the idea that he's our best and most complete midfielder after one good game against a considerably weakened Newcastle side in his first start in ten months.
After 1 game? You are having a laugh. He's been pretty good whenever called upon since last year really. Shame he spent so much time out injured last year.
Anderson is about as complete as a three year olds jigsaw puzzle and most definitely not our best midfielder, not yet anyway.
His potential is higher than Carrick's for sure. On a good day he's better even now, for me. It's just a case of staying injury free and excelling in tigher games.
Its a pity fans dont display the same patience with all our players as is afforded to Anderson ...
Belting goal from Ando last night.
Mind you, I suspect we'll only get the best out of him when he's in an attacking role. Playing him deeper just doesn't suit his style of play at all.
It helps when we play a 3 man midfield too because he has the freedom to attack, so let's hope we see more of that formation in the future.
Can't work out whether you're agreeing with me or not. (Not saying he's a 10...he's an 8) However he does like to attack and that's where he's most comfortable.His best position is CM in a 3-man midfield. He's not an attacking midfielder, never will be, not a Silva or a Kagawa. His biggest strengths are that burst of pace from deeper positions, his first touch and his ability to shield the ball. I don't think he's a particularly incisive passer though.
Like with any other player there are some fans who give him patience while there are others who wanted him out long ago or thought he was just not good enough.
Fans always have different opinions on players but with Anderson its more than that. Im convinced its to do with his personality. Compared him to Fletcher and the abuse he got. Very odd.
how many times a day do you think he does the all-you-can-eat at bem brasil?
One of the first things I do every morning is look at the Guardian and Telegraph football pages. And every day for he last three years, I half-expect to see that Anderson has been sold.
Some day.
Have a word with yourself.
Are you deluded or just a massive fanboi?
He can pass? Can he, feck. His passing is absolutely atrocious at times. He is clever? No he isn't, too many brain dead moments to even begin to mention. His shooting is improving? Erm................ He's quick? Not stand out quick at all, pretty average pace, I would reckon.
Seriously, this place sometimes.
I've officially given up hope on this one. Not saying he won't become a good player, I just don't see him becoming that with us. It's like he missed a step in his development, and is now out of his depth, with no chance of realizing his potential
I've always been a fan of him but feck me, last week he gave an interview talking about how this season will be most important for him and now he looks like that. Didn't make a single fast step yesterday.
It's seriously pissing me off, seeing him report for pre-season looking like that.
It's not what he looks like when he's in shape, and we all know it.
Why is he allowed to turn up for pre-season in that shape? He needs to shed some, and fast.
You'd think the bare minimum requirement for a professional footballer is looking after your body. It's their job and their lives, ffs! Also, I'm not entirely sure his long list of injuries isn't connected to him being too heavy. It takes it's strains on muscles etc.
Rant over.
There's nothing wrong with looking off form during pre-season, but to come back looking as fat and out of shape as that, as a professional footballer at the worlds biggest club is absolutely ridiculous.
I have to agree here. These excuses that Fergie would never let an unfit player off with it aren't washing with me. If I was in his position, I'd be doing everything I can to keep fit and be able to succeed. He seems more content with partying and needs to really focus on his football a lot more.
You wouldn't see passing as bad in a Sunday league game. It's a big season for him. It's make or break in my opinion/
I used to just find him humorous, now i think he's a grade-a cnut taking the piss.
"It's just his body type" ... Seriously, this is truly unacceptable attitude. Sell him today.
Exactly, the excuses made for Andserson is bordering on Scouse delusion.
Have a read back through this thread. Both Nani and Anderson had an inconsistent season with the main difference being Anderson being injured for most of it. Despite this, Anderson has got dog's abuse from the vast majority of people who post in this thread for the whole of the summer so far.
Conversely, the merest hint of criticism of Nani gets his fan-club out in force, shouting down any dissenting opinions.
Obviously Nani - unlike Anderson - has at least one long stint of consistently very good performances under his belt. Which has earned him a lot of patience. Nonetheless, you're kidding yourself if you think Anderson is somehow avoiding the criticism his performances deserve. The consensus has tipped too far in the opposite direction, if anything.
He played well last night, but it was nothing we didn't know he could do already. Well, bar that great strike.
I think the key as always with him is consistency. Given a run of games, staying injury free, he's good enough to start with Carrick in most matches. But I've gotten to the point were I've basically given that up, so as to not get disappointed whenever he breaks down again.
Impossible to determine. Absolutely pointless to debate given there roles/ability.
Its a pity fans dont display the same patience with all our players as is afforded to Anderson ...
If we were in a champions league final tomorrow, Anderson would be starting with Carrick and Cleverely for me.