Dirty Schwein
Has a 'Best of Britney Spears' album
You lost me at Wicker Man. Good effort though.
Seriously, this film is only bearable because Cage is in it!
You lost me at Wicker Man. Good effort though.
I wish I was![]()
tbf I think he's a good actor. Thoughts on next? I felt the ending ruined it for me, a film with a low impact ending always skewers my opinions on the film.
I go to a film quiz with a team from work on the last Tuesday of every month. I am quite knowledgeable with films so I am quite high in demand to go to the quiz. However, I have a stipulation: if they want me to be in their team, the team name has to be Wicker Man (The Nic Cage Version) and so that's what we're called
![]()
Bill, you're conveniently letting Cage off the hook for his inability to say no to whatever trash he's offered
Seriously, this film is only bearable because Cage is in it!
Looper. Wow. Sure, we're meant to disengage our brains, and yes time travel travel themed films are invariably nonsensical. I get that. I do. Honestly. But you hope for a certain amount of entertainment value that makes a movie such as this..er... worthwhile. Entertainment could equate to loads of tits. Or perhaps loads of car crashes. Or even better Hewitt Gordon's prosthetic nose falling off during scenes. But this movie fails miserably at almost everything. Set decades in the future, one could be forgiven into thinking we'd see the director's vision of the future. Instead the vast majority of the movie is set in a poxy Kansas corn field... Wow very Blade Runner you're thinking. But anyway a load of nonsensical nonsense later, the film does a very vague parody of Terminator without the score, quality action and Arnie. Rather, we have Bruce Willis doing his 'I'll be back' impersonation in the middle of that poxy Kansas corn field. Look just avoid this movie if you're looking for a good sci fi. In fact avoid it full stop and watch Knowing instead. At least you can laugh at Nicholas Cage.
Lincoln - It's alright. It's very well made, quite interesting at times and Daniel Day Lewis is fantastic, but it takes a while to get into it, and it's just quite a slow process in general. I did enjoy all the politics stuff, despite it being very black and white in terms of Republicans = good and Democrates = Bad (in a total cartoonishly villain way I might add), it was interesting to see Lincoln wrestle with the war/slavery dilemma and what h was prepared to do to get things to go his way.
The film was at it's worst though whenever it got into Lincoln and his family stuff. I hated Sally Field as his wife, thought she was terrible, and whilst I like Joseph Gordon Levitt, he had no place in this film really... all the father/son stuff felt really tacked on.
Anyway, if you like the idea of a film about the process of American Politics, and making deals to get stuff done, or just Daniel Day Lewis being great, then you'll enjoy this... otherwise you can probably afford to give it a miss.
Watching DDL in that though then inspired me to watch...
Gangs of New York- It's far from Scorcese's best work, but it looks fantastic (the first fight scene in the snow is a particular highlight) and Lewis is tremendous in it. It's also an interesting film from the perspective that pretty much every "gang" is reprehensible on some level, and so the lines of who is a "good" guy and who is a "bad" guy do get blurred from time to time... particular for the climax of the film.
I hope that everytime you get one right, you shout "NOT THE BEES!!!"
No, it's a poor film because cage is in it. The original was far superior because it was creepy and strange. This film is inferior because Cage is creepy and strange.
Why do I feel this has become the Nicolas Cage movie review thread. Lord of war was a good film.
Even Cages better films are utter shit. Con Air and The Rock are shit albeit enjoyable shit. Face/Off is just really really really bad and how he ever won an Oscar for the ordinariness that was Leaving Las Vegas is beyond me and Adaptation was idiotic. The original Wicker Man wasn't a great film but it is a shining light of film making mastery compared to the utter turd of a remake. And every single film that he has made in recent years hasn't just been poor but rather so appallingly bad that straight to DVD would have been a complement. Basically he is a reverse film alchemist who can turn gold to shit.
No it wasn't. It just wasn't quite as bad as The Wicker Man and the like.
On the subject of Nic Cage, did anyone see Peggy Sue Got Married was on the other night? I watched 15 minutes but had to abort, that film has not aged well.
However, I come down on the Cage Is Awesome side in this. As far as off-the-shelf, formulaic Hollywood action movies go, Con Air and The Rock are up there with the best. Leaving Las Vegas is one of my very favourite films, and he is excellent in that. He's been in a load of other brilliant films, such as Raising Arizona and Wild At Heart, and lots of other very good films a tier below, such as Lord Of War and 8MM. Even when he is in something that isnt great, I usually find he is one of the better things about the film.
Don't know if you've seen Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans, Adebisi, but if not you should check it out, it's one of his best performances for me. He's incredible in it.
I get the feeling you're a Cage Hater...
![]()
EDIT: Without noticing it, this is my 1000th post!![]()
Don't know if you've seen Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans, Adebisi, but if not you should check it out, it's one of his best performances for me. He's incredible in it.
Argo A great bit of traditional filmaking. A simple story well told. Those who criticse it as simply US propaganda need their head examining. It was a US film about US citizens hiding in a newly fundamental Islamic state. What did you expect? It paid more than lip service to the causes of the Islamic revolution and then got on with telling a great story. One of the better offerings this year. 8.5/10
I think this film was one of his best as Herzog, unlike many directors these days, allowed Cage to express his wild side in this film, hence the performance he got was really good...
That is just my opinion though and I guess it is a marmite film...
Except that more than one person actually likes marmite
Adaptaion was great.
It is great and he's great in it, probably my favorite Cage performance since Face/Off in 1997. But in this century, he's been almost exclusively a paycheck actor
You almost forget that he had some gems in the 90s & 80s, yet now I would avoid any film he's in
Parker - 6/10
Movie 43 - 4/10
That's generous given what I've heard so far about Movie 43. It's being touted as the worst film ever made.
I cant believe that, it is got to be better than that Bird shit I watched a bit ago, I have even forgot what it is called.
EDIT : I remembered it, Birdemic.
It's not only the age of massive propaganda from governments (Not limited to the US, of course) but Hollywood as well. Argo is like many American films that love to revise history to suit an agenda - so as a piece of fiction, it's not bad. As a film documenting a true moment in history, it's conveniently timed ahead of more ramping up for war with Iran. Meanwhile, I imagine Canadians just see this as another example of disrespect from their arrogant neighbors to the south.
Programming & films from Hollywood to manipulate viewers politically is not new (Goes back to WWII), just more pronounced & less subtle these days. Argo, Zero Dark Thirty, Lincoln, Won't Back Down, Homeland, 24 etc. are only a few examples.
It was based on real events rather than being a historical documentary and most changes were about simplifying the story and adding tension that didn't exist as we saw it in the film. Canada's role was only slightly downplayed mainly in so far as the film skipped the bit between their escape from the embassy and their extraction. A few other countries did help as much as they could but were portrayed as uncaring in the movie, so they might be a bit miffed. Hardly propaganda though except in the sense that it was told from a US viewpoint for a US audience and everyone knows that it is a story and not history.