Blackwidow
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 7,778
OUCH
That's a bad omen
No - just tells how relieable the source is and that he does not have a clue either.
OUCH
That's a bad omen
6 days before Guardiola signed his contract in Munich he wrote that Guardiola for sure does not go to Germany or Italy but that Chelsea FC and London would be where he is going to.
Bit weird to manage barca, bayern & then city. Seems to follow a similar path to klopp & Lvg in wanting to manage big clubs that need a little kick up the back side.
I think mourinho could be a much better manager for city's objectives than pep.
Pep could potentially have his pick of us, Chelsea or city next summer. Would be an interesting one.
I am not sure that he will coach Bayern in 2016/17 - but I am pretty sure that if he coaches any team in 2016/17 it will be Bayern.
True, but if (and it is a big if, of course) he wants to coach in the PL, he may not get a better set of offers than next summer. Depending on what happens for the remainder of the season of course.
True, but if (and it is a big if, of course) he wants to coach in the PL, he may not get a better set of offers than next summer. Depending on what happens for the remainder of the season of course.
Bit weird to manage barca, bayern & then city. Seems to follow a similar path to klopp & Lvg in wanting to manage big clubs that need a little kick up the back side.
I think mourinho could be a much better manager for city's objectives than pep.
Yeah, Bayern surely needed a kick after winning the trebble.![]()
First Klopp to Liverpool now Pep to City
Yay![]()
He's the exact opposite. He's always polite, never picks fights with anyone, always respects managers, journalists, players. And his players never get tired of him, they love him, appreciate how he allows them to express themselves. Everyone is allowed to take risks. After 4 years at Barca, the players wanted him to stay. And right now at Bayern, the players publicly said they want him to stay.He plays an excellent brand of football, my concern however is that he has never really had a managerial challenge. Given his temperament, I could see a Mourinho style meltdown if things started to go south.
I think that's just wishful thinking tbh. All that's missing from city, is European pedigree, and he'll add that in abundance. This without considering 1 or 2 signings he could still make, just because of his name.I am not too worried about him at City. It would not be the same sort of situation he walked in at Bayern.
I think that's just wishful thinking tbh. All that's missing from city, is European pedigree, and he'll add that in abundance. This without considering 1 or 2 signings he could still make, just because of his name.
A city team with Aguero, KdB, Sterling (considering Pep wanted him at Bayern), Silva isn't exactly "poor".
I think he'd walk the league with them IMO. But yeah, football, you never know!
He'd need a couple of new central midfielders, so about half of what Man City do in a transfer window.He would need a whole new midfield to properly implement his system.
Yeah, Fernandinho's not been too shabby & what's to say Pep couldn't attract Thiago/Koke or someone of that caliber with him? It's not like we're talking 5 years from now. It could be next, probably 2 years from. But yeah, there's no certainties in football.He would need a whole new midfield to properly implement his system.
I am not too worried about him at City. It would not be the same sort of situation he walked in at Bayern.
He's the exact opposite. He's always polite, never picks fights with anyone, always respects managers, journalists, players. And his players never get tired of him, they love him, appreciate how he allows them to express themselves. Everyone is allowed to take risks. After 4 years at Barca, the players wanted him to stay. And right now at Bayern, the players publicly said they want him to stay.
You wouldn't be worried if arguably the best manager in the world went to our biggest rivals, at a time when they are already miles ahead of us, and we end up with Giggs taking over from LVG?
Some of you lot really do live in a United bubble. If the above does happen, City would be confirmed as the biggest force in Manchester and English football, without a shadow of a doubt. They will have well and truly come from our shadow, and overtaken us.
A city team with Aguero, KdB, Sterling (considering Pep wanted him at Bayern), Silva isn't exactly "poor".
He plays an excellent brand of football, my concern however is that he has never really had a managerial challenge. Given his temperament, I could see a Mourinho style meltdown if things started to go south.
It is incredible.
Per at City and us with Giggs is nothing short of a disaster. If that happens, I would put money on us not winning the league for the next ten years.
We will console ourselves with the United Way.The amount of people who still seem to think just because we're Manchester United it means everything will be okay is amazing
Now that Fergie is gone, we're exactly the same as every other team. And the only way we will get back to the top is through having quality players, and a quality manager. Romantic nonsense will take us nowhere, as the Moyes era proved.
Pep at City, and us with Giggs would be an absolute catastrophe.
@Invictus he has overseen transitions of already-great teams, who have an almost unmatched pull for players, and are happy to spend big money as an when required. I dont think it is possible for a manager to go through their career without experiencing any sort of challenge or adversity, but as far as things go, Pep inherited a very strong Barcelona team, and a very strong Bayern team. I will say that Bayern have done exceptionally well with some of their transfers - Gotze for £25m, Douglas for £24m, Thiago for £17.5m ...these are all players who you would expect to go for a lot more, in my opinion, or maybe it is just the inflated English transfer market that makes me think that.
I dont think anyone is undervaluing or underrating Pep, or not giving him the credit he deserves. He is being widely touted as the best in the world (and after tonights game, it is hardly the time to argue against that). I just feel that he has performed extremely well, but in two jobs which - as far as elite football management goes - were pretty easy jobs. Of course I say "performed extremely well" but he is yet to win the CL with Bayern, which should really be considered the benchmark for that club, given the lack of competitiveness in the Bundesliga. Nonetheless, looking at how his side played against Arsenal tonight, it was one of the best and most complete European displays I have seen in years.
All this was of course after the Barca job which again was in a a relatively uncompetitive league, with a team that featured one of the GOAT players, as well as the likes of Xavi and Iniesta.
I am at no point trying to make Guardiola out to be some sort of big fraud. Merely that he has - so far - achieved success in a fairly limited set of circumstances, and I just dont regard him as being quite as well proven as some would make out. We already had a pretty lengthy discussion about this in the Giggs thread a while back, so I am hesitant to have a repeat of that.
I guess the shortened version of what I am trying to say is that I dont think Guardiola has been tested in some ways which you would probably expect an elite tier manager to have been. This doesnt mean he hasnt been challenged at all, but that as far as managers of elite clubs go, he has had a pretty easy ride so far.
Strongly disagree with the assertion that Barcelona had an already-great team when Pep took over mate. What they had were some strong pieces, and declining great pieces, and not a lot of structure to the whole thing, apart from morale being low by the end of Rijkaard's tenure. They had finished 10 points behind Villarreal in the league, and won just 4 games away from home. And although they reached the semi-finals of the Champions League vs United, it was an illusion of strength - they had faced the likes of Celtic and Schalke is the previous round of matches, so exactly the greatest test for a supposedly strong team. Some key elements were there, sure, but it was an uphill task for Pep.
Right when he took over, he had to rectify the morale around the club, and sell Ronaldinho and Deco (two of their 3 biggest contributors over the last 5 seasons), apart from the likes of Zambrotta and Thuram. That's 4 first team players, and again for any other manager, losing someone of the caliber of Ronaldinho and Deco would be portrayed as a big deal necessitating a massive transition period. But for Pep, we maintain that he had nothing to do, and the team just ambled its way to a treble on autopilot. Up until then, Messi was not the Messi we know now, that fact is totally lost in the narrative. He was a wide attacker drifting in to complement Eto'o, not the GOAT caliber machine he later became. And for that Pep deserves huge amounts of credit - drawing inspiration from his idol and mentor Johan Cruyff's style of play as a false #9, he guided, and molded, and extracted the best out of Lionel, in a way that Rijkaard never did.
Rafael Márquez, their complement to Puyol was declining, they had signed a new right back, he had to introduce Barcelona B player Sergio Busquets as the #6, he had to find a way to fit Henry, Eto'o and Messi with Lionel as the center of attention instead of Eto'o, and get them to function as a collective. The task seems pretty easy, but it takes a rare manager and motivator to make an Henry and Eto'o defer to a 21 year old. He had to play a midfielder in central defense, he had to play Sylvinho at left-back he had to buy back Piqué who hadn't made many dents at United. And he won the treble in his first season playing the best football we've seen since Sacchi's Milan. That's more than incredible, something that likely won't be repeated for atleast the next couple of decades.
The thing is, he didn't struggle a lot because he didn't plunge his team to great depths - like Mourinho has, necessitating the need to prove himself in a period of struggle. I'd argue that's an excellent quality to have. Also, I'm commenting on this from the perspective of a United fan. We aren't exactly a mid-table club. Whatever luxuries were afforded to Pep in Barcelona or Munich will also translate in Manchester. Sure, he won't have some home grown players like in La Masia, or the access to the German players like in the Bundesliga; but as a club, United are more than capable of providing him whatever ammunition he needs. And Barcelona/ Bayern weren't easy jobs. He had to deal with massive expectations, media interference, board room drama, sponsor pressure, and he's done a brilliant job at both clubs.
Also, to the point about Bayern doing well in the transfer market, now that's a topic for another discussion mate. I've long opined about United's adventures in the transfer-market and how little value we extract, and how little intelligence we evidence at times, and I feel like giving up when people seriously suggest spending £35m on Mane, while calling Coman a very risky punt for a £6m pound loan. Not my money, but it makes me die inside a bit. Also, if the English market is inflated, buy from abroad. What's stopping United from doing that? But no, we need Premier League experience they argue... Sheesh! Anyway, another tangent, but if we get Guardiola, it's imperative that we also employ a top shelf DOF to go with him. The concept of a manager governing every sporting aspect of the club is so passé, and we need to move on a bit.