Mass shooting at Gay night club in Orlando

Also, the 'if everyone had guns, the gunman would be dead quicker' argument is stupid. No way are night clubs going to allow clubbers to enter with firearms.

I'm a day behind on this conversation but this was the point I was going to make. Even if you go by the logic that an armed civilian could've saved the day - a nightclub is not the place for that, the last thing you'd want in a club with drinking involved is a bunch of people with guns thinking they're going to save the day.
 
I was just watching a report on the news in which the response of the police was described in detail, and i have to wonder it has not been the source of more criticism (or maybe it has and i've misapprehend the matter). From the time they waited before moving in on the guy, to the idea that an explosive charge/bearcat armoured vehicle was the least conspicuous way of doing so. I had supposed that the Bataclan siege led to some shift in tactics, with an emphasis on haste rather than negotiation.

One thing to start at which is different from the US vs France and most european countries, and it is both a positive and a negative: these situations will be responded to by local SWAT. There's no time to fly out the FBI HRT, there's no precedent in the US for the military taking lead, and there's the same time constrain to fly out a team from North Carolina or Virginia. I can't imagine that's even a contingency of theirs anymore since 9/11. So response is probably quicker because its local, but it the quality and resources of the local SWAT are variable, and not up to the very best that could be brought if time wasn't an issue.

That leads to your question about tactics shifting. Maybe, but did Orlando SWAT practice this too, or are they maybe still practicing older Hostage Rescue scenarios (which still happen btw)? And even then, as fast as you might want to be, I think no unit wants to go in without an understanding of the layout, number and possibly appearance of suspects, etc.

This is all speculation on my part though. I can't imagine there's any way to respond as quick as we'd like to these events, because there's no way to be alert 24/7 and respond in minutes. The wall thing I'd guess is that in any regular building as conspicuous as you can be you must always funnel through doors. Blowing a hole in a wall creates a surprising point of entry.
 
I'm not saying religion isn't a factor because it must be but - and this plays into what @sullydnl said earlier - the man who did that failed stabbing in Leytonstone shouted something like "this is for Syria" when it was fairly clear that mental health was also a big factor in why he did what he did so I wouldn't say it's open and shut in this case quite yet either

In general, I've been wondering how many of these extremists who carry out attacks are mentally vulnerable people and whether there is anything that can be done in that area in terms of prevention.

Also... just mentioning that bloke in Leytonstone (currently my local area) just makes me shiver, thinking about the possibility that he could have had a gun. Crazy idiot causing a few non-life-threatening injuries would change into massacre quite easily.

Naturally some of them will be mentally disturbed. This guy doesn't sound like a stable kind of guy from the testimony of his ex wife. In life we are all a product of our genes and environment. I am not saying that he was Mr all America and then last week read the Koran, some ISIS propaganda and went to commit the atrocity. Of course it will be the perfect storm of numerous factors in his life. But at the core of his motivation I believe would be his interpretation of Islam, his final justification if you like, hence the last minute call pledging his allegiance
 
ISIS is now claiming the attack that it was their caliphate soldier blah blah.
They waited 48 hrs or so and then thought "Hell!! Let us take credit for a lunatic's action, because it is big number and will help other radicals to feel proud"

Isn't lone attackers exactly what they asked for? So if he's there's any evidence of interest in them then it would seem a fair link and a likely contribution to the motivation.
 
...at the core of his motivation I believe would be his interpretation of Islam
Then this tragedy is entirely of his own making, and nothing to do with his religion - how we choose to interpret religious texts is a personal thing.
 
Naturally some of them will be mentally disturbed. This guy doesn't sound like a stable kind of guy from the testimony of his ex wife. In life we are all a product of our genes and environment. I am not saying that he was Mr all America and then last week read the Koran, some ISIS propaganda and went to commit the atrocity. Of course it will be the perfect storm of numerous factors in his life. But at the core of his motivation I believe would be his interpretation of Islam, his final justification if you like, hence the last minute call pledging his allegiance

I don't want to argue because I'm not really disagreeing with you. My concern is - or this could be seen as an opportunity depending on your outlook - is that if ISIS' strategy is to encourage 'lone wolves' - and if a large proportion of those people are mentally unstable/vulnerable - then what can we do to reduce the pool of potential lone wolves out there?
 
Seems like gun control, homophobia and extreme religious fundamentalism are among several factors that played into the shooting. I wonder why people feel the need to downplay some of those factors just to highlight others?

I mean saying it has nothing to do with homophobia is just as ridiculous as saying it has nothing to do with religion. Yet people can't see that the logical flaws they're criticising in other people's arguments are present in their own. It's a bit strange.
This guy gets it. Bravo.
 
Then this tragedy is entirely of his own making, and nothing to do with his religion - how we choose to interpret religious texts is a personal thing.

His interpretation is the ISIS conservative Wahhabism version of Islam, he believes in the Caliphate. Essentially a strict observance of the Koran so I do believe it to be about religion to a significant degree.

I don't want to argue because I'm not really disagreeing with you. My concern is - or this could be seen as an opportunity depending on your outlook - is that if ISIS' strategy is to encourage 'lone wolves' - and if a large proportion of those people are mentally unstable/vulnerable - then what can we do to reduce the pool of potential lone wolves out there?

I don't know if a large portion of them are mentally unstable or not.

War of ideas, give them a hug? I really I have no plan of action to suggest.
 
I don't know if a large portion of them are mentally unstable or not.

War of ideas, give them a hug? I really I have no plan of action to suggest.

My intuition is that most of them are mentally unstable. I say this because I can't imagine mentally stable people doing such things.

In terms of what to do, I think better mental health care in general would help.
 
Then this tragedy is entirely of his own making, and nothing to do with his religion - how we choose to interpret religious texts is a personal thing.
While I do agree that interpreting ancient religious texts literally is a personal choice, you do have Hadith that quote the Prophet Muhammad as such...

Book 38, Number 4447:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If you find anyone doing as Lot's people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done.
 
Orlando shootings: 'No clear evidence' of IS link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36521761
Seems as if our government are trying to ignore the fact that ISIS called for lone wolf attacks across the country during Ramadan and then a lone wolf attack happens in our country during Ramadan.

It is as though they're arguing semantics about what "link" means.

They asked for it. They got it. Do they have to send the guy an officially sealed order in iambic pentameter or something?
 
Almost impossible without an EU passport, unless you somehow get sponsored by a company first. I don't think either of your professions qualify for the 'elite' ones or whatever those are, I'm afraid.
That's depressing. I know history teachers are a pretty big pool here, but nursing is a massively understaffed profession in the states.

I wonder if I could look up a long lost cousin over there to sponsor lol.
 
Seems as if our government are trying to ignore the fact that ISIS called for lone wolf attacks across the country during Ramadan and then a lone wolf attack happens in our country during Ramadan.

It is as though they're arguing semantics about what "link" means.

They asked for it. They got it. Do they have to send the guy an officially sealed order in iambic pentameter or something?
Well, there is certainly correlation there but that doesn't necessarily mean causation? I think there are quite a few degrees to linkage as well, like was this guy considering doing something like this and decided the timing because of ISIS, or he wouldn't have done anything at all if not for their influence?

I'm not too clear on exactly what the facts of this link are, at the moment.
 
The point's being missed; it is: even if your religious text orders you to kill, you still have the choice not to do so.
 
I think its an incredibly pertinent point that attitudes to homosexuality are still incredibly backward in vast swathes of the Western world, with attitudes having only changed recently, and in some cases have not changed at all, and thats with years and years of stability, comfort, relative ease and access to good quality education. That they haven't changed in a religion whose strongest support bases exist in a different culture, in an unstable part of the world, and in ill-educated rural communities should come as no surprise (I appreciate this is a huge generalisation, but theres truth at the heart of it).

Religion by its very nature is conservative and resistant to change, and Islam's as bad as any for that, but instead of criticising an entire religion for some of its adherents actions we should be criticising those that carry out such intolerant acts and be attempting to facilitate the same shift in attitudes that has seen 'our' religions become accepting of the social norms in which we live.

The response to hatred with more hatred (in this case islamophobia) just entrenches that hate and inarguably is the result that IS wants.
Top quality post.
 
The point's being missed; it is: even if your religious text orders you to kill, you still have the choice not to do so.
Indeed you do.

I mean.. for the record: Genesis 19 and Leviticus 20:13 is most likely where Muhammad got the inspiration to say what he said. I think it's historical fact that Islam is heavily influenced by the other 2 Abrahamic faiths in the area, yet even the loonies at Westboro aren't actually killing people.
 
Fat Chicks, Little Dicks. Their views on arming the country are insane. Although the vast majority of members have demanded more stringent background checks the association continue to suggest everyone be armed to the teeth. Wayne LaPierre is an odious cnut and I would gladly see his life taken by the violence of firearms then the thousands who have sadly lost theirs at the hands of lunatics who had no issues buying weapons of war.
 
The point's being missed; it is: even if your religious text orders you to kill, you still have the choice not to do so.

Well obviously....just like even if you have guns it is your own choice to kill someone. Doesn't stop people from blaming guns now does it.

Islam and religion in general is one of the main reasons for homophobia and the issue should be tackled not ignored. Ignoring it is not going to help educate the idiots who still swear by fairy tales.
 
It would be interesting to see the take of those who post in the "Religion, what's the point" thread on whether you blame the individuals for their actions or their religions.
Religion is a motivator but is only an excuse for the heinous actions committed on Sunday. Homophobia is rampant through most of religion but this was a hate crime pure and simple. His father told the media he was not religious and freaked out when he saw two blokes kissing last month. I am willing to bet he was a closet homosexual himself and watching this sent him right over the edge to ultimate point of mass murder.
 
Well obviously....just like even if you have guns it is your own choice to kill someone. Doesn't stop people from blaming guns now does it.

Islam and religion in general is one of the main reasons for homophobia and the issue should be tackled not ignored. Ignoring it is not going to help educate the idiots who still swear by fairy tales.
Spot on here.
 
My intuition is that most of them are mentally unstable. I say this because I can't imagine mentally stable people doing such things.

In terms of what to do, I think better mental health care in general would help.

In America definitely. The mentally ill are generally on the fringes of society, uninsured and therefore forsaken essentially.

This chap was in training to be in the NYPD however, so I am not sure if he was impoverish or not.
 
I'm not saying religion isn't a factor because it must be but - and this plays into what @sullydnl said earlier - the man who did that failed stabbing in Leytonstone shouted something like "this is for Syria" when it was fairly clear that mental health was also a big factor in why he did what he did so I wouldn't say it's open and shut in this case quite yet either

In general, I've been wondering how many of these extremists who carry out attacks are mentally vulnerable people and whether there is anything that can be done in that area in terms of prevention.

Also... just mentioning that bloke in Leytonstone (currently my local area) just makes me shiver, thinking about the possibility that he could have had a gun. Crazy idiot causing a few non-life-threatening injuries would change into massacre quite easily.

Already been posted in here but worth posting again

 
Last edited:
The guy rang the authorities and pledged his allegiance to ISIS.

You missed my point. I'm not blaming ISIS for this. I'm blaming this idiot for his own actions. ISIS needs to be exterminated because of their atrocities in the Middle East, not because they have a Youtube video filled with hateful gibberish.

That's separate from the point that people are selective regarding blaming "influences" depending on who the shooter is.
 
You missed my point. I'm not blaming ISIS for this. I'm blaming this idiot for his own actions. ISIS needs to be exterminated because of their atrocities in the Middle East, not because they have a Youtube video filled with hateful gibberish.

That's separate from the point that people are selective regarding blaming "influences" depending on who the shooter is.
The reason I think we need to understand the connection with ISIS through some indirect or direct inspiration is because so many people in this country think that ISIS can't come here... especially young people. I can't tell you how many students I've had who have a could-care-less attitude about this issue. People need to realize that it isn't a case of "if" or "when" ISIS can come here, but rather a case in which they are already here.

For me, it has nothing to do with who to blame, but rather with accepting the fact that we've been infiltrated by ISIS without them actually coming here.
 
Douglas Murray who I pretty much disagree with on everything is pretty much spot on here -

 
Well obviously....just like even if you have guns it is your own choice to kill someone. Doesn't stop people from blaming guns now does it.

Islam and religion in general is one of the main reasons for homophobia and the issue should be tackled not ignored. Ignoring it is not going to help educate the idiots who still swear by fairy tales.

Next you'll tell me video games are to blame for school massacres.
 
The reason I think we need to understand the connection with ISIS through some indirect or direct inspiration is because so many people in this country think that ISIS can't come here... especially young people. I can't tell you how many students I've had who have a could-care-less attitude about this issue. People need to realize that it isn't a case of "if" or "when" ISIS can come here, but rather a case in which they are already here.

For me, it has nothing to do with who to blame, but rather with accepting the fact that we've been infiltrated by ISIS without them actually coming here.
@langster
:angel:
 
Next you'll tell me video games are to blame for school massacres.

What a ridiculous comparison. The religious undertones to this are quite blatant but apparently you cannot point a finger at religion. Give me a break.
 
Well obviously....just like even if you have guns it is your own choice to kill someone. Doesn't stop people from blaming guns now does it.

Islam and religion in general is one of the main reasons for homophobia and the issue should be tackled not ignored. Ignoring it is not going to help educate the idiots who still swear by fairy tales.

How do you tackle it though>?
 
Tbf Manson might have deserved a bit more scrutiny if a series of people had referenced him as a motivating factor for their mass killings. At that point it would probably be weirder if he didn't become one of the focuses of the story.