Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,133
Has anyone actually read the article? They're saying they don't know how much it'll cost, not that they're scrapping the idea.
That is really odd, because they said it would cost £60m a year the night before their manifesto launch. Strong n' stable and all that.Has anyone actually read the article? They're saying they don't know how much it'll cost, not that they're scrapping the idea.
And if you don't have very much but want it all taken away from you. Vote consIf you want complete oblivion they are a fantastic choice.
A 49p bag of porridge oats cooked with water would feed quite a few kids.What's the purpose of scrapping free lunches and bringing in free breakfast?
Cheaper, and as less kids to cater for as not everyone will get to school in time for them?
Labour needs to do well in Scotland
I ripped up some that came a week ago and put it into the recycling bin. Turned around after putting the lid down to see the canvasser knocking at next door. I'd put the look on his face up on the wall if I had a picture of it.My bins are full of Tory propaganda.
What the feck are the Tories doing.
Using recent events to try and bury backtracking, it's campaigning of a sort. Although maybe I'm too cynical and it could unfortunate timing. It's notNot sure I'd class backtracking as 'campaigning' tbf.
When is the rescheduled Andrew Neil interview with Paul Nuttall btw? Can't wait to see that.
I dunno, I guess they were just replying to a question from the Indie? But either way that manifesto is a real clusterfeck.Using recent events to try and bury backtracking, it's campaigning of a sort. Although maybe I'm too cynical and it could unfortunate timing. It's not
I think Labour are still the riskier option, just.7p per child for the free breakfasts plan is absurd. As bad as any Labour gaffe, and reiterates that whatever you think of Corbyn's he's no riskier than an option than May.
Ms. Hartley-Brewer doesn't believe that anyone can not afford to eat breakfast - or feed their child breakfast it might be, to be strictly accurate.
She struggles with self awareness, nevermind the lives of others.Ms. Hartley-Brewer doesn't believe that anyone can not afford to eat breakfast - or feed their child breakfast it might be, to be strictly accurate.
She struggles with self awareness, nevermind the lives of others.
Serious policy making has died a death in this election. The Tories manifesto is as substantial as candy floss, and Labour's is so riddled with amateur hour back of the envelope calculations that it seems more designed for posters and memes than for actual implementation.
The IFS are releasing their economic analysis of the manifestos tomorrow, which should be interesting. I suspect neither party will come out of it well.
The 7p figure is misleading in its practical implications though, as it would only be accurate if the scheme saw a 100% participation rate. More than likely the actual range will fall somewhere between 14-21pence per child.
Corbyn encountered a somewhat similar funding problem with his own school meals proposal: in that instance, there was no provision for necessary capital spending by schools (nor staff IIRC).
Better than both of these however, would be to target a significant amount of resources at Home Ec. Or whatever they call it thee days.
Just to clarify, as I understand it, the Tories aren't getting rid of means tested free school meals for families on low incomes. They're getting rid of the coalition policy of universal free school meals for all children in their first 3 years of primary school. Families on low incomes continue to get free school meals throughout school.
Just to clarify, as I understand it, the Tories aren't getting rid of means tested free school meals for families on low incomes. They're getting rid of the coalition policy of universal free school meals for all children in their first 3 years of primary school. Families on low incomes continue to get free school meals throughout school.