Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,133
Christ.Alright. feck off then.
Christ.Alright. feck off then.
Will be different policies though - and of course they have broadly common ground for a few things.
I think the main thing I learnt from it was how many things it considered worth asking that I don't really have strong views on.And depending on how one prioritises certain them too. Whilst i selected 'Most Important' on a good half dozen questions, i'm not sure how well this was reflected in the final outcome.
I think the main thing I learnt from it was how many things it considered worth asking that I don't really have strong views on.
I think the main thing I learnt from it was how many things it considered worth asking that I don't really have strong views on.
See also
This from an account followed by the likes of Barry Gardiner, Clive Lewis, John McDonnell.
Sorry.Honestly, I'd said what I had to say. There's no point me carrying on and ending up throwing more insults at you. I'd just bore people who want to chat about other things, as I'm sure I'm doing right now.
No worries. I was being plenty bitchy.Sorry.
If anyone's still interested, someone did a count. It seems Paxman interrupted Corbyn 54 times and May 6 times.
Out of interest, which of those do you disagree with?Another count - Jeremy Corbyn's wonderful voting record on Anti-Terrorism legislation.
http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/mp.php?mpid=40733&dmp=1053
That guy yesterday attacking Corbyn for imposing a minimum wage on him/his employees... perhaps if you can't afford to pay your employees a living wage then your business is a failure. Perhaps the wellbeing of the millions on minimum wage is more important than the businesses that rely upon the underpaid labor of its employees. Crazy talk in the 21st century I know, crazy I am. Raving!
This country is so far right of me that I feel obligated to emigrate.
If anyone's still interested, someone did a count. It seems Paxman interrupted Corbyn 54 times and May 6 times.
Let's not be harsh to the small business owner, he's worked very hard to be able to be able to underpay his employees.
Out of interest, which of those do you disagree with?
It'll be a real shame when his kids have to go to school with all the plebs won't it?Yeah, lets hope he has to close down when Corbyn gets in. Serve him right for getting somewhere.
Apparently he runs a pharmacy and is a landlord.Let's not be harsh to the small business owner, he's worked very hard to be able to be able to underpay his employees.
It'll be a real shame when his kids have to go to school with all the plebs won't it?
Yeah, lets hope he has to close down when Corbyn gets in. Serves him right for getting somewhere.
I think pimping should also be legalised...
Irrelevant.
Apparently he runs a pharmacy and is a landlord.
Come on get to the chase already. Are you scared he won't tickle Netanyahu's balls the next time he bombs Gaza?Nationalise all pharmacies.
Currently number 1 in iTunes chart but in official Top 40 it's 7th according to yesterday's chart update and they've replaced it with the old version of the song. Sneaky!
It'll be a real shame when his kids have to go to school with all the plebs won't it?
Ones about the PM, during an election campaign, come with potential legal difficulties?I wonder how they get away with justifying that. If they don't allow any political songs they'd be culling the list far more often.
Now, if only there was a way to find out which party chronically underfunds public services and not vote for them.Yes, for both them and the already overcrowded school they'll be entering.
Yeah. Natalie Bennett wasn't even allowed to say the name of the constituency she's standing in on This Week, loads of random rules particularly on BBC.Ones about the PM, during an election campaign, come with potential legal difficulties?
Now, if only there was a way to find out which party chronically underfunds public services and not vote for them.
Irrelevant.
Is the quiz on ideology or actual current policies?Looking back over the quiz, it occurs to me that there isn't a question for future NHS spending and how we'll fund such. A glaring omission IMO. Two policy examples being the Lib Dems income tax rise, and UKIP's GP appointments charge.
Now, if only there was a way to find out which party chronically underfunds public services and not vote for them.