Transfer Tweets - Summer 2017 | Keep it on topic
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
Are there?
Fabinho - utd actually resorted to breifing that we werent in for him. There have been no reliable consistent links with any other midfielder, and even if there were, it Wouldn't mean a change in formation.
The only genuinely reliable links weve had are:
Lindelof- bought
Keane - wanted more game time.
Lukaku - bought.
Perisic - still ongoing
Greizmann - this just shows we were interested in a number 10. The fact utd stated our interst in hi m had 'cooled' showed we were interested, the ban being upheld screwed that. So by that rekoning we are more likely to still be after a number 10
No James? Griezmann to United next window!
Edit- forgot to mention matic and dier. Eoyld have thought they would be as well as hererra/pogba in that 2 of 3 midfielders (assuming fellaini goes) will play as part of midfield 2
Neither would Schweinsteiger to be fair.
Ah. This could be known as snub day if morata patter is true.
Lets all laugh at shitteh 
I hope alves to PSG news is true that will leave city certainly short at FB position and may have to pay over the odd
Id rather city got alves and he was shite rather than them having to fork out money (which is easy for them) on someone who might actually be good
Nothing, really, that you said points for us to be heading dead sure for either 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3. I'll just comment on the sole argument you made, Griezmann being a #10. He's not a playmaker, he's a forward who drops deep while playing with his back against the goal, and he never in his footballing life played in 4-2-3-1! I think we were going 4-4-2 with him. All this and I agree the most likely is for us to keep the more offensive (for Mourinho) 4-2-3-1, but there are some contradictory signs.
Indeed. I think he would have been absolutely dreadful defensively in City's back 4.
That is some strange logic right there
What did he say? Did he give us any update regarding our transfer plans recently?
Alves > Walker, it's not even close.
Exactly
I think Alves at this stage of his career would have been a hilarious disaster for City.
Castles wrote an exclusive 3 days ago suggesting Alves was set to unexpectedly snub City for PSG.
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/.../dani-alves-snub-manchester-city-10762210.amp
What's with the loan between big teams? Have they found out a way to save lots of money in taxes?
Obligation to buy clause? Now that is obviously a deal made to help someone's books look better. though I would imagine both clubs will have to put something on the books for the obligation and not just hold it entirely off until next fiscal year. Could all be a cash flow thing.
Wasn't it an obligation to buy clause that buggered Sunderland with Ricky Alvarez?
I think we might end up signing him.
Would be a good buy
He'd be a quality signing for any premier league club.
To quote Müller himself: "I'm married to my wife only."
He's bought a house in Moss Side then?
They still need to replace Ribery and Robben — at least as a non-dispute starters, their previous plan pretty much failed, so James is more likely to replace one of them (even if it requires a change to the system)
How do they work? What if the team that's obliged to buy can't reach an agreement with the player? Or is the player signed up to the deal as well?
Ox on the cheap wouldnt be a bad idea
I hope so. If he was good, Wenger would play him more.