Mourinho interview with L'Équipe: I'm a constructor, a football mason

@Paul_Scholes18
It's more than about the players a club buys, it's about the mentality at the club. When Ronaldinho went to Barca, they didn't expect to win anything. He transformed the way the club thought about itself. That's what Jose has done lots of times: he's made clubs happier and got them to believe. The positivity and team spirit at our club is much better than it was when he came and if he leaves we will be much better off than when he came. Which will make us much better to compete in the future. And, again, that's more than about the players we have brought in but the mentality he has instilled.

Agree that mentality is very important. With Mourinho though it is obvious it can go both ways. He can build great team spirit and togetherness. His team at Inter had that so much as an example and also at Porto. Although last spell at Chelsea it didn't end that well and we know Mourinho can get into plenty of conflicts.

Inter had that great mentality when Mourinho left, but they failed big time under Benitez. In Real Madrid the spirit was quite low when he left although Anchelotti did a great job to improve it which we know he is very good at.

We had a fantastic mentality under SAF, but we all did see how quickly it can go down under a new manager.

If Mourinho leaves now what will happen will mainly depend on the new manager coming in. Some tactical instructions the players have learned they will still remember and managers after can use that. I think regarding LVG the talk about him building foundations make more sense as he is good at the positional and possession based defensive tactics. Some players like Young and Valencia have clearly benefited from that as an example.

Still though the sucess in the future will mainly depend on player and manager performance in the future and the influence from past manager will 1-2 seasons into the future have diminishing effects.
 
Mourinho's signings since he came to United:

Zlatan - Brilliant post injury
Baily - One of the best CBs in Europe in my opinion.
Pogba - World class
Matic - World class in his respective position
Lukaku - Excellent prior to Pogba injury.
Mkhitaryan - One of the most productive players in Europe pre-signing. No one would think he'd be as shit as he is :lol:
Lindelof - Can feck right off.

Jose is building something special. As it stands right now he's turned us into the best defensive unit in the world which is an amazing achievement given some of the players he uses. Ideally he needs 3-4 more signings and it's exactly the team he wants. So hopefully next summer we'll challenge for everything.
 
The reason they have done so well recently is due to balance, not Ronaldo. They've always had a very talented squad of players, what they lacked was a system to get the best out of all of them. Bringing in Casemeiro allowed that.

Football is of course a team sport and there is many variables. The first champions league win under Anchelotti they played great counter attacking football. Bale and Ronaldo was key in that. 2 world class attacking players with pace and athletic abilities. Angel Di Maria complemented them very well with his abilities from midfield. Alonso as a holding midfielder gave good balance to that side with Modric being a bit more advanced and attacking.

Kroos in and Alonso out really messed up the balance in midfield and they struggled in the bigger games that season since Modric and Kross don't cover the space between the lines as well.
Zidane changed that by getting in Casemiro to play with Kroos and Modric which gave them better balance in midfield again which helped them a lot to win 2 titles.

Not sure what this has to do with Mourinho.
 
What a fantastic thread for all those emoticons from my thread. People overestimate what 'foundations' are & get completely aggressive when talking about LVG.

LVG could never attract the players José has; players like pogba Lukaku and Bailey are players that are bought to be at the centre of our team to play the way the manager wants - they are Josés players and at the core of our tactics.

What LVG did was however briefly; move us on from the grand shadows of SAF and the confusion of Moyes - got rid of players like evra, RVP nearly all from a previous generation (apart from Rooney & this is why he was targeted) & got us playing a very basic, tactical type of football again coupled with some youngsters.

Ever since he came; he implemented a basic tactical awareness back to a club that had to change find its identity as quick as possible & however much we may need or want to play counter attacking football in the games José decides; we can flip a switch and play possession football when we want to.

Because that's what he meant about philosophy - United is theoretically speeking a possession football based team club ever since LVG's arrival & this will be shown in the games we decide to play that way down to the players that will break in to our first team in the future. The same with a 352.

For along time no one will have to rebalance the squad the way LVG did and initiate a new tactical approach - more what is needed is for the future managers be that from José to ppchetino to giggs - is to come in and find those players that play in the way their manager wants to.

We are right now a mix of a possession based counter attacking team due to the way José wants United to play; but united itself is a possession based football club & will be for a long time.
You were wumming in your thread with posts to provoke people; maybe as a response to the deserved smileys, but all the same you went on a wumming-mission.

Rashford, Lukaku & Martial are all high-pace players capable of playing on the counter, and we have more quality in defense to hit opponents on the break than we have in the middle to break teams down when they defend. United is also traditionally a counter-attacking, or at least direct team, posession has usually come through just being better than the opponent rather than circulation of the ball for most of the time.

With Pogba, we're capable of playing with the ball and breaking down teams, but not without him. The squad is simply not suited to play as you claim, and 3-5-2 is just one of multiple usable strategies, all depending on the opponent which is what Jose is all about, and as was commented in your thread he already used that at Inter. For the record I can find records of 3-5-2 from back when Germany was a split country, so it's not LvGs making. Bringing it to United may have been new (fairly certain we had a few games under Ferguson that was 3-5-2-like), but a introduction to a formation isnt groundbreaking stuff. If Van Gaal had left us with some good tools I wouldn't be against giving him credit for it, but the closest I'm getting is that our team looks more comfortable when pressed because they've gotten used to hog the ball for 90 minutes under Van Gaal.

We can agree that "foundation" means very little, if my assumption on that is acceptable from your post.
If all that's needed to "lay the foundations" is to say we'll play posession-football & shift to a new formation, any top-league manager could do it and there is nothing credible about that from a team's success once you're fired for not hitting the set targets or making the supporters enjoy the games.

Moyes & LvG were both terrible managers for Manchester United, there really isn't more to it.

Van Gaal identified that we were weak as shit in midfield when he came and he tried to address it. Considering how long teams, and for my own feelings United specifically tend to wait forever to fix lack of quality in specific areas on the pitch, this is something I was happy with LvG about. Buying a Cb (Rojo) midfielders (Herrera, Bastian, AdM & Schneiderlin) and a at the time striker that could figure on the wing (Martial) were all positive moves in my eyes based on our weakness areas for building a stronger squad, but he also sold players the club could have used as parts of the squad instead of a ton of youngsters that weren't ready, like Rafael, Nani, Chicharito, Kagawa & Zaha
(Not taking in Welbeck, Vidic & Evra into account as I'm slightly certain they decided to leave at the end of Moyes's tenure and just happened to go under LvG, and Rio was going down fast).
I'll give LvG credit for clearing out some of the dead-wood we had in the squad though, it was sorely needed but also something most fans on here were screaming about, especially Buttner, Bebe and the likes.

I believe in building squads of quality players that complement eachother and winning mentality within those squads.
But most managers who leave do so because they didn't win, not because of retirement like Heynckes or Sir Alex.
So you'll have to look at squads when a manager comes in and how many changes they've done and if those changes were good.

In that sense, I think Jose is right in that he tends to be good at spotting problem-areas and address them, although it naturally doesn't work 100% of the time as it doesn't with anyone. Ultimately it's hard for me to say if Van Gaal or Mourinho believe that they deserve much credit for tactical changes they do at any club, but I wouldn't call either unreasonable if they talk about squad-changes.
 
Last edited:
He is right. Chelsea's successes after both times he left, were down to his foundational work, esp the first time around. Same happened at Real Madrid, whatever his haters say.

Simply have to listen to how most of his ex-players talk about him.
 
You were wumming in your thread with posts to provoke people; maybe as a response to the deserved smileys, but all the same you went on a wumming-mission.

Rashford, Lukaku & Martial are all high-pace players capable of playing on the counter, and we have more quality in defense to hit opponents on the break than we have in the middle to break teams down when they defend. United is also traditionally a counter-attacking, or at least direct team, posession has usually come through just being better than the opponent rather than circulation of the ball for most of the time.

With Pogba, we're capable of playing with the ball and breaking down teams, but not without him. The squad is simply not suited to play as you claim, and 3-5-2 is just one of multiple usable strategies, all depending on the opponent which is what Jose is all about, and as was commented in your thread he already used that at Inter. For the record I can find records of 3-5-2 from back when Germany was a split country, so it's not LvGs making. Bringing it to United may have been new (fairly certain we had a few games under Ferguson that was 3-5-2-like), but a introduction to a formation isnt groundbreaking stuff. If Van Gaal had left us with some good tools I wouldn't be against giving him credit for it, but the closest I'm getting is that our team looks more comfortable when pressed because they've gotten used to hog the ball for 90 minutes under Van Gaal.

We can agree that "foundation" means very little, if my assumption on that is acceptable from your post.
If all that's needed to "lay the foundations" is to say we'll play posession-football & shift to a new formation, any top-league manager could do it and there is nothing credible about that from a team's success once you're fired for not hitting the set targets or making the supporters enjoy the games.

Moyes & LvG were both terrible managers for Manchester United, there really isn't more to it.

Van Gaal identified that we were weak as shit in midfield when he came and he tried to address it. Considering how long teams, and for my own feelings United specifically tend to wait forever to fix lack of quality in specific areas on the pitch, this is something I was happy with LvG about. Buying a Cb (Rojo) midfielders (Herrera, Bastian, AdM & Schneiderlin) and a at the time striker that could figure on the wing (Martial) were all positive moves in my eyes based on our weakness areas for building a stronger squad, but he also sold players the club could have used as parts of the squad instead of a ton of youngsters that weren't ready, like Rafael, Nani, Chicharito, Kagawa & Zaha
(Not taking in Welbeck, Vidic & Evra into account as I'm slightly certain they decided to leave at the end of Moyes's tenure and just happened to go under LvG, and Rio was going down fast).
I'll give LvG credit for clearing out some of the dead-wood we had in the squad though, it was sorely needed but also something most fans on here were screaming about, especially Buttner, Bebe and the likes.

I believe in building squads of quality players that complement eachother and winning mentality within those squads.
But most managers who leave do so because they didn't win, not because of retirement like Heynckes or Sir Alex.
So you'll have to look at squads when a manager comes in and how many changes they've done and if those changes were good.

In that sense, I think Jose is right in that he tends to be good at spotting problem-areas and address them, although it naturally doesn't work 100% of the time as it doesn't with anyone. Ultimately it's hard for me to say if Van Gaal or Mourinho believe that they deserve much credit for tactical changes they do at any club, but I wouldn't call either unreasonable if they talk about squad-changes.

This is probably not the right thread to discuss this against each other here because we could go on for ages; open it back on the LVG thread.

Playing possession football isn't just about the passing though is it? It's about the all inclusiveness of all 11 players; that's a big difference from what we had post SAF and now post LVG. With or without Lukaku, Pogba & Bailey (arguably our spine of José players) we have been able to adapt to different formations, play players in different positions & that has 90% to do with what Jose's tactics chooses on the day & the 10% awareness of positioning, possession and passing that's been running through the club consistently for the last 3 years. That's what LVG has done at all his clubs & has stayed that way for a long time.

Its always going to be ' oh any manager could have done what LVG has done because it's so basic' forcing us to play, pass, position game play tactic; but the fact is he did do that & that type of core understanding can penetrate the core of the club down to even the youth levels compared to a more precise, intricate and progressive type of football that a manager like José wants us to play.

Whether you think that's important or not is just your understanding - when I read through your post about players like Rivaldo hating LVG; apart from the Brazilian hatred he has; that negation of such individualism helped Barcelona no matter how degenerative it might seem - same thing for ribery who wasn't so much of a team player; but was much better after LVG had left.

Anyway, let's see though - I did find it interesting how you said that United as a club is a counter attacking club which I don't disagree with & in fact iv been saying from day one that United will only come back to the top of the world when they find the 50/50 balance of being a possession based side with the ability to counterattack no matter who we play on the pitch.

Let's see if that ever happens; I would know who to compliment for our ability to counterattack & I suspect alot of people would do as much as José wants some credit for the Madrid sides counterattack ability. We will see if possession football will peak its head out again in the future as a means to balance our teams capabilities.
 
Last edited:
He brings teams on the cusp of greatness but fails at the final step, mainly because he lacks an attacking philosophy. Attacking philosophy requires ideals and Mourinho doesn't do idealism.

He wouldn't know what to do with the teams he constructs. Which is why he leaves. The Real Madrid we see now is hardly similar to the one Mourinho left. He did form the base for their period of success, but guys like Ancelotti and Zidane were required to unleash their full potential.
Well considering he has won nearly every final his teams have played in and is the only manager ever to win the Treble in Serie A that’s the biggest load of nonsense I’ve ever read.
 
Well considering he has won nearly every final his teams have played in and is the only manager ever to win the Treble in Serie A that’s the biggest load of nonsense I’ve ever read.
That's because you measure greatness by only results. Results are different from development. What happened to that Inter team afterwards? Does the present Real Madrid look anywhere similar to Mourinho's "philosophy"? By his own admission in various documentaries, all he wants to do is "win and leave".

He is a winner and a great manager, but he is no constructor. Our club is in a casual fling with him. It will be fun, and help us get our confidence back. But in the larger scheme of things, I wouldn't bet on his legacy enduring at Man United. Given his recent quotes, he is already looking to a separate future. So should we.
 
He brings teams on the cusp of greatness but fails at the final step, mainly because he lacks an attacking philosophy. Attacking philosophy requires ideals and Mourinho doesn't do idealism.

He wouldn't know what to do with the teams he constructs. Which is why he leaves. The Real Madrid we see now is hardly similar to the one Mourinho left. He did form the base for their period of success, but guys like Ancelotti and Zidane were required to unleash their full potential.

There might be some truth in this. Who knows eh? Who we get as the manager after Jose will be a monumental decision.
 
Didn't Madrid get like 90 points in the league before Jose?

Amusing to see him taking credit for their recent success. It's typical of a man who seems to need constant validation and self appreciation. He seems far too conscious and concerned about his standing in the game. Loved this about SAF. He rarely ever bigged himself up. He didn't have to. An extremely secure man.
 
So why leave before the club hits the peak?
He wasn't good enough. Jose got sacked because his third was poor and Barca continued their dominance. 1 league in 3 years isn't enough at Madrid when Barca are winning more. Zidane had delivered 3 CLs and 1 league. He could have complained about leaving after laying 'foundations' too after his first CL. But he only went on achieved bigger things there.
 
Didn't Madrid get like 90 points in the league before Jose?

Amusing to see him taking credit for their recent success. It's typical of a man who seems to need constant validation and self appreciation. He seems far too conscious and concerned about his standing in the game. Loved this about SAF. He rarely ever bigged himself up. He didn't have to. An extremely secure man.
Quoting your post purely because it's the most recent one, but the B/R headline is fairly dramatic in terms of taking credit when you consider what was said before and after the bits in the OP.
The priority is always the same: develop the club in which you work ... unless you are lucky enough to coach a team that is already built for the win. That's the perfect plan. So the plan does not exist. Honestly.

By the time I left, Real Madrid was ready to explode. It was from there that the club really began to win, especially against Barcelona, that he began to invite himself regularly in the semi-finals of the Champion's League.
Not much wrong with what he said there from a factual perspective. Madrid hadn't won anything in the couple of seasons leading up to his appointment - which is precisely why Florentino approached him. Wrt. the Barcelona bit, they were on the crest of a wave when he arrived and he managed to beat them to the title in 2012. And the semi-final bit also holds true when you look at Madrid's record from 2005 to 2010: Round of 16 loss to Juventus, Round of 16 loss to Arsenal, Round of 16 loss to Bayern, Round of 16 loss to Roma, Round of 16 loss to Liverpool, Round of 16 loss to Lyon. Contrast that with his three years at the club: Semi-final, Semi-final, Semi-final. That was the first time they made 3 consecutive semis since the turn of the century when they won 3 Champions League titles in 5 seasons under Heynckes and del Bosque.

He's no saint by any means and has a well-documented history of stirring the hornet's nest from time to time, but the media is also culpable as regards twisting his words and casting him in a controversial light by highlighting select bits in terms of the narrative to stick the boot in. And what's disappointing is that a segment of his own support-base at United is adept at lapping it up.
 
Quoting your post purely because it's the most recent one, but the B/R headline is fairly dramatic in terms of taking credit when you consider what was said before and after the bits in the OP.

Not much wrong with what he said there from a factual perspective. Madrid hadn't won anything in the couple of seasons leading up to his appointment - which is precisely why Florentino approached him. Wrt. the Barcelona bit, they were on the crest of a wave when he arrived and he managed to beat them to the title in 2012. And the semi-final bit also holds true when you look at Madrid's record from 2005 to 2010: Round of 16 loss to Juventus, Round of 16 loss to Arsenal, Round of 16 loss to Bayern, Round of 16 loss to Roma, Round of 16 loss to Liverpool, Round of 16 loss to Lyon. Contrast that with his three years at the club: Semi-final, Semi-final, Semi-final. That was the first time they made 3 consecutive semis since the turn of the century when they won 3 Champions League titles in 5 seasons under Heynckes and del Bosque.

He's no saint by any means and has a well-documented history of stirring the hornet's nest from time to time, but the media is also culpable as regards twisting his words and casting him in a controversial light by highlighting select bits in terms of the narrative to stick the boot in. And what's disappointing is that a segment of his own support-base at United is adept at lapping it up.

Brilliant post.
 
Before Mourinho came to Real Madrid, they struggled to get through quarter-final in champions league for 7 years, Mourinho turned them into title contenders in champions league and have reached semi-final three times in a row for 3 years before he left them, they went to win 3 times in 4 years

at Manchester United, he turned Manchester United into one of the strongest team post SAF eras in just year and are 2nd in the league, he won Europa, league cup and community shield with United.
Strongest post Fergie? You do realise we finished 6th last season don't you? We finished 4th under LVG. If we're 2nd come May then your comment has some weight.
 
Strongest post Fergie? You do realise we finished 6th last season don't you? We finished 4th under LVG. If we're 2nd come May then your comment has some weight.

We didn't capitulate last season under Jose like LvG's 2nd season or Moyes' season (until we threw away the league for EL). In most of the draws, we were pretty much dominant bar the finishing.

I'd say the trophies make last season better than LvG's 1st season as well.
 
Quoting your post purely because it's the most recent one, but the B/R headline is fairly dramatic in terms of taking credit when you consider what was said before and after the bits in the OP.

Not much wrong with what he said there from a factual perspective. Madrid hadn't won anything in the couple of seasons leading up to his appointment - which is precisely why Florentino approached him. Wrt. the Barcelona bit, they were on the crest of a wave when he arrived and he managed to beat them to the title in 2012. And the semi-final bit also holds true when you look at Madrid's record from 2005 to 2010: Round of 16 loss to Juventus, Round of 16 loss to Arsenal, Round of 16 loss to Bayern, Round of 16 loss to Roma, Round of 16 loss to Liverpool, Round of 16 loss to Lyon. Contrast that with his three years at the club: Semi-final, Semi-final, Semi-final. That was the first time they made 3 consecutive semis since the turn of the century when they won 3 Champions League titles in 5 seasons under Heynckes and del Bosque.

He's no saint by any means and has a well-documented history of stirring the hornet's nest from time to time, but the media is also culpable as regards twisting his words and casting him in a controversial light by highlighting select bits in terms of the narrative to stick the boot in. And what's disappointing is that a segment of his own support-base at United is adept at lapping it up.
Mourinho improved Madrid which is to be expected from a good manager but so did the manager before him. In the season before Jose took charge, under Pelligrini, Madrid amassed over 90 points and scored 102 goals in the league only to finish a mere 3 points behind a great Barcelona side. Was that team also 'ready' to explode, and at least do what it did under Jose? Or was a team that was good expected to keep failing to reach CL quarters and semis? That team also included Alonso, Ramos, Marcelo, Pepe, Benzema and Ronaldo. So surely as much foundation laying was done by the previous managers as well. Also, if Madrid we're so 'ready' immediately after Jose got sacked, then why was his last season so poor?

I think a number of managers improved Madrid to reach the point of their recent dominance. But I also think a lot is down to their enormous spending combined with good managers and importantly their standing in the game. That first step to become a dominate side who could reach 90 plus points was as big a step as any, as was the guy who, you know actually won every thing (Zidane). Zidane is the one who finally fine tuned Madrid and give them the balance that the others didnt even though it is true that the team was years in making.
 
Mourinho should maybe construct our attacking play because it's been horrible. Lukaka is being deprived of chances. I pity him because he gives his all in each match. Hopefully he scores today.
 
Yeah but dem foundations :drool:
:drool:

1) he's a Cnut.

2) he has always been a manager who's liked testing himself in different evironments.
3) he'd rather be (self) credited with laying the foundations

Didn't Madrid get like 90 points in the league before Jose?

Amusing to see him taking credit for their recent success. It's typical of a man who seems to need constant validation and self appreciation. He seems far too conscious and concerned about his standing in the game. Loved this about SAF. He rarely ever bigged himself up. He didn't have to. An extremely secure man.
Yup. Wonder how he'd be if he hadn't won as much as he has. Think he needs a major trophy soon, or he'll self combust again.
 
We didn't capitulate last season under Jose like LvG's 2nd season or Moyes' season (until we threw away the league for EL). In most of the draws, we were pretty much dominant bar the finishing.

I'd say the trophies make last season better than LvG's 1st season as well.
The league is our bread and butter. Being a good cup team is only a consolation. We dominated possession under LVG too, and had plenty of draws too.
 
Mourinho improved Madrid which is to be expected from a good manager but so did the manager before him. In the season before Jose took charge, under Pelligrini, Madrid amassed over 90 points and scored 102 goals in the league only to finish a mere 3 points behind a great Barcelona side. Was that team also 'ready' to explode, and at least do what it did under Jose? Or was a team that was good expected to keep failing to reach CL quarters and semis? That team also included Alonso, Ramos, Marcelo, Pepe, Benzema and Ronaldo. So surely as much foundation laying was done by the previous managers as well. Also, if Madrid we're so 'ready' immediately after Jose got sacked, then why was his last season so poor?

I think a number of managers improved Madrid to reach the point of their recent dominance. But I also think a lot is down to their enormous spending combined with good managers and importantly their standing in the game. That first step to become a dominate side who could reach 90 plus points was as big a step as any, as was the guy who, you know actually won every thing (Zidane). Zidane is the one who finally fine tuned Madrid and give them the balance that the others didnt even though it is true that the team was years in making.
Here's the thing, though: did he specify that Madrid didn't improve under Pellegrini? Did he say that the team he inherited was a poor team? Did he say that his predecessors were garbage at managing the club? Did he say that all of Madrid's success after he left is down to him? No. Again, people are making a mountain of a molehill with a semi-innocuous statement where he was asked if coaching is an easy job - what he said was that the priority is developing the team he's in charge of...and by his own admission, the perfect conditions do not exist!
If a young guy wants to become a coach and imagines that he will only work two hours a day on a nice grassy field, he puts his finger in the eye. If he thinks he's going to make his players better by choosing a battery of technical exercises in a manual, he's wrong all the way. It is necessary to work while always keeping a strong objective in mind. The priority is always the same: develop the club in which you work ... unless you are lucky enough to coach a team that is already built for the win. That's the perfect plan. So the plan does not exist. Honestly,
And as a tangent to that, in relative terms, were he to get a fresh start - he would rather manage the team he's leaving behind than the team he inherited - which is understandable because there was a general improvement over 3 years, some of the fireworks in 2013 notwithstanding:
I would have liked to arrive at Real Madrid the moment I left him. I would like to land at Manchester United just when I decided to leave. Why ? To retake a team that would have been coached by Mourinho ... the dream!
Were Madrid on a good level in the league after Pellegrini? Yes, no doubt about it - they would've been champions had it not been for a special Barcelona team that set a new record for points. However, we do not know if Madrid were ready to explode on all fronts (like they did in the years to come) after Pellegrini left because they were dumped by mighty Lyon in the first knockout round and lost 4-1 across 2 legs to Alcorcón in the Copa del Rey - some ways removed from being semi-finalists in the Champions League in 3 successive seasons - apart from winning the Copa in 2011 and making the final in 2013.

Pellegrini did a lot of good work for Madrid - yes, particularly in the league. Ranieri did a lot of good work at Chelsea. If you want their statements or self-appraisals, read their interviews. Mourinho should not be expected to credit every single manager he succeeded. And again in relative terms, the team was more developed in all competitions when Mourinho left - which aligned with his aim of developing the team in his tenure. That's what he was saying with the ready to explode bit by highlighting all the competitions and not just one in particular.

And you know perfectly well why they were poor in the last season without me having to spell it out in explicit terms...it was due to internal strife and politicking, not a perfect reflection of their footballing ability - which they later evidenced under Carlo. Should Mourinho shoulder some of the blame for that? Yes, and also in terms of tactics - especially against Dortmund where Klopp focused on Pepe with the gegenpress. Should the players? Yes. In saying that, no one is denying Ancelotti the credit he deserves for winning La Décima - his decision to use Di María in midfield and make it the base with Modrić and Alonso was inspired and he brought a lot of stability and balance to the team...which had seemingly deserted them in Mourinho's last season. Same goes for Zidane - who took the setup Ancelotti had built and replicated/tweaked it after Benítez was let go. But all of that doesn't negate the fact that Mourinho played a big role in developing them, too.
 
The league is our bread and butter. Being a good cup team is only a consolation. We dominated possession under LVG too, and had plenty of draws too.

In LvG's second season, we were never the better team in most of the games. As far as his first season is concerned, I'd put it on par with Jose's if it were not for the fact that we actually won trophies.

The league may be our main focus, but the point is, did Jose do better than LvG's first season? Answer is yes because of the trophies. In addition, the only reason we threw away a scrap for 4th is because of the EL, while LvG barely scraped 4th with no Europe.
 
There isn't an argument against this other than Madrid and even then hes clearly talking about their CL resurgence under him.
Edit hope nobody will bring up the Inter under Rafa argument or you're basically belittling Sir Alex as well.
 
Before Mourinho came to Real Madrid, they struggled to get through quarter-final in champions league for 7 years, Mourinho turned them into title contenders in champions league and have reached semi-final three times in a row for 3 years before he left them, they went to win 3 times in 4 years

at Manchester United, he turned Manchester United into one of the strongest team post SAF eras in just year and are 2nd in the league, he won Europa, league cup and community shield with United.

A lot of people forget this.
Though, the talk about laying foundations - I don't buy that at all. Managers should take credit only while they are at the club....not for trophies won after leaving.
 
It’s like taking credit for my ex-gf finding a good husband after we broke up. Because I was a crap bf in comparison.
 
Chelsea 1 after Jose - not very good.

Inter after Jose - struggled.

Real after Jose - blossomed.

Chelsea 2 after Jose - won the league.

Maybe Jose is right that Madrid prospered because of his work. I didn't follow them enough to say whether they continued to play like under Jose or changed tactics. If it is the latter, then he deserves credit for the squad he assembled there but not for the way they played and won the CL. Same with Chelsea 2. I think that Chelsea 2 won mainly because of Kante, he gave them a new dimension in midfield and Conte's tactics doesn't work without him.
 
If he really feels this way, he should think about why an elite manager like him has not been able to build on the good work he thinks he's done at clubs and do everything he needs to to ensure it doesn't happen again.
 
Not sure Jose has done that consistently but that’s also due to time and other contributing factors. Any good coach with moderate time and backing should do the same construction that Jose is talking about so it’s par for the course.
 
Chelsea 1 after Jose - not very good.

Inter after Jose - struggled.

Real after Jose - blossomed.

Chelsea 2 after Jose - won the league.

Maybe Jose is right that Madrid prospered because of his work. I didn't follow them enough to say whether they continued to play like under Jose or changed tactics. If it is the latter, then he deserves credit for the squad he assembled there but not for the way they played and won the CL. Same with Chelsea 2. I think that Chelsea 2 won mainly because of Kante, he gave them a new dimension in midfield and Conte's tactics doesn't work without him.

They reached CL final directly after he left. Not to mention the legacy he built there remained for a few years after he left.

Inter was the only exception but that's because they were already an old squad with players approaching the end of their career. Mourinho's main job their was to bring them success in Europe as fast as possible.

The counter attacking system Mourinho applied in Madrid was still used by Carlo then Zidane, but they both improved other things that Madrid of the past 4 years a nearly complete tactical teams of different styles and solutions to almost any team.
 
Imagine if a player would claim credit after he left ;). Wayne Rooney it is clear that Man United have improved a lot after you left do you think it has anything to do with you leaving? "Yes the performances I put in before I left lifted the club and pushed the high performance standards to the top that other players could follow".
 
Jose talking to the French media again?

Bet he ends up at PSG after United.
 
Imagine if a player would claim credit after he left ;). Wayne Rooney it is clear that Man United have improved a lot after you left do you think it has anything to do with you leaving? "Yes the performances I put in before I left lifted the club and pushed the high performance standards to the top that other players could follow".

It's not the same thing is it ? one's job is to put the bases for a team so that it wins and thrives in the future, the other is just to play.

It would be like discading the fact that Sir Alex put the bases for United to become the club it is now by saying imagine if a player would claim credit after he left .... the rest of your post.
 
Before Mourinho came to Real Madrid, they struggled to get through quarter-final in champions league for 7 years, Mourinho turned them into title contenders in champions league and have reached semi-final three times in a row for 3 years before he left them, they went to win 3 times in 4 years

at Manchester United, he turned Manchester United into one of the strongest team post SAF eras in just year and are 2nd in the league, he won Europa, league cup and community shield with United.

People forget the days were they were conceding 5's and 6's to Barcelona (albeit they may have got tonked under Mourinho, too) and that they were getting knocked out of the CL at the hands of Liverpool, Roma and Lyon without even competing in the games.
 
Not sure Jose has done that consistently but that’s also due to time and other contributing factors. Any good coach with moderate time and backing should do the same construction that Jose is talking about so it’s par for the course.

Particularly when you manage the wealthiest teams in every leagues. Though the fact that he did it with every clubs without miss is the reason why he is one of the best manager of the last two decades. What makes him special is his consistency not his building abilities.