Cop in America doing a bad job, again

What are the repercussions for a cop lying on a police report?

Why don't more cops speak out against bad cop behaviour?

Why are untrained civilians expected to be the only ones to act rationally?

So many questions.
 
Some fcuked up stories there, especially the young Guatemalan shot by border patrol. Couldn't he just fire a warning shot?
 
What are the repercussions for a cop lying on a police report?

Why don't more cops speak out against bad cop behaviour?

Why are untrained civilians expected to be the only ones to act rationally?

So many questions.

It would depend on the department, but lying on a report is a pretty serious offense. If you get caught in a lie it could often result in suspension leading up to termination for more serious incidents. You basically lose all credibility and cannot testify in a court of law, which is one of the important basic duties of being a sworn officer. People that have worked at Internal Affairs have always stressed "if you're ever sitting in front of IA because you fecked up, just tell the truth and say you fecked up and take your 5 day suspension. Cause if you lie, you die ".
 
The guy asked what can be done to change things and you suggested that he reach out. You really think that is going to help?? It's the responsibility of the police to be building the community relations by being transparent, trustworthy and basically just doing their fecking job! The general public shouldn't have to make any effort to do this. I don't understand why you seem intent on putting the onus on the public to reconcile their understanding of police behaviour rather than focusing on why it is happening in the first place.

Ride-alongs should just be for people who are curious as to what cops do on a day-to-day basis, not for building faith and trust in their police services.

Reasoning with a cop after an incident of police brutality is just like reasoning with a gun lobbyist after yet another mass shooting. They will always find excuses and justifications.

Officers who go about doing their job on a day to day basis are the majority of officers out there, regardless of what you might believe. Again, I was offering suggestions, just as I’ve welcomed suggestions before. I fail to see the issues in that open discussion in that regard. Just because you don’t agree with the suggestion, doesn’t mean there’s no merit there.

As for the bolded part, I think the LEO’s here have all been relatively impartial in regards to the incidents posted here. We’ve offered our insights wherever we can to offer a different perspective, and flat out condemned some actions as well. As @choiboyx012 said, not every incident is black and white, and not everything is police brutality, regardless of how it first seems, or the first story that’s released.
 
It would depend on the seriousness of it. If it's illegal, unethical, and immoral then yes i would, especially if it directly involves a person's (or partner's) life.

That pretty much sums up the problem right there. It's either illegal...or it isn't. You shouldn't be making any judgements as to whether actions merit reporting. If they fall beyond the bounds of a policeman's remit, just report it!
 
That pretty much sums up the problem right there. It's either illegal...or it isn't. You shouldn't be making any judgements as to whether actions merit reporting. If they fall beyond the bounds of a policeman's remit, just report it!

We've got officers that drive more than the speed limit, or don't wear a seatbelt. That's illegal. Is it reasonable for me to go crying to the watch commanders office and say officer so-and-so went 50mph on a 45 road?

See, I do have the power to make judgments to report certain things or not, it's called discretion and we use it every day. I can't, nor do i want, to cite or arrest every offense and offender i come across. It'd be a huge waste of time, money, and resources. So you pick and choose your battles with minor stuff. Same thing goes for fellow officers. If you see your partners fecking up, or doing something unsafe, you can hit them up verbally and squash it there. If it rises to something more serious like using force when it wasn't warranted, or lying on a report, then yes that's something all cops should report truthfully.

That's what i meant by it depends on the seriousness of the offense.
 
It wasn’t intended to be patronizing at all. Someone asked what I suggest they could do, and I offered some suggestions in terms of reaching out to law enforcement as well as local groups who may have a solid understanding of community issues and events. Not sure how you took such offense to it

I’m not sure who you seem to think is rationalizing or making excuses for bad behavior in here. I think anyone tied to law enforcement who posts here has taken a similar stance on the issues as most, while also maintaining there’s far less “scum” than you’d like to believe.
It didn't seem patronising to me Skizzo.
 
I dont think it was patronizing but I do think its the wrong way of approaching the issue. As others have said, the police have the responsibility to behave lawfully. It's not the public's job to be more understanding of police abuse or lawbreaking or lying.
 
I dont think it was patronizing but I do think its the wrong way of approaching the issue. As others have said, the police have the responsibility to behave lawfully. It's not the public's job to be more understanding of police abuse or lawbreaking or lying.

Where did I suggest you become understanding of “police abuse, lawbreaking or lying”?

It was one suggestion offered out of a few. If you think posting twitter links to redcafe is more beneficial, then that’s fine too.

Edit: I understand your desire to highlight issues within different facets of law enforcement, and that absolutely shouldn’t be taken lightly. I don’t think anyone here disagrees with your posts on the matter :)
 
I didn’t say you had to. It was a suggestion to someone who asked a question. Not a requirement, a suggestion. I see no harm in suggesting a ride along to someone who has concerns or questions about the day to day happenings in law enforcement. Not to mention getting that face time with an officer/department to help raise concerns of your own.

I didn’t say it solves all the problems, but I fail to see what problems you see with that kind of community relation.
This is a serious question, and I don’t intend it to be condescending or confrontational, but you obviously feel strongly (as you should), so what are you doing to try and change things rather than posting tweets to a football forum where people (mostly) agree with the issues raised?
 
I've no idea how you've connected those two statements.
 
-inserts whatever answer redped wants to hear to continue his crusade-

Whatever man, you carry on! I don't have any crusade!

Bent cops will always do what bent cops do. We both know that will never change!
 
Whatever man, you carry on! I don't have any crusade!

Bent cops will always do what bent cops do. We both know that will never change!

:)

I’m not entirely sure what you think we’re disagreeing on. You just came right off the bat calling me condescending when I was having a discussion with someone else.
 
Is ICE trying to reduce border crossings by families with kids by setting some examples?


That is the suspicion.

Not sure its actually ICE though.

Their role is investigations and they cover multiple areas like illegal immigration, drug trafficking and sex trafficking etc. If you're in the country illegally they are the guys that will knock down your door. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are the ones that arrest people at the border. Citizenship and Immigration Services are the ones that will process immigrants and asylum seekers.

All the agencies fall under Homeland Security though so the lines might get a little blurred.
 
That is the suspicion.

Not sure its actually ICE though.

Their role is investigations and they cover multiple areas like illegal immigration, drug trafficking and sex trafficking etc. If you're in the country illegally they are the guys that will knock down your door. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are the ones that arrest people at the border. Citizenship and Immigration Services are the ones that will process immigrants and asylum seekers.

All the agencies fall under Homeland Security though so the lines might get a little blurred.
there is an example of ICE doing it literally 2 posts ago
 
there is an example of ICE doing it literally 2 posts ago

Post 1875? That was CBP not ICE. It was at the border and it states border officers.

Its irreverent which agency it is anyway. The policy needs to change. To bash LEO and agencies that are simply applying the laws based on policy decisions is counter productive. ICE happen to do some very valuable work as well so to tarnish the entire organization is simply wrong.

Anger and protests should be focused on DC.
 
Last edited:

Fair enough.

Interesting article that. They say ICE are breaking Homelands own rules but ICE is part of Homeland. ICE are responsible for the detention facilities. Up until last year the detention facilities were not treated like prison, they had different rules and requirements. However Trump changed that and now they operate under the same rules as a prison. I wonder if that change is the driver for separating kids from parents when they go into detention now?

What ever the reason ICE and all the other agencies are operating under the direction of Homeland and policies set by the administration. The system should show some compassion and treat the people properly while they are being processed. What is going on is a direct result of Trump and the people at the top not individual LOE officers and agents.