charlenefan
Far less insightful than the other Charley
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 33,052
That’s true, but I think it takes more than the biggest numbers. He’s just not a good footballer, and for all the talk of his numbers, he’d be a lot more prolific if he was.
He’s hard to properly evaluate I think. Like, I can read, and know what his figures say. But I can also see, and he is nowhere near a top level forward. I’m inclined to say that the evidence that he is shit when watching him play, on this occasion, overwhelms any argument made by his numbers. That’s how far away from a top player he looks.
Excluding the obvious greats and even the tier below them, I’d argue that Arnautovic, Dzeko, Sturridge, Lacazette, Benzema, Immobile, Mandzukic, Vardy, Mariano Diaz, Rodrigo, and Hernandez are better players than Lukaku. I could go on and list a tier below even that lot, because that’s how much I don’t rate him, but I don’t want to start a long side-discussion. That said, I believe all of those players I mentioned would at least match his 16 league goals for us if they played every minute like he did last year, and also make us look a much better side full-stop, improving us by making their teammates look better too.
If presented with enough balls in the box, a lot of strikers would get a lot of goals for Belgium. And tbh, I don’t really care what he does for them anyway. Lukaku has played in England for about 8 years and I’ve seen enough to form my opinion that he’s an average player.
If we listed all of his attributes and weaknesses on a piece of paper, it would not be immediately clear whether you are referring to Smalling or Lukaku, I strongly believe that. I’d be a happier United fan once he’s gone.
Who buys him though? Our deal to buy him was apparently 90m and that's because of the usual PL tax involved. There's not a club in the world that would take him off of our hands for even the base level 75m we paid