- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 49,792
- Location
- Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.
- Caf Award
- Caf Lifetime Achievement Award 2019
Eirout?Irexit really doesn't roll off the tongue like Brexit does anyway, it would never take off with the simple folk.
Eirout?Irexit really doesn't roll off the tongue like Brexit does anyway, it would never take off with the simple folk.
Eirout?
One MP in Somerset won't be worried.But at least we'll make our own laws and wont be taking orders from Brussels.
Like... erm.... something about farms in Somerset? The EU makes us do something, or is it that it prevents us from doing something? I forget. But anyway, whatever it is, it will cease to be the huge problem it so clearly is.
Three cheers for Brexit.
There is a big slice of trust attached to the deal I'll admit. But it is a way out. Also I do not subscribe to the notion that all negotiations must be tinged with hatred to the point of verging on war. The DUP - because of their past - are imbuing this situation with just that and it is total over-kill IMO. Taken (calmly) in the round the deal, when looked at properly, is not that bad. It has been hyped up to be hated by the wider population by Parliamentary ultras at both ends. Ken Clarke doesn't have a problem with it and I put a lot of trust in his judgement. This was always going to be a compromise and if we truly wish to call the EU members our friends then we should take them at their word when they say that they have, equally, no desire to persist with a backstop any longer than absolutely necessary.There's no possible way (and never has been) for Labour to come out of this looking good.
Voting for May's deal would be even more disastrous. It's still incredibly unpopular and rightfully so.
Not really the take down I was hoping for tbh.
Is there any article or reading material which deals with the economic impact of a no deal brexit from EU's point of view and why it would be in EU's interest to have a deal agreed with Britain prior to their exit?It's the only way they could prevent a no deal crash out. It also opens up the possibility of us changing our minds and remaining.
They will regret this. Even if her deal doesn't pass, it is difficult to see how May can carry on. There will be a new Tory leader who will have not been voted in by the people. Most leaders in that position will want a GE at some point to give themselves a mandate. TM did just that. With the polls as they were the decision was sound IMO. The campaign though was a total car crash that slashed the Tory majority.
The new Tory leader will probably be a leaver. They will run a GE campaign on honouring the referendum and Labour will not know what to put in their manifesto. They will be trashed for stopping the UK's exit when there was a chance to do so. Stammers argument is a thin veil covering the real Labour aim and that is to never agree with the government about anything at all.
And they point the finger at May for putting party before country. Total hypocrisy.
Will there be unrest from the leavers today.Or just a shrug of the shoulders.
Is there any article or reading material which deals with the economic impact of a no deal brexit from EU's point of view and why it would be in EU's interest to have a deal agreed with Britain prior to their exit?
I cant think of anything specific but it has been discussed a lot as one part of a broader issue.Is there any article or reading material which deals with the economic impact of a no deal brexit from EU's point of view and why it would be in EU's interest to have a deal agreed with Britain prior to their exit?
Is there any article or reading material which deals with the economic impact of a no deal brexit from EU's point of view and why it would be in EU's interest to have a deal agreed with Britain prior to their exit?
Eir-eallyhatetheeuEirout?
There's no possible way (and never has been) for Labour to come out of this looking good.
Voting for May's deal would be even more disastrous. It's still incredibly unpopular and rightfully so.
Happy Brexit day everyone.
I thought the EU said they'd extend the deadline for a couple of weeks, only if May's deal was voted for?
I thought the EU said they'd extend the deadline for a couple of weeks, only if May's deal was voted for?
It's not really exhaustive but it gives you an idea.
https://www.ft.com/content/a8f4f0ec-8bcd-11e8-b18d-0181731a0340
I cant think of anything specific but it has been discussed a lot as one part of a broader issue.
The countries closest to the UK suffer the most. What the Brexiters said in the campaign about German cars and French wine was true in the sense that they stand to lose a significant part of their market, they were just wrong that this would be decisive and lead to political capitulation. There are charts like this that show the direct impact in numbers:
![]()
The biggest issue is Ireland. And having an economic basket case on your doorstep is never good news, so they want to try and find a balance between making sure we are worse off outside the EU, but not so badly off that it becomes destabilising.
Britain and Ireland will be the worst effected, but the rest of the EU will also take an almighty hit.
IMF warnings on economic damage to EU in the event of no deal:
https://amp.theguardian.com/busines...t-would-harm-all-european-countries-warns-imf
NYT article on the vulnerability of different EU regions in a no deal scenario:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/02/07/world/europe/brexit-impact-on-european-union.html
Loved this quote found in the Graun
On Thursday night Newsnight reported that a cabinet minister, when asked why May was pressing ahead with another vote she was sure she would lose, replied: “feck knows, I am past caring. It’s like the living dead in here.”
I thought the EU said they'd extend the deadline for a couple of weeks, only if May's deal was voted for?
But the EU doesn't want devolvement. They don't see it as positive reform.
And I'm sorry but no sane person could gave expected even further concessions to the UK. You lot opted out of almost everything, you contribute less per capita than ITALY - if that's still not good enough, it's probably better if you leave instead of expecting the EU to cater to your every whim.
Article 50 was designed by a Brit and you knew exactly what you were going into once activating article 50. Also note that it's not the EU job to make brexit a success
The extension to 12 April has already been granted. This extension was unconditional.
The extension to 22 May is conditional on the WA being voted through before 11pm today.
It's important to keep in mind, however, that even if the number of Eurosceptics grows, they are still a minority. Appeasing the minority out of fear is rarely a wise course of action.And I don't see greater centralisation as the answer either. It will do nothing to end the disquiet.
I agree, for some, nothing will ever be enough - they don't believe in the EU. But that's not say the EU can continue to ignore the criticism from across Europe of its approach/ideologies - because if they do, the UK's departure will be a precursor rather than an isolated case. Britain may be alone in actively wanting to leave, but they are by no means alone in how alienated they feel by the EU.
That's bullshit. Corbyn could hand May a deal on a piece of paper, then May put's it to parliament and Labour would vote against it. Party politics nothing less. Labour have no cohesive stand on Brexit and neither is it their No. 1 one priority.What a load of bullshit. Putting party before country would be them voting for the WA today. There's no hypocrisy they stood on a platform of stopping a disastrous brexit and they don't want to step off the cliff before they know if there's rocks underneath.
The easy and electable route is for Labour to vote it through. They'll be punished for voting against something they agree with because the public are dim and can't think two steps ahead.
I'm surprised commentators still seem to regard it as unlikely this deal will pass, it looks to me like it will.Seriously scared her deal will get through now.
Labour MPs have absolutely no back bone
I'm surprised commentators still seem to regard it as unlikely this deal will pass, it looks to me like it will.
Seriously scared her deal will get through now.
Labour MPs have absolutely no back bone
I'm surprised commentators still seem to regard it as unlikely this deal will pass, it looks to me like it will.
If I have no say in what powers are created and how they are used what difference does it make whether they are made in London or Brussels?Is localisation of powers not a valid reason?