Fingeredmouse
Full Member
Is it? Ideological opposition to the welfare state (including, increasingly, the NHS and education) is ideological opposition to support for the most vulnerable in society.What an absolute load of rubbish.![]()
Is it? Ideological opposition to the welfare state (including, increasingly, the NHS and education) is ideological opposition to support for the most vulnerable in society.What an absolute load of rubbish.![]()
I am not against a 2nd vote or referendum at all. If you want one have one would be my take on it. I just can't see the point of one. I think the country would be split pretty much the same as last time.Odd that this question wasn't answered. @Honest John
I am not against a 2nd vote or referendum at all. If you want one have one would be my take on it. I just can't see the point of one. I think the country would be split pretty much the same as last time.
I really do not think that this thing is going to be overturned.
At least the WA is a mechanism to move forward in some fashion.
Odd that this question wasn't answered. @Honest John
What, passing the WA or a 2nd ref?It would shut a lot of people up.
Outside of the brexit element, how does him winning effects the dynamics in Scotland and northern Ireland?
Had the feeling those parts view him as the worst representative of English exceptionalism that doesn't give a shit about the rest. Is my perception accurate or do most not differ between him and the English Tories in general? How does he get along with the DUP? @Cheesy @Ian Reus
I might be wrong, but wasn't it a bunch of Remainers ( I'm looking at you Ms Balls and you Benn minor ) who organised and won a vote to prevent the UK leaving without an Agreement ??
HoC refuses to pass May's Agreement ; EU say there is no other Agreement ; and Hoc says UK can't leave without an Agreement.
Perhaps there's the answer - passing the agreement is the only way out of the deadlock.
Perhaps another and related question....We all know Tory Brexiteers' objections to May's Agreement, but what are Labour's objections to it ?
Well.....Today's objections, that is....
Plot twist.Queenie can still save us.
Is it? Ideological opposition to the welfare state (including, increasingly, the NHS and education) is ideological opposition to support for the most vulnerable in society.
May's deal is the key I reckon. Somehow he has to get it through. Not sure how but some more 'clarification' from the EU maybe, or something concrete in the future arrangement that he can hang on to to say that the context has changed.
If he can pull it off and the UK leaves, with a deal on the 31st Oct then everything becomes possible for Johnson. The Brexit party, although pissed off, will cease to have a raison d'etre so the chance of losing votes to them disappears. With the Labour party as it is at present he could call GE and probably win by a decent margin. May's deal, even though the numbers last time out don't stack up, is still the path of least resistance IMO. Johnson's test is whether he can sell it better than May. Remember the deficit went from -230 to -149 to -58 which means he needs to get another 30 odd MP's to go for it.
For me that is the best outcome in all this.
They don't oppose the Welfare state. Conservatives certainly view welfare as a last resort - and that is how it should be! Sitting on welfare should never be a lifestyle choice, and it certainly was a viable option in the past.
https://spartacus-educational.com/Lhealth48.htmWinston Churchill led the attack on Bevan. In one debate in the House of Commons he argued that unless Bevan "changes his policy and methods and moves without the slightest delay, he will be as great a curse to his country in time of peace as he was a squalid nuisance in time of war." The Conservative Party voted against the measure. The Tory ammendment stated that it "declines to give a Third Reading to a Bill which discourages voluntary effort and association; mutilates the structure of local government; dangerously increases minisaterial power and patronage; approppriates trust funds and benefactions in contempt of the wishes of donors and subscribers; and undermines the freedom and independence of the medical profession to the detriment of the nation." (2) However, on 2th July, 1946, the Third Reading was carried by 261 votes to 113. Michael Foot commented that the Conservatives had voted against the "most exciting and popular of the Government's measures a bare four months before it was to be introduced". (3)
Having racist idiots running our countries is the new special relationship.Welcome to the club, UK.
They really, really do.They don't oppose the Welfare state. Conservatives certainly view welfare as a last resort - and that is how it should be! Sitting on welfare should never be a lifestyle choice, and it certainly was a viable option in the past.
It's a brave new world.Having racist idiots running our countries is the new special relationship.
No dole scum on your watch.They don't oppose the Welfare state. Conservatives certainly view welfare as a last resort - and that is how it should be! Sitting on welfare should never be a lifestyle choice, and it certainly was a viable option in the past.
It's as dumb as feck but what can you do?It's a brave new world.
What, passing the WA or a 2nd ref?
Having racist idiots running our countries is the new special relationship.
A 2nd referendum since nobody could claim that they didn't know what they are voting for. My view is that Britain needs to leave and that it needs to hurt massively so that when Britain returns, there is no argument from Brexit supporters. It's the only way to reunite everybody.
The Tories have always been racist idiots. At least Boris doesn't hide it. Malcolm X once said something about having more respect for a man who lets him know where he stands rather than one who pretends to be his friend.
Are we taking bets on what the first thing he fecks up is?
They really, really do.
Even if, at best and implausible case scenario, it is an opposition to perceived indolence, the impact on the vulnerable in society of the ideologically driven attack on the support structures is not an acceptable cost.
No dole scum on your watch.
I left liars out of my comparisons between the two leaders. Just because he's a racist idiot doesn't mean you can believe what he tells you.The Tories have always been racist idiots. At least Boris doesn't hide it. Malcolm X once said something about having more respect for a man who lets him know where he stands rather than one who pretends to be his friend.
Paul was saying that about may since the beginning of her stint. Boris the savior is here to stay.Gone by Christmas.
It's a brave new world.
Meh... Wait till he picks his cabinet... I'm sure things will get worseBoris fecking Johnson...really?
Yes Minister had intellectual insight within it's humor. This is more Beavis and Butt-Head than Yes Minister.It's like 'Yes, Minister' came to life, isn't it?
Paul was saying that about may since the beginning of her stint. Boris the savior is here to stay.