The Manchester United fans control the club's destiny

Yeah I've always hated Madrid and their white hanky waving. But we are the complete opposite with how content we are with accepting mediocrity which ironically promotes it.

Can you imagine if Real Madrid were enduring a season like ours?

I think Ole would need security to make it out of the Bernabeu alive and riots would ensue.

Their fans demand success.

Ours don't care if our manager make us much worse, because he's a former player and he gets the club.
 
Our current manager delivered arguably the finest moment in our entire history. He scored a last minute winner in the CL final to seal the historic treble. Of course that's going to have an effect with most fans. He's a legend.

This was always going to be an issue giving him job. Nobody would like to sack him if he wasn't up to it. The club certainly don't seem like they want to.

Once Ole is sacked, maybe Woodward will call up Sheringham.

After all, he equalized vs Bayern.

Then maybe he'll finally give it to Giggsy once Teddy fails.

Who cares what he did as a player? The only thing that matters is his managerial ability. And it's putrid.
 
You should only spend big if we have a right manager in. Spending big under a League One manager will make our position much worse.

Sacking him is absolutely a solution here. It's what every top team does.
Based on what you'd think Ed and our fecking clueless board could get your "right manager" here ?

And even if we could get "a right manager" based on what you'd think with Ed and co. still at the board we would make the right buy?

As I said, I was once so naive, just like you now thinking changing manager would solve everything. Our problem is just much more than that. If you like, yeah sack Ole. That won't change a damn thing. Both Klopp and Pep refused to come to Utd. And they were right, sadly.
 
Based on what you'd think Ed and our fecking clueless board could get your "right manager" here ?

And even if we could get "a right manager" based on what you'd think with Ed and co. still at the board we would make the right buy?

As I said, I was once so naive, just like you now thinking changing manager would solve anything. Our problem is just much more than that. If you like, yeah sack Ole. That won't change a damn thing. Both Klopp and Pep refused to come to Utd. And they were right, sadly.

Based being absolutely sure that our current manager is probably the worst in our history.

If the Liverpool owners were thinking like you are now they would've never appointed Klopp in the first place but rather continue with Dalglish or Rodgers(who is also miles better than Ole, btw).

Sacking, hiring might get you a right manager. Not sacking and keeping the wrong one clearly won't.
 
I can't imagine Juve or Real fans taking this shot lying down tbh.

Have AC Milan fans kicked off much?
 
Based being absolutely sure that our current manager is probably the worst in our history.

If the Liverpool owners were thinking like you are now they would've never appointed Klopp in the first place but rather continue with Dalglish or Rodgers(who is also miles better than Ole, btw).

Sacking, hiring might get you a right manager. Not sacking and keeping the wrong one clearly won't.
You still don't get it.

First, your "right manager" would just refuse us the same way Klopp and Pep did. Even us fans would know how shit our state is as a football club, the guys in the football world would have no idea? Honestly I'd doubt any great manager (or even potential great) with a serious football project would come to us now.

Second, your idea is the same with having a broken machine making broken products. Yeah keep making those. Maybe we'll get a good one, the last one was crap. How about a new machine?

And about Liverpool owners. Klopp refused us but came to Liverpool. Does this tell you something about our owners and Liverpool owners?

Honestly I don't get the hate you gave to Ole and you not mentioning a thing about the Glazers, Ed and co while it's clear as day that those are our biggest problem.
 
I agree with others, there’s too many on here, and at the matchdays, with this holier than thou attitude telling others to stop being entitled.

This idea of dynasties and empires collapsing in the modern football era is generally rubbish, we’re the exception, not the norm.

I’ll stop expecting big things when the club had the balls to come out and say we’re not gonna go for it anymore.
 
I can't imagine Juve or Real fans taking this shot lying down tbh.

Have AC Milan fans kicked off much?

Milan's situation was different. Imagine if lets say Sir Alex Ferguson had suddenly turned senile and he crushed us to the ground. Would fans turn against him? With the difference that Berlusconi was more important to them then Sir Alex was to us. Also Milan are financially wise far smaller then we are. Their fan base is smaller, and they don't even own a stadium FFS. They deserve to be in a better situation then they are but they need constant injection of solid cash to remain a competitive side.
 
Yeah I've always hated Madrid and their white hanky waving. But we are the complete opposite with how content we are with accepting mediocrity which ironically promotes it.

I agree. Sure, jeering your own players is not a good look and should only be reserved for extreme circumstances, but the manner in which some fans are just fine with how things are going disgusts me.

It's almost as if there's an unwritten rule within our fanbase, especially those who are influential and belongs to a certain demographic, that you're automatically a better fan if you just chant about our past glory for ninety minutes and shut up otherwise. Noisy Nigerian fans, red-eyed Chinese fans and matchgoing fans on the brink of giving up their season tickets demanding change? 'Nah, we could do without them. Spoiled twats. They're not real fans.' You see this stuff on Twitter every time.

Feck right off.
 
Once Ole is sacked, maybe Woodward will call up Sheringham.

After all, he equalized vs Bayern.

Then maybe he'll finally give it to Giggsy once Teddy fails.

Who cares what he did as a player? The only thing that matters is his managerial ability. And it's putrid.

I'm not defending him. I'm telling you why he's been given more leniency from most fans. It's not hard. A club legend will always get more leniency from fans. Same at other clubs too not just United.
 
You still don't get it.

First, your "right manager" would just refuse us the same way Klopp and Pep did. Even us fans would know how shit our state is as a football club, the guys in the football world would have no idea? Honestly I'd doubt any great manager (or even potential great) with a serious football project would come to us now.

Second, your idea is the same with having a broken machine making broken products. Yeah keep making those. Maybe we'll get a good one, the last one was crap. How about a new machine?

And about Liverpool owners. Klopp refused us but came to Liverpool. Does this tell you something about our owners and Liverpool owners?

Honestly I don't get the hate you gave to Ole and you not mentioning a thing about the Glazers, Ed and co while it's clear as day that those are our biggest problem.

There is not only one 'right manager', there are many that can improve us.

You are not getting it, not me. If the machine is broken, you do nothing ? Is that your solution?

About Klopp - when Liverpool signed him we already had a manager, you don't know the exact details to paint it black and white.

I've made the stance on Glazers and Ed long time ago and say it in every other post that they are one of the biggest problems, but so is Ole is that so difficult to understand?

Ole is also their puppet and protecting him and backing him is essentially backing the Glazers.
 
Can you imagine if Real Madrid were enduring a season like ours?

I think Ole would need security to make it out of the Bernabeu alive and riots would ensue.

Their fans demand success.

Ours don't care if our manager make us much worse, because he's a former player and he gets the club.

To some fans, a manager who 'gets the club' is preferable to one who has little to no history with the club but could deliver actual success on the pitch.

Someone put the whole thing nicely on a post here a few weeks back: there are fans who view the club as a family, the players their children and the manager the nanny who's been working for the family for years. So these folks would be like, 'No! Don't you dare criticise my children and don't you dare think our nanny is doing a shit job taking care of them. How dare you, stay away from my family!'
 
Sunderland have been forced to sell due to fan pressure.

Fans will have to come together and stop this. We cannot allow the club to lose its identity.
 
I don't like the concept of booing during the match but I think way we've been run and managed in recent years calls for some sort of protest by the fans. The club is for the fans who absolutely have the right to express dissatisfaction at the state of things. In fact I'd argue that our matchgoing fans who I respect and admire (especially the away match goers), are far too passive and naive.


Well you have hit the nail on the head. Passive, accepting that OGS is the way & the re-build will take three years+. The Regime are suckering loyal fans into this. Margins are dropping and they are re-aligning spend with that.

We need 000's of match day fans to start calling out Woody & the Glazers. Sorry booing is not enough & if this effects the players, sorry so be it. As many have said rock bottom is not here yet, so lets speed up the process and get out of it quicker. The only way - radical change required.
 
There is not only one 'right manager', there are many that can improve us.

You are not getting it, not me. If the machine is broken, you do nothing ? Is that your solution?

About Klopp - when Liverpool signed him we already had a manager, you don't know the exact details to paint it black and white.

I've made the stance on Glazers and Ed long time ago and say it in every other post that they are one of the biggest problems, but so is Ole is that so difficult to understand?

Ole is also their puppet and protecting him and backing him is essentially backing the Glazers.

Great, at least we could agree on Glazers and Ed being our biggest problem.

Now, about sacking Ole and get a new one:

1. The puppet word is a bit harsh, I would say "in line". The new one must be in line with the Glazers and Ed as well. Otherwise do you think he can get the job?

2. As he is in line with the Glazers and Ed, do you think he's a great manager and our "right manager" ? I'd doubt so. The possibility of him to be great is just too small tbh.

3. Then you'll give the Glazers and Ed at least another one year of "revaluation of the squad and the new manager". No money spent or worse, lot money spent but bad buys. Pretty the same shit as now imo.

Or:

1. Demote Ed to commercial matters only and sack this fecking clueless board immediately. I would like the Glazers to be gone as well but it seems just impossible.

2. Hire a good DOF and make sure the board are fulled with football expert people.

3. Start from that. Look for a new manager if the DOF and new board think Ole is not good enough.

Which one is better in your opinion?

And about Klopp, you can read it here:
https://www.balls.ie/amp/football/jurgen-klopp-man-utd-disneyland-377557
https://www.90min.com/posts/5793228...-outrageous-adult-version-of-disneyland-pitch

There is not many details but fact is he refused us then signed for Liverpool.
 
Last edited:
Great, at least we could agree on Glazers and Ed being our biggest problem.

Now, about sacking Ole and get a new one:

1. The puppet word is a bit harsh, I would say "in line". The new one must be in line with the Glazers and Ed as well. Otherwise do you think he can get the job?

2. As he is in line with the Glazers and Ed, do you think he's a great manager and our "right manager" ? I'd doubt so.

3. Then you'll give the Glazers and Ed at least another one year of "revaluation of the squad and the new manager". No money spent or worse, lot money spent but bad buys.

Or:

1. Demote Ed to commercial matters only and sack this fecking clueless board immediately. I would like the Glazers to be gone as well but it seems just impossible.

2. Hire a good DOF and make sure the board are fulled with football expert people.

3. Start from that. Look for a new manager if the DOF and new board think Ole is not good enough.

Which one is better in your opinion?

1. Ole won't get a top job anywhere bar United. He is much more 'in line' than say Poch who often spoke his mind and stayed at Spurs for more than 5 years.

2. Glazers and Ed aren't footballing guys. The manager is. He is the one who will make the biggest difference on the pitch straight away.

3. I'm not sure where this nonsense is coming from. We have spent and spent every year since Fergie retired. We have spent 150m this Summer, spending isn't our problem, obviously. Just getting good players won't cut it. As I've said players like Maguire, AWB and James - who have looked good initially have regressed in the last couple of months and is visible to see.


1* - Ole is Ed's appointment, sacking him will point the fingers at him, continuing with him is backing him and his 'plan'.

2* - no arguments there, but under Ole this is not on the cards - visible since the last year.

3* - again the Ole 'plan' doesn't include hiring a DoF.
 
I created a thread a good while ago about our apathetic fanbase and that it will actually hinder us in the long-term as we are on a road to nowhere with Woodward and Glazers in charge. I was derided by a good few around here. Don't think anyone would disagree with me now. Until match going fans start protesting and some form of movement gets going, a la green and gold, we will be mired in mediocrity just like Tampa fans are. Glazers couldn't give a monkeys about us.
 
Alot of our fans deserve this mediocrity, they didn't even boo at half time last time. You think that would happen at Barcelona, Bayern or Real?

Old Trafford fans acted like the good little sheep the Glazer's want. So naive it's unreal.
 
This low form has been brewing for years. For me last night I saw the announced team and felt a surge of hatred for the money we’ve wasted over the last five seasons. In that time (before Ole) we’ve spent over half a billion pounds and have nothing (apart from Martial and Pogba) to show for it.

100%. The money wasted on absolute dross over the years has been criminal. Last night was the first time where, watching City score their goals, I was apathetic to it. The team last night was awful.
 
1. Ole won't get a top job anywhere bar United. He is much more 'in line' than say Poch who often spoke his mind and stayed at Spurs for more than 5 years.

2. Glazers and Ed aren't footballing guys. The manager is. He is the one who will make the biggest difference on the pitch straight away.

3. I'm not sure where this nonsense is coming from. We have spent and spent every year since Fergie retired. We have spent 150m this Summer, spending isn't our problem, obviously. Just getting good players won't cut it. As I've said players like Maguire, AWB and James - who have looked good initially have regressed in the last couple of months and is visible to see.


1* - Ole is Ed's appointment, sacking him will point the fingers at him, continuing with him is backing him and his 'plan'.

2* - no arguments there, but under Ole this is not on the cards - visible since the last year.

3* - again the Ole 'plan' doesn't include hiring a DoF.
At this point I'm afraid it's just a waste of time tbh. You seem to not even understand what I said. We'd better stop here mate.

Anyway, back to the topic.

I don't think it's possible to get rid of the Glazers. It's their club. And it costs a fortune. It seems just impossible to get rid of them regardless of how much we hate them.

So, the solution here is to voice our discontent against Ed & co and make the Glazers heard of that. To a point that they'd understand that a change is a must. Especially on Ed stepping down from football matters. And a DoF.
 
The real problem is the Glazers running this club like a business, it worked fine under their dad because he knew that to run a business you have to hire people who do (SAF and Gill) which made the club highly successful.

Now he's passed the club onto his kids they put a banker in charge of the whole operation, it doesn't take a genius to realise what was going to happen.

Now they're in a position where the money is still coming in thanks to the past success, and the club is still valued at 3 billion - so they're milking it because all they see this club as is a cash cow, unfor9they probably think they can still sell it for 3 billion when the club is relegated.

Sad state of affairs for this club until sponsorship starts to dwindle, for that we need to be as vocal as we can, as I read above, no sponsor wants to be associated with a bad brand.
 
At this point I'm afraid it's just a waste of time tbh. You seem to not even understand what I said. We'd better stop here mate.

Anyway, back to the topic.

I don't think it's possible to get rid of the Glazers. It's their club. And it costs a fortune. It seems just impossible to get rid of them regardless of how much we hate them.

So, the solution here is to voice our discontent against Ed & co and make the Glazers heard of that. To a point that they'd understand that a change is a must. Especially on Ed stepping down from football matters. And a DoF.
Let me ask you this, Glazers were here since 2005. We won 5 PL titles, CL and numerous other titles under world class manager. We didn't have a DoF then.

Why is it so difficult to understand that the manager has a large part of how we perform on the field?
 
Problem is sacking Ole and hiring someone else won't solve this. May give a new manager bump but that's all. And would give Ed another year to "evaluate the squad" again without any big buy.

Our true problem is the Glazzers, Ed and the board. Saying #Oleout is actually helping the real culprits imo.

Wow...

If you put ole at madrid, Barcelona, city, or ajax he'll make them midtable.
 
All those clubs have people in charge who breathe football and want glory above profit.

Yeah. And what do they do? Sack the wrong manager, always, first and foremost

But not United. We not only want succes, and a dof, we want everything. We want the dof to take ole by his hand, we want ole to become our next saf, we're longing to be properly managed yet wallow in romantics.
 
I agree. Sure, jeering your own players is not a good look and should only be reserved for extreme circumstances, but the manner in which some fans are just fine with how things are going disgusts me.

It's almost as if there's an unwritten rule within our fanbase, especially those who are influential and belongs to a certain demographic, that you're automatically a better fan if you just chant about our past glory for ninety minutes and shut up otherwise. Noisy Nigerian fans, red-eyed Chinese fans and matchgoing fans on the brink of giving up their season tickets demanding change? 'Nah, we could do without them. Spoiled twats. They're not real fans.' You see this stuff on Twitter every time.

Feck right off.

Always the oot to blame.

I doubt there so many out of uk fans in that stadium, not in the numbers that can drive old trafford somewhere.

You'd think coming to UK and actually got a ticket to a derby is for anyone.
 
Is the stretford occupied by mostly locals? I presume most of them would be local season ticket holders?
If stretty is empty in a big game, that would send a clear enough message i think.
 
There's no way this thread will descend into local and foreign United fans exchanging barbs about how best to behave at Old Trafford. No sirree.

Heh. I think for an armchair fan its hard to understand that the actual football is quite a small part of match going fans experience. For them its turning the tv on just before the match and back off again after so their priorities are totally different. A regular who goes to the pub with their mates beforehand singing songs, gets some food outside the ground, sits in with people they know, goes back to the pub after etc etc etc. The two types of fans are totally different in their support and will likely rarely agree.
 
Always the oot to blame.

I doubt there so many out of uk fans in that stadium, not in the numbers that can drive old trafford somewhere.

You'd think coming to UK and actually got a ticket to a derby is for anyone.

Scandinavian supports club is pretty massive but still not enough.
 
Then you'll give the Glazers and Ed at least another one year of "revaluation of the squad and the new manager". No money spent or worse, lot money spent but bad buys. Pretty the same shit as now imo.
I'm not sure where this nonsense is coming from. We have spent and spent every year since Fergie retired. We have spent 150m this Summer, spending isn't our problem, obviously. Just getting good players won't cut it. As I've said players like Maguire, AWB and James - who have looked good initially have regressed in the last couple of months and is visible to see.

It's not nonsense.

The club themselves said we are in a rebuild phase.

That means you re build- invest money.

You don't say I want to rebuild my house, spend over the top on heating and sell the electrical goods and say but we spent alot on the heating.

In a rebuild - if you sell (Lukaku, Herrera) you have to at the least replace them and add.

The club spend £50m net spend a year and fans think ohh we spend so much money.
 
There is not only one 'right manager', there are many that can improve us.

You are not getting it, not me. If the machine is broken, you do nothing ? Is that your solution?

About Klopp - when Liverpool signed him we already had a manager, you don't know the exact details to paint it black and white.

I've made the stance on Glazers and Ed long time ago and say it in every other post that they are one of the biggest problems, but so is Ole is that so difficult to understand?

Ole is also their puppet and protecting him and backing him is essentially backing the Glazers.

This is what grinds my gear, people keep talking about the "Klopp reject us and go to Liverpool" without any context.

When we appointed Moyes, Klopp was still doing fine with Dortmund and, as a football man, it's quite hard to make him left Dortmund. Liverpool didn't get him at that time either.

When Klopp finally left Dortmund, we already appointed LVG.

When Klopp went to Liverpool, LVG finished top 4 last season and started that season pretty positive (we were top 3 with just some points of top), no way we can justify sacking LVG at that time to appoint Klopp.

So, all in all, Klopp is our missed chances, but saying he rejected us to go to Liverpool is just wrong.
 
It's not nonsense.

The club themselves said we are in a rebuild phase.

That means you re build- invest money.

You don't say I want to rebuild my house, spend over the top on heating and sell the electrical goods and say but we spent alot on the heating.

In a rebuild - if you sell (Lukaku, Herrera) you have to at the least replace them and add.

The club spend £50m net spend a year and fans think ohh we spend so much money.
The club spent 75m net if we are to be exact.

Moreover lot is spouted on how much Jose spent(rightfully so of course), but let me ask you this - how does Jose's spending look like if he decided to sell Pogba and Lukaku last Summer?

Considering Pogba is 100m and more asset and Lukaku was sold roughly for 75m pounds?

He'd break even...

Fact is we had 150m(175m EUR) pounds for a rebuild, we decided to spend it on 3 players, net or not.

What did people expect? 300m to be available?

You can buy a whole team with 175m EUR from the continent if you ditch the Brexit ideology that could easily beat our best current side.
 
This is what grinds my gear, people keep talking about the "Klopp reject us and go to Liverpool" without any context.

When we appointed Moyes, Klopp was still doing fine with Dortmund and, as a football man, it's quite hard to make him left Dortmund. Liverpool didn't get him at that time either.

When Klopp finally left Dortmund, we already appointed LVG.

When Klopp went to Liverpool, LVG finished top 4 last season and started that season pretty positive (we were top 3 with just some points of top), no way we can justify sacking LVG at that time to appoint Klopp.

So, all in all, Klopp is our missed chances, but saying he rejected us to go to Liverpool is just wrong.
Of course. Klopp rejecting us is a nonsense. What we should've done is hired Jose when we hired Moyes, then after 3-4 seasons of him challenging for top honours (he did win the PL at the time and he would've had a championship winning team at his disposal) we should've hired a young progressive coach like Nagelsmann, Ten Hag or Rose...
 
Home fans should remain silent for 5 mins at the start of next match as a sign of protest against how the club is being run.
 
Glazers certainly aren't going to just leave without someone buying the club. The best thing is for them to appoint a DOF and get rid of Solskjaer at the end of the season.
 
The club spent 75m net if we are to be exact.

Moreover lot is spouted on how much Jose spent(rightfully so of course), but let me ask you this - how does Jose's spending look like if he decided to sell Pogba and Lukaku last Summer?

Considering Pogba is 100m and more asset and Lukaku was sold roughly for 75m pounds?

He'd break even...

Fact is we had 150m(175m EUR) pounds for a rebuild, we decided to spend it on 3 players, net or not.

What did people expect? 300m to be available?

You can buy a whole team with 175m EUR from the continent if you ditch the Brexit ideology that could easily beat our best current side.


It must be me being daft or naive but this is what I expect:

April / May - Ole and Ed to sit down and discuss the transfer market. Ed will obviously say something in the lines of, we have £150m to spend plus whatever we make from selling players.

Ole has an idea that £150m is what I have and I need 5 players.

Then you don't go and splash all £130m on 2 players would you? you would look at alternatives.

And if we had £150m to spend, with the sell of Lukaku and others there was still another £75m left to be spent?

I am sure you can get 2 decent midfielders for that much considering Tilemans release clause was £40m

Some fans are acting as if Ole said I want Maguire, AWB and then Ed said good now you have reached your limit sorry.

So now this season we have to go spend another £150m, so myt question is why not spend £200m in one window and less the window after?
 
I went last night and instead of booing I was already in the queue for a beer.

Sorry if I've let the club down lads. Will try harder next week.
 
This is what grinds my gear, people keep talking about the "Klopp reject us and go to Liverpool" without any context.

When we appointed Moyes, Klopp was still doing fine with Dortmund and, as a football man, it's quite hard to make him left Dortmund. Liverpool didn't get him at that time either.

When Klopp finally left Dortmund, we already appointed LVG.

When Klopp went to Liverpool, LVG finished top 4 last season and started that season pretty positive (we were top 3 with just some points of top), no way we can justify sacking LVG at that time to appoint Klopp.

So, all in all, Klopp is our missed chances, but saying he rejected us to go to Liverpool is just wrong.

Klopp is just an example, the reality is that any manager worth their salt won’t want to come here due to the setup of the club. That’s due to the owners and Ed Woodward. We can go through another 4 managers and it’ll be the same story over and over again. And the fans will want each manager sacked, over and over again. It never ends.