redshaw
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
- Messages
- 9,951
Last two Wed 245 and 359
Last two Wed 245 and 359
Yes, that’s why they’re spiking now. Several places are hitting their highest number of cases even when accounting for increased testing. It is happening all across the southern half of the US.Weren't the numbers still going up when they reopened in parts of the US?
That's good. Nice oneHe is okay, he was ill after we met up, this led him to get a test. He's totally fine now. Got off lucky.
Yes, that’s why they’re spiking now. Several places are hitting their highest number of cases even when accounting for increased testing. It is happening all across the southern half of the US.
We’re trying to make sure Brazil doesn’t pass us in numbers or incompetence; we have to be the best at everything.
This surge in southern/hot regions is the final nail in the coffin of the idea that warm weather would be the undoing of the virus.
I believe it is, and in addition the places in question range from sub-tropical forest/coastal humidity to semi-arid. Thus, there is little to no evidence of a correlation to humidity either like some think might influence common viruses.This surge in southern/hot regions is the final nail in the coffin of the idea that warm weather would be the undoing of the virus.
The Manchester rave season restarts with two parties, one death, three stabbings and a rape. Probably fair to say that social distancing wasn't high on the agenda.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-53040827
I believe it is, and in addition the places in question range from sub-tropical forest/coastal humidity to semi-arid. Thus, there is little to no evidence of a correlation to humidity either like some think might influence common viruses.
At this rate we won’t see a ‘second wave’ here, it will be a plateau that rises again when they re-open bars, schools, and football stadiums towards the end of summer. I try not to fear monger, but this aspect of the virus scares me a bit for my country where wearing a mask can make you a target for abuse.
Fecking hell, just read this. Cant believe people are actually this braindead and willing to risk lives like that
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavi...tion-for-about-a-year-says-drugmaker-12007789
So first I've seen of this. Chief exec of AstraZeneca (who are producing the Oxford vaccine) are saying it will only provide protection for a year. So it may not be the magic bullet that people hoped. Furthermore, they are now saying potentially October rather than September
That sounds good to me. Also, given the noises about old cold viruses giving partial protection, could there be some ongoing protection that's less than full immunity after a year? That way annual boosters could be prioritized for the elderly and vulnerable, with 2 or 3 yearly cycles for the rest.
A very big well done to Marcus Rashford for raising the profile of this subject.
A long time ago when I was at school, I benefitted from free school meals.
My father died when I was 10 and my mother was a single parent with 4 young children to bring up.
Every Monday, when the other children in my class paid for their school meals, the teacher made a point of saying to me when he called out the names, 'oh yes. You don't pay for yours'.
And I remember very well one particular time when I didn't eat something, a teacher pulled me by my ear to the front of the canteen and told everybody 'this boy who doesn't even pay for his school meals doesn't like the free food he is given'.
It was so embarrassing. But I just had to get used to it.
It won't need to get to everyone immediately.You’d imagine so. “About a year” is a movable feast. It’s not like you‘ll get to 364 days, then lose immunity overnight.
As with all vaccines, it’s getting it into people that will be the challenge. If you could create a vaccine that gives 100% immunity and give it to everyone then you could eradicate the virus from your country completely even if it only made you immune for a few months.
Apart from countries where it’s got a foothold in bats etc. anyway. The fact this virus can live in animals makes complete eradication pretty much impossible.
Governments could make it a mandatory shot to take when leaving or entering a country, the onus could be placed on the travel companies to ensure passengers have had there shots by the passenger having a stamp or an electronic stamp on there passports.You’d imagine so. “About a year” is a movable feast. It’s not like you‘ll get to 364 days, then lose immunity overnight.
As with all vaccines, it’s getting it into people that will be the challenge. If you could create a vaccine that gives 100% immunity and give it to everyone then you could eradicate the virus from your country completely even if it only made you immune for a few months.
Apart from countries where it’s got a foothold in bats etc. anyway. The fact this virus can live in animals makes complete eradication pretty much impossible.
Thats a bummer Wibble, hope some sort of solution appears to change thatAustralia is unlikely to allow international travel barring maybe with NZ until 2021. Looks like I won't be seeing the offspring any time soon![]()
Thats a bummer Wibble, hope some sort of solution appears to change that
Governments could make it a mandatory shot to take when leaving or entering a country, the onus could be placed on the travel companies to ensure passengers have had there shots by the passenger having a stamp or an electronic stamp on there passports.
I was kind of talking about after that in the eradication process and prevention process, that will force anti vaxers to get the jab if they want to enter or exit the country, make it mandatory especially on island nations like ours where where it should be possible to regulate thatSurely the best thing to do would be to get it out in care homes first.
Then roll it out to everyone else on the flu jab register.
Anti vaxers make up a small proportion of society. Plus I wonder how many will change their views of a Vivid vaccine means they keep their job etc. |
Speaking of vaccines...
It's a depressing story. I think some people initially had the vague hope that, "they were going to die this month anyway, it just changed the wording of the death certificate."Pretty interesting article and stats on excess deaths during the Coronavirus pandemic.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-53073046
I remember the assertion on here that it was the wildlife and not the general unsanitary conditions in wet markets that caused the virus outbreak. The latest cluster in Beijing has occurred in a market with no wildlife section:
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/soc...oronavirus-cases-rise-137-restrictions-return
It's most likely neither. These markets are hubs because there is a large concentration of people, the virus doesn't have to come from the market for the market to be the center of the outbreak, it just needs one person, probably a seller/producer, to be infected. These markets are everywhere and pretty much the norm in most poor countries and you don't actually see that many virus outbreaks linked with them.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ses-after-women-arrive-from-uk-carrying-virus
"The pair were released early from government quarantine and permitted to drive from the city of Auckland to Wellington, the capital – nearly 650km away – before being diagnosed or even tested, health officials said."
SARS 2 was definitely present in the Pangolins being sold in Wuhan, with a high probability it first made the jump to humans from there.
SARS 1 was traced back to Civet cats being sold in a wet market and SARS 2 was definitely present in the Pangolins being sold in Wuhan, with a high probability it first made the jump to humans from there.
Was it? I haven't seen this confirmed anywhere? Do you have a source?
Was it? I haven't seen this confirmed anywhere? Do you have a source?