SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Over 53k confirmed cases reported today. :(
 
Last edited:
Our government

....

Reminds me of this :D:
giphy.gif
 
Its a bit of both. Mental how quickly its going up.

But then again people are fecking stupid.
Yeah. I needed to go in to my local town centre to post something and it was crazy - like a normal day! People out eating food from the various vans, masks on only maybe 10% outside and probably 60% (worn correctly) inside, absolutely no social distancing. It’s a real shit show at the moment.
 
A very crude calculation is total positive tests vs total hospitalised which would be roughly around 10% obviously there is deaths and people that weren't tested or didn't go for one to take into account, also age of infected makes a huge difference.

A reasonable estimate would be between 5-10% i guess.
Yeah it really depends on the age profile of infections. This is the latest data released by the ONS up to the 13th December, where you have the the familiar diverging stories: most people getting infected are younger, but most people going to hospitals are older. Unfortunately, infections among the older age groups are increasing vs. the prior week. And we have every reason to expect infections among older people to increase the most over the holidays.


If we keep seeing more people 45+ getting infected then we will see larger proportions hospitalised and higher average mortality rates. The growing hospitalisation rate pre-Christmas for folks aged 85+ was a legitimate problem. For the week ending 29th November, for every 100,000 85+ year olds in the country, 139 of them were hospitalised with covid. The following week it had increased to 147, and the next week it had increased to 173. That was a couple of weeks pre-Christmas. They just weren't as well shielded as before.

If you take a rough overall estimate from cases and hospitalisation rate, there were 20k cases on the 8th December and 2,000 people hospitalised with covid on the 15th December (allowing for a c. 7-day lag). If you go back to the beginning of November, there were 16,000 cases on the 1st and and 1,700 hospitalisations on the 8th. So about 10% of people would go to hospital, and it varies somewhere in that 5-10% range depending on the age profile, the hospital situation etc. So the 40k cases a day would likely bring us up above our 3,000 hospitalisations a day peak from back in April, just next week, which fits with early reports of hospitals saying they're already above their peak.
Thanks, both of you. @Brwned , those figures over 3000 hospitalizations are particularly concerning, even more so considering we have over 50000 new cases today.
I think I'm still in shock no further lockdown ( a proper one, at least matching those in France, Germany, Spain and Italy) has been announced.
 
No chance you can say excess deaths and use that. The figure won't be the same each year, so that's not a good stat. Its fear mongering.
That's not true, actually. Because they're compared against averages.
Yep. I work with the people who produce those numbers here in Canada; it's actually even a little more complex. They look at long-term death numbers for the period in question, and also take demographic changes into account (how the population's size and make-up change due to deaths, births, and migration). Based on that, they calculate the range of expected deaths (the expected average, and the plus/minus ranges; see for example the Statistics Canada graph). The difference between the actual number of deaths and this expected average then produces the excess deaths number.

Of course, there are a few footnotes to that number. First, as I said, there is a range of expected deaths. Only one excess deaths number is provided, and that's based on the average number of expected deaths (i.e., the middle of the range); but the actual number of excess deaths could be anything between the top or bottom of the range of expected deaths. And second, the excess deaths number lacks context. Because of the lockdowns and hygiene measures, some diseases are not spreading as much as usual. For example, the flu season is reduced, and has led to reduced flu deaths. And as people are staying home, they are less likely to get into a car accident - and so on. On the other hand, due to the lockdowns, a lot of regular health care (like surgery, regular appointments and preventive screenings) have been suspended, leading to additional deaths, which are not directly caused by COVID-19 but are nonetheless caused by the pandemic.

It's hard to say what the exact impact is of each of those footnotes. But as a general indicator, the excess deaths number is much more interesting than the 'simple' number of COVID-19 deaths, which is certainly an underestimate (as people are not tested for COVID-19 consistently) and incomparable across countries (as different countries have different rules for when to attribute a death to COVID-19).
 
Thanks, both of you. @Brwned , those figures over 3000 hospitalizations are particularly concerning, even more so considering we have over 50000 new cases today.
I think I'm still in shock no further lockdown ( a proper one, at least matching those in France, Germany, Spain and Italy) has been announced.
It’s just a matter of time now imho. We’re just slow and indecisive
 
Apparently they’re holding a meeting to discuss new tiers tomorrow, I’d be surprised if most of the uk isn’t just put into tier 4 It’s spiralling out of control again
 
Yes, and that’s not wishing death on her family. That you then tagged a staff member about it is baffling. I feel sorry for the admin, you probably tag him a dozen times a day

I don’t disagree with what you’ve said here (although earlier you equated not wearing a mask to living your life, which is odd), but taking a flippant and irreverent comment and trying to turn it into something more is stupid.

Can we agree the guys below wish them love, prosperity and long life? :)

Anyway, let's move on.

Young girl on the news a day or two ago wasnt wearing a mask out shopping, the reporter asked if was concerned about catching covid.

'Not really, I'm young so it won't really affect me'

How i hope she gets it and suffers badly.

Right there with you.

Willfully ignorant decisions have consequences.

It probably won’t be her that suffers, but a beloved member of her family. Hope that family member’s death devastates this idiot.
 
Apparently they’re holding a meeting to discuss new tiers tomorrow, I’d be surprised if most of the uk isn’t just put into tier 4 It’s spiralling out of control again
Yeah they are. Hancock will be announcing the changes at 3PM tomorrow.

From what I’ve seen it’s suggesting the midlands and more of the north in tier 4.
 
Thanks, both of you. @Brwned , those figures over 3000 hospitalizations are particularly concerning, even more so considering we have over 50000 new cases today.
I think I'm still in shock no further lockdown ( a proper one, at least matching those in France, Germany, Spain and Italy) has been announced.

I get the impression there's still a lot of support for a regional approach, or resentment for region x being "punished" for region y's high case numbers. People don't really want to look at it from a national perspective. Once you move to the local perspective, people adapt to that. Folks in the north saying we spent ages in the highest tier, got things back down, and now the southerners are screwing things up we get screwed again. Folks in the south west saying we've kept things under some control the entire time and you're killing our businesses all over again because folks on the other side of the country are out galivanting etc.

There's a lot of blame culture and regional politics that make the national lockdown seem less viable for many. And the government have lost a shitload more credibility from a low base just in the last month, so it's hard to know what kind of reaction it would be met with. I'm sure the behavioural science folks are worried at this point it might just push people in the other direction: if they're locking us down again, clearly lockdowns don't work, and why did they open things up at Christmas, what's all this bollocks about new strains, I'm not having it any more.

It's not a good excuse for delaying things, that only makes things worse, but it seems plausible to me that the situation is bad enough on multiple dimensions that when they do finally take action, it won't work this time round. It's hard to know who's the silent majority and loud minority any more. The mood definitely seems very different in here, which was already disproportionately "pro-lockdown".
 
My Mate just text me and told me his GF tested positive and he cant understand how as she only saw her family and his family over christmas eve and christmas day - just the 12 people. FOR F**K SAKE!!!

I mean this is an intelligent man saying this to me. Now they have brought it to our village. Thanks man.
 
France - 3K today. 364 deaths.

The ratio deaths/case is so different for each country.

Very difficult to interpret data and make international comparisons.

If you control for the time delays (c. 2-3 weeks between deaths and cases), age profiles (people 65+ are over 100x more likely to die than 18-29 year olds) and comorbidities, the mortality rate is mostly very consistent across countries. The only thing that tends to influence things beyond that is how people report cases (e.g. Russia's recent acknowldegment of under-reporting). You shouldn't be looking at the cases and deaths ratio on the same day because people don't die the day they're diagnosed, they're both lagging indicators with significantly different lags.
 
If you control for the time delays (c. 2-3 weeks between deaths and cases), age profiles (people 65+ are over 100x more likely to die than 18-29 year olds) and comorbidities, the mortality rate is mostly very consistent across countries. The only thing that tends to influence things beyond that is how people report cases (e.g. Russia's recent acknowldegment of under-reporting). You shouldn't be looking at the cases and deaths ratio on the same day because people don't die the day they're diagnosed, they're both lagging indicators with significantly different lags.

Thanks. You're absolutely right. I have made a schoolboy error!
 
The way the Tories have handled this whole thing has been a disgrace. Should see them unelectable for the foreseeable but obviously that's impossible.

We had an advantage over other countries in that we're an island and we should have closed the borders way back at the start of March or even earlier even. No flights in or out (allowances of course for Brit nationals abroad etc). An extremely stringent lockdown put in place right from the start that was actually enforced. No rush to open pubs and hospitality. No summer jollies abroad to packed beaches in Spain et al. No 'it's christmas time so we'll ignore the virus exists for a few days, go mix and be happy' crap.

Just an absolute shambles.
 
My Mate just text me and told me his GF tested positive and he cant understand how as she only saw her family and his family over christmas eve and christmas day - just the 12 people. FOR F**K SAKE!!!

I mean this is an intelligent man saying this to me. Now they have brought it to our village. Thanks man.

Apparently hundreds of today’s cases in Ireland have between 10 and 30 close contacts. All very well moaning about the government but that’s fecking ridiculous behaviour.
 
Chile said on Tuesday it had recorded its first case of the British variant of coronavirus, prompting health authorities to reinstate a mandatory quarantine period for all visitors entering the South American nation from abroad. The variant, which could be up to 70% more transmissible, has spread rapidly from Britain, where it was first identified, to countries across the globe, including Pakistan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada and Israel, among others.
 
Increasingly likely that schools will be closed. Or at least be postponed.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-possible-new-covid-restrictions-source-says

Dr Michael Tildesley, of the University of Warwick, who is part of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, which also feeds into Sage, said he had not heard anything about a “tier 5” but that it seems likely that if any extra measures were taken, these might include schools and universities closing.

“In terms of tier 4, it doesn’t appear to be effective in those parts of the country where the new variant is circulating, but we will learn more over the next week or so,” he said.

The move to close schools has been backed by Dr Nick Davies, another member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling and an author of the recent analysis.

“If our parameter estimates are correct … it seems like [tier 4] alone isn’t enough, so something else might need to be done on top of that. And we’ve looked at school closures because that’s sort of the next obvious thing to do on top of those restrictions,” he said, although he added that the evidence around schools closing is unclear.

Schools closed for the majority of pupils during the first lockdown in the spring, while the other restrictions included the edict to venture outside only once a day for exercise, leave home only for essentials, and for all non-essential shops and places of worship to close.


Yep. I work with the people who produce those numbers here in Canada; it's actually even a little more complex. They look at long-term death numbers for the period in question, and also take demographic changes into account (how the population's size and make-up change due to deaths, births, and migration). Based on that, they calculate the range of expected deaths (the expected average, and the plus/minus ranges; see for example the Statistics Canada graph). The difference between the actual number of deaths and this expected average then produces the excess deaths number.

Of course, there are a few footnotes to that number. First, as I said, there is a range of expected deaths. Only one excess deaths number is provided, and that's based on the average number of expected deaths (i.e., the middle of the range); but the actual number of excess deaths could be anything between the top or bottom of the range of expected deaths. And second, the excess deaths number lacks context. Because of the lockdowns and hygiene measures, some diseases are not spreading as much as usual. For example, the flu season is reduced, and has led to reduced flu deaths. And as people are staying home, they are less likely to get into a car accident - and so on. On the other hand, due to the lockdowns, a lot of regular health care (like surgery, regular appointments and preventive screenings) have been suspended, leading to additional deaths, which are not directly caused by COVID-19 but are nonetheless caused by the pandemic.

It's hard to say what the exact impact is of each of those footnotes. But as a general indicator, the excess deaths number is much more interesting than the 'simple' number of COVID-19 deaths, which is certainly an underestimate (as people are not tested for COVID-19 consistently) and incomparable across countries (as different countries have different rules for when to attribute a death to COVID-19).
Yeah. The trend is consistent in most countries I've bothered to check around the world. If anything, we're undercounting the number of deaths.

Good point about the reduced deaths from other causes not being accounted for as well. People staying home means less accidents, less flu, etc.


The Empire Strikes Back!! :devil:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Last edited:
We should carry on doing nothing different for a few more days, just to make completely sure the hospitals wont be able to cope.

Then around NYE or start of the new year, the government can announce a bunch of new measures and act as if the surge in cases was completely unforseeable and hadn't been predicted by anyone. Just make sure it's announced too late to stop anyone partying and infecting their relatives on NYE itself.

If only it was possible to forsee in some way that a variant of the virus that has been present in London for months would somehow spread to other areas of the country, where thousands of people from London travel to and from every day.
 
My Mate just text me and told me his GF tested positive and he cant understand how as she only saw her family and his family over christmas eve and christmas day - just the 12 people. FOR F**K SAKE!!!

I mean this is an intelligent man saying this to me. Now they have brought it to our village. Thanks man.
Crap. I thought gatherings were banned? I guess this means the tier restrictions are useless because people blatantly ignore it.

Maybe provide a tip hotline to report offenders with a 100 pound reward if true. That would solve a lot of problems with idiots.
 
My Mate just text me and told me his GF tested positive and he cant understand how as she only saw her family and his family over christmas eve and christmas day - just the 12 people. FOR F**K SAKE!!!

I mean this is an intelligent man saying this to me. Now they have brought it to our village. Thanks man.
Intelligent man with a lack of common sense or logic
 
Can we agree the guys below wish them love, prosperity and long life? :)

Anyway, let's move on.

I didn’t say they wished them love, I said they didn’t wish death on her family, which is what you claimed. This is like the third time I’ve had to explain this to you ye damn tool.

Anyway, let’s move on. Wishing you love, prosperity and a long life :)
 
Crap. I thought gatherings were banned? I guess this means the tier restrictions are useless because people blatantly ignore it.

Maybe provide a tip hotline to report offenders with a 100 pound reward if true. That would solve a lot of problems with idiots.
He’s in ireland
 
We should carry on doing nothing different for a few more days, just to make completely sure the hospitals wont be able to cope.

Then around NYE or start of the new year, the government can announce a bunch of new measures and act as if the surge in cases was completely unforseeable and hadn't been predicted by anyone. Just make sure it's announced too late to stop anyone partying and infecting their relatives on NYE itself.

If only it was possible to forsee in some way that a variant of the virus that has been present in London for months would somehow spread to other areas of the country, where thousands of people from London travel to and from every day.
I'm still shocked that they found it in Sept and it was spreading for 3 months before they realised it was a problem and did something. I thought they were boasting about all their testing, and all the forensic and epidemiological work.

Intelligent man with a lack of common sense or logic
Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification.
 
I'd actually forgotten we still have NYE to come. :nervous:

Yep. Today has been a real eye opener. I live in a small village on a National trust estate and although the NT have closed the park off there are numerous footpaths in from the village. Literally hordes of people today, so many I can’t even describe it without it sounding like hyperbole. It’s snowed really heavily here and I went outside at one point and there must have been 12 - 15 people all in a huge group, completely taking the whole pavement up and you could see their breath clouds all mingling. Do these dolts not read or watch the news? >50k new infections, a number that was scoffed at when Sage predicted it in October.

Wherever I looked today, I saw people just not being careful. As usual, us residents just stayed in.
 
Last edited:
All I know is if I was to take a dozen random pictures of Belfast city centre just before Christmas you would not find 90% of people wearing masks in and out of shops, and if you have anyone in your family working in hospitality or retail you would have no shortage of stories every day of the pains they have to go to reminding people to put their masks on, keep their distance, etc. So again it's about the proportions you deem acceptable here. "By and large", "fantastic compliance" etc. are quite vague descriptions of quantitative measurements, so you might be seeing the same thing other people are seeing but describing it differently because they are imprecise descriptions on both sides, and you have different expectations.

Personally I would expect 100% adherence to masks by this point so 80%, while a big improvement on the summer, is still unacceptably poor. 90% is acceptable. 99% is fantastic. Imperfection is just a part of life. Social distancing is harder to say because they're context-dependent but I would say the majority in supermarkets I've been to don't make much effort to distance. There aren't mass crowds because there are fewer people but there are still people impatiently squeezing through busy aisles, some have no problem brushing up against you because they feel entitled to walk through that space at that time, and lots of people walk around as if they're unaware of their surroundings and the moment they're in.

I get the desire for normality. Many of the spaces we've been going to for years are shut off from us, so in the few places we're allowed to go back to we would like to act relatively normally, if we have to put on a mask then fine but I'm not going to space myself out on an escalator, wait for people to go past in the aisles, etc. That's how it comes across and it isn't an uncommon thing where I'm at.

The reality is we live in a global world and can see how other citizens have adhered. It is the case that many countries in the East have seen more rigorous adherence, and it has had a positive effect on transmission. They hold themselves to higher standards in this regard, in large part because the social pressure forces them to. That social pressure is uncomfortable but it isn't unkind. There is this idea that saying people are doing the wrong thing is unkind, but the counter-argument is that doing the wrong thing is itself unkind to other citizens.

I agree with you that there are a lot of people that seem unhealthily angry at the world, and seeking out that information verges on masochism at points. Then again I just assume that is mostly just their coping mechanism at the moment. We all have to have some kind of coping mechanism. It helps you cope to focus on most people complying but some people need a different kind of focus to help them get by. But I don't think pointing out the imperfections in society's response that you see in every day life are all like that. I'm not angry at people, but I think it's both necessary and healthy to expect more from our citizens at the moment. Things are getting worse so we need to make more sacrifices. That's unfortunate but true. You can blame the government while still demanding more from individuals.

You see, in my experience I’d say that 9/10 folk wearing masks when in the supermarket is about par for the course. I’m not going to pretend that my anecdotal evidence is worth a jot, mind. It will certainly vary from person to person. On the whole, however, I don’t conduct my day-to-day activities and feel as if people are being reckless, or behaving with a total disregard for the safety of others. As I’ve said several times now, I think people, generally, are trying their best to get through this. I agree with the tone of your post more generally, however. What I’m finding a little tedious, mind you, is this sort of thing...

Yeah. I needed to go in to my local town centre to post something and it was crazy - like a normal day! People out eating food from the various vans, masks on only maybe 10% outside and probably 60% (worn correctly) inside, absolutely no social distancing. It’s a real shit show at the moment.

I really don’t mean to get at you but what is your issue here? If it is people (en masse) not wearing masks, or refusing to display good manners in a shop, then you’re well within your rights to feel distressed. But let’s get it right: people eating takeaway food from a van is absolutely fine. People walking around a town centre is absolutely fine and well within what the public has been instructed to do (area dependent). Or is it only acceptable to do so when somebody such as yourself decides that they need to post something? I mean, now we’ve started to dissect the decision making of others re. eating food from takeaway vans, it really begs the question as to whether or not you really needed to post whatever it is that required posting. Am I being unfair? Of course I am. I’m being a bit of twat. But this is the kind of discourse that we really need to nip in the bud: there are people milling around that town centre who are going about their business no differently to you; perhaps trying to maintain some semblance of normality or routine. That shouldn’t be discouraged until the government make an executive (belated?) decision to demand that they stop doing those things.

And while I’m at it, without meaning to discredit what you’re saying, if only 6 out of 10 people were wearing masks inside of shops then I’d be very alarmed as to what they’re putting in the water wherever you happen to live. I walked around a busy city centre last night (I wanted some new work clothes for next week - was this allowed?) and there is no way that 40% of people weren’t wearing masks inside. Anecdotal again, mind you, but you see my point.
 
Are people really getting worked up about posters saying they hope some totally random person on a news report suffers with covid because they are ignorant about wearing a mask and taking precautions?

Who cares.
 
Are people really getting worked up about posters saying they hope some totally random person on a news report suffers with covid because they are ignorant about wearing a mask and taking precautions?

Who cares.

Pointing out that it’s more than a little strange is perfectly reasonable.
 
Pointing out that it’s more than a little strange is perfectly reasonable.

But really who cares? Are we getting offended on other people's behalf again. People who we don't even know and don't even know us or never will. Random people from the TV.

Then you have posters angling for mods to punish people. Feck me :lol:
 
But really who cares? Are we getting offended on other people's behalf again. People who we don't even know and don't even know us or never will. Random people from the TV.

Then you have posters angling for mods to punish people. Feck me :lol:

Some people care more than others, I guess. It doesn’t bother me; I do think it’s objectively strange, however. If you’re going to say really silly things every time you see somebody doing something that might contravene any sort of guidance then you’d be best locking yourself away and turning off the television for another year or so. It’s unhealthy.