Roger
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2001
- Messages
- 2,593
Over 53k confirmed cases reported today. 
Last edited:
Christmas lag or just the way it’s going?
Yeah. I needed to go in to my local town centre to post something and it was crazy - like a normal day! People out eating food from the various vans, masks on only maybe 10% outside and probably 60% (worn correctly) inside, absolutely no social distancing. It’s a real shit show at the moment.Its a bit of both. Mental how quickly its going up.
But then again people are fecking stupid.
A very crude calculation is total positive tests vs total hospitalised which would be roughly around 10% obviously there is deaths and people that weren't tested or didn't go for one to take into account, also age of infected makes a huge difference.
A reasonable estimate would be between 5-10% i guess.
Thanks, both of you. @Brwned , those figures over 3000 hospitalizations are particularly concerning, even more so considering we have over 50000 new cases today.Yeah it really depends on the age profile of infections. This is the latest data released by the ONS up to the 13th December, where you have the the familiar diverging stories: most people getting infected are younger, but most people going to hospitals are older. Unfortunately, infections among the older age groups are increasing vs. the prior week. And we have every reason to expect infections among older people to increase the most over the holidays.
If we keep seeing more people 45+ getting infected then we will see larger proportions hospitalised and higher average mortality rates. The growing hospitalisation rate pre-Christmas for folks aged 85+ was a legitimate problem. For the week ending 29th November, for every 100,000 85+ year olds in the country, 139 of them were hospitalised with covid. The following week it had increased to 147, and the next week it had increased to 173. That was a couple of weeks pre-Christmas. They just weren't as well shielded as before.
If you take a rough overall estimate from cases and hospitalisation rate, there were 20k cases on the 8th December and 2,000 people hospitalised with covid on the 15th December (allowing for a c. 7-day lag). If you go back to the beginning of November, there were 16,000 cases on the 1st and and 1,700 hospitalisations on the 8th. So about 10% of people would go to hospital, and it varies somewhere in that 5-10% range depending on the age profile, the hospital situation etc. So the 40k cases a day would likely bring us up above our 3,000 hospitalisations a day peak from back in April, just next week, which fits with early reports of hospitals saying they're already above their peak.
No chance you can say excess deaths and use that. The figure won't be the same each year, so that's not a good stat. Its fear mongering.
Yep. I work with the people who produce those numbers here in Canada; it's actually even a little more complex. They look at long-term death numbers for the period in question, and also take demographic changes into account (how the population's size and make-up change due to deaths, births, and migration). Based on that, they calculate the range of expected deaths (the expected average, and the plus/minus ranges; see for example the Statistics Canada graph). The difference between the actual number of deaths and this expected average then produces the excess deaths number.That's not true, actually. Because they're compared against averages.
It’s just a matter of time now imho. We’re just slow and indecisiveThanks, both of you. @Brwned , those figures over 3000 hospitalizations are particularly concerning, even more so considering we have over 50000 new cases today.
I think I'm still in shock no further lockdown ( a proper one, at least matching those in France, Germany, Spain and Italy) has been announced.
Yes, and that’s not wishing death on her family. That you then tagged a staff member about it is baffling. I feel sorry for the admin, you probably tag him a dozen times a day
I don’t disagree with what you’ve said here (although earlier you equated not wearing a mask to living your life, which is odd), but taking a flippant and irreverent comment and trying to turn it into something more is stupid.
Young girl on the news a day or two ago wasnt wearing a mask out shopping, the reporter asked if was concerned about catching covid.
'Not really, I'm young so it won't really affect me'
How i hope she gets it and suffers badly.
Right there with you.
Willfully ignorant decisions have consequences.
It probably won’t be her that suffers, but a beloved member of her family. Hope that family member’s death devastates this idiot.
Yeah they are. Hancock will be announcing the changes at 3PM tomorrow.Apparently they’re holding a meeting to discuss new tiers tomorrow, I’d be surprised if most of the uk isn’t just put into tier 4 It’s spiralling out of control again
Thanks, both of you. @Brwned , those figures over 3000 hospitalizations are particularly concerning, even more so considering we have over 50000 new cases today.
I think I'm still in shock no further lockdown ( a proper one, at least matching those in France, Germany, Spain and Italy) has been announced.
53K today. 414 deaths.
France - 3K today. 364 deaths.
The ratio deaths/case is so different for each country.
Very difficult to interpret data and make international comparisons.
If you control for the time delays (c. 2-3 weeks between deaths and cases), age profiles (people 65+ are over 100x more likely to die than 18-29 year olds) and comorbidities, the mortality rate is mostly very consistent across countries. The only thing that tends to influence things beyond that is how people report cases (e.g. Russia's recent acknowldegment of under-reporting). You shouldn't be looking at the cases and deaths ratio on the same day because people don't die the day they're diagnosed, they're both lagging indicators with significantly different lags.
My Mate just text me and told me his GF tested positive and he cant understand how as she only saw her family and his family over christmas eve and christmas day - just the 12 people. FOR F**K SAKE!!!
I mean this is an intelligent man saying this to me. Now they have brought it to our village. Thanks man.
It won't be.Apparently they’re holding a meeting to discuss new tiers tomorrow, I’d be surprised if most of the uk isn’t just put into tier 4 It’s spiralling out of control again
Dr Michael Tildesley, of the University of Warwick, who is part of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, which also feeds into Sage, said he had not heard anything about a “tier 5” but that it seems likely that if any extra measures were taken, these might include schools and universities closing.
“In terms of tier 4, it doesn’t appear to be effective in those parts of the country where the new variant is circulating, but we will learn more over the next week or so,” he said.
The move to close schools has been backed by Dr Nick Davies, another member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling and an author of the recent analysis.
“If our parameter estimates are correct … it seems like [tier 4] alone isn’t enough, so something else might need to be done on top of that. And we’ve looked at school closures because that’s sort of the next obvious thing to do on top of those restrictions,” he said, although he added that the evidence around schools closing is unclear.
Schools closed for the majority of pupils during the first lockdown in the spring, while the other restrictions included the edict to venture outside only once a day for exercise, leave home only for essentials, and for all non-essential shops and places of worship to close.
Yeah. The trend is consistent in most countries I've bothered to check around the world. If anything, we're undercounting the number of deaths.Yep. I work with the people who produce those numbers here in Canada; it's actually even a little more complex. They look at long-term death numbers for the period in question, and also take demographic changes into account (how the population's size and make-up change due to deaths, births, and migration). Based on that, they calculate the range of expected deaths (the expected average, and the plus/minus ranges; see for example the Statistics Canada graph). The difference between the actual number of deaths and this expected average then produces the excess deaths number.
Of course, there are a few footnotes to that number. First, as I said, there is a range of expected deaths. Only one excess deaths number is provided, and that's based on the average number of expected deaths (i.e., the middle of the range); but the actual number of excess deaths could be anything between the top or bottom of the range of expected deaths. And second, the excess deaths number lacks context. Because of the lockdowns and hygiene measures, some diseases are not spreading as much as usual. For example, the flu season is reduced, and has led to reduced flu deaths. And as people are staying home, they are less likely to get into a car accident - and so on. On the other hand, due to the lockdowns, a lot of regular health care (like surgery, regular appointments and preventive screenings) have been suspended, leading to additional deaths, which are not directly caused by COVID-19 but are nonetheless caused by the pandemic.
It's hard to say what the exact impact is of each of those footnotes. But as a general indicator, the excess deaths number is much more interesting than the 'simple' number of COVID-19 deaths, which is certainly an underestimate (as people are not tested for COVID-19 consistently) and incomparable across countries (as different countries have different rules for when to attribute a death to COVID-19).
The Empire Strikes Back!!![]()
Crap. I thought gatherings were banned? I guess this means the tier restrictions are useless because people blatantly ignore it.My Mate just text me and told me his GF tested positive and he cant understand how as she only saw her family and his family over christmas eve and christmas day - just the 12 people. FOR F**K SAKE!!!
I mean this is an intelligent man saying this to me. Now they have brought it to our village. Thanks man.
Intelligent man with a lack of common sense or logicMy Mate just text me and told me his GF tested positive and he cant understand how as she only saw her family and his family over christmas eve and christmas day - just the 12 people. FOR F**K SAKE!!!
I mean this is an intelligent man saying this to me. Now they have brought it to our village. Thanks man.
Can we agree the guys below wish them love, prosperity and long life?
Anyway, let's move on.
He’s in irelandCrap. I thought gatherings were banned? I guess this means the tier restrictions are useless because people blatantly ignore it.
Maybe provide a tip hotline to report offenders with a 100 pound reward if true. That would solve a lot of problems with idiots.
I'm still shocked that they found it in Sept and it was spreading for 3 months before they realised it was a problem and did something. I thought they were boasting about all their testing, and all the forensic and epidemiological work.We should carry on doing nothing different for a few more days, just to make completely sure the hospitals wont be able to cope.
Then around NYE or start of the new year, the government can announce a bunch of new measures and act as if the surge in cases was completely unforseeable and hadn't been predicted by anyone. Just make sure it's announced too late to stop anyone partying and infecting their relatives on NYE itself.
If only it was possible to forsee in some way that a variant of the virus that has been present in London for months would somehow spread to other areas of the country, where thousands of people from London travel to and from every day.
Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification.Intelligent man with a lack of common sense or logic
I'd actually forgotten we still have NYE to come.![]()
All I know is if I was to take a dozen random pictures of Belfast city centre just before Christmas you would not find 90% of people wearing masks in and out of shops, and if you have anyone in your family working in hospitality or retail you would have no shortage of stories every day of the pains they have to go to reminding people to put their masks on, keep their distance, etc. So again it's about the proportions you deem acceptable here. "By and large", "fantastic compliance" etc. are quite vague descriptions of quantitative measurements, so you might be seeing the same thing other people are seeing but describing it differently because they are imprecise descriptions on both sides, and you have different expectations.
Personally I would expect 100% adherence to masks by this point so 80%, while a big improvement on the summer, is still unacceptably poor. 90% is acceptable. 99% is fantastic. Imperfection is just a part of life. Social distancing is harder to say because they're context-dependent but I would say the majority in supermarkets I've been to don't make much effort to distance. There aren't mass crowds because there are fewer people but there are still people impatiently squeezing through busy aisles, some have no problem brushing up against you because they feel entitled to walk through that space at that time, and lots of people walk around as if they're unaware of their surroundings and the moment they're in.
I get the desire for normality. Many of the spaces we've been going to for years are shut off from us, so in the few places we're allowed to go back to we would like to act relatively normally, if we have to put on a mask then fine but I'm not going to space myself out on an escalator, wait for people to go past in the aisles, etc. That's how it comes across and it isn't an uncommon thing where I'm at.
The reality is we live in a global world and can see how other citizens have adhered. It is the case that many countries in the East have seen more rigorous adherence, and it has had a positive effect on transmission. They hold themselves to higher standards in this regard, in large part because the social pressure forces them to. That social pressure is uncomfortable but it isn't unkind. There is this idea that saying people are doing the wrong thing is unkind, but the counter-argument is that doing the wrong thing is itself unkind to other citizens.
I agree with you that there are a lot of people that seem unhealthily angry at the world, and seeking out that information verges on masochism at points. Then again I just assume that is mostly just their coping mechanism at the moment. We all have to have some kind of coping mechanism. It helps you cope to focus on most people complying but some people need a different kind of focus to help them get by. But I don't think pointing out the imperfections in society's response that you see in every day life are all like that. I'm not angry at people, but I think it's both necessary and healthy to expect more from our citizens at the moment. Things are getting worse so we need to make more sacrifices. That's unfortunate but true. You can blame the government while still demanding more from individuals.
Yeah. I needed to go in to my local town centre to post something and it was crazy - like a normal day! People out eating food from the various vans, masks on only maybe 10% outside and probably 60% (worn correctly) inside, absolutely no social distancing. It’s a real shit show at the moment.
Are people really getting worked up about posters saying they hope some totally random person on a news report suffers with covid because they are ignorant about wearing a mask and taking precautions?
Who cares.
Pointing out that it’s more than a little strange is perfectly reasonable.
Two days ago it was 30kI stopped following those stats a while ago but 50k seems very high?
Two days ago it was 30k
But really who cares? Are we getting offended on other people's behalf again. People who we don't even know and don't even know us or never will. Random people from the TV.
Then you have posters angling for mods to punish people. Feck me![]()