Droid_Repairs
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2021
- Messages
- 609
Of course not, it was just a fabricated pretext.But they did not invade Donbas only.
Nope.You’ve honestly lost the plot.
I was thinking they should start claiming all of those islands and Sakhalin Island too. Talk about how they are under control by a nazi government, etc.
True! It seemed like there was a will if it's true that Ukrainian pilots were already on their way to Poland to pick them up, so perhaps they got cold feet after it was made so public or there was a collective decision that supplying planes is just one step too involved. Or some planes were delivered secretly. Or like you said, maybe they came to the conclusion that they won't make much difference right now, and therefore not willing to risk provoking Russia.Sure, but that still comes back to the value of those planes in one way or another. Poland might have got them for 1 pence from a country that could afford to do whatever strategic deal that was, but to Poland they mean a lot. They'd want to be convinced they're going to be of use and not simply shot down in quick time.
Seems like only a few countries have these MiGs to provide and it's a much tougher decision than providing arms and missiles from their point of view.
Still, if there's a will there's probably a way. Within NATO they could certainly offer guarantees to these countries that planes would be replaced.
Why?What a moronic suggestion.
Why?
You want enemies running around free to do what they want, or are ordered, to do?
I'm not talking concentration camps here, just internment. Happened in UK during WWII, why not if there's another war?
Between the missing Romanian Mig and the annexing of these Japanese Islands, we are seem to be well on our way to a broader conflict.![]()
Romanian MiG almost certainly crashed due to poor weather. The rescue helicopter sent after it likely crashed due to the same reason.
Between the missing Romanian Mig and the annexing of these Japanese Islands, we are seem to be well on our way to a broader conflict.![]()
The Kremlin propaganda sounds like “we are going to protect Donbas form the real rulers of Ukraine (the neo Nazis). “
This message has been shouted and repeated all around Russia for 8 years. Many in Russia do believe that the Russian population of east Ukraine (especially the Donbas) was at risk of a genocide and that an intervention is necessary to prevent that genocide.
Was there poor weather?Romanian MiG almost certainly crashed due to poor weather. The rescue helicopter sent after it likely crashed due to the same reason.
For Russian soldiers, they are missioned to do what they have been told and ordered, to neutralise Ukraine military force and to liberty the people of Ukraine.
Why?
You want enemies running around free to do what they want, or are ordered, to do?
I'm not talking concentration camps here, just internment. Happened in UK during WWII, why not if there's another war?
Good news.
Well saidThe goal here is to turn the Russian people against Putin and the war as much as possible. We're not getting these repeated videos of Russian soldiers calling home for no reason. And in fact the EU has discussed proposals to try and create a brain drain from Russia into the rest of Europe. They actively want to lure highly qualified Russians into their countries.
What you're proposing seems (amongst many other things) insanely conterproductive and stupid in terms of the actual approach at play here. Putin is trying to convince Russia they're fighting Nazis and you want to do the heavy lifting for him by putting Russians who have done nothing wrong into internment camps.
That liberation part is coming from Putin and his Russian propaganda, to portray the mission as a defensive campaign to "liberate" Ukraine. He literally announced this as a limited “special military operation” to “demilitarise” Ukraine and protect citizens in the Donbas from what he claimed was a Ukrainian “genocide”. Of course they are not going to admit the invasion has anything to do with territorial expansion etc.What in the name of sweet Moses are you talking about!?
‘Liberate’ them from what… their own government that they voted in and are fighting for!?
‘Liberate’ them from their own Liberty! Ffs, man.
Can you afford to take that chance in a war, though?The Russian people is not your enemy. The immense majority of Russian diaspora in the west are far more hostile towards Putin and his regime than you and I will ever be.
What the actual feckSurely if the war spreads to UK/US, it would be fair, from a security perspective, to put all Russian nationals within that country into a camp. Do you really want a load of nationals from a country you're at war with wandering around freely?
I'm talking if a war occurred in/spread to UK, not the current conflict (unless it widens to us, of course).The goal here is to turn the Russian people against Putin and the war as much as possible. We're not getting these repeated videos of Russian soldiers calling home for no reason. And in fact the EU has discussed proposals to try and create a brain drain from Russia into the rest of Europe. They actively want to lure highly qualified Russians into their countries.
What you're proposing seems (amongst many other things) insanely conterproductive and stupid in terms of the actual approach at play here. Putin is trying to convince Russia they're fighting Nazis and you want to do the heavy lifting for him by putting Russians who have done nothing wrong into internment camps.
Surely if the war spreads to UK/US, it would be fair, from a security perspective, to put all Russian nationals within that country into a camp. Do you really want a load of nationals from a country you're at war with wandering around freely?
Interesting thread that explains more issues facing the Russian convoy.
That's an amazing idea. Perhaps the US/UK could get them to aid the war effort by forcing them to work long hours too.Surely if the war spreads to UK/US, it would be fair, from a security perspective, to put all Russian nationals within that country into a camp. Do you really want a load of nationals from a country you're at war with wandering around freely?
Russia, China, India... are not Libya. Besides, it will happen gradually but by many countries around the world instead of one trying to take on the dollar. The problem for the dollar here is not one country trying to evade sanctions to survive, it will be many countries around the world losing confidence in the dollar and they will gradually start to diversify their currencies instead of stockpiling dollars. The US has been using the dollar too much as a weapon recently, and many countries already started trading in other currencies/using other payment systems. John Kerry actually talked about it too back in 2015 (I already posted the video earlier in this thread, will post again if interested).People (or countries) have been aware of this and have been trying (to no avail) to move from USD. Those that tries (Libya) got obliterated
SWIFT is US biggest Nuclear weapon, and they've shown the world just how devastating that is, and I have no doubt smaller and less "cooperative" countries will now try to find a way to circumvent the use of SWIFT, or at least minimize it.
The EFJ General Secretary Ricardo Gutiérrez expressed surprise: “First of all, it should be remembered that media regulation does not fall within the competence of the European Union. We believe the EU has no right to grant or withdraw broadcasting licences. This is an exclusive competence of the states.”
“Secondly, the total closure of a media outlet does not seem to me to be the best way to combat disinformation or propaganda,” added Gutiérrez. “This act of censorship can have a totally counterproductive effect on the citizens who follow the banned media. In our opinion, it is always better to counteract the disinformation of propagandist or allegedly propagandist media by exposing their factual errors or bad journalism, by demonstrating their lack of financial or operational independence, by highlighting their loyalty to government interests and their disregard for the public interest.”