Adam-Utd
Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 39,954
Sainz to get his first win. He's class around Monaco and this Ferrari seems excellent with lots of downforce on.
I reckon that's a good shout, could happenSainz to get his first win. He's class around Monaco and this Ferrari seems excellent with lots of downforce on.
Hamilton and Russell both 18/1
https://www.oddschecker.com/motorsport/formula-1
Thats not bad odds... merc has been good at slow speeds all season
I've put a bit on both drivers as the odds are pretty good
Have a hunch for Russel as he's been great in quali and it's so hard to overtake
Sainz to get his first win. He's class around Monaco and this Ferrari seems excellent with lots of downforce on.
All bad luck has to turn somewhere, but I agree he's more than likely going to get pole, lead the race for 90% then crash on the last few lapsHe is also cursed this season, though.
It would make for a great Drive to Survive episode given his start to the season.
Why is he entitled to be ahead of Russel? This dismisses the possibility that Russel is actually the better driver, and I don't see how it can be said with certainty that he is not - this is the only time that they both have the same car and so far it's pretty clear who is better.Monaco is not a good hunting ground for Mercedes but I really think Mercedes could have a chance this weekend.
Once Lewis has a car he is happy with and trusts, his times and he will be will improve and he will be ahead of Russell.
Nothing is pretty clear at all. They've both been driving a pogo stick.Why is he entitled to be ahead of Russel? This dismisses the possibility that Russel is actually the better driver, and I don't see how it can be said with certainty that he is not - this is the only time that they both have the same car and so far it's pretty clear who is better.
I never said he was entitled , just my own opinions and I have never dismissed the ability of any driver.Why is he entitled to be ahead of Russel? This dismisses the possibility that Russel is actually the better driver, and I don't see how it can be said with certainty that he is not - this is the only time that they both have the same car and so far it's pretty clear who is better.
On any other track i would agree, but Monaco has never been a strong track for lewis. Three wins in his career. Where as he has 8 wins at Hungary, Silverstone. 7 at Canada etc.Monaco is not a good hunting ground for Mercedes but I really think Mercedes could have a chance this weekend.
Once Lewis has a car he is happy with and trusts, his times and he will be will improve and he will be ahead of Russell.
The first race it actually worked properly and Hamilton caught him rapidly, and nearly ended up overtaking him from 30 seconds behind.
Yeah there is that and if Russell gets in front, he will be hard to pass, Monaco is a horrible place for Lewis.On any other track i would agree, but Monaco has never been a strong track for lewis. Three wins in his career. Where as he has 8 wins at Hungary, Silverstone. 7 at Canada etc.
So out of the Mercedes pair i fancy russell this weekend.
Hamilton had to fight his way through the pack, you can swing it both ways.Which only happened because George had to spend the entire race defending....
Hamilton had to fight his way through the pack, you can swing it both ways.
He was clearly the faster in Barcelona. As I said, far too early to call it definitive.
Hamilton lost time stuck behind slower cars every lap, only able to overtake under DRS.It doesn't swing both ways. Lewis wasn't losing time breezing past much slower cars in the middle of the race, none of whom defended vs him because they knew it was futile. But George will have easily lost 15-20 seconds or more on his optimal just from defending Max for all those laps.
Of course you didn't say it, but the bellow for sure sounds like it is a no question who is the better driver, only a matter of Lewis being comfortable with the car.I never said he was entitled , just my own opinions and I have never dismissed the ability of any driver.
I just don't get where you got dismissed and entitled from ?
Once Lewis has a car he is happy with and trusts, his times and he will be will improve and he will be ahead of Russell.
Fair point, I do think Lewis is the better driver, in ability and experience.Of course you didn't say it, but the bellow for sure sounds like it is a no question who is the better driver, only a matter of Lewis being comfortable with the car.
Ouch that's bad.Hamilton slower on the softs than Leclerc on the hards.
Ouch that's bad.
Now that's not part of the plan.Hamilton slower on the softs than Leclerc on the hards.
Hamilton slower on the softs than Leclerc on the hards.
There was no reason to let them fight with a dodgy DRS and pushing engines in the heat. Perez still had pace at that point. On tyres I maintain he could've stayed out but they went for the fastest lap and took maximum points.
In his 3rd stint Perez did 16 laps on the yellow tyre C2. He then pit for the softer red tyre C3 and did 13 laps. That 3rd stint would've been 16 + 13 = 29 laps.
Hamilton stint 3 on the C2 tyre did 26 laps whilst rampaging through the field. Bottas completed 32 laps on C2.
3 laps longer than Hamilton when he'd managed his tyres and was coasting at end on lower fuel levels. Russell was 30 seconds behind after pitting with 10 laps to go and had overheating issues.
Which makes me wonder: do teams consider driving style when contracting drivers? Like in this case: McLaren would have known what their car was like, and probably could have known Ricciardo's driving style. Put those two together, and the issue is clear. Is that something they consider ("it'll be a slow start for him in the car, but we are confident that he'll manage to adapt"), or do they look higher level ("great talent, proven winner, very markettable, let's get him") ?Interesting info about danny ric (who may lose his seat at mclaren next season).
""...While it would be dangerous to try to simplify Ricciardo’s 2021 cause to a single issue, it did often come back to how he attacks a braking zone and tries to rotate the car.
Despite being famously adept at late-braking passes, Ricciardo’s preferred style in normal conditions is to brake slightly earlier, with less pressure, and roll the speed into the corner.
That requires a positive front end to get the car rotated. At medium and low speed, the McLaren was ill-suited to this technique.
Team-mate Lando Norris was much more effective with a later, harder brake that facilitated a sharper rotation and allowed him to get on the power again quicker.
Ricciardo could not quite drill that technique into himself, even though he got better at it through the season...."
Its a very good question. My guess would be the latter.Which makes me wonder: do teams consider driving style when contacting drivers? Like in this case: McLaren would have known what their car was like, and probably could have known Ricciardo's driving style. Put those two together, and the issue is clear. Is that something they consider ("it'll be a slow start for him in the car, but we are confident that he'll manage to adapt"), or do they look higher level ("great talent, proven winner, very markettable, let's get him") ?
The latter would be a bit like a team getting Ronaldo because, you know, "fecking hell, Ronaldo!" - even if he's not a fit for the team's playstyle at all.
It sounds a bit like it with the Ricciardo situation. I mean, even if you would expect him to adapt, you'd also have to accept the significant risk that, given how long he's been using his existing style, it will take a long time for his adaptation and might never work perfectly.Its a very good question. My guess would be the latter.