prateik
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 42,276
Chelsea players not getting booked.. Fulham have 2 already.
Someone needs to tell this referee that not every foul on Felix warrants a yellow card.
You means he's definitely going to be a success?Thank God we didn't go for Felix. Same as Gakpo. Truly, Redcafe was on point yet again.
Why the negativity? We needed a striker, not an attacking midfielder.Thank God we didn't go for Felix. Same as Gakpo. Truly, Redcafe was on point yet again.
Thank God we didn't go for Felix. Same as Gakpo. Truly, Redcafe was on point yet again.
I rate the guy and he's shown his class against us on multiple occasions. Not sure if he'll succeed at Chelsea but he certainly would have fit right in our eleven and EtH wanted himYou means he's definitely going to be a success?
This is of course utter nonsense. We got to third in the league without a conventional striker.Why the negativity? We needed a striker, not an attacking midfielder.
Come on, van de Beek isn't that odd...What a player Felix is. Wish we'd got him instead of that Dutch clown whose name isn't even real
someone please
Felix is a half season loan that cost 11m plus his wages (another 5-6m) as a #10/roaming attacker (but not #9). Never made sense to pay 16m for half a season of a player who plays in the same position as Bruno or Rashford. Maybe if he was left footed, or a natural #9.Thank God we didn't go for Felix. Same as Gakpo. Truly, Redcafe was on point yet again.
Maybe. But going by what's reported it doesn't look like the best dealI rate the guy and he's shown his class against us on multiple occasions. Not sure if he'll succeed at Chelsea but he certainly would have fit right in our eleven and EtH wanted him
But the 30m the Glazers paid themselves is fine? Why do people care about the price when the prize is a CL place, 50/60m, potentially a run for the FA cup or Europa on top of the Carabao.Maybe. But going by what's reported it doesn't look like the best deal