The Firestarter
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Messages
- 29,162
"smoking can be a hazard to your ship" would also dothey should reply with photos of the large russian navy ships destroyed for very little money
"smoking can be a hazard to your ship" would also dothey should reply with photos of the large russian navy ships destroyed for very little money
Of course the Russian embassy was gonna jump on the Challenger tank loss.
Active Protection Systems are a thing and probably can deal with such stuff as well, but they are not widely used at the moment.Imagine making fun of western tanks saving their crews' lives, while at the same time Russian tanks completely wipe out the own crew because they sit on their ammo. That said, I think tank manufacturers need to come up with new ideas to protect tanks against the cheap suicide drones. All the tanks are vulnerable to them right now.
I don't think any new ideas is needed to stop slow moving targets like that, either you use EW equipment to jam out the signals to the drone or an old fashioned AA gun should be able to handle it. The problem for both sides in Ukraine is that they don't have enough of these available.That said, I think tank manufacturers need to come up with new ideas to protect tanks against the cheap suicide drones. All the tanks are vulnerable to them right now.
Relying on Russian-language media and open-source material sourced from Russian social media channels, the BBC counted 190 suspected Ukrainian attacks inside Russia and occupied Crimea in 2023.
The regular drone strikes have forced Moscow’s airports to cancel, delay and divert hundreds of incoming and outgoing flights, further damaging Russia’s aviation industry, which has already come under heavy pressure from Western sanctions.
The package includes additional air defense equipment, artillery rounds and anti-tank weapons.
For his part, the hacked Russian officer, Maj. Anton Valentinovich Perevozchikov, did not deny his role in recruiting the Cubans. He instead sent an expletive-laced reply to The Intercept denouncing NATO and declaring, “Russia will win.”
Cheers.Bravo, @VorZakone, for your dedicated work in this thread.
Can't wait to read all the articles you've posted today.
Bravo, @VorZakone, for your dedicated work in this thread.
Can't wait to read all the articles you've posted today.
No, I appreciate his tweets & find the articles interesting.Sarcasm, right?
Don’t think so. I second that @VorZakone - this has become my main source of keeping up with the news these days.Sarcasm, right?
+1Don’t think so. I second that @VorZakone - this has become my main source of keeping up with the news these days.
No, I appreciate his tweets & find the articles interesting.
I get ya.Fair enough. Its just the endless use of possibly/probably made up "officials" as sources in pretty much every one of his links that winds me up a bit.
Why does it wind you up? Quotes from officials in the NYT, Reuters, BBC etc are some of the closest sources we can get and they give a feeling of the mood in governments.Fair enough. Its just the endless use of possibly/probably made up "officials" as sources in pretty much every one of his links that winds me up a bit.
Unless you think the NYT is "making up" these officials.
No one is saying you should believe what these officials say. They can be wrong and have been wrong. But that in itself isn't new.
If he knows so in advance what operations Ukraine is involved with and he acts unilaterlly against it at his own judgement, what prevents Musk to pass any critical information about the counteroffensive to Russia?