Scott Moe, from Saskatchewan, has to be the dumbest cnut of a premier in Canada if there was no Danielle Smith around.
Saskatchewan premier vows to veto ruling on school pronoun policy (BBC)
Moe pushed forward a policy that bars teachers from using the preferred pronouns and genders of students under 16 without their parental consent. That was before the highest court in the province blocked that policy.
Moe has been a very good premier for Saskatchewan. He's had a rather positive approval rating for his entire tenure.
That's only because Saskatchewan is full of racists, bigots and homophobes/transphobes. He's a shitty Premier from a stupid party and Saskatchewan is a dump these days. He's no Roy fecking Romanow, that's for sure.
Sorry, I just spent six weeks there.
Fair enough, and I won't try to convince you that your experience wasn't what you describe. I will say that I lived in Saskatoon from age 3 - 30 (excepting an exchange year, and one year in Edmonton) and it's become about 1000x more multicultural and cosmopolitan over my time. I was the only non-white kid in most of my classes growing up. A couple years ago I did some work in elementary schools and we were playing cricket at recess with the massive South Asian population that exists now. Schools had the equipment and everything.
You won't find that in BC, where I'm at now, despite there being a huge Punjabi population here. I'd consider moving back to SK if it wasn't so damn boring and ugly.
I'll give you the multicultural aspect. I grew up there as well (age 1 - 25) and there are definitely many more south Asian, Filipino and African residents these days but as a person with some indigenous ancestry, I'm confident in saying that a majority of the white residents hold archaic beliefs about race and sexuality and the Saskatchewan party holds those, too. Hopefully some of these new residents will stick around there and foster change through participation in government.
Yeah, I won't put up much fight on Harper's "old stock Canadians" in Saskatchewan being behind the times. But I will say that I find anti-Indigenous sentiment in the Okanagan worse than it is in Saskatchewan. Some of the shit people say here![]()
People who are against trans rights or are busy trying to get laws passed concerning trans people, how many trans people have they actually talked with?
I have a friend who was born male and transitioned to female a decade ago, so she's female, not trans. According to her this isn't something that someone wakes up one day and decides to do, it's something that is clear and apparent to the person from their earliest memories. So people who know they are in the wrong body can't act to change anything until well into adulthood, according to many states laws now.
It's a strange topic if it doesn't affect you, or your family, or people you know, but once you do know someone in that community, it's really not that complicated. Those kids are suffering and they are telling their parents what they need - why not listen to them? Does anyone think any of those parents are intentionally pushing their kids into this? It's terrifying. A couple friends of mine had this very thing happen, and in addition to trying to help their kids not feel suicidal, and trying to get their peers to accept them, they are also now fighting with people who feel compelled to tell them what to do for their kids' health and sanity.
I just wish people would let the people it affects make the decisions they need to make without harassment and judgment.
It might make it clearer if I define terms. A trans person (in my definition) is switching from whatever their original gender was, to the other gender. It's not being a transvestite, and it's not someone who is gay and acting butch or femme or whatever. The person is taking steps (medication, surgery) to become the other gender.I feel like I agree with half of what you say and disagree with the other. I wouldn't say I am pro or anti trans rights, in so much that I agree that a person should be able to live how they wish within the rules of society. But I perhaps don't extend that to them having the right to tell others how to think.
I would never be rude to a trans person intentionally and would do my best to address them how they wish. I wouldn't however accept the demand that they are treated as the opposite sex in situations where biology matters (medical, sport, changing rooms, prisons etc). It's sad that in having what I would call a balanced opinion, would actually be seen as offensive by many.
Probably my most 'controversial' opinion in the context of your post is that I think it should be illegal for anyone who isn't an adult to have any kind of medical intervention to change gender, be is surgical or via medication.
They weren’t born a man; they were born a baby boy. It all depends on when they went through the transition. If it was after puberty, yes, they would enjoy extra muscle mass, larger frames, etc. if they transitioned before puberty, the advantages would probably disappear. That swimmer who did it after already competing at collegiate level is probably an outlier. The point is, if people were given the therapy and surgeries they needed as youth, instead of fighting and having to wait until their adult years, this would be rare.If you think trans women should be competing in sport against biological women then your crazy. They obviously have an unfair advantage by being born a man. I can't even believe this is a debate.
i really don’t know what specific things or laws you’re referring to, but the laws in the US are definitely transphobic and anti-trans.Incorrect, the reason for what you perceive as anti-trans laws is to not infringe the rights of others.
You cannot have a law disadvantages females to allow a trans female to compete.
It's not about being pro or against, it's about maintaining fairness.
They weren’t born a man; they were born a baby boy. It all depends on when they went through the transition. If it was after puberty, yes, they would enjoy extra muscle mass, larger frames, etc. if they transitioned before puberty, the advantages would probably disappear. That swimmer who did it after already competing at collegiate level is probably an outlier. The point is, if people were given the therapy and surgeries they needed as youth, instead of fighting and having to wait until their adult years, this would be rare.
I’m talking teenage years.You can't let children transition! That's lunacy. They're children. They don't know anything! There's a couple of years at most between kids stopping believing in Santa, and kids starting puberty....and they should be exposed to concepts like picking gender?! Come on, this is just daft. That's bad parenting.
They weren’t born a man; they were born a baby boy. It all depends on when they went through the transition. If it was after puberty, yes, they would enjoy extra muscle mass, larger frames, etc. if they transitioned before puberty, the advantages would probably disappear. That swimmer who did it after already competing at collegiate level is probably an outlier. The point is, if people were given the therapy and surgeries they needed as youth, instead of fighting and having to wait until their adult years, this would be rare.
The hormone replacement starts at 14, early puberty. Surgeries are a bit later, 16 or 17. I think you need to find some first hand accounts, because it will surprise you. They are as sure of their gender as you are. It’s not like experimenting with being gay or whatever.Advocating for surgery pre-puberty? That’s crazy!! Offer counselling and support sure, but a child should not be given that responsibility when they lack the emotional maturity to make the decision.
Even in mid teens - high school age is too young!
I’m talking teenage years.
I’m guessing you don’t have kids? Puberty can start anywhere between 9 and like 15, but 13-14 is most common. You should listen to them Instead of telling them what you think they should do. If it’s not you, your family, or your friends, be grateful because it’s rough. If you do meet someone who it affects directly, just listen.But teenagers are going through puberty already... And teenagers are still immature children. They can't make decisions either.
I’m talking teenage years.
How many times do you need to be told or read that young teenagers pre puberty or during are taking puberty blockers and not hormone therapy.This is a very different discussion but, to be blunt, it's a bit of can of worms, isn't it?
You have to be 18 to vote, 16 to legally consent to sex, 18 to gamble, and you can't even purchase certain media until you're 18, all because you're not considered mentally developed enough to make an informed decision on these things, yet young teenagers (or even younger again when you consider puberty blockers) are capable of making an informed decision on taking potentially life-altering hormones therapy and a bit later undergoing certainly life-altering medical procedures?
It's a bit of a cliche, but it's a cliche for a reason - "it's not a phase, mom!"
Teenagers and kids are sure as shit of a lot of things until they're not, why is this an exception?
How many times do you need to be told or read that young teenagers pre puberty or during are taking puberty blockers and not hormone therapy.
they can realize at preschool age they are the wrong gender outwardly. So around 5. There was a 5 year old in my son’s class who was super angry all the time because his parents dressed him like a boy. He got angry when they cut his hair because he said “they won’t know I’m a girl!” This kid, Watson, was an absolute terror, totally bullied the other kids. Then one day her parents capitulated and allowed her to wear girl clothes to school from then on, and to style her hair like a girl, and she became sweetness and light. Night and day personality switch.This is a very different discussion but, to be blunt, it's a bit of can of worms, isn't it?
You have to be 18 to vote, 16 to legally consent to sex, 18 to gamble, and you can't even purchase certain media until you're 18, all because you're not considered mentally developed enough to make an informed decision on these things, yet young teenagers (or even younger again when you consider puberty blockers) are capable of making an informed decision on taking potentially life-altering hormones therapy and a bit later undergoing certainly life-altering medical procedures?
It's a bit of a cliche, but it's a cliche for a reason - "it's not a phase, mom!"
Teenagers and kids are sure as shit of a lot of things until they're not, why is this an exception?
They weren’t born a man; they were born a baby boy. It all depends on when they went through the transition. If it was after puberty, yes, they would enjoy extra muscle mass, larger frames, etc. if they transitioned before puberty, the advantages would probably disappear. That swimmer who did it after already competing at collegiate level is probably an outlier. The point is, if people were given the therapy and surgeries they needed as youth, instead of fighting and having to wait until their adult years, this would be rare.
You're advocating surgery and serious heavy medication/intervention whatever for little kids? Do you know how fecked up that is?they can realize at preschool age they are the wrong gender outwardly. So around 5. There was a 5 year old in my son’s class who was super angry all the time because his parents dressed him like a boy. He got angry when they cut his hair because he said “they won’t know I’m a girl!” This kid, Watson, was an absolute terror, totally bullied the other kids. Then one day her parents allowed her to wear girl clothes to school and she became sweetness and light. Night and day personality switch. So at what age would it be appropriate to let Watson begin to resemble the girl she was in the inside? She felt like there had been a terrible mistake made by God. Get her the blockers and then surgery she needs so that she can start to live her life. It’s not a casual choice. You should read up.
You're advocating surgery and serious heavy medication/intervention whatever for little kids? Do you know how fecked up that is?
You can really tell the posters who have zero experience with children or teenagers with gender identity issues.
There's a trans girl in my daughter's class at school. My daughter came back from hockey with a black eye yesterday after getting an elbow in the face from this kid. Who is, by all accounts, a very nice person, day to day, but bigger/stronger than the other girls in the class and apparently extremely aggressive in the way she plays hockey. I've been dipping in and out of this transgender in sports debate in an entirely abstract way up until now. It all feels a lot more real as of the last 24 hours.
To be clear, I'm sure there have been plenty of "cis girl vs cis girl" black eyes over the years, so I'm keeping this all in perspective. Just all seems a lot more real when your own kid walks onto a pitch with someone born a different gender.
they can realize at preschool age they are the wrong gender outwardly. So around 5. There was a 5 year old in my son’s class who was super angry all the time because his parents dressed him like a boy. He got angry when they cut his hair because he said “they won’t know I’m a girl!” This kid, Watson, was an absolute terror, totally bullied the other kids. Then one day her parents capitulated and allowed her to wear girl clothes to school from then on, and to style her hair like a girl, and she became sweetness and light. Night and day personality switch.
So at what age would it be appropriate to let Watson begin to resemble the girl she was in the inside?
She felt like there had been a terrible mistake made by God. Get her the blockers and then surgery she needs so that she can start to live her life. It’s not a casual choice. You should read up, because I think you’re making a common mistake and equating gender with sexuality.
It’s not a teenager choice. It’s a years-long process. The kids that are truly trans, and not simply gay, or transvestite, it’s their identity.
I agree it is a very drastic decision, but they know that too.
I know there are some who stop halfway
In many many cases it is apparent very early that there is a gender issue. At that point, subject to hugely extensive medical review by specialists and experts, preventing the onset of puberty until someone is older is a hugely beneficial action. My nephew did not get this help and it made life far far harder than neccesary.
My comments weren't about sport specifically and that line of discussion is probably better done in the other (not sport related) transgender thread.
It sounds like you are being very considered in your response when it is your kid with the black eye.
The main problem in these discussions is that you have 10% of people who are genuinely worried about women sports and 90% of people who have never watched a women sports event in their life and just don't like transgender people. This second set of people will pretend to be in the first one 100% of the times.Incorrect, the reason for what you perceive as anti-trans laws is to not infringe the rights of others.
I obviously can't speak for the care received by your nephew, but the UK's gender services are essentially being shut down in disgrace because of how poorly they've handled the care of those referred to them. This includes, perhaps most notably, placing individuals on medical pathways with little to no supporting research.
We should want these things to be extensively reviewed by medical experts, but from what I've read, I'm not sure that's necessarily the case.
Tavistock was closed because it couldn't keep up with demand for its services. The Cass report recommended multiple centres be opened on a regional basis, rather than one centre in London.
The reality is that increased demand has lead to long waiting lists. It would take years for young people to even get a first appointment - they are certainly not being rushed into treatment - anything but.
The solution isn't to deny young people the care they need because they're deemed 'too young', and instead force them to suffer through years of puberty which will have potentially detrimental effects on them in later years; it's to provide the facilities and care to ensure the correct medical treatment is available for each individual on a case by case basis.
I meant "read up" as "read up on people's first hand experiences", because what you keep doing is repeating the same argument from your perspective - which is not adequate. I infer from your writing that you don't have children of your own, so you are operating from your own experiences of becoming a teenager 10, 20, 30 (?) years ago. Your personal experience is not as relevant as someone who is a trans person. You keep positioning this discussion as if trans people are adopting a lifestyle choice, and you are using the same language as people who are hostile to LGBTQ. You sound like you don't have any first-hand interactions with trans people. That's why I am urging you to read their personal stories.I don't really want to get into specific individuals too much because a) it's too emotive and b) it's all anecdotal. However, I'll address some of this post in sections:
If the school are happy with it, there's nothing wrong with Watson attending school in a dress or, as you've put it, "resemble the girl she was in the inside". This is very different to medical transition.
While we're talking anecdotally, my sister in law absolutely refused to wear her school uniform from around 5-years-old through to about 10/11-years-old. Instead, she pretty much exclusively wore cargo pants and rugby shirts, and was generally a typical 'tomboy'. I don't believe she ever claimed to be a boy, which is obviously a difference, but the fact remains she grew out of it and, while she's still very sporty, is very much a 20-something woman.
I'm just going to ignore the "God" comment because that's a whole different can of worms again.
You also need to stop telling people to "read up" because you have no idea how much reading they've done on the subject.
I'm not equating gender with sexuality (or indeed sex) at all. I'm not even sure what's given you that impression.
The crux of it is that we recognise that children/teenagers lack the ability to make informed decisions on many aspects of life, and as such, they are legally ring-fenced from them, but this is somehow different?
Again, they can't consent to sex, they can't vote, they can't gamble, and they can't buy a ticket to see Saw X in the cinema.
This reads as contradictory to me.
It's a decision they begin to make and consider as younger children, but at the same time it's a drastic decision?
Regardless, the point remains that they're surely too young to be making any informed decision on these potentially irreversible medical treatments?
And this is basically the point I'm making. Some of these treatments are irreversible. There is a severe gap in studies on the long-term effects of puberty blockers (anecdotally, a friend was prescribed what is the same drug for something, but was only allowed to take it for three months due to the potential long-term side-effects), let alone the potentially permanent effects of starting hormone replacement therapy or the definite irreversible changes of undergoing surgery.
What's wrong with simply letting these kids live and dress how they want (within reason, of course) and see how things go as they grow up?