Pakistan is the key player. Britain, USA and India need to find a way to get it back to something approaching normality, and I don't mean with another US invasion.
US shouldnt do anything about it, let India do it
Pakistan is the key player. Britain, USA and India need to find a way to get it back to something approaching normality, and I don't mean with another US invasion.
But even focusing on specific areas will lead to an increase in Islamic Radicalisation. You have to remember, Pakistan is not the US, or the UK, or Canada, where even the working class (if it even exists) have the opportunity to progress. The vast majority in Pakistan are illiterate and ill-educated, and due to the feck-ups in charge there, they will remain so. When they see Iraq getting bombed, they see it as a War against Islam, no matter what the Correspondent may, or may not, say. How do you think the common villagers will react to their own country getting attacked?! It doesnt even bear thinking about IMHO...
The best way to solve the problem is to lend the support to Pakistan's own leaders to sort it out. Admittedly, that isnt going to be so easy when you have the self-styled "Mr 10%" in charge of the country, and its why I personally dont think Democracy will ever work in a country like Pakistan, well not in the next hundred years or so, but its the best long-term strategy.
The terrorists apparently called a few numbers in Pakistan from their mobiles.
They were also reported speaking in Punjabi. They carried dollars, and had foreign credit cards on them!
The twats should have worn bright orange jackets with the legend: 'I am a terrorist'.
This is a wake up call to all us Indians. For so many years, we have been fed with sunshine stories about the efficiency of our commandos. In fact one NDTV commentator described them as the best in the world. But we saw the pathetic performance of these guys. Hundreds of them, and they let go of three terrorists from Nariman House. They take 60 hours to combat about 20 gunmen.
We really dont know how many of them were killed in there. That figure will never be divulged.
Lets hope sanity prevails, and the security services succeed in nipping such incidents in the bud in future.
Punjabi in a peshwari accent. The police are suspecting Bin Ladden's involvement according to the local newspapers. As for the commandos, their job is not just to kill the terrorists. They would've stormed the places if thats the case. They have to protect the citizens while fighting the terrorists.
Is that all there were anver 20?(I'd be surprised if there werent more) Yeah your forces were I have to say pathetic, that said it was a unique position in that hostages were all over the places as in the case of the two hotel, the Jewish hotel was far simpler and every second they waited on that you knew there was a better chance the Jews were going to get executed.
That's what the media agencies said-about 20. Surely if the hostages were were scattered all over the place, you'd need at least two guys to hold a batch. Then you'd need another ten guys to take on the forces in combat. So, my guess is that there were more than 20. Dont know. How they kept going for over 60 hours is what bewilders me.
But, the crap that was being spewed out by the media is laughable. Lets see what nonsense they dish out after all this is over.
This government has failed miserably, they don't care about people's security as long as their positions are secure. Lal Bahudur Shastri resigned his railway minister position accepting responsibility for a railway accident. Can you imagine the current Congress leaders doing anything like that after the number of attacks this year.
It has become a fad to demand the resignation of a government whenever there is an incident. However much any government tries to eliminate terrorist threats, there is always an element of escape for the terrorists.
The biggest terrorist attack, was, in my opinion, 9/11. Were there any demands for Bush to resign?
Ridiculed, yes. He looked a bloody clown with that scared face. But was he asked to resign?
This government has failed miserably, they don't care about people's security as long as their positions are secure. Lal Bahudur Shastri resigned his railway minister position accepting responsibility for a railway accident. Can you imagine the current Congress leaders doing anything like that after the number of attacks this year.
I have to question Al-Qaeda's involvement, they love taking credit for any and everything they do, they did they would have released a tape saying they did, also they released a tape a day ago which didnt mention a word about the attack
They didn't take credit for 9/11 until it became blatantly obvious it was them after the video tape of Bin Laden planning the attack was released.
I think you overestimate the change that is gonna happen in the US with Obama, I certainly think things will improve, but come on you cant change all that's wrong here in 8 years let alone 20, as long as he gets the major issues right I am fine and doesnt feck anything up that isnt already broken I am fine as well
Are you a Christian, McGrath? If you are, did you go out onto the streets to march/protest against the sexual abuse that's been occuring in Christian Churhes the word over? I would be willing to bet that you didn't.
The point I am making is that your average Muslim cannot be held responsible for the actions of a few.
I'm not Christian
True your average Muslim cannot be held responsible for the actions of a few idiots.
At the moment it seems that any criticism of Islam is met with an aggressive response.
But I do believe that the Muslim community is not doing enough to prevent its youngster falling under the influence of these fundamentalists, it seems the likes of Omar Bakri, Anjem Choudary et al are better at getting their message across than moderate Muslims. Although to stop these people we will have to do this as a community as they threaten all of us and all of us will benefit if we can stop these idiots.
I do believe that political Islam is an increasing threat to liberal western societies.
You act as if India is Islamic or at least a large share of Islamic, it's 80 v 12 %, in the end this shit was just to draw Pakistan into the frame and still they will largely outnumbered. I am not looking fro a war, not one cent of me I would love to see the US take a seat back and laugh at other nations as has been done with the US recently, Islam is 1 large country away from big trouble in its stronghold the MIddle East, if the go after one of the three countries, Israel, Russia, especially, and China watch out for WWIII. It's one I wont mind as I reckon it is one we will win from the beginning
Punjabi in a peshwari accent. The police are suspecting Bin Ladden's involvement according to the local newspapers. As for the commandos, their job is not just to kill the terrorists. They would've stormed the places if thats the case. They have to protect the citizens while fighting the terrorists.
Punjabi in a peshwari accent.
Arrested terrorist says gang hoped to get away
NEW DELHI: The gang of terrorists who wreaked mayhem in Mumbai for three days were made to believe by their Lashkar bosses that they were not
being sent on a suicide mission and that they would be coming back alive.
In a sensational disclosure made by Ajmal, the jihadi nabbed alive by Mumbai cops, the group had planned to sail out on Thursday. Their recruiters had even charted out the return route for them and stored it on the GPS device which they had used to navigate their way to the Mumbai shoreline.
This suggests that the terrorists were willing to undertake a mission which they knew would be very risky, but not necessarily suicidal.
Sources said that the bait of safe return must have been used by the recruiters to convince the wavering among the group to join the audacious plot against Mumbai.
Ajmal made another important disclosure: that all terrorists were trained in marine warfare along with the special course Daura-e-Shifa conducted by the Lashkar-e-Taiba in what at once transforms the nature of the planning from a routine terror strike and into a specialized raid by commandos.
Battle-hardened ATS officials are surprised by the details of the training the terrorists were put through before being despatched for the macabre mission. This was very different from a terrorist attack, and amounted to an offensive from the seam, said a source.
Ajmal has revealed the name of his fellow jihadis all Pakistani citizens as Abu Ali, Fahad, Omar, Shoaib, Umer, Abu Akasha, Ismail, Abdul Rahman (Bara) and Abdul Rahman (Chhota).
The account of Ajmal also strengthens the doubt of the complicity of powerful elements in the Pakistani establishment. According to him, the group set off on November 21 from an isolated creek near Karachi without the deadly cargo of arms and ammunition they were to use against the innocents in Mumbai. The group received arms and ammunition on board a large Pakistani vessel which picked them up the following day. The vessel, whose ownership is now the subject of an international probe, had four Pakistanis apart from the crew.
A day later, they came across an Indian-owned trawler, Kuber, which was promptly commandeered on the seas. Four of the fishermen who were on the trawler were killed, but its skipper, or tandel in fishermen lingo, Amarjit Singh, was forced to proceed towards India. Amarjit was killed the next day, and Ismail the terrorist who was killed at Girgaum Chowpaty took the wheel.
A trained sailor, Ismail used the GPS to reach Mumbai coast on November 26. The group, however, slowed down its advance as they had reached during the day time while the landing was planned after dusk. The group shifted to inflatable boats, before disembarking at Badhwar Park in Cuffe Parade.
From there, they mandated to kill indiscriminately, particularly white foreign tourists, and spare Muslims split up into five batches. Two of them Ismail and Ajmal took a taxi to Victoria Terminus. Three other batches of two each headed for Oberoi Hotel, Cafe Leopold and Nariman House. The remaining four went to Taj Hotel.
He may have been motivated enough to kill innocents indiscriminately. In police custody, Ajmal Amir Kasab, the terrorist who was caught alive by
the Mumbai police at Girgaum Chowpatty, has been forthcoming with details about the attack on Mumbai and his accomplices, all suspected Lashkar operatives from Pakistan.
Kasab, who sustained minor injuries in the police firing that killed his partner Abu Ismail (25) on Wednesday night, was produced before the Esplanade Metropolitan Magistrate on Friday. The magistrate remanded him to police custody till December 8. Incidentally, Kasab and Ismail were the two who gunned down ATS chief Hemant Karkare, additional CP Ashok Kamthe and encounter specialist Vijay Salaskar.
Kasab told the police that he and 9 others got off a vessel about 10 nautical miles from Mumbai and shifted to two boats hijacked from fishermen.
One source in ATS familiar with the details of the interrogation quoted him saying that in all 16 fidayeens came to Mumbai on Wednesday. A native of Faridkot in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), 21-year-old Kasab told police they had done a reccee of Mumbai few months ago. He said he had come along with eight of the operatives to Mumbai as students and lived in a rented room at Colaba market, a stone's throw away from Nariman House.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ang_hoped_to_get_away/articleshow/3771598.cms
What the hell are you on about Psycho?
You'd like your country to take a back seat and want to laugh at others misery?
True. All extreme right wing political thought muddied with religion is extremely dangerous. Before these incidents in Mumbai, Malegaon blasts was big news with the arrest of around a dozen terrorists belonging to a right wing Hindu party.
As an Indian yourself do you think India is on the verge of falling into such a trap with the ever increasing radicalsation of youths to various right wing racist elements within India? Could this could escalate into a major problem for communal relations in India?
Its true after all Mahatma Gandhi was silenced by a Hindu bigot
I'm well aware of the vile acts of terror committed by Hindu's most recently against India's Christian minority.
At times like this I'm afraid that extremists tend to prosper which is why I was referring to the likes of Omar Bakri et al
Living in the UK I will focus on the situation here as its what I'm more familiar with but I do feel it that Muslims in Britain seem to lack WHAT I PERCEIVE TO BE any kind of positive leadership, maybe this is why these bigots prosper?
MI5 report challenges views on terrorism in Britain Exclusive:
Sophisticated analysis says there is no single pathway to violent extremism Alan Travis, home affairs editor guardian.co.uk
Wednesday August 20 2008 19.01 BST The Guardian, Thursday August 21 2008
The MI5 research document
MI5 has concluded that there is no easy way to identify those who become involved in terrorism in Britain, according to a classified internal research document on radicalisation seen by the Guardian.
The sophisticated analysis, based on hundreds of case studies by the security service, says there is no single pathway to violent extremism.
Alan Travis discusses the MI5 report into terrorism in Britain Link to this audio It concludes that it is not possible to draw up a typical profile of the "British terrorist" as most are "demographically unremarkable" and simply reflect the communities in which they live.
The "restricted" MI5 report takes apart many of the common stereotypes about those involved in British terrorism.
They are mostly British nationals, not illegal immigrants and, far from being Islamist fundamentalists, most are religious novices. Nor, the analysis says, are they "mad and bad".
Those over 30 are just as likely to have a wife and children as to be loners with no ties, the research shows.
The security service also plays down the importance of radical extremist clerics, saying their influence in radicalising British terrorists has moved into the background in recent years.
The research, carried out by MI5's behavioural science unit, is based on in-depth case studies on "several hundred individuals known to be involved in, or closely associated with, violent extremist activity" ranging from fundraising to planning suicide bombings in Britain.
The main findings include:
• The majority are British nationals and the remainder, with a few exceptions, are here legally. Around half were born in the UK, with others migrating here later in life. Some of these fled traumatic experiences and oppressive regimes and claimed UK asylum, but more came to Britain to study or for family or economic reasons and became radicalised many years after arriving.
• Far from being religious zealots, a large number of those involved in terrorism do not practise their faith regularly. Many lack religious literacy and could actually be regarded as religious novices. Very few have been brought up in strongly religious households, and there is a higher than average proportion of converts. Some are involved in drug-taking, drinking alcohol and visiting prostitutes. MI5 says there is evidence that a well-established religious identity actually protects against violent radicalisation.
• The "mad and bad" theory to explain why people turn to terrorism does not stand up, with no more evidence of mental illness or pathological personality traits found among British terrorists than is found in the general population.
• British-based terrorists are as ethnically diverse as the UK Muslim population, with individuals from Pakistani, Middle Eastern and Caucasian backgrounds. MI5 says assumptions cannot be made about suspects based on skin colour, ethnic heritage or nationality.
• Most UK terrorists are male, but women also play an important role. Sometimes they are aware of their husbands', brothers' or sons' activities, but do not object or try to stop them.
• While the majority are in their early to mid-20s when they become radicalised, a small but not insignificant minority first become involved in violent extremism at over the age of 30.
• Far from being lone individuals with no ties, the majority of those over 30 have steady relationships, and most have children. MI5 says this challenges the idea that terrorists are young men driven by sexual frustration and lured to "martyrdom" by the promise of beautiful virgins waiting for them in paradise. It is wrong to assume that someone with a wife and children is less likely to commit acts of terrorism.
• Those involved in British terrorism are not unintelligent or gullible, and nor are they more likely to be well-educated; their educational achievement ranges from total lack of qualifications to degree-level education. However, they are almost all employed in low-grade jobs.
The researchers conclude that the results of their work "challenge many of the stereotypes that are held about who becomes a terrorist and why".
Crucially, the research has revealed that those who become terrorists "are a diverse collection of individuals, fitting no single demographic profile, nor do they all follow a typical pathway to violent extremism".
The security service believes the terrorist groups operating in Britain today are different in many important respects both from Islamist extremist activity in other parts of the world and from historical terrorist movements such as the IRA or the Red Army Faction.
The "UK restricted" MI5 "operational briefing note", circulated within the security services in June, warns that, unless they understand the varied backgrounds of those drawn to terrorism in Britain, the security services will fail to counter their activities in the short term and fail to prevent violent radicalisation continuing in the long term.
It also concludes that the research results have important lessons for the government's programme to tackle the spread of violent extremism, underlining the need for "attractive alternatives" to terrorist involvement but also warning that traditional law enforcement tactics could backfire if handled badly or used against people who are not seen as legitimate targets.
The MI5 authors stress that the most pressing current threat is from Islamist extremist groups who justify the use of violence "in defence of Islam", but that there are also violent extremists involved in non-Islamist movements.
They say that they are concerned with those who use violence or actively support the use of violence and not those who simply hold politically extreme views.
Some fundamentalist Muslim traditionalists see that the world is divided into two houses: the House of Islamic Peace (Dar al-Salam), in which Muslim governments rule and Muslim law prevails, and the House of War (Dar al-Harb), the rest of the world, still inhabited. The presumption is that by natural law these domains will compete and fighting is inevitable therefore the duty of jihad will continue, interrupted only by truces, until all the world either adopts the Muslim faith or submits to Muslim rule.
I struggle to see the difference with the above beliefs and fascism.
No chance at all
Which site did you copy trash that from?
I wish you stopped your habit of editing posts after I have replied. Making my posts seem retarded.![]()