Scores die in Israeli air strikes

Cheers



It is a fair comparison. Chechnyans don't consider themselves Russian either, they consider themselves under an endless occupation, they don't want Russians on their land, and they've paid a higher price than the Palestinians. No-one cares because Russia is conceived of as a powerful country that is allowed to pull that kind of shit.

When you say 'never belonged to them', that's factually wrong, historical and archaeological records clearly show a Hebrew/Jewish presence on the land over several thousand years, including long periods of self-government. But whether you consider such ancient history relevant to current claims or not (I don't), it makes no sense to make out that modern Israelis have no right to the land. The state's sixty years old - in what way does a fourth-generation Israeli child have less right to the land than a Palestinian kid? You might as well tell modern-day Australians to go back to Britain or Ireland.

What's your answer? Should Israelis with Israeli parents and grandparents go back and reclaim Polish houses? Should they go back to Iraq, where in 1950, before the pogroms, the population of Baghdad was nearly a quarter Jewish? Or should they just submit to 'rightful' Arab rule - a rule that would, rest assured, see 'genocide', 'massacre', 'ethnic cleansing', 'modern-day Nazis' and the like restored to their proper usage within days?



The situation of Arab Israelis is indeed incomparable to that of blacks in apartheid South Africa, but not in the way you're suggesting. We've been through it too many times on here, apartheid no, discrimination yes, same as minorities in many countries, vote, healthcare, college education, Arab on supreme court, economically far better off than Arabs in many Arab states, economically worse off than most Jewish Israelis, ethnic/religious character of state problematic, but see situation of Druze and Bedouins for lack of simple state racism, etc. etc.

As for Palestine, I've been to the West Bank too, it's got its problems, the settlements are a disgrace and should be removed, the Israelis should be much fairer about water, and yes it should be given full statehood with the appropriate security guarantees to Israel. Economically it's doing rather well at the moment, mainly due to trade with Israel. There are far worse places to live than the West Bank.

Gaza is a different matter, but the Israelis pulled out of Gaza three years ago. It's bizarre to talk about hostile relations between two separate countries as 'apartheid'. They could also have improved their standard of living by not electing a government that responded to the Israeli concession of territory by repeatedly shelling them and continuing to vow their total obliteration.

Have you been to Grozny by the way, and talked to people there? The city has been decimated to a fraction of its former size, its population virtually halved. In the meantime, thousands still remain in bombed-out shells, without electricity or water, eight years on from the war.



It's not. For that, see the conflicts I mentioned above, in which hundreds of thousands have been killed in a matter of a few years, in a context of no existential threat to the agressors. That's considerably more than have been killed on both sides in over 60 years of the Arab-Israeli conflict, including at least 2 wars declared on israel by the Arab states.

It's scant consolation to bereaved families, but the fact remains, the Arab-Israeli conflict is small beer compared to a lot of other conflicts round the world.



Israel has done many brutal things and made many stupid mistakes, but it doesn't pull shit like that on purpose. Not because they're nice guys, but because the bad publicity is a major problem.





Your disgust for the people of Israel is itself disgusting. To group together for opprobrium an entire nation, including little kids who don't know shit, old women who were chased out of Middle Eastern countries in pogroms, Peace Now activists who've fought for years for a Palestinian state, immigrant Ethiopian Falashas trying to build a new life for themselves, or just ordinary Joes going about their business like you find in any other country, countries guilty of far worse crimes... disgusting mate.

It's good that you support oppressed populations - though I don't see you weighing in on here about how the populations of the countries responsible disgust you and make your blood boil. None of your reasons for privileging the Arab-Israeli conflict for special outrage are convincing. An atrocity is an atrocity, it should be judged according to its scale and its manner, not extrinsic factors like whether world nations treat it in a balanced way. It's not Israel's fault that extremists round the world care far more about Muslims killed by Jews than Muslims killed by Russians, Serbs, Chinese, Hindus or other Muslims. It's not Israel's fault if other states are biased in their favour (or have a more nuanced approach to blame than you prescribe). Besides, the world did sod all about Rwanda, gave carte blanche to Russia in Chechnya and China in Tibet, and has been toothless and equivocal about the actual genocide in Darfur.

As for the dipossession, look around the world. How many Greeks are left in what is now the Turkish part of Cyprus, and vice versa? How many Hereros in Southwest Africa? How many Japanese in Manchuria? How many ethnic Germans in Czecholsovakia and Poland? Oh, and how many Jews in Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Egypt, Iraq...? A lot less than there are Arabs in Israel and the occupied territories. Have the Palestinians been fecked on, are they still being fecked on, and should they get a state? Absolutely. Do Israeli actions justify their demonisation above far worse acts by other states? Of course not. I don't think you even know why you're combusting about this issue above all others - though the clue lies, I suspect, somewhere in your descriptions of Israeli 'sneering' and 'arrogance'. Have a look at yourself.


good one Pletch - make some of the silly idiots think for a change both pro and anti Israeli
 
Seriously, this is some serious bullshit. What a conclusion! Unreasonable to attack Gaza because it doesn't respect the cease-fire? In other words it's more reasonable to just let them fire those "symbolic rockets" for the next 10 years and hope they eventually get tired or bored of it and simply stop.

Unreasonable to undermine the democratic choices its people have made?? Well I'd agree with this statement if the Hamas and those who elected them would live somewhere far away on an isolated planet where they can bomb and kill no one but themselves.

Unreasonable to sabotage Hamas in its social work? Holy crap, I'm speechless.

you are taking someone out of context. Hamas was not the only side not respecting the ceasefire. To stop rockets being fired one could have just lifted the blockade.
 
60 years? "Palestines" didn't exist before 1967.

Palestine existed for centuries, as did the Palestinians. Three quarters of it is Jordan and the rest is Israel - at least according to one of our Israeli contributors. The problem now is how to partition Israel into a place where both Israelis and the Palestinians can live in, which is the root cause of the problems.
 
http://www.metimes.com/Politics/2009/01/03/israeli_arabs_protest_against_gaza_offensive/afp/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/world/2007/alan_johnston/default.stm

You are not functioning very well at near combustion conditions. Since you're familiar with the region what would you feel safer doing:

1. Waving a Palestinian flag in Israel.
2. Waving a Fatah flag in Gaza.

Freedom of expression...

what would you be safer doing:

walking along the street in Sderot
walking along the street in Gaza City
 
Palestine existed for centuries, as did the Palestinians. Three quarters of it is Jordan and the rest is Israel - at least according to one of our Israeli contributors. The problem now is how to partition Israel into a place where both Israelis and the Palestinians can live in, which is the root cause of the problems.

Sorry, I mispelled my original post. I meant the people "Palestinians". Palestine of course existed.
 
I'm trying to stay as objective as possible. The thing is I can understand the Israel/Hamas conflict because of its parallels to the Serbia/KLA conflict 10 years ago.

and do you remember what happened to Serbia after that conflict? So why is the West not acting now?
 
Rabbi Gabriel was a friend of mine.

Lets be clear. As I write in my first post, I have a HUGE issue with the people of Israel. There policies are despicable, lacking of any shred of moral legality and are the actions of the worst kind of humanity that we know of today.

Utter projection.

Like in the Mumbai attacks the alleged freedom fighters from Pakistan in an ideal world shouldn't have had any apparent reasons to grab a jewish couple, cut the eyes, ears and nose out of Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg, broke his legs and then smashing his face with bullets, torturing his pregnant missus for hours, stripping her, smashing her abdomen constantly and finally shooting between her legs, killing their children- it all sums up the brutal abhorrence of Jihad’s around the world who have turned on against Israel as whole
 
Rubbish. the UK is far from being an Israeli ally. If anything, together with Spain the UK is the most biased European country in favour of the Arabs in the ME conflict.

I think you are fundamentally wrong there. UK government is 100% behind Israel. Of the papers, only the Independent and the Guardian criticise Israel openly, most others sit on the fence. But even the Guardian gives a platform to... Alan Derschowitz?

Compare the treatment of Israel with the treatment of Serbia in 1999...
 
Cheers



It is a fair comparison. Chechnyans don't consider themselves Russian either, they consider themselves under an endless occupation, they don't want Russians on their land, and they've paid a higher price than the Palestinians. No-one cares because Russia is conceived of as a powerful country that is allowed to pull that kind of shit.

When you say 'never belonged to them', that's factually wrong, historical and archaeological records clearly show a Hebrew/Jewish presence on the land over several thousand years, including long periods of self-government. But whether you consider such ancient history relevant to current claims or not (I don't), it makes no sense to make out that modern Israelis have no right to the land. The state's sixty years old - in what way does a fourth-generation Israeli child have less right to the land than a Palestinian kid? You might as well tell modern-day Australians to go back to Britain or Ireland.

What's your answer? Should Israelis with Israeli parents and grandparents go back and reclaim Polish houses? Should they go back to Iraq, where in 1950, before the pogroms, the population of Baghdad was nearly a quarter Jewish? Or should they just submit to 'rightful' Arab rule - a rule that would, rest assured, see 'genocide', 'massacre', 'ethnic cleansing', 'modern-day Nazis' and the like restored to their proper usage within days?



The situation of Arab Israelis is indeed incomparable to that of blacks in apartheid South Africa, but not in the way you're suggesting. We've been through it too many times on here, apartheid no, discrimination yes, same as minorities in many countries, vote, healthcare, college education, Arab on supreme court, economically far better off than Arabs in many Arab states, economically worse off than most Jewish Israelis, ethnic/religious character of state problematic, but see situation of Druze and Bedouins for lack of simple state racism, etc. etc.

As for Palestine, I've been to the West Bank too, it's got its problems, the settlements are a disgrace and should be removed, the Israelis should be much fairer about water, and yes it should be given full statehood with the appropriate security guarantees to Israel. Economically it's doing rather well at the moment, mainly due to trade with Israel. There are far worse places to live than the West Bank.

Gaza is a different matter, but the Israelis pulled out of Gaza three years ago. It's bizarre to talk about hostile relations between two separate countries as 'apartheid'. They could also have improved their standard of living by not electing a government that responded to the Israeli concession of territory by repeatedly shelling them and continuing to vow their total obliteration.

Have you been to Grozny by the way, and talked to people there? The city has been decimated to a fraction of its former size, its population virtually halved. In the meantime, thousands still remain in bombed-out shells, without electricity or water, eight years on from the war.



It's not. For that, see the conflicts I mentioned above, in which hundreds of thousands have been killed in a matter of a few years, in a context of no existential threat to the agressors. That's considerably more than have been killed on both sides in over 60 years of the Arab-Israeli conflict, including at least 2 wars declared on israel by the Arab states.

It's scant consolation to bereaved families, but the fact remains, the Arab-Israeli conflict is small beer compared to a lot of other conflicts round the world.



Israel has done many brutal things and made many stupid mistakes, but it doesn't pull shit like that on purpose. Not because they're nice guys, but because the bad publicity is a major problem.





Your disgust for the people of Israel is itself disgusting. To group together for opprobrium an entire nation, including little kids who don't know shit, old women who were chased out of Middle Eastern countries in pogroms, Peace Now activists who've fought for years for a Palestinian state, immigrant Ethiopian Falashas trying to build a new life for themselves, or just ordinary Joes going about their business like you find in any other country, countries guilty of far worse crimes... disgusting mate.

It's good that you support oppressed populations - though I don't see you weighing in on here about how the populations of the countries responsible disgust you and make your blood boil. None of your reasons for privileging the Arab-Israeli conflict for special outrage are convincing. An atrocity is an atrocity, it should be judged according to its scale and its manner, not extrinsic factors like whether world nations treat it in a balanced way. It's not Israel's fault that extremists round the world care far more about Muslims killed by Jews than Muslims killed by Russians, Serbs, Chinese, Hindus or other Muslims. It's not Israel's fault if other states are biased in their favour (or have a more nuanced approach to blame than you prescribe). Besides, the world did sod all about Rwanda, gave carte blanche to Russia in Chechnya and China in Tibet, and has been toothless and equivocal about the actual genocide in Darfur.

As for the dipossession, look around the world. How many Greeks are left in what is now the Turkish part of Cyprus, and vice versa? How many Hereros in Southwest Africa? How many Japanese in Manchuria? How many ethnic Germans in Czecholsovakia and Poland? Oh, and how many Jews in Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Egypt, Iraq...? A lot less than there are Arabs in Israel and the occupied territories. Have the Palestinians been fecked on, are they still being fecked on, and should they get a state? Absolutely. Do Israeli actions justify their demonisation above far worse acts by other states? Of course not. I don't think you even know why you're combusting about this issue above all others - though the clue lies, I suspect, somewhere in your descriptions of Israeli 'sneering' and 'arrogance'. Have a look at yourself.

Pletch,

you write well and I still enjoy reading your posts. And we do share alot in in terms of morality and a passion for not accepting injustice.

However, that does not mean that most of the above is correct. Although well argued, its your own personal bias and too much of it is speculative. As for the personal attacks, you don't need to do that and they have belittled you just a little in my opinion.

So from my side and with all due respect, we'll have to agree to disagree.

However thanks for taking the time to give a well thought out response. Its appreciated.
 
Well, bad as it might sound, if we wanted to do that, there would have been far from than a few hundred dead. So it's not genocide.

By the way, a Hamas rocket landed in a Kindergarten in Ashdod yesterday. Luckily it was empty, and no one was hurt. Of course, nobody gives a f*ck about that.

of course we give a f*ck. But since the Palestinian causalties number hundreds and israeli ones do not, we quite understandably focus the Palestinian causalties first and foremost.
 
It's less stupid than the argument Bob and others frequently make - that they're killing as many Palestinians as they can. They're quite patently not, and they'd kill a lot less if Hamas didn't use their own people as shields.

It's fairly simple. The IDF, like all armies engaged in war, don't really give a feck about civilian casualties, but don't like bad publicity. Not giving a feck about civilian casualties is bad, but not nearly as bad as Hamas and similar terrorists, who actively seek them on both the enemy's and, perversely, their own side, and if they had Israel's power would kill every last enemy civilian they could find - save for the Arabs and perhaps the odd Druze and Bedouin if they were feeling nice - and 'international pressure' be damned.

but you are speaking on the assumption that Hamas are just itching to kill every Israeli on the planet. Which to me is far from clear. Yes, we can go on about what it says in their charter, but the truth is that their actions are influenced in a large part by Israeli actions, i.e. if there was a peaceful Israel instead of a hostile Israel then Hamas would not be what they are now. If you oppress people for years, blockade them etc etc, then what's more likely: that they hate you because of the oppression and blockade or because of some 'ideological hatred'?
 
As for the dipossession, look around the world. How many Greeks are left in what is now the Turkish part of Cyprus, and vice versa? How many Hereros in Southwest Africa? How many Japanese in Manchuria? How many ethnic Germans in Czecholsovakia and Poland? Oh, and how many Jews in Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Egypt, Iraq...? A lot less than there are Arabs in Israel and the occupied territories. Have the Palestinians been fecked on, are they still being fecked on, and should they get a state? Absolutely. Do Israeli actions justify their demonisation above far worse acts by other states? Of course not. I don't think you even know why you're combusting about this issue above all others - though the clue lies, I suspect, somewhere in your descriptions of Israeli 'sneering' and 'arrogance'. Have a look at yourself.

*cough* Kurds *cough*

As a Kurd, I feel it's a bit unfair how the Palestinians gets all the media coverage. I mean, if we had a few terrorist organizations of our own hoping for the destruction of Turkey/Iran/Iraq/Syria, then maybe people would care.
 
*cough* Kurds *cough*

As a Kurd, I feel it's a bit unfair how the Palestinians gets all the media coverage. I mean, if we had a few terrorist organizations of our own hoping for the destruction of Turkey/Iran/Iraq/Syria, then maybe people would care.

you had Ocalan?
 
I find it ridiculous that he was fined for it. I recall Ghanian west ham player john pantsil flashing an Israeli flag during the last world cup and not punished. I don't think either should be punished but it shows the sad double standards in this world.

rules are rules and FIFA does not allow this
 
I have found that Fisk usually comes across as the most self-hating white person in the history of self-hating white people. I'm oversimplifying of course, but in general, every piece he writes is West=Bad, Others=Good, West=Oppressors who deserve any damage they get, Others=Victims whose actions can always be excused. The article could just as easily be retitled "Why do I hate the West so much, we will ask".

I admit it's been a couple of years since I read his stuff much, but I doubt it has changed.

but instead of criticising Fisk, look at the evidence and the facts he gives...

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinio...ate-the-west-so-much-we-will-ask-1230046.html
 
Nick, Thanks for posting with empathy and reason.

I guess my point of view on this is the historical one. This current attack is just the latest sorry chapter in a 60+ year old injustice on the people of Palestine. I'm sure you know the history, but if you don't, I encourage you to find out. Never has there been a better situation for the phrase "one mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist".

I have been to Palestine and seen what its like, I'm as well read as I need to be on the history and have debated this subject often and at length with people who know far more about it than me. They all come to the same end point: Solve the Palestine issue and all this 'global terrorism' nonsense goes away. Yes, it really is as simple as that.

One cannot ignore the history or origins of this tragedy. It is integral to every single action that takes place. And until those root causes are resolved, the subsequent reparations distributed and some kind of justice made, it will go on and on and on. Maybe that day will come sooner than we think when the ME runs out of oil and so it is no longer in the interests of the West to have a fully financed mafioso in the region.

I cant/don't have sympathy for the Israeli cause here. They are involved in an immoral subjugation of an historic and distinguished people and its land. Any man will fight for his home if it is taken by another through force and outside of the law. And so it will go on until one day, some time, he regains his home. It cannot end any other way.

I have read quite a bit on the history but was never able to draw these conclusions .Perhaps you could outline your thinking historically speaking.
 
Remember there are a number of moderators on this forum, not all Muslim. We discuss any comment we feel might not be acceptable, and the appropriate action to taken. If you think I am being blinkered in my moderating due to my religion, and you're not satisfied with the way this forum is moderated you have the freedom to leave.

WeWonItTwoTimes has basically spouted similar rubbish in more than one post. I never infracted him, or wrote a PM asking him to cool down - Sammky was even man enough to apologise.

Perfect Moderating I would say.

:lol: I am eternally grateful for your kindness.

Civilians lose their innocence the moment they decide to support an organisation at the ballot box committed to the destruction of another nation and its people.

This is like Nazi Germany all over again, although thankfully in this instance the military power is overwhelmingly weighted in the civilised nation's favour.

I think we all know what would happen if the roles were reversed and the islamist facists had the upper hand militarily. We wouldn't be talking about a couple of hundred civilians being accidentally killed, we'd be talking about millions of civilians being brutally murdered through mass genocide.
 
I think we all know what would happen if the roles were reversed and the islamist facists had the upper hand militarily. We wouldn't be talking about a couple of hundred civilians being accidentally killed, we'd be talking about millions of civilians being brutally murdered through mass genocide.
Eh, didn't the Jews live under the Ottomans rather less persecuted that they were by the Christians, for hundreds of years?
 
Out of interest how would you like your country to respond to hundreds of rockets being fired on its territory?

You'd probably try the United Nations first and then quickly realise that the best option is to sort it out yourselves and start fighting back.
We've not had hundreds of rockets fired on our country because we haven't locked up 1.5 million people
 
You can't mean that! You come across to be a nice guy. How would you feel if it was Israeli children being blown to pieces on THAT scale. You may say "I know all about war so I don't need you telling me..." but would you really be happy to live in the conditions that Gazans do? Would sit back and let a foreign force control what you can and can't receive or would you fight back? For a second forget about the political and religious background. Hamas may be terrorists but it should tell you something about how dire the situation of Gazans is for them to be elected (you can't believe the absolute shite "wewonittwotimes" was spouting). You may think that your soldiers are killing a few hundred Hamas "terrorists" but those kids who've witnessed what no-one should ever have to in their live times are the new breed of Hamas members and they're going to be far more hardline than this set. Israel has inadvertently increased the number of future hamas members and could you really blame those children if they want payback after losing their whole families?

What worries me is that you really believe your own tripe, such as the orders I'm talking about are to murder kids. The democratically elected government of Israel ordered army to lift the rocket threat off 500000 of its citizens. That is the minimal and most basic requirement from an elected government according to any international standard.

Let me suprise you somewhat, and tell you that you don't feel more for the Palestinian civilians any more than I do. Not only children, but adults too. I feel for the dead kids and their families, and for the kids who'll never see their parents again. I don't have to spout racist, or rightous, shit on the web in order to prove it. The difference is that unlike some here who find it easy to put themselves in place of the Palestinians, very few bother to think what life in Southern Israel is like. The Israeli government can't allow this to go on, even if sitting in bomb-shelters for years isn't as photogenic as demolished buildings.

I understand what you're saying about suffering children turning their anxieties into future hate but you're missing a few points in your analysis:
1. Those kids are indoctrinated under Hamas to hate Israel no matter what.
2. I don't think there'll be a peacefull solution in the ME before the Palestinians understand Hamas is their problem more than it is ours.
3. My cousin was shot in the face from 10 yards by a Palestinian on her way back home from school a few years ago. That didn't make me hate Palestinians, or convinced me to go out and kill as many of them as possible. I hope the other side matures to the point of understanding that the vicious cycle needs to stop, and the need to move on for a better future requires abandoning unrealistic aspirations. That's very unlikely under Hamas, and unfortunately sympathizers of the Palestinian cause are too blinded by their hate to Israel to deliver the message to the people they so much care for.
 
What worries me is that you really believe your own tripe, such as the orders I'm talking about are to murder kids. The democratically elected government of Israel ordered army to lift the rocket threat off 500000 of its citizens. That is the minimal and most basic requirement from an elected government according to any international standard.

Let me suprise you somewhat, and tell you that you don't feel more for the Palestinian civilians any more than I do. Not only children, but adults too. I feel for the dead kids and their families, and for the kids who'll never see their parents again. I don't have to spout racist, or rightous, shit on the web in order to prove it. The difference is that unlike some here who find it easy to put themselves in place of the Palestinians, very few bother to think what life in Southern Israel is like. The Israeli government can't allow this to go on, even if sitting in bomb-shelters for years isn't as photogenic as demolished buildings.

I understand what you're saying about suffering children turning their anxieties into future hate but you're missing a few points in your analysis:
1. Those kids are indoctrinated under Hamas to hate Israel no matter what.
2. I don't think there'll be a peacefull solution in the ME before the Palestinians understand Hamas is their problem more than it is ours.
3. My cousin was shot in the face from 10 yards by a Palestinian on her way back home from school a few years ago. That didn't make me hate Palestinians, or convinced me to go out and kill as many of them as possible. I hope the other side matures to the point of understanding that the vicious cycle needs to stop, and the need to move on for a better future requires abandoning unrealistic aspirations. That's very unlikely under Hamas, and unfortunately sympathizers of the Palestinian cause are too blinded by their hate to Israel to deliver the message to the people they so much care for.
Hamas were formed in the mid 80's, Israel had a long time to make peace with the Palestinians before Hamas came along, they are just another excuse to prolong the occupation
 
Palestine existed for centuries, as did the Palestinians. Three quarters of it is Jordan and the rest is Israel - at least according to one of our Israeli contributors. The problem now is how to partition Israel into a place where both Israelis and the Palestinians can live in, which is the root cause of the problems.

That's debatable. However, it is obvious that neither side can make the other disappear, and therefore any solution should be based on current demography rather than Ottoman figures.
 
We had people in Northern Ireland blowing up people, we didn't respond by locking up entire communities.

We had the odd couple of bombs every year or so on the mainland, and we still managed a fair few atrocities. If we'd had thousands of rockets falling on provincial English towns, all hell would have broken loose.
 
I think you are fundamentally wrong there. UK government is 100% behind Israel. Of the papers, only the Independent and the Guardian criticise Israel openly, most others sit on the fence. But even the Guardian gives a platform to... Alan Derschowitz?

Compare the treatment of Israel with the treatment of Serbia in 1999...

Or for that matter compare the (lack of) international outcry following NATO bombardment of civilian targets to that Israel has to face WHEN IT WAS ATTACKED FIRST.
 
We had the odd couple of bombs every year or so on the mainland, and we still managed a fair few atrocities. If we'd had thousands of rockets falling on provincial English towns, all hell would have broken loose.

You forgot the widespread torture and detention without trial, as well as trying to lock up whole communities ;)
 
but you are speaking on the assumption that Hamas are just itching to kill every Israeli on the planet. Which to me is far from clear. Yes, we can go on about what it says in their charter, but the truth is that their actions are influenced in a large part by Israeli actions, i.e. if there was a peaceful Israel instead of a hostile Israel then Hamas would not be what they are now. If you oppress people for years, blockade them etc etc, then what's more likely: that they hate you because of the oppression and blockade or because of some 'ideological hatred'?

For you it's far from clear, but I'm sure you can understand that unless it's clear to the Israeli government it can't allow a Hamas-led territory on our doorstep with uncontrolled border crossings.Israelis have a by far smaller margin for error here, than you have back in London for example.

Without belittling the current suffering in Gaza let me run what seems to be a wild scenario. If Hamas extends its missile range from 40 to 60km it would be able to hit the nuclear plant in Dimona. What would happen to the Gaza Strip in response would make the current plight of the Gazan looks like a day out on the beach. Why is it that sympathizers of the two sides can't see that sometimes there are common interests and not only a clash of interests? Getting rid of Hamas is a Palestinian interest, and unfortunately until this happens I can't see us abandoning our demand for control of what goes in and out of Gaza.
 
*cough* Kurds *cough*

As a Kurd, I feel it's a bit unfair how the Palestinians gets all the media coverage. I mean, if we had a few terrorist organizations of our own hoping for the destruction of Turkey/Iran/Iraq/Syria, then maybe people would care.

I was as disgusted as you were at the recent outburst of Arduan. Needless to say nobody questioned publickly his logic considering the attacks of his army on the Kurds in Northern Iraq.
 
It's the extremists that make bad names for both sides, unfortunately they are so many that the elect extremists.