Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 50,825
At this point is there anything that isn't "typical Caf"?
Anderson is a huge talent, just like RVP was a huge talent. Arsenal stuck by him through the injuries and they got one helluva player before we snapped him up. Some players are burdened with injuries. If Anderson's injuries meant that he had lost his pace and strength, he would probably be gone, but he isn't, which means that Ferguson sees a real talent there that is yet to blossom fully.
Lawman: you are completely in the wrong when you say that people don't put a lot of stick on Anderson compared to other players. How many times haven't we seen the fat argument, lazy argument and fitness argument, whereas Cleverley has gotten away with the 60 minute interval that he does - and does it none better than Anderson. Posters on here were also adamant that Anderson was slow and seriously lacked pace - deluded as hell.
I personally love it when posters stick up for players, because after matches this place is one sorry ass place to read. Evra's thread is fairly quiet at the moment, which means he plays well - I've bumped it a few times after some really good performances, but there will only be a couple of posts that agree. Then wait till he makes a mistake and you can see how the knee-jerk reactions bobble, sell Evra, retire Giggs and sack Fergie all over again. It's the same with Rio really, who is having a terrific season, but his thread is a frickin mausoleum.
Anderson was utterly rubbish against Southampton, but Smalling was just as bad. I'm a fan of Smalling, but he deserves at least as much criticism.
So yeah, I think it's good that we have some who defend the players and refrain from knee-jerk reactions, but instead like to focus on the positive aspects of the game, unlike the vast majority in here.
This thread is testament to the fact that Anderson really splits opinion amongst fans. I personally think he is a brilliant player but it has only been shown in spurts. Imo the only thing he is currently lacking is consistency (mostly injury related) and that's maybe what makes some of his detractors more reluctant to heap praise on him.
I really don't know how you could call him a 'brilliant' player there really is no tangible evidence to support that view. Has he ever put in a show stopping performance for us a la Robin Van Persie or Ronaldo? They are brilliant players btw.
For me he is usually a 6/10, a guy who sometimes throws a few 7 & 8's out there.
I don't get this statement, seeing as soon as he has a good 60 minutes his fans run into this thread and start rambling about how good he is. What's the difference?
The majority of what's being said here is basically a rehash of what's been said for the last two years, so it's hardly knee jerk.
I don't understand why people take personal offence when either Nani or Anderson are criticised. Now, there will be extreme views from both sides of the camp, but in this instance, it appears to be constructive criticism. For me; people vastly overrating a performance is equally as bad as people vastly underrating a performance.
Lets call a spade a spade; Ando was poor the other night - he has had some very good games this season but Wednesday night was not one of them. So what is wrong with people echoing those sentiments?
I also don't get why people are asking why he is being singled out? He isn't, this just happens to be, the erm.......Anderson thread. Plenty of other players were poor the other night, and that has been addressed in their respective threads.
FWIW, your comment does not make you a better fan, if that is what you are trying to achieve. At least add something constructive to the debate.
That's Anderson in soundbites.Of the top of my head, this season, that QPR game he came on I thought he was great, the Reading game too before he got injured and the Chelsea league cup game. I thought his performance in all three was more than a 7 or 8 but like I said it's in bursts..
Like I said, why repeat when a poster has just made a wonderful counter argument to yours right above mine. Sometimes posts are so idiotic that they deserve nothing more than a "nonsense", imo of course. Other posts deserve debate, yours rarely do, but that said....
Anderson this season had just made himself first choice before he got injured.
And besides that, what is this garbage about "he's played less games over the last couple of seasons than before"... why make stuff up? that's not debating, it's just nonsense.
This season Anderson, withstanding injury (which we never know with him) is likely to surpass his appearances for every other season other than his debut season. His ball retention is better, his assist stats are better, and yet you have decided "he's going backwards".
So now I've given you plenty of reasons, when to be honest, you yourself should have just known that you were talking hyperbolic knee-jerk nonsense because he had a poor game last night.
I really don't know how you could call him a 'brilliant' player there really is no tangible evidence to support that view. Has he ever put in a show stopping performance for us a la Robin Van Persie or Ronaldo? They are brilliant players btw.
For me he is usually a 6/10, a guy who sometimes throws a few 7 & 8's out there.
You're an arsehole
Anderson in a nutshell....
I find it funny the outrage here at times when he is criticised. He's here nearly 6 years now, thats a long time. Hes still not someone I can ever fully trust. Not in the way you could with a fully fit Fletcher.
Now compare both their respective journeys with United and the abuse Fletcher got here at times was so much worse. It seems to me that Anderson's happy go lucky personality grants him extra levels of patience with fans.
Im not saying he hasnt improved somewhat but personally I expect more from him and I think the club should as well. His stamina issues should be a thing of the past after 6 years here. The fact that they arent makes me think he'll never be the player we need him to be on a consistant basis.
He's evidently a better player than when he signed,
So I'm an arsehole because I called out your post claiming that Anderson is "going backwards" is nonsense and then just 2 posts down you agree with me![]()
I get the 6 years argument. But hasn't a good chunk of that time been spent on the treatment table? For a young lad, it's not really helpful for your development. He's now 24 reaching 25 with a chance to get some regular games. I agree with the notion that he's been fortunate Sir Alex hasn't brought in a new CM but maybe part of that has to do with SAF still having some belief in him.
It may feel like he's going backwards because he hasn't fulfilled the initial expectations but are you going backwards if you're showing some improvement in your game? I still maintain it may not have been the best idea to try and convert Anderson into a disciplined midfielder who can get up and down the pitch as a sort of box-to-box type midfielder. You can still see his tendencies to play as an attacking mid more so than a centre mid.
Comparing Anderson's trajectory to Rooney, Ronaldo and other players who have developed well here is a bit harsh when they've spent much less time on the treatment table. That has to be factored in for me simply because I think he's missed out on some quality time to really develop his game. I still think he can make a name for himself here but not to the extent most of us had initially hoped.
Not to sound overly harsh, but the fitness table shouldn't really be used as an excuse for a professional footballer. The club shouldn't be getting sentimental or giving him so many chances just because he's had injuries.
Although I agree with you to a certain extent, I think we have to remember the amount of time effort and money that has been put into Anderson. Of course United will give him every chance they can, until they are absolute certain that Anderson is not the man for United, we will continue to back him. It would be disastrous if we let him go before his peak years, only for him to then find and maintain that extra gear we know he has.
Not to sound overly harsh, but the fitness table shouldn't really be used as an excuse for a professional footballer. The club shouldn't be getting sentimental or giving him so many chances just because he's had injuries.
I don't think we should sell him by the way, but at this stage that's more to do with the fact that our midfield is going to be so short in numbers in the Summer more than his actual talent.
I really get troubled with the constant 'late development' comparisons with Ronaldo, that get applied to many players. Ronaldo was an extra special talent and that much was obvious to the whole world whilst he was still a teenager. For example, I remember reading an interview with Luis Figo before Euro 2004 where he stated with confidence that Ronaldo would be the best player in the world.
There were some naysayers in the English media; Hanson and Macari being two that particularly annoyed me; but there were many more who could see the obvious and rare talent. Remember that at 19 he made the FA Cup final his own and that summer he made the Euro 2004 team of the tournament. We don't have any young players in the squad, at the moment, who are as talented as him.
Still feel the same but ultimately we cant wait forever either. its gona be a tough call when it happens.
Its not like he brings us at his best something that is so unique and ground breaking it can't be found elsewhere.
When does his current contract run out?
I get this whole 'we can't keep waiting' theory, but I don't get it much in the context that he has had a largely excellent season. he played his first bad game in ages and people are now saying he should be sold.
I get this whole 'we can't keep waiting' theory, but I don't get it much in the context that he has had a largely excellent season. he played his first bad game in ages and people are now saying he should be sold.
It's very strange indeed.
Lads, he's just back from injury and he was poor in a game in which pretty much everyone was poor. Before the injury he'd just hit some superb form. So here's a novel idea, let's give it a month or two and see how this goes for him, can he hit that top level again quickly and if he does, can he get stay injury free and get some consistency with it? After a very decent first game back before this and that ball to Rooney, surely we can forgive him one poor game?
Rinse and repeat.
Well Anderson was hyped up as the best young attacking midfielder in the world before we signed him, there was massive hype. He got that European Golden Boy award (or whatever it's called) in 2008 too I think. The hype for him back then was similar to the hype around the likes of Gotze now. Most people expected him to go on to really great things.
He's the one player that I actually felt gutted about when you signed him.
Future world player of the year.
I jizzed when we got him.
He's a real player. Only impetuousity and consistency away from being the best player we have i reckon, which will come soon enough. Was a bit sloppy today though, few passes went astray.
Let's just say, from what I've seen so far, he is really a special talent. Hence, the granted working permit back then was very much an appropriate decision.
Anderson, minus the typical flaws of youth, which may happen in a couple of years, will be up there with the very best midfielders in the world i reckon, quite possibly the best.
Reckon he could well be our best player too.
When have you ever seen Fabregas so utterly dominated in the centre of the park? I'm suprised by the man of the match voting, I thought Anderson absolutely ran the show. The strength, the pace, just the sheer quality of the lad is sensational
Still a teenager, the dreadlocked Brazilian has made a huge impact, is already in Brazil's national squad and is considered the heir apparent to Ronaldinho as his country's star player.
Can't disagree with that Cina. I've said plenty of times, Anderson's injuries have always stopped us getting an idea of the consistency levels he can reach, and maybe injuries will keep doing that as you say.
All I'm saying here though is, it's the first poor game in a long time, Carrick and Smalling were also very bad amongst others and I just don't think that deserves the level of negative debate that has started in here again.