Eboue
nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Is this ICE a criminal organisation or what?
yes
Is this ICE a criminal organisation or what?
Not sure if it's the right thread, but just came across this:
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/30/...ly-excused-of-murder-released-trnd/index.html
It's the story about Richard Philips who's spent 45 years wrongfully in prison. What's
almost as staggering is that already in 2010 his co-defendant told a parole board that he had lied when he was arrested and that Philips was innocent. Despite this knowledge it took four years until someone tipped off the Innocense Clinic and after that four more years before Philips was finally acquitted. Now that he's free he can potentially get a maximum of 2.250.000 usd in reparations.
Imagine spending 45 years in prison for something that you didn't do and learning that a parole board didn't act on it when they heard of your innocense eight years ago. And that spending 45 years in prison is only worth 2.250.00 usd.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent," Scalia wrote in a 2009 dissent of the Court's order for a federal trial court in Georgia to consider the case of death row inmate Troy Davis. "Quite to the contrary, we have repeatedly left that question unresolved, while expressing considerable doubt that any claim based on alleged 'actual innocence' is constitutionally cognizable."
The legal definition of "actual innocence" is the absence of facts required to convict someone based on a criminal statute, according to the Legal Information Institute. Defendants appealing convictions seek to prove actual innocence by submitting new evidence that reverses the court's confidence in a past verdict.
The cop clearly says "gun, gun" on the video so they genuinely believed he was armed. It was a tragic situation where the cops have to make split second life and death judgement calls.
Clark knew very well they were cops. There was an helicopter overhead and the cops had been in the neighborhood a few minutes. He was caught on camera by the helicopter acting suspiciously and trying to avoid detection.
It's always easy to say this when the person who's dead has absolutely nothing to do with you. And besides I don't know what you're trying to insinuate here. Even though he knew they were cops and a helicopter was overhead, I still don't see the need for the police to take his life away.
Tased and beaten up for jaywalking.
Jaywalking seems like a stupid offence anyway. How come Americans accept this law? With all the fuss about freedom of speech and the right to bear arms why doesn’t everyone demand to be treated like adults when it comes to going out for a walk?!
BBC Editorial on the Baltimore cops
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/when_cops_become_robbers
BBC Editorial on the Baltimore cops
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/when_cops_become_robbers
Tased and beaten up for jaywalking.
Jaywalking seems like a stupid offence anyway. How come Americans accept this law? With all the fuss about freedom of speech and the right to bear arms why doesn’t everyone demand to be treated like adults when it comes to going out for a walk?!
https://www.ramapo.edu/law-journal/...ed-social-historical-look-mass-incarceration/Although slavery was illegal, southern states empowered by the 13th Amendment instituted the Black Codes, which would eventually become the infamous Jim Crow Laws. Black Codes and Jim Crow laws increased the severity of petty crimes, and acts such as loitering or jaywalking resulted in imprisonment. A majority of newly freed African Americans found themselves in prison, and back on the plantations.
I think jaywalking was introduced as an offence soon after the civil war.
Yes, found a source:
https://www.ramapo.edu/law-journal/...ed-social-historical-look-mass-incarceration/
There was a revealing moment when Joe Kennedy, Democrat and former prosecutor, said the quiet part out loud - he opposes marijuana legalisation because then there will not be an easy way to stop and search cars. Here: https://reason.com/blog/2018/04/01/rep-joe-kennedy-iii-is-sad-that-pot-lega
In a ruling Monday, a majority of the Supreme Court, in a review of what by all appearances is one of the least justified shootings imaginable, held that law enforcement is almost always right. In Kisela v. Hughes, police in Tucson, Arizona, responded to a call that a woman was hacking at a tree with a knife. When they arrived, Amy Hughes came outdoors holding a kitchen knife at her side. Hughes didn’t respond immediately to requests to drop it. Two officers held back but one saw that as reason to shoot, hitting her four times and leaving her gravely wounded. She survived and sued.
In an unsigned opinion, the court rejected Hughes’ claim of excessive force, saying officers are entitled to immunity unless previous cases clearly tell them a specific use of force is unlawful. True enough, there may not be a previous case where the life of a tree was at stake. But here, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a blistering dissent, found that no one’s life was at stake: Hughes did not raise the knife in the direction of the police, or her roommate. She wasn’t behaving erratically or verbally threatening anyone. The ruling, Sotomayor wrote, shows an “unflinching willingness” to intervene prematurely to wrongly grant immunity.
Are you criticising the “Land of the Free”?That’s interesting. It’s a fecking terrible law. Infantilising fully grown adults. Surprised there isn’t more of a fuss made about it. Take away their guns and everyone loses their mind. Take away their right to walk across roads and that’s all just fine, apparently.
Shots were fired because they he didn't listen to commands to show his hands and they believed he had a gun. Or maybe you missed the office say "gun" in the video?
It would be interesting if one of our US cop posters could chime in on this one.
We usually do comment on most incidents.
Do you get training or guidance on being absolutely sure that a perp is holding a weapon? I just can't believe that the Clark shooting cops could clearly ID a gun under those circumstances. It seems to me that if we grant you the power to take lives in the performance of your duties then you should have to be damn sure that it's necessary.
What a read.BBC Editorial on the Baltimore cops
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/when_cops_become_robbers
Anyone been watching “Flint Town” on Netflix?
Yeah, though I stopped when I saw one of the cops wearing a Blue Lives Matter hat.
How come?
I don’t mean how come that put you off, as I know how you feel about that “movement”, as it were. I was just curious if you didn’t find the show in general interesting enough to carry on with?
It’s pretty one dimensional.
It gave a brief history of flint, and I liked the parts where the residents would be speaking at town halls and such.
Outside of that?
It centres mostly on the police community, the two love birds, the mother and son duo, the new police chief etc.
I kinda have a feeling it’ll focus on how militarised the police force gets, and I don’t need to see that.
I don’t really see what it’s going to do to benefit me or give me any other perspective.
But if you can tell me otherwise, I’m open to watching it again.
Watched a couple episodes. Too depressing for me. But makes me really appreciate my job and am reminded of how good i have it.Anyone been watching “Flint Town” on Netflix?
I agree, the community aspects were the best thing about it. I personally didn’t care for the “bio’s” on the officers. Not sure if it was included to try and show a “look we’re regilar people” kind of spin or what, but it took momentum away from the show.
Personally I enjoyed it for the reason above that we both touched on. Seeing the interaction between the police and the community. It’s a unique circumstance in which the numbers are hugely disproportionate, and they have very unique struggles in terms of the town itself and all they’ve gone through. Granted, I don’t see it as a piece that will change someone’s opinion on the current climate, but I don’t think a show about anything would.
More than anything i hope it sparks more of a nationwide discussion about issues and things that need to happen. Although, I don’t hold out much hope.
On a side note, and this is open to yourself, or anyone. I just finished FTO training, so will be taking out new officers who come to our office after graduating the academy, and training them to see if they make it off the field training phase. I plan on having a variety of discussions across topics since we’ll have time to kill in the car while hunting those ticket quotasif there’s a perspective or topic that you think would be good to broach, or something you would like to hear a new officers perspective and thoughts on, let me know. This is probably a little far out of left field, but I’m open to hearing suggestions, in PM or otherwise
![]()
This is a great idea, thanks!
I'm currently snowed under with work, moving house and potentially moving jobsbut i'll make a note to come back to you on this when I have more time in the next week or so.
Not sure if it's the right thread, but just came across this:
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/30/...ly-excused-of-murder-released-trnd/index.html
It's the story about Richard Philips who's spent 45 years wrongfully in prison. What's almost as staggering is that already in 2010 his co-defendant told a parole board that he had lied when he was arrested and that Philips was innocent. Despite this knowledge it took four years until someone tipped off the Innocense Clinic and after that four more years before Philips was finally acquitted. Now that he's free he can potentially get a maximum of 2.250.000 usd in reparations.
Imagine spending 45 years in prison for something that you didn't do and learning that a parole board didn't act on it when they heard of your innocense eight years ago. And that spending 45 years in prison is only worth 2.250.00 usd.
Horrible he lost most of his life for wrongful conviction but $2.25M is certainly not a bad amount to receive based on the law, which equates to 50K per year. He should be able to live the remainder of his life without worry with that amount of loot, assuming he doesn't spend it all quickly. Course it would be quite shitty of the Fed tax him on it.
DEPUTIES AMBUSHED BY GUNMAN
Trenton, Florida - At approximately 3:00 PM this afternoon, two Gilchrist County Deputy Sheriffs were shot and killed in the Ace China restaurant in downtown Trenton, after a suspect walked up to the business and shot both deputies through the window. As fellow deputies responded to the scene, they found the shooter deceased outside the business, and both Deputy Sheriffs where they died of their wounds.
At this point, it remains an active criminal investigation with no apparent motive or indications as to why this tragedy occurred.
Our thoughts and prayers are with these brave deputies’ families, friends, colleagues at Gilchrist County Sheriff's Office, and the community they selflessly served.