Cop in America doing a bad job, again

To me it's clearly fear, that man is in fear of his life and completely loses control. The problem is the fear is not rational in the circumstance and the officer should be much, much better than that.

Excellent analysis, mate. He is definitely reacting through fear, as soon as he heard the word gun he started panicking, but as you say, REALLY panicking. He lost control completely and again, as you say, he's clearly not in control at any point after he heard the word gun. The swearing got me too as it showed he had lost the plot, and I think the report I saw said he fired 7 shots, which for lack of a better word is complete overkill. 2 hit him in the heart but he didn't die instantly, so he suffered for some time.

Quite how his lady and kid get over that i'm not sure. The verdict is disgraceful and I bet it's destroyed the poor woman all over again.

I know double jeopardy means that the case can't be tried again, but is this the end? Is there any chance a judge or the Supreme Court could overturn the ruling? And I hate to say this, I really do, but what are the chances of civil litigation?
 
An article mentioned that the acquittal all stemmed around the definition of culpable negligence. In this case, reaching for something when you are known to have a gun on your person.

My estimate is the victim did not consider having a gun to be out of the ordinary, and took a far more relaxed stance to the situation than the shooter. The shooter severely tensed up the moment he learned of the gun, and the movement of the victim triggered him into premature escalation.

I don't think the shooter should have ever been in a job that involved carrying a firearm, nor should he going forward.
 
Excellent analysis, mate. He is definitely reacting through fear, as soon as he heard the word gun he started panicking, but as you say, REALLY panicking. He lost control completely and again, as you say, he's clearly not in control at any point after he heard the word gun. The swearing got me too as it showed he had lost the plot, and I think the report I saw said he fired 7 shots, which for lack of a better word is complete overkill. 2 hit him in the heart but he didn't die instantly, so he suffered for some time.

Quite how his lady and kid get over that i'm not sure. The verdict is disgraceful and I bet it's destroyed the poor woman all over again.

I know double jeopardy means that the case can't be tried again, but is this the end? Is there any chance a judge or the Supreme Court could overturn the ruling? And I hate to say this, I really do, but what are the chances of civil litigation?

The swearing reallly struck me.

I know it's not a situation most of us will find ourselves in but it almost sounds like an admission of guilt, at the least blind panic.

You shoot to stop if you have to, not 7 times, you should be justified in doing so and as soon as you do you should be clearing the threat/weapon and administering first aid, tasking ambulances etc. It's professional and procedure.

Not continuing to point a gun at a man shot 7 times, his partner and child, whilst saying feck in a blind panic.
 
The swearing reallly struck me.

I know it's not a situation most of us will find ourselves in but it almost sounds like an admission of guilt, at the least blind panic.

You shoot to stop if you have to, not 7 times, you should be justified in doing so and as soon as you do you should be clearing the threat/weapon and administering first aid, tasking ambulances etc. It's professional and procedure.

Not continuing to point a gun at a man shot 7 times, his partner and child, whilst saying feck in a blind panic.

I couldn't agree more. I don't think there's much to add really, you have said it all. Feck, it's just so needless and I honestly can't get the thoughts of the poor woman and kid out my head. Another thing that struck me was how his wife/gf was after he was shot. She remained so calm and polite, still calling the officer Sir for goodness sake. I know she would have been petrified, mortified and devastated and definitely in fear of not only her own, but her kids life too, but still. For her to act and remain so calm after what just happened is unbelievable. SHE is the kind of person you would want as a Police Officer and in charge of firearms. She is definitely the kind of person you would want around in a dangerous or stressful situation. I wouldn't want that cop serving me hot coffee let alone in possession of any kind of firearm ever again.
 
Counting the gunshots in a US police involved shooting is the wrong argument to make, akin to questioning shot placement. They're trained to shoot "until the threat is eliminated". It's going to be almost impossible to argue against an officer's judgment of when the threat was eliminated in a court room.

The big questions I have center around 1) what happened in the car that we cannot see and 2) why is the officer jumping to such a threatened stance when the driver is following proper concealed carry weapons training when informing the officer that he is armed.
 
Counting the gunshots in a US police involved shooting is the wrong argument to make, akin to questioning shot placement. They're trained to shoot "until the threat is eliminated". It's going to be almost impossible to argue against an officer's judgment of when the threat was eliminated in a court room.

The big questions I have center around 1) what happened in the car that we cannot see and 2) why is the officer jumping to such a threatened stance when the driver is following proper concealed carry weapons training when informing the officer that he is armed.

To be honest I think considering every incident in terms of what is required in a court room is indicative of a very poor mindset. The thing shouldn't be happening, full stop.

I know what you mean though how many shots it takes to stop someone is like asking how long is a piece of string. But case by case it totally relevant.

The number of shots have to be proportional to the risk and that's an ongoing assessment.

He's maybe less than 2 foot away, and pointing his gun down at a (presumably relatively) stationary seated male. He shouldn't miss. 7 shots indicates panic and lack of plan/control. As does his words, as does his body language. When we're given such clear footage you have to begin to consider these things and make judgements.

Hindsight is 20/20 of course, but it's undeniably such poor work and he should have been thoroughly questioned on every minute detail of that shit show, because none of his rationale would stand up.

We can't really answer your questions, if we are to go by his own words then the males drug habit as viewed in a matter seconds played into part of the reason for the shooting....

Mind bogglingly stupid.
 
Also @Carolina Red i think you 100% can argue about the quality of an officers judgement on when a threat is eliminated. The officer will of course have his say but it's not gospel nor beyond debunking.

You present training, you present best practice, you show the difference between textbook and what he did, you ask him what the man was doing after the 3rd shot, fourth shot, 5th, 6th, he won't be able to answer and you build up the picture that the officer could never have known when the threat was present, diminished or eliminated.
 
Though I still think the core, driving issue is gun control and the availability and commonplace nature of guns.

Officers fracturing and making terrible, life destroying decisions is a product of the environment, That's not intended to absolve anyone but it doesn't stop it being true.
 
To be honest I think considering every incident in terms of what is required in a court room is indicative of a very poor mindset. The thing shouldn't be happening, full stop.
I've grown up in the litigious society that is the United States, and while I am a teacher, I spent a good bit of college studying to be a lawyer until I decided I just couldn't do it for 30 years. Basically... that's how I look at things for a number of reasons.

When looking at a legal case, the only questions that matter in these cases, if you want someone who did something bad to end up behind bars for it, are questions that will pass muster in a court room.

I just don't see attacking the number of shots fired as being a productive discussion because of all the other factors involved. There are way too many cases that defense attorneys can bring up in court where wounded people went on to wound or kill police officers and/or citizens.
 
Though I still think the core, driving issue is gun control and the availability and commonplace nature of guns.

Officers fracturing and making terrible, life destroying decisions is a product of the environment, That's not intended to absolve anyone but it doesn't stop it being true.
I agree with this. The fact that literally anyone could be carrying a gun must factor into a police officer's mentality in the US.
 
I agree with this. The fact that literally anyone could be carrying a gun must factor into a police officer's mentality in the US.

There's always that factor, and there's always that "unknown" factor about everyone encountered. That being said, I've stopped cars full of parolees, people who've admitted to having a weapon in the car, made stops on vehicles who've brandished firearms at fellow motorists...and all those situations have avoided any kind of escalation by remaining calm, professional, respectful, and using backup when you feel it may be necessary.

It sounds like a simple solution to what can be complex and ever evolving situations, but the majority of situations won't escalate if neither party chooses to.

Granted, some situations cannot be avoided, and we had the situation I described earlier in the thread where a man was shot and killed on the freeway, but those shouldn't be the norm, and while I feel officers should be prepared for a situation like that...they can't approach every situation expecting it.
 
and while I feel officers should be prepared for a situation like that...they can't approach every situation expecting it.
Agreed completely. I was more saying it's something that is probably in the back of the mind (at least should be there rather than at the forefront of it)
 
Mate, I feel so bad, watching the video (yet again) and with the audio is just sickening. His wife and kid were in the car, his fecking KID! I feel sick that i'm powerless to help, and even sicker that the jury acquitted. Does anyone know the number of jurors that wanted to acquit? It's inconceivable to me that the officer is not now sat in an orange jumpsuit contemplating his mistake and what he has done to that poor woman and her child. I honestly cannot fathom this one, racist jurors is the only answer I can come up with. I don't know how they can live with themselves and I certainly do not know how that officer can. Man, I sure hope Karma really is a bitch in his case.

The original vote was 10 for acquittal and 2 for quilty. Does not seem that it took much for the 2 jury members who originally were voting quilty to make it an unimanious vote for acquittal. There were two blacks on the jury and both voted for acquittal from the start.
 
Gotcha. I do think, unfortunately, some officers have that perpetuating in their mind constantly (or often enough, at the very least).
I would be willing to put money on that unfortunately.

I've never had an experience with a police officer that was anything less than professional, though. Luckily.
 
The original vote was 10 for acquittal and 2 for quilty. Does not seem that it took much for the 2 jury members who originally were voting quilty to make it an unimanious vote for acquittal. There were two blacks on the jury and both voted for acquittal from the start.

Is this info usually public?
 
I would be willing to put money on that unfortunately.

I've never had an experience with a police officer that was anything less than professional, though. Luckily.

It varies from state to state, department to department, but I'm glad you've had no issues with any interactions :)

Most interactions and encounters are as such, it's just the bad ones that stand out and are highly publicized to the point where it seems like it's all that happens. And while even one incident is too many, it's still far from the picture that is often painted.
 
The original vote was 10 for acquittal and 2 for quilty. Does not seem that it took much for the 2 jury members who originally were voting quilty to make it an unimanious vote for acquittal. There were two blacks on the jury and both voted for acquittal from the start.

Thank you :)

Is this info usually public?

Yes, it's very common for that information to be disclosed to the public. Usually one of the jurors releases the info to the press themselves, probably for a bit of cash. However, jurors have pretty strict rules during the trial where they are not allowed to speak to the press and are told to avoid reading or watching anything about the trial they are overseeing. After though, it seems to be a different matter.
 
I don't know how that murdering prick got off. It's a scandal. Officers getting away with executing people for the flimsiest of reasons. He smoked weed, killing his daughter with second hand smoke, so I thought he was someone who wouldn't give a shit about my life? And that's your defence? And it works? Despite the video clearly showing you lost your shit and shot the guy 7 times in a blind panic? Really beggars belief!

"Motherfeckin police gettin badder//Coz if I had a camera, the shit wouldn't matter" - Ice Cube
 
Though I still think the core, driving issue is gun control and the availability and commonplace nature of guns.

Officers fracturing and making terrible, life destroying decisions is a product of the environment, That's not intended to absolve anyone but it doesn't stop it being true.

In my opinion, the larger context is only loosely mentioned. We attach names to the incident. The officer in question, his record. The victim, his priors or lack thereof. Nothing genuine is done in terms of maintaining a single news story throughout*. You've just quoted 4 topics. Depending on the officer and individual involved a slant is given to make most money off the news story. Be that race, brutality, whatever. There's always an angle. A cursory nod is given within that narrative to gun control. Someone from the right speaks, someone from the left speaks. It's forgotten until the next time.

Bottom line: America needs less guns. They need guns taken out of the hands not fit to own them. The fit and proper person test should be difficult. The country could take 30% of guns out of the country if they only targeted guns in the hands that most citizens would not want owning guns. They could remove large calibre guns from all but the most justified owners. Those two things would probably take the country down somewhere near normal-world figures for gun related deaths..

With all due respect, you guys don't know what you're talking about.

Yes, America has a gun problem, and I'd rather be hit with a baton by a UK police officer who's unarmed, than shot by a US police officer who's armed. We're in this situation and I don't see guns disappearing overnight. But that's not the main reason why people are up in arms over this.

People are up in arms because black people are disproportionately killed by police officers, and have been for many years. Dismissing that as a slant, and dismissing decisions that destroy families and communities as "a product of the environment" is incredibly ignorant.

Look at the statement the officer made, where he rapidly came to a heinous conclusion regarding Castile's threat level, based on his appearance (shock horror) and the smell of marijuana, a smell that his partner did not corroborate (shock horror). It goes without saying that the vast majority of cops (including the ones on here and ones I've met, interacted with and have been arrested by) do not think like this, but for feck sake, how low is the margin of error for black people that someone can get lit up in a car if he does not throw his keys on the dashboard, keep his hands on the wheel, and slowly say "sir yes sir", actions that the average white person in America cannot relate to? Heaven forbid that I'm driving in a neighborhood and all police officers are advised to be on the lookout for a "black male with a beard between the height of 4' 6'' and 6' 8''," and during a traffic stop I sneeze or stumble while getting out the car. I wish I could say that was me joking.
 
With all due respect, you guys don't know what you're talking about.

Yes, America has a gun problem, and I'd rather be hit with a baton by a UK police officer who's unarmed, than shot by a US police officer who's armed. We're in this situation and I don't see guns disappearing overnight. But that's not the main reason why people are up in arms over this.

People are up in arms because black people are disproportionately killed by police officers, and have been for many years. Dismissing that as a slant, and dismissing decisions that destroy families and communities as "a product of the environment" is incredibly ignorant.

Look at the statement the officer made, where he rapidly came to a heinous conclusion regarding Castile's threat level, based on his appearance (shock horror) and the smell of marijuana, a smell that his partner did not corroborate (shock horror). It goes without saying that the vast majority of cops (including the ones on here and ones I've met, interacted with and have been arrested by) do not think like this, but for feck sake, how low is the margin of error for black people that someone can get lit up in a car if he does not throw his keys on the dashboard, keep his hands on the wheel, and slowly say "sir yes sir", actions that the average white person in America cannot relate to? Heaven forbid that I'm driving in a neighborhood and all police officers are advised to be on the lookout for a "black male with a beard between the height of 4' 6'' and 6' 8''," and during a traffic stop I sneeze or stumble while getting out the car. I wish I could say that was me joking.

I totally agree but you're simplfying the point and marrying two problems that are related but not the same. You only have to look at the numbers that support all that, it's a fact that black people are more at risk from police in certain circumstances in the US, though numerically it can be skewed from place to place.

Police profile. They have to, police in the UK do it. Police everywhere do it. Part of the job. Humans everywhere do it everyday too! It seems all too often to be deeply flawed in the States and given an unbelievable weight but it happens in the U.K. Without the constant threat of guns and violence it never or very rarely gets to such a dramatic and tragic point but it starts in exactly the same way.

I may be shouted down but I would also argue that it doesn't always revolve solely on race. An officer will judge a person by the colour of the persons skin, their size, their tone, their manner, face tattoos, clothes, haircut, accent, religion and innumerable other things before he every really gets any fact. It's not necessarily wrong to do so, or at least it's almost unavoidable not to. It centres around what an officer does with those preconceptions, in of themselves they aren't even really unhealthy in my opinion but it seems, certainly in the footage here that the officer has let those preconceptions come to the front and dominate his process, he hasn't been objective or challenging and has allowed, in my opinion complete and utter fear dictate his off the charts response. It's wrong, it's manslaughter imo at the least and I'm convinced it would be that at least in the UK court system, but that in itself is a pointless argument really.

All those factors that will influence someone before they really interact with the person are to be taken with a massive pinch of salt but everyone will do it, UK, US, police, civilian. It's part of an assessment that happens in milliseconds before you even really talk to the person.

If the US wasn't the way it was, with regards to access to guns, it would likely play out like most European countries, much much much lower rates of fatal shootings and miscarriages of justice, but it still happens the same way, in the beginning, it's the response and end product that's different.

My point is that the US exists in a vacuum, at least among '1st world countries'. You simply cannot detach the gun control and crime rate issues from the topic and say this is just about race, imo.

Please don't confuse that with me saying there is no problem around race. Clearly there is! But it's amplified and made deadly by other issues too. I'm not seeking to justify the actions of these particular cops, I don't think anyone can, but I do think the issue is over simplified and forcibly put into just one box, and in my experience people who just want to view it in a wider context get shouted down and told they know nothing by people who are admittedly more directly affected, easy for me to say as a white man in the U.K., I know.

Please don't tell me I know nothing, it's neither true nor fair.
 
Police profile. They have to, police in the UK do it. Police everywhere do it. Part of the job. Humans everywhere do it everyday too! It seems all too often to be deeply flawed in the States and given an unbelievable weight but it happens in the U.K. Without the constant threat of guns and violence it never or very rarely gets to such a dramatic and tragic point but it starts in exactly the same way.

I may be shouted down but I would also argue that it doesn't always revolve solely on race. An officer will judge a person by the colour of the persons skin, their size, their tone, their manner, face tattoos, clothes, haircut, accent, religion and innumerable other things before he every really gets any fact. It's not necessarily wrong to do so, or at least it's almost unavoidable not to. It centres around what an officer does with those preconceptions, in of themselves they aren't even really unhealthy in my opinion but it seems, certainly in the footage here that the officer has let those preconceptions come to the front and dominate his process, he hasn't been objective or challenging and has allowed, in my opinion complete and utter fear dictate his off the charts response. It's wrong, it's manslaughter imo at the least and I'm convinced it would be that at least in the UK court system, but that in itself is a pointless argument really.

All those factors that will influence someone before they really interact with the person are to be taken with a massive pinch of salt but everyone will do it, UK, US, police, civilian. It's part of an assessment that happens in milliseconds before you even really talk to the person.

Rarely is an issue such as police shootings dependent on one issue. I never denied that.

Just because profiling is a natural reaction doesn't make it rational or justified. Especially when profiles are created based on stereotypes and quasi-facts. And if someone is carrying a deadly weapon when interacting with me, it is only right that they either suppress all urges to put me in a preconceived box pending actual facts, or not act on those urges and shoot me because I look a certain way that justifies their stereotypical notions of me. I'm not sure why anything less would qualify as something that should be accepted or tolerated.

If the US wasn't the way it was, with regards to access to guns, it would likely play out like most European countries, much much much lower rates of fatal shootings and miscarriages of justice, but it still happens the same way, in the beginning, it's the response and end product that's different.

My point is that the US exists in a vacuum, at least among '1st world countries'. You simply cannot detach the gun control and crime rate issues from the topic and say this is just about race, imo.

Please show me where I said this is exclusively about race.

Please don't confuse that with me saying there is no problem around race. Clearly there is! But it's amplified and made deadly by other issues too. I'm not seeking to justify the actions of these particular cops, I don't think anyone can, but I do think the issue is over simplified and forcibly put into just one box, and in my experience people who just want to view it in a wider context get shouted down and told they know nothing by people who are admittedly more directly affected, easy for me to say as a white man in the U.K., I know.

Please don't tell me I know nothing, it's neither true nor fair.

If (and a big if) your assumption is that guns magically disappearing would make race issues in America non-deadly and minor, then me saying that you don't know much about this issue isn't far off the mark. If that isn't your assumption then ignore that comment.
 
Saw what looked like a routine traffic stop this morning and while I didn't see the driver I could see the motorbike cop with a stance that indicated he was ready to react quickly (incl with his hand on his holstered gun) when talking to the driver. It just struck me as odd, at 7am in a quiet residential area.
I know the cops wants to go home at the end of his shift, so if I'm in his position maybe I'm wired to the max too, cos the next interaction could be your last.
Not defending the cops here but it's easy for us keyboard types to judge their reactions, and overreactions.

I know that when stopped by the coppers it's two hands high on the steering wheel - and if you do reach for something you tell them what you're going to do, before you do it and then you reach across your body to further allay any fear they might have. It's just common sense these days. Each time I've done that I've not gotten a ticket either.
 
Saw what looked like a routine traffic stop this morning and while I didn't see the driver I could see the motorbike cop with a stance that indicated he was ready to react quickly (incl with his hand on his holstered gun) when talking to the driver. It just struck me as odd, at 7am in a quiet residential area.
I know the cops wants to go home at the end of his shift, so if I'm in his position maybe I'm wired to the max too, cos the next interaction could be your last.
Not defending the cops here but it's easy for us keyboard types to judge their reactions, and overreactions.

I know that when stopped by the coppers it's two hands high on the steering wheel - and if you do reach for something you tell them what you're going to do, before you do it and then you reach across your body to further allay any fear they might have. It's just common sense these days. Each time I've done that I've not gotten a ticket either.

Whenever I see stuff like this I always find myself thinking that if the person who got shot didn't behave a little more calmly and rationally (as you describe above) then the whole thing could have been avoided. The problem is that we've got two people who are both scared shitless (the cop and the guy in the car) and people who are scared shitless are extremely likely to do stupid, irrational things. A massive dump of adrenaline literally shuts down the parts of your brain that you need to think calmly and rationally. And the reason they're both scared shitless is the same thing that always comes up in these discussions. There's too many guns in America. So long as that issue goes unsolved, I don't see any solution.
 
Look at the statement the officer made, where he rapidly came to a heinous conclusion regarding Castile's threat level, based on his appearance (shock horror) and the smell of marijuana, a smell that his partner did not corroborate (shock horror). It goes without saying that the vast majority of cops (including the ones on here and ones I've met, interacted with and have been arrested by) do not think like this, but for feck sake, how low is the margin of error for black people that someone can get lit up in a car if he does not throw his keys on the dashboard, keep his hands on the wheel, and slowly say "sir yes sir", actions that the average white person in America cannot relate to? Heaven forbid that I'm driving in a neighborhood and all police officers are advised to be on the lookout for a "black male with a beard between the height of 4' 6'' and 6' 8''," and during a traffic stop I sneeze or stumble while getting out the car. I wish I could say that was me joking.

Heh. The description the cop in this scenario said the guy in the car fitted was ludicrously vague. "A black man with longish hair, might be cornrows, might be dreds, with a wide nose". Well when you put it like that...
 
Rarely is an issue such as police shootings dependent on one issue. I never denied that.

Just because profiling is a natural reaction doesn't make it rational or justified. Especially when profiles are created based on stereotypes and quasi-facts. And if someone is carrying a deadly weapon when interacting with me, it is only right that they either suppress all urges to put me in a preconceived box pending actual facts, or not act on those urges and shoot me because I look a certain way that justifies their stereotypical notions of me. I'm not sure why anything less would qualify as something that should be accepted or tolerated.



Please show me where I said this is exclusively about race.



If (and a big if) your assumption is that guns magically disappearing would make race issues in America non-deadly and minor, then me saying that you don't know much about this issue isn't far off the mark. If that isn't your assumption then ignore that comment.

In your first reply you stated 'People are up in arms because black people are disproportionately killed by police officers, and have been for many years. Dismissing that as a slant, and dismissing decisions that destroy families and communities as "a product of the environment" is incredibly ignorant.'

Which insinuates that the conversation CarolinaRed and I were having was seeking to overlook or downplay the obvious role race plays in all these incidents. I don't think we were dismissive at all, nor ignorant. We're discussing an element of the issue - namely gun control and crime rates that is a undeniable factor in these discussions. Which you go on to state yourself. Maybe I think it's a big part of the issue, maybe you think it's a small part, but it's impossible to argue it doesn't impact.

It seems unnecessary to try and paint it (in my view) as though we are seeking to diminish the race element and devalue the destruction by simply giving our thoughts on other contextual and very important factors. Perhaps that's not what you're getting at but it seems such a needless point to score, equal to telling someone repeatedly they don't have a clue! Which you continue to do by putting words in my mouth.

Our posts agree on 90% and the remaining 10 seems to be more misunderstanding than a difference of opinion. If anything I think the only issue in your posts content wise is they over simplify.

I don't see a point were America could ever even get rid of the guns so whatever impact it may or may not have on race relations is entirely moot and it's too simplistic to limit to one issue anyway, to limit ownership and tighten up on checks already seems like Everest. It's steeped in the culture and here to stay. Which is only all the more reason to factor it into any debate on police responses, race related or otherwise... because it's going nowhere.

Tldr; we were having a totally reasonable chat about something you acknowledge is a factor, yet you picked around 10 words out of 100s to try and speak for us and shame us as ignorant or known nothing's.
 
I shit on cops more than the average person - but, that doesn't mean I discount the job they do or the very real danger they face on a daily basis...

Case in point -

 
Whenever I see stuff like this I always find myself thinking that if the person who got shot didn't behave a little more calmly and rationally (as you describe above) then the whole thing could have been avoided. The problem is that we've got two people who are both scared shitless (the cop and the guy in the car) and people who are scared shitless are extremely likely to do stupid, irrational things. A massive dump of adrenaline literally shuts down the parts of your brain that you need to think calmly and rationally. And the reason they're both scared shitless is the same thing that always comes up in these discussions. There's too many guns in America. So long as that issue goes unsolved, I don't see any solution.

It's common sense, innit. Yeah, I know it's not common, but if you want an easier life it might be worth a try.
 
In other news, the sky is still blue.

It's been going on for over 100 years. They can't hide it anymore because of social media, but they will still get away with it, like they have been doing.

The whole 'justice' system is a joke.


Also - Black Lives Matter.

In case it wasn't clear, I support what that movement stands for.
 
Whenever I see stuff like this I always find myself thinking that if the person who got shot didn't behave a little more calmly and rationally (as you describe above) then the whole thing could have been avoided. The problem is that we've got two people who are both scared shitless (the cop and the guy in the car) and people who are scared shitless are extremely likely to do stupid, irrational things. A massive dump of adrenaline literally shuts down the parts of your brain that you need to think calmly and rationally. And the reason they're both scared shitless is the same thing that always comes up in these discussions. There's too many guns in America. So long as that issue goes unsolved, I don't see any solution.

That's what they have training for though. If he can't deal with a routine traffic stop, then he's probably not fit for the job. The victim did what he was supposed to do and the officer escalated the situation, when he should be the calm one.
 
I don't understand even 1% of how that shooting happened.

The culture of the police in America is so alien it's insane.
 
Another thing that struck me was how his wife/gf was after he was shot. She remained so calm and polite, still calling the officer Sir for goodness sake. I know she would have been petrified, mortified and devastated and definitely in fear of not only her own, but her kids life too, but still. For her to act and remain so calm after what just happened is unbelievable. SHE is the kind of person you would want as a Police Officer and in charge of firearms. She is definitely the kind of person you would want around in a dangerous or stressful situation. I wouldn't want that cop serving me hot coffee let alone in possession of any kind of firearm ever again.
She is acting this way because this is the way you have to be with the police, as a black person. That little bit of attitude you may of had for being stopped for the 3rd night in a row? You have to stow it. Every action you perform you have to be thinking about how it can be interpreted. Basically you do not want to be next....

In other news, the sky is still blue.

It's been going on for over 100 years. They can't hide it anymore because of social media, but they will still get away with it, like they have been doing.

The whole 'justice' system is a joke.


Also - Black Lives Matter.
:(
Saw what looked like a routine traffic stop this morning and while I didn't see the driver I could see the motorbike cop with a stance that indicated he was ready to react quickly (incl with his hand on his holstered gun) when talking to the driver. It just struck me as odd, at 7am in a quiet residential area.
I know the cops wants to go home at the end of his shift, so if I'm in his position maybe I'm wired to the max too, cos the next interaction could be your last.
Not defending the cops here but it's easy for us keyboard types to judge their reactions, and overreactions.

I know that when stopped by the coppers it's two hands high on the steering wheel - and if you do reach for something you tell them what you're going to do, before you do it and then you reach across your body to further allay any fear they might have. It's just common sense these days. Each time I've done that I've not gotten a ticket either.
We've had examples where people have done everything they are supposed to do, and still get shot. Tired of hearing that argument tbh...
 
Saw what looked like a routine traffic stop this morning and while I didn't see the driver I could see the motorbike cop with a stance that indicated he was ready to react quickly (incl with his hand on his holstered gun) when talking to the driver. It just struck me as odd, at 7am in a quiet residential area.
I know the cops wants to go home at the end of his shift, so if I'm in his position maybe I'm wired to the max too, cos the next interaction could be your last.
Not defending the cops here but it's easy for us keyboard types to judge their reactions, and overreactions.

I know that when stopped by the coppers it's two hands high on the steering wheel - and if you do reach for something you tell them what you're going to do, before you do it and then you reach across your body to further allay any fear they might have. It's just common sense these days. Each time I've done that I've not gotten a ticket either.

Pretty tired of the argument that the civilian needs to be the one who is acting rationally at all times, otherwise the cop wouldn't have acted the way they did.
Also, black people are seen as criminal or threatening even when they don't do anything irrational.

Philando Castille told the officer he was armed & licensed to carry, and he was reaching for his wallet with his ID, and he still got killed - why?
Where is the common sense in that?

Can we stop generalising and acting like all we have to do is obey what a police officer says, otherwise we're asking for trouble?
There's literally video evidence that disproves this.
 
I couldn't agree more. I don't think there's much to add really, you have said it all. Feck, it's just so needless and I honestly can't get the thoughts of the poor woman and kid out my head. Another thing that struck me was how his wife/gf was after he was shot. She remained so calm and polite, still calling the officer Sir for goodness sake. I know she would have been petrified, mortified and devastated and definitely in fear of not only her own, but her kids life too, but still. For her to act and remain so calm after what just happened is unbelievable. SHE is the kind of person you would want as a Police Officer and in charge of firearms. She is definitely the kind of person you would want around in a dangerous or stressful situation. I wouldn't want that cop serving me hot coffee let alone in possession of any kind of firearm ever again.

Well considering she was arrested in a separate incident where she attacked other women with a hammer...no, I don't think she'd necessarily be suited for having a job with a firearm.