RDCR07
Not a bad guy (Whale Killer)
single payer is non negotiable for any democratic hopeful in 2020
It aint going to be easy. Not with the plethora of corrupt corporations and Republicans running against them.
single payer is non negotiable for any democratic hopeful in 2020
While the UK polititians will stay silent while they bash their own NHS. Not very patriotic that one.
Already seen Corbyn Tweet, good for him, even if I don't agree with all his politics. Regardless of that, it is the job of polititians in the UK to defend their NHS, even the ones who don't like it. Not the first time this smear campaign starts at FOX (Murdoch), wonder why he doesn't try it at Sky News.In fairness Jeremy Hunt and Corbyn have both come out against Trump today over his Tweets.
He would have more chances with the American right wing movement imo. His wife is German and probably he has a good pension from the EU Parliament who he hates so much.And it's no secret Farage wants to move to the USA. He's always been a hypocrite with his foreign wife and job in the European Parliament.
10% = 35 million people, that's almost the entire population of Spain or Argentina, not good enough for a country like the United States should be.In all fairness most Americans do have better healthcare than the NHS provides. The problem with the US system is 10% of the population don't have sufficient coverage and thousands are forced to file bankruptcy because of medical costs. Americans treat healthcare like going to the store. You book your own specialist visit. See them within a week or two and usually the follow up is extremely swift. I have gone from making a call to an orthopedic office to having knee surgery in literally two weeks. That was for a fairly minor non life threatening issue.
So in the context of what Trump is posting it will resonate with many Americans. It just creates fear that a single payer system does not fix the problems.
In all fairness most Americans do have better healthcare than the NHS provides. The problem with the US system is 10% of the population don't have sufficient coverage and thousands are forced to file bankruptcy because of medical costs. Americans treat healthcare like going to the store. You book your own specialist visit. See them within a week or two and usually the follow up is extremely swift. I have gone from making a call to an orthopedic office to having knee surgery in literally two weeks. That was for a fairly minor non life threatening issue.
So in the context of what Trump is posting it will resonate with many Americans. It just creates fear that a single payer system does not fix the problems.
10% = 35 million people, that's almost the entire population of Spain or Argentina, not good enough for a country like the United States should be.
In all fairness most Americans do have better healthcare than the NHS provides.
They might receive better coverage, but considering the amount that healthcare costs they're probably not getting better value for what they're paying, and often have to live with perpetual fear that if they're struggling for money they won't be able to afford it. The beauty of the UK system is that you can always afford it even when you're having financial troubles because everyone pulls together and contributes.
Plus the healthcare itself is still very good anyway. Problems are there, yeah, but it's still a superb service.
I've read many, many accounts by Americans who have experienced the HNS that disagree with you.
All my family are in the UK. I lived there 35 years. My wife worked in the NHS 18 years, and now 18 years in healthcare here.
I've read many, many accounts by Americans who have experienced the HNS that disagree with you.
Exactly. It's ok for those that can afford it but even then they are paying through the nose. In essence all US citizens are paying for private care. The equivalent of Bupa. Those without suffer the most. At least in the rest of the civilised world and especially here in the UK we all get the same care unless we choose to pay for private care.
I wouldn't ever want a system like the USA has, in my opinion it's a human rights violation for many.
Exactly. It's ok for those that can afford it but even then they are paying through the nose. In essence all US citizens are paying for private care. The equivalent of Bupa. Those without suffer the most. At least in the rest of the civilised world and especially here in the UK we all get the same care unless we choose to pay for private care.
I wouldn't ever want a system like the USA has, in my opinion it's a human rights violation for many.
Agree with your sentiment at the end. However don't try and spin the US system to the point where its only the wealthy that benefits. Its the majority of Americans that can very good healthcare. If you're on average earnings or less the percentage you pay is greater than the UK. If you're on average earnings or more the actual costs different narrows significantly. If you'r a working professional like a Nurse, in IT or have a decent office job the percentage of earnings going to healthcare is similar to the UK.
One more point the very poor that qualify for Medicaid and the over 65s that qualify for Medicare get fairly comparable coverage to the NHS for free.
Yeah, I feel most people in the states who are employed and middle class or above can get very good health insurance through their employers. Although the system is still pretty lopsidedly tilted towards insurance, medical, drug, and pharma companies and away form patients.
You just said yourself if you are on average or less then you pay more than the UK. Then you add in prescription costs and medical bills for operations that aren't covered by the insurance. Pre existing conditions etc.
Christ! What a cnut! People in the UK protest to save the NHS, not to destroy it, YOU feckING CLOWN!
You are constantly defending him, it shouldn't feel unusual to you.
What a shock.I disagree.
I believe we've had few of those... This is libcafe you know?
Yet in the UK everyone gets treated whether they are rich, poor, destitute or from another country and without money or insurance. Thank God for the NHS. Couldn’t bear to live in a country where people didn’t automatically get the healthcare that they needed. It’s nauseating just to think about it. Not to mention cruel, heartless and uncivilised.Agree with your sentiment at the end. However don't try and spin the US system to the point where its only the wealthy that benefits. Its the majority of Americans that get very good healthcare. If you're on average earnings or less the percentage you pay is greater than the UK. If you're on average earnings or more the actual costs different narrows significantly. If you'r a working professional like a Nurse, in IT or have a decent office job the percentage of earnings going to healthcare is similar to the UK.
One more point the very poor that qualify for Medicaid and the over 65s that qualify for Medicare get fairly comparable coverage to the NHS for free.
Exactly. It's ok for those that can afford it but even then they are paying through the nose. In essence all US citizens are paying for private care. The equivalent of Bupa. Those without suffer the most. At least in the rest of the civilised world and especially here in the UK we all get the same care unless we choose to pay for private care.
I wouldn't ever want a system like the USA has, in my opinion it's a human rights violation for many.
Yet in the UK everyone gets treated whether they are rich, poor, destitute or from another country and without money or insurance. Thank God for the NHS. Couldn’t bear to live in a country where people didn’t automatically get the healthcare that they needed. It’s nauseating just to think about it. Not to mention cruel, heartless and uncivilised.
Its not even okay for those of us who can. (I had a silver plan under BCBS, a reputable company) Endless amounts of paperwork, worrying about in network / out of network, pre-existing conditions, lifetime caps, having people be tied to their employers in order to have insurance, prescription drug prices, lack of rural care, etc. The entire system is irreparably broken.
Yet in the UK everyone gets treated whether they are rich, poor, destitute or from another country and without money or insurance. Thank God for the NHS. Couldn’t bear to live in a country where people didn’t automatically get the healthcare that they needed. It’s nauseating just to think about it. Not to mention cruel, heartless and uncivilised.
That’s because the 2 main US parties aren’t that far apart on the political spectrum.Actually I think the name Recafe is pretty accurate.The interesting thing with the political compass when I get GOP friends to do it they don't score far off where many Dems score.
You will also be very surprised to hear US hospitals have to provide certain services like ER regardless of ability to pay. If you have insurance that pays, if you are truly poor medicaid gets billed. The group that do need some protection are the ones earning above the medicaid limit with a job without insurance. Extending medicaid and/or making employer provided insurance mandatory. The US system has many flaws but its not all doom and gloom.
The researchers found that a lack of health insurance had a mortality hazard ratio of 1.40. In other words, they concluded that Americans without health insurance were 40% more likely to die than those with it, even after taking into account the individual’s “gender, age, race/ethnicity, poverty income ratio, education, unemployment, smoking, regular alcohol use, self-rated health, physician-rated health and body mass index”.
The researchers calculated that in 2005, lack of health insurance resulted in 44,789 deaths of Americans age 18 to 64
Not even sure why you quoted me and posted that because I said the same thing.
"The group that do need some protection are the ones earning above the medicaid limit with a job without insurance. Extending medicaid and/or making employer provided insurance mandatory."
That highlights exactly what I said on the previous page. People are way to focused on subjective analysis than being objective or pragmatic.
I quoted you because of the line about treatment via ER. I then offered Objective and Pragmatic analysis of why that was not an actual alternative.
Well there is a first.....a Guardian article being offered as objective analysis.
The US healthcare system, has many flaws, and something needs to be done to protect the people without insurance.
The source is a study from Harvard with data from the CDC. Did you even read the article or did you just want to repeat your opinions?
Comments from Dirty Money documentary-maker Alex Gibney:
The final film in the series focuses on Trump, who has been covered endlessly over the past couple of years. What more was there to add?
The essence of Trump’s appeal was that he’s a great businessman, so therefore he’ll be a great president. We thought, OK then, let’s take a focused look at what he was like as a businessman.