- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
- Messages
- 38,565
- Supports
- Arsenal
Liverpool fans are unbearable after just one win.
here's a man who knows nothing of, and has seen nothing of, Grujic.I understand why Grujic joined Liverpool,even tho he could see Markovic and say "So this is how you ruin your progress" but what on earth Liverpool seen in him,weird. At least Markovic took proper step and went to Benfica first.
And Swanson's on the wrong tact ... again. Will he ever learn ? No.Arsenal last won the PL in 03/04.
I can't really remember the last time you won the PL..
..oh that's right, you never did.
We last won the league in 2004. Check it again.
Your dripping bitterness, after all your previous pretense at civility, just makes it all the sweeter. Keep it up lad you're doing yourself no favours.Liverpool fans are unbearable after just one win.
Ok, we are shit and deserve to be in the Europa League. Case closed.Your dripping bitterness, after all your previous pretense at civility, just makes it all the sweeter. Keep it up lad you're doing yourself no favours.
And Swanson's on the wrong tact ... again. Will he ever learn ? No.
As far as I'm aware if the kicker touches the ball again after the first kick before another player then it should be an indirect free kick to the other team, not a retake.
![]()
Two City players in the penalty area and Caballero was off his line before Mahrez struck the ball. Surely it should be a retake based on the City offences?
Thats for encroachment, not for kicking the ball twice.It's a retake when the defensive team commits the offence.
![]()
Thats for encroachment, not for kicking the ball twice.
Again that's encroachment. Not kicking the ball twice.Outcome of the kick: No goal
Infringement for encroachment: Defending team
Outcome: Penalty is retaken
United and Arsenal are totally wank this season. Thank feck we didn't leave it for them to do us any favours.
So we blow steam up their arse rather than make statements of fact. Thought that was rawk's rule.Remember we're guests here mate.
so top 4 will be Chelsea, Tottenham, City and Liverpool. It is hard to see another result, IMO![]()
So we blow steam up their arse rather than make statements of fact. Thought that was rawk's rule.![]()
City won 4-0 West Brom this season and they only need to win 1 and draw 1 in 2 games left. Arsenal's chance unfortunately is very slim IMO. But good thing is that Wenger - he is going to stay anywayArsenal still have an outside chance, City still have West Brom to play (although obviously Arse still have Everton too).
here's a man who knows nothing of, and has seen nothing of, Grujic.
No way, man! He won them the League Cup - their biggest trophy in Premier League eraSpurs fans singing about Sol Campbell having HIV... Classy, that's how you say goodbye to WH.
They remain a small time clubNo way, man! He won them the League Cup - their biggest trophy in Premier League era![]()
I am not taking the piss. Half this forum agrees with that as well. Also, I specifically mentioned this season.Bit of a difference between saying they've been poor, and just calling them total wank. They're pretty great about letting oppo fans be critical (far more than any other teams forums), no need to take the piss.
I am not taking the piss. Half this forum agrees with that as well. Also, I specifically mentioned this season.
Think you are taking it a bit too seriously anyways. I like united overall otherwise I wouldn't sign up on their fan forum.
Again that's encroachment. Not kicking the ball twice.
Don't see your point when both managers have agreed that ruling it out for the double kick was the correct decision. Whether or not there was encroachment or the keeper was off his line I don't care.
The decision to disallow the goal and award an indirect free kick for Mahrez kicking the ball twice was correct and that seems to be going over your head.
Many were quick to praise the referee for spotting this, while others, Craig Shakespeare included, felt that Madley and his officials should have spotted that two Manchester City players had entered the area before Mahrez had touched the ball (for the first time).
"To the letter of the law it's a double touch," the Leicester boss said. "But he could bring it back for an encroachment from Manchester City so there's a bit of injustice. It's bad luck from our point of view."
Nonsense. This is what Shakespeare said:
I've given you references from the law to why it should have been a retake.
Outcome of the kick: No goal (= because of the double touch)
Infringement for encroachment: Defending team (because of two City players being inside the area when Mahrez first touches the ball)
Outcome: Penalty is retaken
It would be nice if you could use the laws of the game to disprove me rather than saying 'both managers agree' when they clearly don't.
First tier yeah maybe not. That's your Griezmanns, Suarez level. Ain't happening
Whats second tier?
Never liked Liverpool at all. Yeah, i respect their history, but they are just a bunch of cocky glorified hunters these days. People like Thompson and Lawrenson are just pathetic.
Go on cocky mate. I am sure you are gonna win the treble next season![]()
Yeah, I don't get that either. I'm 30 and have been supporting Liverpool since I was around 10. Those years have been barren, to say the least, so calling me a gloryhunter is quite off mark, if you ask me.
Last time ya'll had CL to attract players, the best you came up with was Lallana and Can. Good players mind, but I'd have expected Liverpool to be able to reach them CL or not.Our ability to get decent players really relies on CL.
Kenedy on the left is something a lot of Chelsea fans have wanted to see. I'd personally like to see Aina on the right as well.
What's that based on? Performances for the U-23s?