Acole9
Outstanding
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 12,507
Kasper being asked one thing and he is answering something else.
He's really not coming out of this at all well, he's a bit of a twat really.
Kasper being asked one thing and he is answering something else.
I've had about 10 replies in the last hour or so, who even mentioned Kasper Schmeichel? And yes, my friend's dad thinks something, I'm at university with some reasonably well-connected people and am myself from a reasonably well-connected family, I also have a uni friend whose dad is a Manchester United director and another owns a Bulgarian bank, I've also played racket ball with Roger Federer, tennis with Judy Murray, my dad used to play golf with Hugh Grant, hope that makes me more believable?Where to start?? This post..... or your posts since ..... or that you haven't backed up your original post and fail to answer other poster's points (a la Kasper Schmeicel).
Your friend's Dad thinks Ranieri supposedly did something? Could it be any more convoluted or vague?
If the sports science staff were so fundamental to Pearson, they could have been sacked/let go ages ago then? They were there when Leicester only just avoided relegation two seasons ago.
Remember, your original post was specific and bold in saying the entire football world had unanimously come to an opinion that you disagreed with.... namely that even if Leicester were getting relegated, they should have stuck with Ranieri.
All you've done is link three Leicester forum posts and a story from your friend's Dad's second cousin's neighbour.
No one is arguing that this season has been poor for Leicester or that Ranieri may have made mistakes but you're adding two and two and making 53 by saying the entire world is only against the sacking because they're sentimental sheep.
Maybe it's because Ranieri hasn't become a bad coach overnight, maybe it's because the owners said they would stick by him, maybe it's because it's clear the players are playing sh!te, maybe it's because he might have kept them up anyway and maybe (MAYBE) for some, it is because they are sentimental.... and that's a bad thing yeah?
For what it's worth, I'd have kept him - Leicester owners appear to have forgotten that their natural position is about 10-18 and last season was a miraculous one-off.
Haha, not surprised then with Leicester recent form and I also noted this week before as one of the reason their form suffered. And most members on here will label Ranieri as some god. These staff members played a vital part of their run for their title and fight for relegation. Ranieri seems to get all the credit when things are going well and no credit when things are going bad on here haha.according to someone with a decent source Ranieri had sidelined Craig Shakespear and Mike Stowell, key members of the coaching staff, reduced to role of the sports science team, sacked the psychologist that all the players used and were close to, changed the dietary staff and increased the intensity and volume of training against the advice of all the coaching team
I've had about 10 replies in the last hour or so, who even mentioned Kasper Schmeichel? And yes, my friend's dad thinks something, I'm at university with some reasonably well-connected people and am myself from a reasonably well-connected family, I also have a uni friend whose dad is a Manchester United director and another owns a Bulgarian bank, I've also played racket ball with Roger Federer, tennis with Judy Murray, my dad used to play golf with Hugh Grant, hope that makes me more believable?
When Leicester were nearly relegated they were still a happy and united team, and have you ever thought that Ranieri didn't become a great coach overnight either? My point was that you and the rest of the world don't believe Ranieri should have been sacked simply because on the surface he shouldn't. But the closer to the club you get the more you realise it wasn't a surface problem.
I've had about 10 replies in the last hour or so, who even mentioned Kasper Schmeichel? And yes, my friend's dad thinks something, I'm at university with some reasonably well-connected people and am myself from a reasonably well-connected family, I also have a uni friend whose dad is a Manchester United director and another owns a Bulgarian bank, I've also played racket ball with Roger Federer, tennis with Judy Murray, my dad used to play golf with Hugh Grant, hope that makes me more believable?
When Leicester were nearly relegated they were still a happy and united team, and have you ever thought that Ranieri didn't become a great coach overnight either? My point was that you and the rest of the world don't believe Ranieri should have been sacked simply because on the surface he shouldn't. But the closer to the club you get the more you realise it wasn't a surface problem.
that's not what happens here, they still haven't said why Pearson was sacked and they cannot stand him, personally the owners liked Claudio a lotCould help with living up to the tag line. Jokes aside, if Ranieri was the main problem, then it would be in the best interests of everyone else associated with Leicester to clarify how, given the public sentiment. Of course, this may also spur them on, them against the world type of deal.
I don't confess anything other than surface knowledge. But I've yet to see anything that makes the sacking seem sensible.
I've had about 10 replies in the last hour or so, who even mentioned Kasper Schmeichel? And yes, my friend's dad thinks something, I'm at university with some reasonably well-connected people and am myself from a reasonably well-connected family, I also have a uni friend whose dad is a Manchester United director and another owns a Bulgarian bank, I've also played racket ball with Roger Federer, tennis with Judy Murray, my dad used to play golf with Hugh Grant, hope that makes me more believable?
that's not what happens here, they still haven't said why Pearson was sacked and they cannot stand him, personally the owners liked Claudio a lot
the official reason was always "non footballing reasons", Claudio has been sacked for footballing reasons yet there is outrage over that and not someone being sacked for something unrelated to his ability to do the jobDid Pearson's sacking need to be explained? Seemed extremely unstable.
the official reason was always "non footballing reasons", Claudio has been sacked for footballing reasons yet there is outrage over that and not someone being sacked for something unrelated to his ability to do the job
the official reason was always "non footballing reasons", Claudio has been sacked for footballing reasons yet there is outrage over that and not someone being sacked for something unrelated to his ability to do the job
look at the league table, 2 or 3 more wins and this wouldn't even be a conversation but we are now in the bottom 3, were always likely to be by the time we played Liverpool on Monday, relegation is a very real threatWasn't Hoddle sacked from the England position for non footballing reasons. As well as Sam. Sometime it may require scrutiny, other times it's fairly evident and a bit of a fart in a box.
The sacking calls into question, IMV, how much leeway a manager can through success create for himself, and the answer seems to be very very little.
The sacking calls into question, IMV, how much leeway a manager can through success create for himself, and the answer seems to be very very little.
look at the league table, 2 or 3 more wins and this wouldn't even be a conversation but we are now in the bottom 3, were always likely to be by the time we played Liverpool on Monday, relegation is a very real threat
I've had about 10 replies in the last hour or so, who even mentioned Kasper Schmeichel? And yes, my friend's dad thinks something, I'm at university with some reasonably well-connected people and am myself from a reasonably well-connected family, I also have a uni friend whose dad is a Manchester United director and another owns a Bulgarian bank, I've also played racket ball with Roger Federer, tennis with Judy Murray, my dad used to play golf with Hugh Grant, hope that makes me more believable?
Fair play to Kasper. Apparantely, I've been hearing stories that he is one of the ring-leaders, but he doesn't seem like the kind. Have any other players come out with to thank Claudio? I've not heard anything from Vardy, Mahrez etc.
The things I cannot comprehend are:-I think it's a classic case of manager striking while in a position of strength to gain increased power at a club, forgetting that their success was only partially down to him anyway.
Reading his posts, he might well have....No.
You haven't snorted coke with Maradona.
Tilting my screen in all directions but can't find white text
Reading his posts, he might well have....
I still find that story absurdly hilarious! I can't decide which is the most damning part; the racism... the arse-licking... or the being idiotic enough to film it! Haha, poll?Was there a reason needed for him to go after all the shit he has done though?
Probably the biggest of it his son throwing all those racial slurs at prostitutes who were licking his and his friends' arseholes in Thailand and all of this shit?
This is the worst post I've ever seen.Are you sure it was Ranieri's managerial abilities that helped Leicester City last year and not something else?
I mean, haven't you ever thought of some new enhancing technology, still uknown, therefore still legal?
I do believe Ranieri is a nothing.
And I can't believe how his players were always first to get on the ball last year, challenge after challenge for the whole 90 minutes, week in week fecking out.
The media also built an icon of the good grandpa coach.
On the other hand, in his previous job (greek national team) he was deminishing his players and he brought staff together with him and this staff was really USELESS.
He was acting like a diva in the dressing rooms and nobody liled him.
Or the fact that Pearson thought the board were wrong to sack his son.....I still find that story absurdly hilarious! I can't decide which is the most damning part; the racism... the arse-licking... or the being idiotic enough to film it! Haha, poll?
Are you sure? Have you read "endless wheelies" post near the top of this page?This is the worst post I've ever seen.
spat out my coffee!!I've had about 10 replies in the last hour or so, who even mentioned Kasper Schmeichel? And yes, my friend's dad thinks something, I'm at university with some reasonably well-connected people and am myself from a reasonably well-connected family, I also have a uni friend whose dad is a Manchester United director and another owns a Bulgarian bank, I've also played racket ball with Roger Federer, tennis with Judy Murray, my dad used to play golf with Hugh Grant, hope that makes me more believable?
When Leicester were nearly relegated they were still a happy and united team, and have you ever thought that Ranieri didn't become a great coach overnight either? My point was that you and the rest of the world don't believe Ranieri should have been sacked simply because on the surface he shouldn't. But the closer to the club you get the more you realise it wasn't a surface problem.
"my dad used to play golf with Hugh Grant" was taking it too far.
@Penna @Raoul @Sultan
Obviously Liverpool losing to Leicester would greatly help our top 4 chances as well as normally provide amusement to Manchester United fans.
But Im finding myself desperately wanting Liverpool to give Leicester a hammering on Monday to precipitate their relegation at the end of the season. During Monday's Liverpool vs Leicester game, Ill be supporting Liverpool!!
Interested to find out what % of United fans feel the same? If you agree, perhaps create a poll?
@Penna @Raoul @Sultan
Obviously Liverpool losing to Leicester would greatly help our top 4 chances as well as normally provide amusement to Manchester United fans.
But Im finding myself desperately wanting Liverpool to give Leicester a hammering on Monday to precipitate their relegation at the end of the season. During Monday's Liverpool vs Leicester game, Ill be supporting Liverpool!!
Interested to find out what % of United fans feel the same? If you agree, perhaps create a poll?
Ultimately what matters to me is how well United do. Liverpool dropping points increases our chances of making top 4 and finishing above them.
Leicester winning or losing is entirely irrelevant to us. Liverpool losing, however, has a big impact on our standings.
Some my question is, you can't possibly be serious?
I'd only ever support/wish for a Liverpool victory if it was beneficial for United.@Penna @Raoul @Sultan
Obviously Liverpool losing to Leicester would greatly help our top 4 chances as well as normally provide amusement to Manchester United fans.
But Im finding myself desperately wanting Liverpool to give Leicester a hammering on Monday to precipitate their relegation at the end of the season. During Monday's Liverpool vs Leicester game, Ill be supporting Liverpool!!
Interested to find out what % of United fans feel the same? If you agree, perhaps create a poll?
Im guessing its just me then! Scrap the poll!I'd only ever support/wish for a Liverpool victory if it was beneficial for United.
Personally, I couldn't force myself to create a poll which has "I want Liverpool to win" as an option!@Penna @Raoul @Sultan
Obviously Liverpool losing to Leicester would greatly help our top 4 chances as well as normally provide amusement to Manchester United fans.
But Im finding myself desperately wanting Liverpool to give Leicester a hammering on Monday to precipitate their relegation at the end of the season. During Monday's Liverpool vs Leicester game, Ill be supporting Liverpool!!
Interested to find out what % of United fans feel the same? If you agree, perhaps create a poll?
Ranieri is a scum.This is the worst post I've ever seen.