Strangely though, they seem to have gone very quiet.
Spend days writing essays pointing out how wrong everyone else was in a very condescending manner whilst at the same time trying to act infinitely superior all due to basing everything on a 4 page statement from a disgustingly corrupt AG, only to go quiet when the full report is released.
Priceless.
Sigh. The reaction to the report has been exactly what I'd expected it to be, which I've tried explaining an alternative perspective on to no avail. It simply ended with people outright putting words in my mouth, being corrected on it, and then pretending it never happened.
There is no room for an alternative perspective. The only purpose it serves is as an opportunity for ridicule for you. That's cool, if that's what you need to process these things, have fun with it. However it really is bizarre to me that people in this thread still don't see how they come across. It's been a genuine education in an echo chamber. I don't go on twitter so I'd never seen it unfold quite so clearly.
If you don't want to reckon with that I've no interest in de-railing the thread any more. Unfortunately nothing has changed since the report came out, the tone of the thread has been remarkably consistent throughout. And that consistency is celebrated in here as evidence of foresight, rather than an absence of critical self reflection. There's no more need to make that point. It's as clear as it'll ever be. I no longer understand what you lot get out of it, but I now understand how it works.
If people want to know what I though if the report, it remains really simple:
The idea that this is being presented as a new twist makes very little sense, from my perspective. Who in here
didn't think there would be damaging information in the report that was excluded? We can point to lots of people who did. Here's a few snippets from me. There's more if you want to look.
It doesn't seem that complicated at this point.
- Muller didn't charge him or anyone close to him on either crime. That's obviously critical information.
- Even Barr, Trump's man, says there was an argument for obstruction of justice. That's huge. The fact that he decided against prosecuting still leaves the possibility that congress will impeach him, given the patterns previously established into special prosecutors' investigations into obstruction of justice in the past.
- We have every reason to expect the evidence collected that didn't meet the threshold of criminal prosecution on the Russian "collusion" case will be politically damaging to Trump, albeit given Muller's decision was much firmer on that one, it seems likely it won't be an impeachable issue either. But we already know that the way Trump deals with national security issues is inept and dangerous, that attitude has a ripple effect on his core team, and so it would be very surprising that after an investigation this deep, they didn't find a lot more "questionable" relationships, meetings and more. We've already heard about some of them.
What came out of the report was entirely predictable, subsequent to Barr's memo. For the people who think Barr's summary of the principal conclusions has now been invalidated, someone should tell the
BBC.
BBC said:
Mr Mueller's report says he found no criminal conspiracy between Mr Trump's campaign and Russia, but could not reach a concrete legal conclusion on whether Mr Trump tried to obstruct the investigation.
Or maybe the BBC have just been duped by Barr's memo, to the point where they're unable to understand the report themselves. Unlike the experts in here.
The notion that I'm somehow taken aback by the fact there is incriminating evidence against Trump in there, or I'm confused about Barr's motives in holding it back, is pretty easily disproven.
We know from Barr's memo there is incriminating evidence there.
...
The fact he didn't share the evidence for that was obviously of benefit to the president, and the attempt to suppress the underlying evidence is designed to benefit the president too.
What you remember and what was said have been consistently established as different things, they're only a caricature created in your own mind, and yet time and again the fiction is more prominent than fact. That's what is odd about this thread. It's obvious, and yet unseen. I thought people just couldn't see it. Now it's clear people just don't want to. Whatever floats your boat I suppose.