Evra accuses Suarez of racist remarks | Suarez guilty of racial abuse

I don't know why the RAWK lot are bringing Fergie into it and calling him bacon face, but then I suppose it's just indicative of the problem those racist sympathisers have with faces that aren't pure white in appearance...
 
I don't know why the RAWK lot are bringing Fergie into it and calling him bacon face, but then I suppose it's just indicative of the problem those racist sympathisers have with faces that aren't pure white in appearance...

OK thats pretty extreme

I very much doubt they are all racists. Most likely in denial or genuinely worried that their star player ‘s future is in jeopardy. If it was Wayne Rooney a lot of us would refuse to believe it without 100% concrete evidence
 
I don't know why the RAWK lot are bringing Fergie into it and calling him bacon face, but then I suppose it's just indicative of the problem those racist sympathisers have with faces that aren't pure white in appearance...

:lol::lol:
 
:lol:

He gets called 'bacon face' by bitter opposition fans? I've never heard of that before, but it's excellent. Sir Bacon Face.
 
Whatever name they call him, nothing beats RAWK autochanging SIR Alex Ferguson to Mr. Alex Ferguson...

Pathetic doesn't come close to describing it.
 
Slur Alex is another one. That inherently witty Scouse sense of humour, I'm afraid.
 
Oh come on we call Benitez "Fatty" or "FSW" and I've seen many posters call Dalglish "Dogleash" or my personal favourite "Dogbreath".

But they shouldn't make nick names for their most bitter rivals manager who has led us to God knows how many trophies (I've lost count).
 
Yeah but...bacon face? That's one of the shittest derogatory nicknames ever.
 
Yet "Dogleash" is witty and funny I presume?

No, it's shit. What's your point? I think all nicknames like that are incredibly shit, but seeing as we were talking specifically about other fans' nicknames for SAF, I said so.
 
No, you're right, it's comic genius. It's because, like, his face looks like bacon, innit?
 
No, it's shit. What's your point? I think all nicknames like that are incredibly shit, but seeing as we were talking specifically about other fans' nicknames for SAF, I said so.

Fair enough. The point I was trying to make is it's a bit hypocritical of the Caf as a forum to critisize RAWK for giving our manager shit nicknames, when we do exactly the same about Liverpool's managers.
 
Yeah its like the guy who looks like a thumb

Eyepopper?
Fair enough. The point I was trying to make is it's a bit hypocritical of the Caf as a forum to critisize RAWK for giving our manager shit nicknames, when we do exactly the same about Liverpool's managers.

Welcome to football, my dear friend!

On the Caf, we like our tints red.
 
My wife is from Chile, and while "negrito" can be used to describe someone fondly (usually someone who is a darker skinned Latin), it is not used in anything but a negative way when talking to a black person, and certainly not when they are addressed as negrito.

It's not all that different than English, really, in the sense that there is a big difference in meaning if you're speaking in the first or third person. It's fine to say, "That man is black." But you do not go up to a black person and say, "Hey Blackie, how are you?"
 
playing devils advocate for a moment,is too much being made of this?

isn´t something like this just gamesmanship? i´m sure rooney got stick from oppposition players for his infedelities,same as i´m sure giggs does for his or any player thats done something distasteful in the eyes of others and then can be wound up to hopefully be put off his game?


before ya´ll go ape here,this isn´t my view but is there a case for this purely being gamesmanship albeit a very unpleasant kind.

The difference is, FIFA have a campaign to "kick racism out of football".

Giving a player stick/abuse because of their prior actions (a la Rooney/Giggs) is very different from abusing them because of the colour of their skin.
 
why so lite a punishment from Liverpool , if you got found guilty of racial abuse in your work place you would be sacked for gross misconduct , why should it be any different for a football player.

Because Liverpool are tight fisted twats protecting their investment, which is also one of their best players.
 
Because Liverpool are tight fisted twats protecting their investment, which is also one of their best players.

I can understand that , but if he is found guilty and I dont think he will the FA will bottle out of it , but if he is.His place at Liverpool must be untenable, how can they keep him with out a massive backlash from , well everybody but there own fans.
 
An attempt to trivialise racism from a deranged RAWK fecker


That's dentalist! You dentalist bastard!
This discussion on racism is nonsense. Racism is the persecution of someone due to a physical / cultural attribute.
Racism used to be really series shit like getting shot, lynched, beaten, burned out of your house, or slightly less serious shit like being denied rights like voting, optimal public health care - demoted to a second class citizen in general.
Without meaning to piss anyone off, but a bit of name calling on a football pitch isn't really the racism that Martin Luther King or Nelson Mandela was concerned about. Slagging someone's physical attributes in a team sport is common place. Not necessarily pleasant at times, but not a hanging offense. Look at Peter Crouch - every commentator has to mention his height in some way or other every time he does something on the pitch. What if every commentator mentioned a persons skin colour every time they got the ball? There would be outrage.
I think the racism issue has become so over sensitized, that it's now bordering on the ridiculous, which is actually detrimental to anti-racism causes. It means racist issues cannot even be discussed in civil debate. You cannot even argue for ethnic minorities to obey national laws without being immediately defeated by being called a racist.
I was in a pub one evening and some fecker from London looked at me and said "hey shorty" to get a few cheap laughs for him and his mates. I'm 6ft 9in so you could see what he was (predictably) trying to do. I looked at him and said "alright snowflake" - he was black, so it was a like-for-like exchange. He went fecking mental.
I think everyone needs to reflect on what racism really is. It's so much more than name calling - millions of Africans and there global cousins will tell you the true evil meaning of racism. Wars for rights were not fought simply because black people were tired of being called names.
Evra should just feck off, grow a pair of balls, and reply in kind to Luis - bugs bunny maybe, the tooth fairy, or what about just a buck-toothed fecker?
By the way, one of my best mates is an Indian chick, so anyone who wants to call me racist can feck right off.

Can't believe the mods on there let this go on. Some very dangerous leniency regarding racism being practised not only by those in control of the club itself, but also people supposed to control the thousands of fans following them
 
Poyet slams 'cry baby' Evra over racism claim

Brighton boss Gus Poyet has branded Patrice Evra a cry-baby for complaining about alleged racist comments made by Liverpool’s Luis Suarez.

And Poyet warned that the FA’s acceptance of the Manchester United defender’s claims against his fellow Uruguayan will make it “too easy” for any player or manager to accuse opponents of racism without foundation.

Suarez has been charged by the FA with racially abusing Evra during Liverpool’s 1-1 draw with Manchester United at Anfield last month.

He is expected to plead not guilty.


Poyet said: “I played football for seven years in Spain and was called everything, because I was from South America.

“And I never went out crying like a baby, like Patrice Evra, saying that someone said something to me.”

Poyet accepts his fellow countryman’s explanation that anything he said to Evra had no racist intent.

“I believe Luis Suarez. It’s simple,” he said.

The Brighton manager is concerned that the FA appears to have sided with Evra rather than Suarez on what he considers the flimsiest of evidence.

“I’m surprised, in a really sad way, that he’s been charged,” Poyet added. “I think it’s worse to charge someone because you trust one person when you have no proof.

“I’m sad, because it’s going to become too easy. I can make a complaint about any opposition manager, and if I take it as far as I can, he’s going to get charged.

“Why are we going to take one person’s word over another one’s? It’s too risky.


What a plank!
 
If that poster is over the age of 14, the state has seriously failed him in his education.
 
maybe its just me...but, i'm baffled as to how incensed people are about the FA's charge, i mean if suarez is indeed innocent, shouldn't this be his chance to come out and defend himself??...its not like they just gave him an automatic punishment or anything like that, he's got a chance to respond, and give his side of the story!