Gareth Barry - how important is he?

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
135,011
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Caf Award
Caf Lifetime Achievement Award 2021
All hail Barry: Why low-key Gareth is Manchester City's man for the big occasion

By Ian Ladyman

Last updated at 11:11 PM on 20th December 2011


On being informed by a friend earlier this year that the increasingly peculiar Joey Barton had criticised him extravagantly in a magazine interview, Gareth Barry had only one question.

‘What time are we due on the first tee?’ he asked.

While those close to him advised Barry to defend himself or request an apology, the Manchester City player was concerned only about what time his weekly round at a Cheshire golf course was about to start.

Perhaps we should not be surprised. This was, after all, a case of the credentials of Gareth Barry of City and England being questioned by Joey Barton of QPR and, well, QPR. It was hardly going to be a fair fight.
Mr Reliable: Gareth Barry is Manchester City's go-to guy

Nevertheless, Barry’s reaction was typical of an unfussy, pragmatic individual who, almost without being noticed, has quietly become one of the most important players of Roberto Mancini’s time at the Etihad Stadium.

Players like David Silva, Sergio Aguero and, of course, Mario Balotelli, will always generate more headlines and demand more attention. They are extravagantly gifted.

Consider this remarkable fact, though. Since Mancini took over at City two years ago this week, his team have faced the Barclays Premier League super powers of Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool and Tottenham on 19 occasions and Barry has started all but one of those games. Last May, against Tottenham at home, he missed out because he was injured.

It is a telling statistic, one that says everything for the way that Mancini has come to rely on a player who — along with Ivory Coast international Yaya Toure — has come to form the anchor of his midfield.
Playing against the big guns: Barry takes on Alex Song during City's 1-0 win over Arsenal

One former City player, the 1968 championship winner Mike Summerbee, is convinced of Barry’s significance.

‘He is so important to us,’ said Summerbee recently. ‘I would go as far as saying that he is one of our best players.

‘Look at the games he plays. When we need to win, he plays. That says everything. He is a fantastic and sometimes under-rated player.’

Signed from Aston Villa by Mancini’s predecessor Mark Hughes, Barry’s stock has risen and fallen with the English football public in the intervening months and years. Now it is on the rise again.

Considered indispensable to Fabio Capello’s England in advance of the 2010 World Cup, Barry ended up limping in to the tournament barely half-fit after suffering an ankle injury playing for City a month before things got underway in South Africa.

During a miserable four weeks for the national team, few suffered more than Barry. Clearly in no condition to play, he cut an embarrassed, shambling figure as Germany routed England 4-1 in Bloemfontein.

‘The bottom line is that Gareth shouldn’t have been there,’ said a source close to the 30-year-old. ‘He wasn’t fit and it showed. Gareth suffered during that World Cup and continued to suffer after it.’

Barry’s rehabilitation has been gradual but his stand-out showing in City’s 1-0 win at home to Arsenal at the weekend provided the most compelling evidence yet that he is ready to become a central figure in this season’s title race and indeed for his country in next summer’s European Championships in Poland and Ukraine.

On Sunday, the range and accuracy of Barry’s passing was exemplary. When City play fluently, tempo is everything and at the weekend it was Barry’s metronomic passing — more than Silva’s artistry or Toure’s blustering power — that eased Mancini’s team through what was a tight and important game.

Coaches at City believe that the presence of Balotelli and Aguero have helped Barry’s game this season. Whereas last season’s attacking focus Carlos Tevez would, more often than not, come short towards the midfield looking for the ball, City’s current attacking duo are more likely to run behind defences to give Barry a better range for his passes.

Certainly, Mancini’s coaching staff have long appreciated Barry, even if they would like to see more assists and goals. Low maintenance and reliable, the southerner is a throwback to the pre-Twitter and Facebook age.
Back on song: Barry netted England's 2000th international goal against Sweden

‘He hates all that stuff,’ said his friend. He doesn’t understand why anybody would want to tell people what they had for breakfast.

‘Gareth isn’t anti-social. He likes his mates but really he just wants to do his stuff on the pitch and go home.’

On a recent flight home from Champions League duty, one image perhaps summed Barry up well.

While his team-mates settled down to play interactive racing and war games on their personal computers, Barry and James Milner began a game of the traditional dice game Yahtzee.

It probably wouldn’t have been Joey Barton’s chosen way to pass time on a flight but City’s ‘teacher’s pet’ (Barton’s words) won’t care about that.

Next summer one of these men will be in Eastern Europe with an England shirt on. The other will be at home feeling angry.

Read more: Gareth Barry is Manchester City's man for big occasions | Mail Online

Ok, so it's the Daily Mail but it fits with something I was thinking watching the Arsenal game the other day. Gareth Barry has settled in at City and is playing really well. I'd go as far as saying that his improvement is one of the more important factors in their progression from a dour and negative team that draws too many games into a ruthless goal-scoring machine.

He still seems to a figure of fun on here, though, for some reason. Granted he struggled for a while after his transfer to City but I think he's become criminally under-rated and is a very good player. Anyone else agree?
 
It was really annoying that three of their duff players Barry, Toure.K (pen aside) and particularly Zabaleta played really well. Needs to get it in perspective though, Arteta was easily the best CM on the pitch and Fabregas he ain't. Nasri was shite warmed up mind you.
 
It was really annoying that three of their duff players Barry, Toure.K (pen aside) and particularly Zabaleta played really well. Needs to get it in perspective though, Arteta was easily the best CM on the pitch and Fabregas he ain't. Nasri was shite warmed up mind you.

He was great against us too.

He's actually been excellent in every game I've watched this season.
 
He's similar to a couple players we have who were seen as underrated when Ronaldo was here but then people realise why they weren't rated after he left.
 
He's like their version of Carrick, very important to them but will go unnoticed by many.
 
I haven't watched much of City this year. Would anyone compare his role to Carrick's for us? Or are they very different?
 
I agree, though I still think he's yet to rediscover his best Villa form. But yeah, it has become a meme to make fun of him, so it continues regardless of performances.

He's the unglamorous midfielder type though. The kind of player who's contributions often go unnoticed. Couple that with the fact he plays for City and the absolutely unforgivable sin of being English, and you get the perfect man to praise if you wanna be the devil's advocate.
 
No, he's been overrated most of the time - he's putting in some good performances in a team with players like Silva, Ballotelli and Aguero doing the business.

In that case you could say the same about Deschamps and Makelele

He has a role in the side and he does it well. Clearly Mancini is very happy with him because even with all their cash he always plays.

I think he uses the ball well too
 
he's a limited player, playing a limited role, in an excellent team

I doubt city would miss him if he had a prolonged period out
 
In that case you could say the same about Deschamps and Makelele

He has a role in the side and he does it well. Clearly Mancini is very happy with him because even with all their cash he always plays.

I think he uses the ball well too

Agreed. Speaks volumes that De Jong isn't getting a look in, even in big games.
 
Good player, has been a vital part of Man City's team this year. One of those players that does a good job without ever receiving all that much credit.
 
Not very important. They'd probably miss him less than any other first team player apart from Clichy...and that's because Clichy is crap.

He's fine when other teams are sitting off or being run ragged by the likes of Silva and co...but then anyone who can kick a ball would be fine in that scenario. As soon as City face anyone who's in the game he's suddenly 3 yards behind the play, being caught out positionally, and allowing the opposition to almost run through on his back four at will.

Only time I've seen him play well in any meaningful context this season was against Arsenal...and even then he wasn't really doing his job. Arsenal must have gone in behind him about 50 times, and he was offering nothing going the other way to compensate. I think he's their weak link.

Underated is funny also. He's got 50+ England caps, once won England player of the year, and was bought for £20million+. All despite essentially being a coin faced Aston Villa player who looked ok against Andora once...he's one of the most overated players I can remember.
 
Underated is funny also. He's got 50+ England caps, once won England player of the year, and was bought for £20million+. All despite essentially being a coin faced Aston Villa player who looked ok against Andora once...he's one of the most overated players I can remember.

:lol:
 
He's a footsoldier to City's stars - he might have been given more credit than he was due in the past but he's of more importance to City now than some here are admitting.

He's impressed me every time I've seen him this year - always looks to me like he looked around and saw De Jong, Nasri and Yaya at club level and Parker at international level and realised he needed to step up this season.
 
I don't rate him myself. He's a decent, steady player. Maybe their version of Carrick, but I don't think he's in Carrick's league.

He gives away a lot of silly free kicks too.
 
I think he's quite limited, but I'd say he's tactically very obedient, which the modern coach loves in a deep midfielder. He's their Carrick, but with more dynamism but less ability on the ball.
 
I think he's quite limited, but I'd say he's tactically very obedient, which the modern coach loves in a deep midfielder. He's their Carrick, but with more dynamism but less ability on the ball.

Sounds about right to me. He's a company man, basically.
 
He's a bit like Vidic with pace. This thread just might win us the league.
 
I think he's found out against top opposition time and time again. Offers no real protection to the defence.

He's a decent player against teams who sit off City, pinging the ball right and left. Whenever he's pressurized somewhat, he usually walks the ball out to one of the full backs, and then passes to him, or turns home and plays it to Hart.

As for the article in the OP: Seriously? Mike Summerbee as the quoted main source of praise? It would be like Paddy Crerand telling anyone who'll listen that Park Ji-Sung is one of the top wingers in world football.
 
Underated is funny also. He's got 50+ England caps, once won England player of the year, and was bought for £20million+. All despite essentially being a coin faced Aston Villa player who looked ok against Andora once...he's one of the most overated players I can remember.

Yes. He's a steady Premiership midfielder - that's it. Unfashionable or not, he lacks a few things to be a proper player at the very top level - touch, pace, aggression.
 
Yes. He's a steady Premiership midfielder - that's it. Unfashionable or not, he lacks a few things to be a proper player at the very top level - touch, pace, aggression.

Ability on the ball in tight spaces - too easy to nullify.
 
Not very important. They'd probably miss him less than any other first team player apart from Clichy...and that's because Clichy is crap.

He's fine when other teams are sitting off or being run ragged by the likes of Silva and co...but then anyone who can kick a ball would be fine in that scenario. As soon as City face anyone who's in the game he's suddenly 3 yards behind the play, being caught out positionally, and allowing the opposition to almost run through on his back four at will.

Only time I've seen him play well in any meaningful context this season was against Arsenal...and even then he wasn't really doing his job. Arsenal must have gone in behind him about 50 times, and he was offering nothing going the other way to compensate. I think he's their weak link.

Underated is funny also. He's got 50+ England caps, once won England player of the year, and was bought for £20million+. All despite essentially being a coin faced Aston Villa player who looked ok against Andora once...he's one of the most overated players I can remember.

Completely agree with this.