Well, there's been tweets on twitter saying #JFLS and #JusticeForLuisSuarez
If that gets turned into a chant there are no words to describe it.
Even "Free Luis Suarez"
Evra accuses Suarez of racist remarks | Suarez guilty of racial abuse
- Thread starter Feeky Magee
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
Well, there's been tweets on twitter saying #JFLS and #JusticeForLuisSuarez
If that gets turned into a chant there are no words to describe it.
Even "Free Luis Suarez"
There's no way he could back. How would it look if Liverpool's only first team black player didn't choose to wear it.
Can someone explain to me why when you have a quick look at RAWK, the Scousers are getting moist over how 'classy' the club and players have been on this. What exactly is Liverpool fans defence of Suarez here? Seriously? That saying nigger in Uraguay is ok and therefore it should be ok here? Totally nuts. I genuinely can't understand that their case is, if Suarez has admitted using the word.
Will there be a minute of applause/silence t the next game at Anfield?
Probably, they might even have some inconsolable fans crying their hearts out for effect as well, just to add to the scene.
cnut diving, of course he's the real victim.
Scouse painting themselves as victims again for the bazilionth time. Every fecking time, it's always them.
Don't forget he fecking cheated Ghana of a world cup goal by one of the most blatant handball's I've ever seen...plus he was previously banned for 7 games for biting another player in Holland I think. The guy's also a cheat and a diving git.
I predict an increase to the ban, points deduction, kkkenny having another breakdown and quitting, and the manchester ship canal bursting its banks due to all the tears from klanfield and tears of laughter from ot.
Sparkystramus has spoken.
Sparkystramus has spoken.
Klanfield!!! feckin Classic!!!
Pissing off Africa in the proccess. Just saying.
Klanfield
need to get that trending on the trender thing.SkyNewsBreak Sky News Newsdesk
AP: Luis Suarez's lawyer says Liverpool striker will appeal against eight-match racism ban
AP: Luis Suarez's lawyer says Liverpool striker will appeal against eight-match racism ban
Sparky Hughes you're a legend! From now on LFC's ground will be known by me(and millions of others) as KLANFIELD!!! 
Good. Given the retarded behaviour of his club, hopefully his punishment will be quadrupled.
Sparky Hughes you're a legend! From now on LFC's ground will be known by me(and millions of others) as KLANFIELD!!!
I just wish i was good at photoshop to change the this is anfield sign and add a pic of one of those sheet hearing idiots to it
Come on Suarez....get #20,000.
Someone 'll do it...Honestly that Klanfield name is hilarious its really got meI just wish i was good at photoshop to change the this is anfield sign and add a pic of one of those sheet hearing idiots to it
I wonder how Poyet's employers, Brighton Hove Albion, feel about his outspoken support for Suarez.
brilliant Olly.Olly you're a legend. Brilliant work/
Goodness gracious!
I've been cracking up for the last 10 minutes going through the last few pages of this thread. Is this even happening? Please tell me I'm not imagining this.
Vindication does not come without a downside for Patrice Evra
Manchester United's full-back has seen his reputation take a hit despite Luis Suárez being found guilty of racial abuse
Daniel Taylor
guardian.co.uk
Wednesday 21 December 2011
So far, there has been nothing from Patrice Evra to indicate what he thinks of the Football Association's verdict, whether he thought the hearing was fair and what he makes of the backlash against him, but it is fair to assume there is vindication and, perhaps, the sense of a strange set of circumstances when a black footballer can be racially abused and yet come out of it with his reputation dismantled, too.
Liverpool have stopped short of branding him a liar, but only just. They have gone public that he is "not credible" and, on the first two days of Luis Suárez's hearing, their lawyers made a great play of pointing out that when Evra exchanged punches with a Chelsea groundsman, Sam Bethell, in 2008, the FA disciplinary commission considered his evidence "exaggerated". As recently as last week, Kenny Dalglish seemed convinced his player would get off on the basis that Liverpool planned to expose Evra as an unreliable witness.
Out of it, the perception has grown that Evra likes to "play the race card". The idea has grown that he is trouble, that he will say anything, that he has previous. It has been a blur of spin, bandwagon-jumping and, in some cases, deliberate deception. The result, football being the business it is, is that because enough people have set out to discredit him, they have managed to do so through sheer weight of numbers.
The Manchester United full-back is not entirely blameless and if it is true that he had an Ali G moment with the referee, Andre Marriner, and complained he was being booked only because he was black, there is a legitimate question of why this was not reported to the FA separately.
Liverpool want charges to be pressed because of the way he spoke to Suárez in "the most objectionable of terms". All we know so far is Evra said something along the lines of "Don't touch me, you South American," though more will emerge when the FA releases its full findings.
But Evra never cited racism in the Chelsea case, contrary to what you may have read elsewhere. Liverpool's extraordinary statement referred to Evra having no credibility and used as an example his "prior unfounded accusations". Except it was Mike Phelan, United's assistant manager, and Richard Hartis, the goalkeeping coach, who purported to hear the word "immigrant" used at Stamford Bridge. The story that it was Evra has gathered so much momentum now that even the usually reliable Press Association presented it as fact. Liverpool, they said, were referring to "racism allegations Evra made against Chelsea groundsman Sam Bethell, which were not proven".
The truth is something completely different. Likewise, Evra kept his distance when two deaf United fans complained they had lip‑read Steve Finnan making a racist remark to him during a Liverpool-United game in 2006. The simple truth is that Evra has complained of being racially abused only once before, and that was the 1-1 draw at Anfield on 15 October.
If this were politics, it would be described as a smear campaign. Perhaps, if this were not United versus Liverpool and two such high-profile players, Evra might even be congratulated for having the courage to stand up to what Paul Goulding QC and his colleagues have now identified as racism, subject to a possible appeal. That is, after all, what the authorities want. Yet Evra has not been portrayed as the victim in the real sense of the word, and Liverpool have argued that he is, indeed, the villain, unreliable and malicious when it comes to the truth. It will hardly encourage others to come forward the next time someone is called a "negro" on a football pitch.
His form has plummeted, too. While Suárez has embellished his reputation as Liverpool's outstanding player of the season, there is a feeling at Old Trafford that the strain may have affected Evra. He has had an erratic year but a blip has become a full-blown slump and it was startling to see a left-back who once had legitimate claims to be recognised as the best in the business look so vulnerable at Queens Park Rangers last weekend. The FA's independent commission may have come down on his side, but that vindication does not come without its downside.
Manchester United's full-back has seen his reputation take a hit despite Luis Suárez being found guilty of racial abuse
Daniel Taylor
guardian.co.uk
Wednesday 21 December 2011
So far, there has been nothing from Patrice Evra to indicate what he thinks of the Football Association's verdict, whether he thought the hearing was fair and what he makes of the backlash against him, but it is fair to assume there is vindication and, perhaps, the sense of a strange set of circumstances when a black footballer can be racially abused and yet come out of it with his reputation dismantled, too.
Liverpool have stopped short of branding him a liar, but only just. They have gone public that he is "not credible" and, on the first two days of Luis Suárez's hearing, their lawyers made a great play of pointing out that when Evra exchanged punches with a Chelsea groundsman, Sam Bethell, in 2008, the FA disciplinary commission considered his evidence "exaggerated". As recently as last week, Kenny Dalglish seemed convinced his player would get off on the basis that Liverpool planned to expose Evra as an unreliable witness.
Out of it, the perception has grown that Evra likes to "play the race card". The idea has grown that he is trouble, that he will say anything, that he has previous. It has been a blur of spin, bandwagon-jumping and, in some cases, deliberate deception. The result, football being the business it is, is that because enough people have set out to discredit him, they have managed to do so through sheer weight of numbers.
The Manchester United full-back is not entirely blameless and if it is true that he had an Ali G moment with the referee, Andre Marriner, and complained he was being booked only because he was black, there is a legitimate question of why this was not reported to the FA separately.
Liverpool want charges to be pressed because of the way he spoke to Suárez in "the most objectionable of terms". All we know so far is Evra said something along the lines of "Don't touch me, you South American," though more will emerge when the FA releases its full findings.
But Evra never cited racism in the Chelsea case, contrary to what you may have read elsewhere. Liverpool's extraordinary statement referred to Evra having no credibility and used as an example his "prior unfounded accusations". Except it was Mike Phelan, United's assistant manager, and Richard Hartis, the goalkeeping coach, who purported to hear the word "immigrant" used at Stamford Bridge. The story that it was Evra has gathered so much momentum now that even the usually reliable Press Association presented it as fact. Liverpool, they said, were referring to "racism allegations Evra made against Chelsea groundsman Sam Bethell, which were not proven".
The truth is something completely different. Likewise, Evra kept his distance when two deaf United fans complained they had lip‑read Steve Finnan making a racist remark to him during a Liverpool-United game in 2006. The simple truth is that Evra has complained of being racially abused only once before, and that was the 1-1 draw at Anfield on 15 October.
If this were politics, it would be described as a smear campaign. Perhaps, if this were not United versus Liverpool and two such high-profile players, Evra might even be congratulated for having the courage to stand up to what Paul Goulding QC and his colleagues have now identified as racism, subject to a possible appeal. That is, after all, what the authorities want. Yet Evra has not been portrayed as the victim in the real sense of the word, and Liverpool have argued that he is, indeed, the villain, unreliable and malicious when it comes to the truth. It will hardly encourage others to come forward the next time someone is called a "negro" on a football pitch.
His form has plummeted, too. While Suárez has embellished his reputation as Liverpool's outstanding player of the season, there is a feeling at Old Trafford that the strain may have affected Evra. He has had an erratic year but a blip has become a full-blown slump and it was startling to see a left-back who once had legitimate claims to be recognised as the best in the business look so vulnerable at Queens Park Rangers last weekend. The FA's independent commission may have come down on his side, but that vindication does not come without its downside.
Okay, I can still see the pictures. How is this possible? What a football club!
Well done, Sparky Hughes and Olly!All the more reason for Evra to sue Liverpool for libel.
Do, dodo do dodo do do, Luis Suarez! Gotta love Liverpool fans.
Nice to see him being booed by Wigan though.
Nice to see him being booed by Wigan though.
Wow...
Even if the appeal were to fall in favour of Suarez, this is all absolutely embarrasing and pathetic.
Never seen anything like it.
Even if the appeal were to fall in favour of Suarez, this is all absolutely embarrasing and pathetic.
Never seen anything like it.