Amir
Full Member
unless its jorge mendes of course![]()
Do we know he ever received a fee from United for Ronaldo or Nani agreeing a new deal?
unless its jorge mendes of course![]()
It like when Chavs & Shitty started paying ridiculous transfer fees, this set a precedent for the whole transfer market.
It's less of a risk giving your best player a big bump in salary, as so few other players fit in the same category. If you start inflating salaries from the bottom up, it will have a much more dramatic overall effect on the wage structure of the club.
Imo we don't have to inflate anything. Just as Rooney, Pogba is one of the best in his category. Yes, it's more of a gamble with him but the risk money wise is much lower too.
Imo we don't have to inflate anything. Just as Rooney, Pogba is one of the best in his category. Yes, it's more of a gamble with him but the risk money wise is much lower too.
We gambled on much worse than him, recently too. Bebe for example.
Imo we don't have to inflate anything. Just as Rooney, Pogba is one of the best in his category. Yes, it's more of a gamble with him but the risk money wise is much lower too.
We gambled on much worse than him, recently too. Bebe for example.
Players like Rossi and Pique and also fine example of success stories for youngster leaving United.
Exactly, some of the decisions do baffle me sometimes.
They have no worries for dishing out 7 MILLION for an unknown player from league 2 portugal that turned out to be dogshit - but when wages are slightly questioned they start playing hard ball.
Well all i can say is i really do hope pogba signs on, im sure we will look back to regret it one day
Surely every players wants to make it at a club of the level of United and Barcelona. Pique has, Rossi has forged a very good career for himself, but he's still at Villareal.
Looking at Juventus rising to the top again, returning to the CL next season, I can't see him being fast tracked there. A loan to another club would be more likely.
Its really 50/50 situation for Pogba. On one hand he could look up to players like Welbeck, Cleverley, Jones and Smalling. If you are good enough, sooner or later you will get your appearance and pay rise. However, there are also exceptions. Players like Rossi and Pique and also fine example of success stories for youngster leaving United.
Fair enough. I got chatting to him about united and after a while he told me a couple of things and every so often, when something of note is happening I just ask him if he knows about it. Sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn't.
I dont know what the standard procedure is re agents fees. Surely as an employee of the player the agent fee should come from him?
You'd think so, wouldn't you?
I guess it's the same as income tax. Footballers want to receive every last penny of whatever money is offered to them and expect the club to pay whatever deductions their might be.
I don't know united's reasoning but I know there's a general feeling amongst clubs that they shouldn't be paying the agents. I met Peterborough united chairman daragh macanthony a while back and he simply refuses to pay agents when he signs players or for renewals. If the agent asks for a cut he says no thanks and bins the deal. It's a brave stance but you will lose/miss out on a few good players.
To be truthful clubs shouldn't be paying agent fee's thats for the player to do.
They shouldn't but they do. They do it to keep or get the players they want.
At the age of 19 rooney, ronaldo, anderson, jones, rafael, fabio, evens, de gea, macheda and nani and smalling a little older where all on substantially more than what pogba is being offered. Granted, some if not all of those players had "proven" themselves in the first team.
Average / Poor premiership footbalers are on in excess of £50k per week these days. So a red hot highley thought of prospect could argue that he is worth £40k per week.
But we set a precedent with Rooney. Does that mean we'll have to double everyone's wages now? I don't think.
You pick the players you think they're/will be the most influential and do everything to keep them.
If our best player can demand a wage that sets him way above anyone else, then our best young talent can do the same, in relation to the other young players.
We just have to decide whether we want to keep him or not.
For the record, I think this 40k Sun thing is bollocks.
If you inflate the salary of a kid who's essentially only played reserve football, that will have knock on effects on the salary expectations almost every other player in the first team squad.
Completely and utterly different, Rooney for all his faults had been an integral part of a champions league and PL winning side and contributed many vital performances by then, Pogba has looked good in the reserves......
It depends on who the agent is contracted with and for whom he is doing specific work. It is common practice for the agent to be dealing on behalf of both the club and the player, and for his fees to be split accordingly between the two. Also, quite often the club will pay the players share of the fees as well, with the payment made on his behalf forming part of his remuneration package and being taxed as a benefit in kind via either his tax code over the year or (depending on amounts) via his SA Return.
What are you basing that on, just the conversation with the one club's chairman? It's common practice for clubs to pay agent fees, so I'm not sure you're right in claiming there is a 'general feeling amongst clubs' that they shouldn't be doing it.
Who's to say they shouldn't? It's not exactly unusual for employers to pay for things on behalf of their employees as part of their packages. I'll be plenty of people on here have their employer paying for medical insurance for them, or providing them with company cars. As long as it's all above board and the correct taxes are being paid then why shouldn't they?
I'd love to know where you're getting this information from?
aaaaaaand [/chief multiquote]
It's just on a different scale. Out of our reserve players Pogba's the one with most potential and is highly rated, so he can be rewarded with a better contract that the rest. Of course you have to have a limit as to how high are you prepared to go. 40k is ridiculous. 20-25k is justifiable (sort of).
Who's to say they shouldn't? It's not exactly unusual for employers to pay for things on behalf of their employees as part of their packages. I'll be plenty of people on here have their employer paying for medical insurance for them, or providing them with company cars. As long as it's all above board and the correct taxes are being paid then why shouldn't they?
You've got a point, Rooney set a bad precedent.
We all knew that was going to be the case.
They left for first-team football though and not for money. Do you think Pogba will be a first-team regular at Juventus, if that's where he decides to go? His chances of first-team football at United are pretty good if he decides he wants to stay.
He left Le Havre at 16. He left United at 18. He left Juventus at 2?
To me he seems to be an Adebayor type - he will leave anytime he is offered more and even thought he may be talented like Adebayor he will never fulfill his potential.
At the age of 19 rooney, ronaldo, anderson, jones, rafael, fabio, evens, de gea, macheda and nani and smalling a little older where all on substantially more than what pogba is being offered. Granted, some if not all of those players had "proven" themselves in the first team.
The other rediculous thing in tis saga is lets say the fugures are accurate and we have offered him £20k per week. He signs a 5 year deal on £20k per week. He goes on the pre-season tour and impressess. He gets his chance in first team and looks the part. So he's a 20 year old midfielder doing the biz for a top team in a top league it wont be long before he's wanting £60k, £80k or £100k per week, and other clubs will be willing to give him it and so where faced with yet another contract dispute and unhappy player. It becomes more high profile as he is now a first teamer and may disrupt this dressing room.
Taking all into consideration, its not a question of can we afford the extra £20k per week but can we afford NOT to offer Paul Pogba £40k per week??? I don’t think we can.
Id rather we succomb to player power and give him more or less what he wants. If he signs and turns into the player he can be it’s a bargain. If he turns out not to be a world beater £40k per week is still a low salary for a decent squad player these days. If he turns out to be a bebe then we have him tied to a long contract and some moron will pay £8 - £10m for him and we get our money back.