United Commercial Partnership Revenue

Getting back on topic, I've noticed in several articles over the last few days that we apparently now have telecom deals in 44 countries (I assume this information came from the Kantar global fan base media release from a few days ago given that it's been so widely reported). That's up from the 37 countries where we've officially announced we have agreements in so I think it's fair to assume there will be some new developments on that front over the next month or two.

The next most likely targets would appear to be the likes of South Korea, Japan, China, Mexico, Singapore and Thailand. Interestingly, the recent deals with telecom companies in Bulgaria and Turkey show that Europe can also be breached. World domination is what I'm after!
 
Getting back on topic, I've noticed in several articles over the last few days that we apparently now have telecom deals in 44 countries (I assume this information came from the Kantar global fan base media release from a few days ago given that it's been so widely reported). That's up from the 37 countries where we've officially announced we have agreements in so I think it's fair to assume there will be some new developments on that front over the next month or two.

The next most likely targets would appear to be the likes of South Korea, Japan, China, Mexico, Singapore and Thailand. Interestingly, the recent deals with telecom companies in Bulgaria and Turkey show that Europe can also be breached. World domination is what I'm after!

It's all well and good having these small-ish deals but are they seen as the foundation for something much bigger? Do united plan on getting more control of their mobile highlights and then distribute them using these telecoms companies in various territories, with profits being split?

Arnold said that what they have in mind, will make the current deals look like small fry, any idea what he may be on about?
 
It's all well and good having these small-ish deals but are they seen as the foundation for something much bigger? Do united plan on getting more control of their mobile highlights and then distribute them using these telecoms companies in various territories, with profits being split?

Arnold said that what they have in mind, will make the current deals look like small fry, any idea what he may be on about?

Well the agreements with credit card companies in Asia have been rolled out over the last year or so and that's definitely part of the plan. ''Direct monetisation'' of the fan base was the buzzword used by Arnold. There was talk that some of the proceeds from the IPO would be used to expand the commercial operation in Asia. Talk of purchasing retail and property space in major cities across Asia. I think the deal with Nike restricts what we can do in that respect until it expires in June 2015. As for whether we'd be looking to gain more control on our mobile highlights, that's certainly possible, but we'll just have to wait and see.
 
Bit of a step down in class though, Audi to Chevrolet.
I'd have thought we would try and keep our image up for long-term gain, M&S rather than Primark, you know?

(I know feck-all about cars, but I once hired a Chevrolet and it was shite)
 
Bit of a step down in class though, Audi to Chevrolet.
I'd have thought we would try and keep our image up for long-term gain, M&S rather than Primark, you know?

(I know feck-all about cars, but I once hired a Chevrolet and it was shite)

All depends on the chevrolet.

chevrolet-camaro.jpg
 
Yeah, well mine didn't look like that. Looked like some dyslexic designer's copy of a land-rover with an engine the size of a loaf of bread. Badge was the same though, which is my point, you don't get crap Audis.
 
Yeah, well mine didn't look like that. Looked like some dyslexic designer's copy of a land-rover with an engine the size of a loaf of bread. Badge was the same though, which is my point, you don't get crap Audis.
Yeah you do.
 
Bit of a step down in class though, Audi to Chevrolet.
I'd have thought we would try and keep our image up for long-term gain, M&S rather than Primark, you know?

(I know feck-all about cars, but I once hired a Chevrolet and it was shite)

Moving from Audi down to Chevy kind of mirrors the teams fortunes too-
 
AON faces US censure over Zimbabwe blood diamonds

HARARE - The world’s biggest insurance broker in sales, which is also a sponsor of Manchester United football club, AON Corporation, is currently faced with investigations over Zimbabwe’s so called ‘blood diamonds’, it has been revealed.

There are reports that the company’s Zimbabwe arm of the broking group has already been warned by the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) over its dealings with sanctioned Mbada Diamonds and is currently under discussion for possible breach of US laws.

Highly placed sources within the firm have confirmed that, just until recently, AON was the designated insurance broker for Mbada Diamonds.

The company’s Zimbabwe wing is partly owned by TA Holdings. TA Holdings has a 30% stake in Aon Zimbabwe, and TA Holdings has 33.8% owned by Masawara PLC, an investment firm based in the Channel Islands . TA Holdings has under its porfolio Aon Zimbabwe, Zimnat Life, Zimnat Lion Insurance, Grand Reinsurance Company, Lion Assurance Company and Botswana Insurance Company in its portfolio. AON Zimbabwe’s parent company is US owned although it recently moved its headquarters from Chicago to London.

In this view, AON Corporation, falls under the US jurisdiction and any violation of OFAC which administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign countries and regimes would result in huge fines.

Mbada Diamonds was listed on US sanctions last year as a result of its negative record on reported human rights abuses and links with ZANU (PF). When asked to comment, a US Embassy spokesperson (name withheld) in Harare stated that while Mbada remains under sanctions, any person or company under US jurisdiction which trades with Mbada is guilty of contravening US statutes.

“As a company controlled by the Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation (ZMDC), Mbada Diamonds is subject to sanctions administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). In July 2008, following widespread political violence in Zimbabwe, OFAC added the state-owned ZMDC to its list of sanctioned entities. As a consequence, U.S. nationals may not do business with ZMDC or with companies in which ZMDC has significant ownership,” she said.

Contacted for comment, AON Zimbabwe Managing Director, Susan Mutangadura refused to answer on either whether a warning from OFAC was issued or that they conducted business with Mbada Diamonds in the past:

“Client confidentiality is an integral part of the way we do business with our clients, current and prospective. I am accordingly not able to issue a statement as requested,” She stated.

On the other hand Mbada Diamonds gave an unclear reply as their Public Relations officer and former Herald reporter, Mr Tafadzwa Chiremba, initially asked this reporter to reveal his sources and later replying stating:

“I hereby inform you that as Mbada Diamonds we are courteous to reveal our service providers to the public. This is so in view of protecting them from the purge of illegal sanctions that were slapped on our company by the US.”

Aon group is not new to controversy as it has been allegedly involved in corruption, bribes and human rights abuses in the past. In 2009, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined the company a £5.25 million for anti-corruption failings, with the group’s UK subsidiary found guilty of failing to crack down on possible bribery. The FSA found the company had made “suspicious payments” worth £4.6m to people and firms overseas. In 2004, the company was singled out by a human rights organisation, Burma Campaign for allegedly “directly or indirectly helping to finance Burma’s brutal military dictatorship.”

In 2011, Aon is reported to have paid $100 Million in Penalties and Disgorgements for FCPA violations including more than $16 million in fines to settle charges that its subsidiaries bribed foreign government officials. - Zimeye
Don't like this one bit.
 
Scrape through the surface of many, many major corporations , and the majority will have involvement in unsavoury markets/activities somewhere , just a matter of not getting caught !
 
There's just one problem with this, Zimbabwe don't have 'blood diamonds'.

You are correct - Zimbabwe diamonds are not considered conflict diamonds and can be sold on the internation market. If it's ethically correct with Mugabe is another matter....
 
What human rights abuse diamond mining do they have then?

Marange diamonds (their main diamond-area) are allowed sold on the international market as Zimbabwe is not considered a warzone - however - by buying Marange diamonds, people are basically helping Mugabe regain his power

But it's not illegal
 
It has to do with Bob being a tyrannical asshole we(the US) don't deal with more than "Blood Diamonds."
 
I think the car deals are pretty good indication of United's global ability to be re-launching pad or re-branding tool for a product/service.

Audi wanted to change its fuddy-duddy image a few years ago and did a multi-prong approach including using United as a vehicle.

Obviously GM must have noticed Audi's success and United's contribution so are willing to go down the same route. I am they will get a better deal than from Audi.

My concern is that with GM, its the second major sponsor that is US government owned, AIG being the other. Soon we will be the "phoenix" brand vehicle.
 
I think the car deals are pretty good indication of United's global ability to be re-launching pad or re-branding tool for a product/service.

Audi wanted to change its fuddy-duddy image a few years ago and did a multi-prong approach including using United as a vehicle.

Obviously GM must have noticed Audi's success and United's contribution so are willing to go down the same route. I am they will get a better deal than from Audi.

My concern is that with GM, its the second major sponsor that is US government owned, AIG being the other. Soon we will be the "phoenix" brand vehicle.

Erm, haven't we moved on from AIG? And GM's government ownership is now less than 30%.
 
AIG also had its issues after the sponsorship deal started. GM has done fairly well since the recovery and is now realizing spending the money they could spend on a Super Bowl ad could go to Manchester United and be seen by far more people. Rather than focusing on their US market and ignoring others, they diversified they bonds, to call on the mighty Wu Tang Financial.
 
You are correct - Zimbabwe diamonds are not considered conflict diamonds and can be sold on the internation market. If it's ethically correct with Mugabe is another matter....

What human rights abuse diamond mining do they have then?

Marange diamonds (their main diamond-area) are allowed sold on the international market as Zimbabwe is not considered a warzone - however - by buying Marange diamonds, people are basically helping Mugabe regain his power

But it's not illegal

It has to do with Bob being a tyrannical asshole we(the US) don't deal with more than "Blood Diamonds."

Zimbabwe's diamonds are just fine, and there is nothing illegal about buying diamonds from them. The issue here is sanctions imposed on Zimbabwe by the US. Hence why I don't quite agree that it is 'Blood Diamonds' and I don't think it is despicable either.

Whilst I'm no fan of Mugabe, I can also appreciate that the country is in a much better place than it was a few years ago with the land grabs. Nobody is currently being killed or slaughtered in Zimbabwe and the country has become a lot more stable. The economy is finally growing again. And I've seen this first hand, I was there just 3 weeks ago.

And in any way, you'd be hard pressed to find a mining company internationally that don't infringe on human rights in some way, shape or form.
 
Saw the DHL advert on tele for the first time last night.

I can imagine theres a lot of unhappy ABU's out there screaming at the TV
 
ManUtd Stuff @ManUtdStuff
Hong Kong Jockey Club has committed $1.41m over the next 3 yrs to establish & run its Youth Football Camp in partnership with United. #MUFC
 
Money comes to money as Man United anounce yet another multi-million pound deal


Football News 24/7

There's an old saying - that money comes to money and that's certainly the case so far as Manchester United regarded to be the richest sporting club in he world - is concerned.

Sports betting firm Bwin has now become the sponsor of Manchester United FC for the 2012/13 season, replacing previous official sponsors of three years Betfair.

Bwin are the current sponsors of La Liga champions Real Madrid, but with their €16 million a year shirt sponsorship deal expiring at the end of this season, the betting company took the opportunity to shift their promotion away from the Spanish market where they have already gained good exposure. In addition, Bwin said it was looking to move from costly offline brand advertising to digital partnerships, with Bwin.party co CEO Norbert Teufelberger commenting:

“As the official online gaming and betting partner, bwin.com has numerous online sponsoring rights, which fit perfectly with bwin.com products. Manchester United is famous for its international fan community. The club has more than 25 million friends on Facebook and over 200 official fan communities in 24 countries.”

Manchester United currently has a number of sponsorship deals already in place with major companies, including AON insurance for £20 million a year, Nike for £23.5 million a year and DHL for £10.5 million a year. Following announcement of the multimillion pound deal between Manchester United and Bwin, a message on the club’s website stated:

“Two giants in the world of sports coming together to start an enthralling partnership. From now on, bwin is Official Online Gaming and Betting Partner of English record-holders Manchester United!”

http://www.footballtradedirectory.com/news/2012/july/money-comes-to-money-as-man-united.html?
 
10.5m/year from DHL.. wow.. WOW
I actually dont believe that...
 
sharing sponsors with the vermin ffs.

furthermore going from audi to chevrolet is a massive prestige drop. None of the players will be turning up in chevrolet/gm products after driving R8's, q7's, and A8's.
 
Aon Set For New Role


Aon is to extend and rework its sponsorship of Premier League soccer club Manchester United.

The risk management firm is to become the title sponsor of the club's new global business network and of the Manchester United Foundation. The business network is to be created as a forum for sponsors, executives and heads of state to meet and discuss key economic issues. The Manchester united Foundation, meanwhile, supports community projects and soccer schools.

The new agreement follows the announcement earlier this week that General Motors' Chevrolet brand would replace Aon as Manchester

Manchester United chief executive David Gill said: "One thing Aon and Manchester United understand is the need to use different strategies to reach different objectives, and both of us are very focused on achieving objectives. Aon continues to be everything that any business could want from a partner with strong relationships at every level within our business, and we look to build similar relationships with Aon and their prospective clients for years to come."

Greg Case, the chief executive of Aon, added: "The first phase of our partnership, which continues into 2014, was focused on uniting our firm and the colleagues in it while reinforcing the brand of Aon. The second phase is intended to continue this momentum but with even more of a focus around clients and communities. We are very excited about continuing this new dimension of our partnership with Manchester United over the long term."

Aon's original sponsorship deal with Manchester United began in the 2010/11 season.
 
So we are now a football club with a business-to-business sponsor :devil:
 
How much of that is Fergie pocketing though?