Fergie's obsession with picking old players in midfield

Yeah but scholes isn't an am/c if he is he's the deepest one around. Don't get me wrong I think scholes has a big part to play but because he has to play so deep and can't cover his partner he leaves problem and if carrick did have a partner who was in his prime an knew centre mid he could do more.

I don't think we necessarily have to go to a 3 although kagawa playing a bit deeper would help, I expect in general that clev will get more games and has just been reset following the Olympics.

He's our second highest played CM (ironically the same mins as Scholes both on 235). But with Clev you have to remember that he was involved in both Internationals and the Olympics. So it's probably a decent idea to rest him a little bit.

Carrick: 450mins (100%)
Scholes: 235mins (52%)
Cleverley: 235mins (52%)
Giggs: 170mins (38%)
Ando: 86mins (19%)
Powell: 20mins (4%)
 
Swap Fletcher out for Carrick, or a properly fit Fletcher, and that midfield combo from tonight looks very good if we want to play a 4-3-3. You could probably play Kagawa instead of Anderson or Cleverley in that system too.

Surely Fergie must see how much more life there was in our play tonight compared to when he tries to rely on playing through Scholes/Giggs?
 
I think people will be disappointed if they think Fergie will suddenly stop relying on experience because of tonights match.
 
I think people will be disappointed if they think Fergie will suddenly stop relying on experience because of tonights match.

I'd wish he'd do that just a little, for instance if we need a CB, we should use one of the youngsters and keep Carrick in midfield.

I do think Fergie seems to put huge emphasis on experience, possibly more than in the past. It seems as though one of Scholes or Giggs - if not both - willl be starting every big game and I don't think it's the correct decision. But that's Fergie for you. If he's decided you need someone with experience in that center of midfield, Carrick alone will not do...
 
That midfield performance was a million times better than anything the first team midfield has produced in absolutely ages...and that's despite Fletcher being nowhere near fit and Anderson doing his usual dying trick an hour into the game...and despite having the world's most inexperienced defence behind them.

Imagine if we'd tried to play that defensive line behind a midfield two with Scholes or Giggs in it...or basically any midfield we've line dup with in the PL this season.
 
That midfield performance was a million times better than anything the first team midfield has produced in absolutely ages...and that's despite Fletcher being nowhere near fit and Anderson doing his usual dying trick an hour into the game...and despite having the world's most inexperienced defence behind them.

Imagine if we'd tried to play that defensive line behind a midfield two with Scholes or Giggs in it...or basically any midfield we've line dup with in the PL this season.

Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Newcastle had a weakened lineup and we were at home.

If you think a midfield of Cleverley and Anderson are the answer to a more solid defensive midfield shape then you clearly don't remember some of the games last season.
 
17 years ago, everyone was screaming at Fergie to use experience and thought he was crazy to put so much trust in the youngsters. 17 years later everyone is screaming at Fergie to give the youngsters their time and stop putting the emphasis on experience.

I remember someone once saying that "if you put your trust in young people, they will surprise you."
 
Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Newcastle had a weakened lineup and we were at home.

If you think a midfield of Cleverley and Anderson are the answer to a more solid defensive midfield shape then you clearly don't remember some of the games last season.

Put Carrick behind them (or a fully fit Fletcher) and it should be good. Better than Carrick-Scholes, not to mention Carrick-Giggs.
 
I'd wish he'd do that just a little, for instance if we need a CB, we should use one of the youngsters and keep Carrick in midfield.

I do think Fergie seems to put huge emphasis on experience, possibly more than in the past. It seems as though one of Scholes or Giggs - if not both - willl be starting every big game and I don't think it's the correct decision. But that's Fergie for you. If he's decided you need someone with experience in that center of midfield, Carrick alone will not do...

Yup, agree with this too.
 
Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Newcastle had a weakened lineup and we were at home.

If you think a midfield of Cleverley and Anderson are the answer to a more solid defensive midfield shape then you clearly don't remember some of the games last season.

It was just a far, far better midfield performance. Both of our goals were also a direct result of it. When other than that was the last time our midfield was by far the biggest strength of our team, in any game?

Also, Fletcher played in the Carrick role tonight, which is why the defensive problems that may have been caused by Anderson and Cleverley weren't an issue.

Also, in relation to that, people really need to stop using a bunch of games where we thrashed everyone we played as an example for why we shouldn't try to do the same thing again. I mean, are you all mental?
 
Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Newcastle had a weakened lineup and we were at home.

If you think a midfield of Cleverley and Anderson are the answer to a more solid defensive midfield shape then you clearly don't remember some of the games last season.

We were outplayed by 10 men against a fecking shit liverpool side. Dont tell me anything aabout a weakened newcastle side.
Clev and Anderson with Carrick behind them would work wonderfully against any team. Put Kagawa Rooney and RvP in front od them and teams would shit themselves facing us. But as I know fergie, he will stick with a 442 no matter how badly out of form our wingers are and on top of that will play scholes or giggsy in that system
 
It was just a far, far better midfield performance.

Also, Fletcher played in the Carrick role tonight, which is why the defensive problems that may have been caused by Anderson and Cleverley weren't an issue.

Also, people really need to stop using a bunch of games where we thrashed everyone we played as an example for why we shouldn't try to do the same thing again.

It's a bit weird, isn't it? Yet people don't seem to have a problem with the Carrick-Scholes pair even though that was how we started that utterly wretched 1-0 defeat at City, for example. Quite an important game that we lost with a miserable performance.
 
Neither coming from a player with the big game experience either. So that destroys the whole point of "experience wins you games". Ferguson has problems letting go of his old guard imo, I know Scholes coming back helped us last season but all it seems to have done is delayed the much needed CM signing.

Considering our wingers are out of form and we have Welbeck and Hernandez eager for games, I still find it a mystery why we aren't trying 4-3-3:

---Clev-Carrick-Ando---
-Kagawa-RVP-Welbeck-

The above would imo work very well, as Carrick could sit a little deeper and screen while Clev/Ando would be the engine in midfield. Once Rooney returns from injury I could see him playing ahead of Welbeck in that lineup.

Well I never... :cool:
 
Also, in relation to that, people really need to stop using a bunch of games where we thrashed everyone we played as an example for why we shouldn't try to do the same thing again. I mean, are you all mental?

Bizarre isn't it.

We fecking smashed everyone playing those two and played great football, but wait, we gave away a few chances....

Er, we give away enough chances without them.
 
Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Newcastle had a weakened lineup and we were at home.

If you think a midfield of Cleverley and Anderson are the answer to a more solid defensive midfield shape then you clearly don't remember some of the games last season.

I'm sure someone will correct me if wrong but didn't we start off last season in great form with Cleverly and Anderson until the bad injury to Cleverly
 
This thread is abit OTT for me, at least some of the statements in it.

Firstly, I can't believe anyone has yesterday down as our worst performance at anfield. Anyone catch the 4-0 in 90, or the 3-1 or 2-0 in 2001. The defensive performance alone put it above plenty of other performances we have put in there recently IMO. Christ, I reckon O'Shea's last minute winner was a poorer performance than yesterday.

I also think LFC, as poor as they may look in the league table, are being hugely under-estimated on here. Not only is this their biggest game of the season, it also comes after the 23 year long Hillsborough campaign has just concluded and their crowd and the occasion would have galvanised them. Personally I only think they were the better side UNTIL the sending off and to be honest, I don't find that highly surprising given the occasion, our recent record there and them having everything to prove. After the sending off I never thought we were in danger of losing the match and was highly confident we would win. Other than Gerrard's goal in the second half I can't recall any notable incident they created. Their also the best side we have played so far this season and will show that by the end of the year.

Now, I was against playing Giggs over Cleverley yesterday but after Scholes played two in two games, he was always going to be rested for the game at Anfield and our track record with Scholes at Anfield has not been good for years. Anderson had very little game time, so it was a straight choice between Clev and Giggs, and Giggs got the selection.

Furthermore, the entire team did not play well yesterday(other than the back four) and the wingers and the attack deserve as much scrutiny as the centre midfield. THe problem at the moment is not just with the central players, it's collectively as a whole, the entire team is not playing well. If anything, the solidity and individual performance of the back four yesterday was progress and a step towards a solid base, which we need.

I'm also not sure after effectively the majority of the forum wanting United to sign and play an attacking midfielder like Kagawa, plenty wanting this over the inclusion of Rooney, why this is generating so much criticism. Kagawa's now analysed as a support striker when, for me, he's playing as the attacking midfielder as part of a midfield three that plenty wanted. For me, he is part of our central midfield options and part of Carrick and Giggs. He's playing the role different to Rooney and Welbeck did for most of last season, that's evident to see.

Kagawa's going take some time to fit in with our style of play, brand of football and individual players. This is something which is struggling at the moment and has not been helped by Valencia and Nani being seriously out of form for the most part. Valencia barely had an impact yesterday(pen aside) and after defending Nani for his Gala performance, he was incredibily frustrating and wasteful yesterday. All of this combined is not giving RVP much to work with and also the lack of cohesion is effecting the entire team. You can't place all of this on the centre of the park every time.

This side is going to need a good 15-20 games to be properly judged. There's too things that need to be settle to expect instant success. We have a host of players returning from injury and fitness in defence and midfield, we are playing a slightly different type of play and we have new players familiarising themselves in attack. Yesterday was the first time all season our back four looked collectively strong lead by Rio and it's only a matter of time before the attack starts to click more effectively, the talent is to good for that. If this is the case and the midfield is the problem, then fine, but it's way to premature to go down that road already and some of the opinions reflect this. People writing off Clev and Carrick as a pairing when they have to my memory played once together is lunacy. Anderson and Carrick have always looked a reasonably balanced pairing to me as well.

The likes of Clev and Anderson have hardly had a chance and Fletcher not even had a proper run of games yet. On top of Vidic slowly feeling his way back in, RVP and Kagawa getting used to the club, Rooney injured early season and a host of defenders slowly coming back from minor injuries, it's not surprising we are hardly firing on all cyclinders, is it?

All ready we have two of our toughest away games out of the way and having managed to win five consecutive games, clawed ahead of City early on(which is key) and now have a basis to go on and improve. Personally I reckon we will be fine and soon will look strong in all areas. Most confident I have been in the side since 08/09. Only thing I can't get my head round, is the keeper rotation after DDG's form last season.

Great post, agree with all of it.
 
I haven't spoken to one United fan who can understand Giggsy's selection in central midfield ahead of the likes of Cleverley at Anfield.

Fergie does seem obsessed with this experience thing but i'm not sure what kind of message it sends to our younger out and out midfielders. When Fergie trusts a 38 year old former winger to do the job over the likes of a newly established England midfielder.

Can't be good for the confidence surely?
 
I haven't spoken to one United fan who can understand Giggsy's selection in central midfield ahead of the likes of Cleverley at Anfield.

Fergie does seem obsessed with this experience thing but i'm not sure what kind of message it sends to our younger out and out midfielders. When Fergie trusts a 38 year old former winger to do the job over the likes of a newly established England midfielder.

Can't be good for the confidence surely?

Who's going to be brave enough to tell he keeps getting it wrong then?
 
Also, in relation to that, people really need to stop using a bunch of games where we thrashed everyone we played as an example for why we shouldn't try to do the same thing again. I mean, are you all mental?

:lol:

So true.
 
The Neviller said:
When was the last time [Scholes and Giggs started]?

Last week against Wigan.

The Neviller said:
How often does it happen now?

Last season Liverpool at home, Sunderland, Man City and Norwich away. And it would presumably have been more if Scholes hadn't retired until January.

..
 
Scholes is still class, Carrick can provide moments of greatness. But Giggs, eh....not anymore. Playing them all together against top teams is just asking for a pace raping.
 
Can we change this topic title to: "Fergie's obsession with not signing central midfielders."
 
Stupid decision to start Scholes and Giggs.

We could all see it on here. No idea why Fergie can't.
 
Giggs has still got it but him and Scholes together means we're just too short of pace and strength.

Giggs hasn't played well in over a year. For a 38 year old that's usually a sign.
 
It's not just the old players. It's the old style. Our plan A at the moment is essentially a plan B. If there isn't anyone in space, lump it in the box, or pass it out wide for someone else to lump it in the box. Then wonder why our only striker, a 4ft 6 supporting player, and the 2 center midfielders sitting on the half way line aren't magically heading in 5 goals a game.

It's like a game of Fifa where you're on the edge of the box and none of your players are making any runs.
 
It's just too fecking predictable now, everything. No craft in our play and our tactics are so limited for a club which has always prided itself in winning in style.
 
DO explain the rational of playing Giggs instead of Ando or Cleverley?

I prefer the rationale of..

Midfield A play abysmally at the weekend. And rather badly in the midweek before it.

Midfield B play pretty well on Wednesday.

Big game this weekend. Play Midfield A.

Winner.
 
Bring in the younger players please SAF, he's being too negative, experience does nowt when the legs are gone.
 
If we want to win anything this season these 2 cannot begin games together. We were very lucky last week and this week we have been found out by a half decent side. It was coming
 
I know I'll get abuse for this but I honestly don't ever want to see Giggs start a game for us again. Woeful doesn't begin to describe 90% of his performances in 2012.