Goooose
New Member
It's like watching Ronaldo in 06/07. Levy will never let him go for less then about £50m now.
...speaking with Geoff Shreeves right now.
"Gareth, a great goal, but you've only got one living grandparent, tell us how that feels."
Who'll pay 50 though ?
If he's off to Spain I reckon Levy will take £50m for him.
Who'll pay 50 though ?
Do yourself a favour and have a look at who he's scored his goals against this year. The notion of him as POTY ahead of RVP is hilarious.
Do yourself a favour and have a look at who he's scored his goals against this year. The notion of him as POTY ahead of RVP is hilarious.
I think they will be queuing up to be honest. Everybody from the likes of City, Chelsea, Madrid and maybe even us. Then there's the likes of PSG who will probably throw 300k a week at him.
Us?
With our sponsorship deals and improvement in debt, we should have quite a bit lying around if we wanted to spend it.
That's a first team spot you don't have to worry about for 10+ years.
Chelsea don't need him really. They need to strengthen other positions and want to reign in spending a bit.
City, maybe yeah.
Madrid he won't fit with Ronaldo there already as they both want to do exactly the same thing for mine and play on the same side. But maybe they'll bid anyway.Would be better going for a Mata mind you to play on the right.
PSG, don't see him going or them realistically paying that.
Madrid always wants shiny new things. I expect Ronaldo to leave & Bale to come in; all in all, he'd be a slightly less expensive CR (in view of Ronaldo's contract 'problem').
You really expect Ronaldo to leave? Due to what reasons, if I may ask?
Ronaldo won't leave but that wont put them off bidding for Bale. They paid 30m for Modric when they already have one of the best midfields in the world, he starts almost every game on the bench. Di Maria would be dropped and Bale will play wide while Ronaldo plays central or to the right side. They'd make it work even if they interchanged all the time.
Of the current top 6 Suarez has scored against City, Chelsea, Everton & Arsenal so far this season
Against top half teams this season Luis Suarez has had 13 starts, and scored five goals. Robin Van Persie on the other hand has made just 10 starts against the rest of the top half, and yet has scored nine times. Suarez has had a good season, but half his goals have come against Wigan, QPR and Norwich. Saying he's been better than RVP, or even close to him, is akin to claiming Walcott's been better than Bale.
And no one is saying Suarez is better than Van Persie.
Shit-loads of people are, you need only look at the Mail's silly awards thing today. Before tonight I'd have put good money on him getting POTY.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tions-Sportsmails-experts-say-season-far.html
It's not just the Mail's journos, there was a very serious danger he'd win the Football Writer's Award purely because he's great at hammering crap teams and because he plays for plucky little Liverpool, a club with a mere 200 million quid's worth of players on their books.
Fortunately the Welsh messiah has put a stop to that and so we'll have a mere injustice with the award (like Ginola) rather than travesty (like Parker)
It's not just the Mail's journos, there was a very serious danger he'd win the Football Writer's Award purely because he's great at hammering crap teams and because he plays for plucky little Liverpool, a club with a mere 200 million quid's worth of players on their books.
Fortunately the Welsh messiah has put a stop to that and so we'll have a mere injustice with the award (like Ginola) rather than travesty (like Parker)
He's scored 8 of Spurs' last 9 goals and over half of them have been screamers. There's only a few players in the world that could do what he's done recently. Certainly not Walcott. Part of the reason Spurs have been lacklustre going forward is because Bale's gone into uber-selfish mode, but he's winning them games on his own so in fairness why shouldn't he?
Against top half teams this season Luis Suarez has had 13 starts, and scored five goals. Robin Van Persie on the other hand has made just 10 starts against the rest of the top half, and yet has scored nine times. Suarez has had a good season, but half his goals have come against Wigan, QPR and Norwich. Saying he's been better than RVP, or even close to him, is akin to claiming Walcott's been better than Bale.
A 28 year old Ronaldo back in the summer or this guy at the age of 23?
It's not just the Mail's journos, there was a very serious danger he'd win the Football Writer's Award purely because he's great at hammering crap teams and because he plays for plucky little Liverpool, a club with a mere 200 million quid's worth of players on their books.
Fortunately the Welsh messiah has put a stop to that and so we'll have a mere injustice with the award (like Ginola) rather than travesty (like Parker)
Is it best to highly rate a player because he scores screamers, or show caution because he's scoring so many screamers?
One wonders whether we are witnessing something very unsustainable or very indicative of future ability.
I'd say it's a mixture of both, weighted towards the latter.
Yea no doubt he's in incredible form, I was only asking because I'd seen a few comments like 'after tonight....' so thought I may have missed something particularly special.