Mesut Özil

Oh I certainly will maybe that way you might learn something, and I don't know why you feel the need to bold my post and then call me ill informed when in fact you are.

I said they would probably make half the fee back form shirt sales and they probably will, even in this article Madrid made back more than half of the fee.

http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2012/7/30/3201349/how-much-are-shirt-sales-really-worth



And I'm talking about the transfer fee mr ill informed.


fair enough - I didn't know exactly what you were saying.

I still disagree with it. I'll try and put some time into why later.
 
Oh I certainly will maybe that way you might learn something, and I don't know why you feel the need to bold my post and then call me ill informed when in fact you are.

I said they would probably make half the fee back form shirt sales and they probably will, even in this article Madrid made back more than half of the fee.

http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2012/7/30/3201349/how-much-are-shirt-sales-really-worth



And I'm talking about the transfer fee mr ill informed.
Have you even read the article you quoted? It explains later on why the idea that the club gets a signficant amount of money back with shirt sales is nonsense. The articles closes with the following phrase:
But the impact of individual players (especially popular ones) on shirt sales has been grossly overestimated. No player can pay for himself on the back of shirt sales, so if anyone suggests that they can, feel free to tell them they're wrong.

The assumption that Ronaldo sold every year as many shirts as in his first season is plain stupid and we also have to discount all the buyers who would have bought a Madrid shirt anyway, but just chose Ronaldo because they liked him more than Alonso or Kaka or whoever. The number of shirts the club sells that wouldn't have been sold without the signing are a small part of the total numbers, therefore the whole idea that the club gets half his money back with shirt sales is just wrong.
 
Heard the fee is €45mill rising to €50mill! [Insert joke about the fee not rising as it might be linked to Arsenal winning trophies]. That works out £38mill rising to £42mill and considering Spurs coughed up £30mill (rising to £35mill) for Lamela represents good business. Lamela will probably become a fine player himself but at least with Ozil we know he is already there.....

Lamela was 30m euros (not pounds), with €5 of possible future add-ons, making the total possible fee £30m (not £35m).
 
Have you even read the article you quoted? It explains later on why the idea that the club gets a signficant amount of money back with shirt sales is nonsense. The articles closes with the following phrase:


The assumption that Ronaldo sold every year as many shirts as in his first season is plain stupid and we also have to discount all the buyers who would have bought a Madrid shirt anyway, but just chose Ronaldo because they liked him more than Alonso or Kaka or whoever. The number of shirts the club sells that wouldn't have been sold without the signing are a small part of the total numbers, therefore the whole idea that the club gets half his money back with shirt sales is just wrong.

Well it also says

So all the money Madrid make from Ronaldo shirts is used... to pay Ronaldo.

Anyway I just started a thread on it

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/can-big-name-transfer-fees-be-recouped-by-shirt-sales.376838/
 
You had 1 or 2 at a stretch so that couldnt be a concern for you. It was for us though, we didnt need him.

EDIT: You had none actually, calling Wilshere world class already would be a stretch.


You had Young and Valencia on the pitch against Liverpool. Are you seriously saying you don't need Ozil?

He's a genuine world class player. You've got fewer than you think you do.
 
You had Young and Valencia on the pitch against Liverpool. Are you seriously saying you don't need Ozil?

He's a genuine world class player. You've got fewer than you think you do.


Valencia plays on the right so unless you're suggesting we play Ozil out on the right, its as significant as having Jones play RB for us that game. And young's a squad player who was playing because our starters were injured.
 
Valencia plays on the right so unless you're suggesting we play Ozil out on the right, its as significant as having Jones play RB for us that game. And young's a squad player who was playing because our starters were injured.


The reality is that you have Kagawa who is a bit of an enigma for you and Rooney who doesn't want to be there. Ozil is better than those two players. You may not have 'needed' him but he is exactly the type of player that any top club should be in for if he becomes available. You missed out big time.
 
The reality is that you have Kagawa who is a bit of an enigma for you and Rooney who doesn't want to be there. Ozil is better than those two players. You may not have 'needed' him but he is exactly the type of player that any top club should be in for if he becomes available. You missed out big time.

The reality is, you know feck all.
 
The reality is that you have Kagawa who is a bit of an enigma for you and Rooney who doesn't want to be there. Ozil is better than those two players. You may not have 'needed' him but he is exactly the type of player that any top club should be in for if he becomes available. You missed out big time.


The reality is that whether or not Rooney wanted to be here, he is. He will start behind RVP almost every meaningful game he's fit for which incidentally is where Ozil plays. So once we'd decided not to sell Rooney and gone through the entire summer drama to keep him, it made little sense to spend 40mil+ on a player only to play him out of position.

If we had the chance to feck Rooney off outside the country for a good fee and had the choice of buying Ozil, I'd have a different opinion about this but once we'd kept him, no way could we fit Ozil in too without putting square pegs in round holes.
 
The reality is that whether or not Rooney wanted to be here, he is. He will start behind RVP almost every meaningful game he's fit for which incidentally is where Ozil plays. So once we'd decided not to sell Rooney and gone through the entire summer drama to keep him, it made little sense to spend 40mil+ on a player only to play him out of position.

If we had the chance to feck Rooney off outside the country for a good fee and had the choice of buying Ozil, I'd have a different opinion about this but once we'd kept him, no way could we fit Ozil in too without putting square pegs in round holes.


Fair enough, good points.

It also depends on how you want to play in the long-term, and whether Moyes prioritises wing-play as much as Ferguson. First indications seem he does.
 
Fair enough, good points.

It also depends on how you want to play in the long-term, and whether Moyes prioritises wing-play as much as Ferguson. First indications seem he does.


Looks like he believes in having a proper right winger on one side and a tucked in wide player operating centrally on the left which is also how I like to see us set up. Having another "Di Maria" sort of a winger on the right would overcrowd the central areas.
 
Rooney has tried to leave twice now.

Kagawa has talent but didn't have a successful first season and he hasn't featured yet this season. Your team could do with Ozil or someone of his ilk.

But he's still here, isn't he? we don't allow our top players leave to domestic rivals, you see. Kagawa could easily become as effective as Ozil in the next few years. Time will tell though.
 
Fair enough, good points.

It also depends on how you want to play in the long-term, and whether Moyes prioritises wing-play as much as Ferguson. First indications seem he does.

I wouldn't take anything from the teams he is playing so far. He'd be daft to come in and bring in a new system to a successful team, especially with the pressure already on the results. If he's going to change things he'll work hard on it in training first before he brings it in over time.
 
The reality is that whether or not Rooney wanted to be here, he is. He will start behind RVP almost every meaningful game he's fit for which incidentally is where Ozil plays. So once we'd decided not to sell Rooney and gone through the entire summer drama to keep him, it made little sense to spend 40mil+ on a player only to play him out of position.

If we had the chance to feck Rooney off outside the country for a good fee and had the choice of buying Ozil, I'd have a different opinion about this but once we'd kept him, no way could we fit Ozil in too without putting square pegs in round holes.

Spot on. Its a shame to see a top player go to a rival but that's the reality of the position the club found themselves in. Ozil was clearly only available once Bale signed. At that point Rooneyt was staying. Perhaps had Ozil been available weeks before things might have been different.

Ozil probably could play wide left - but its not his position and it potentially forces a change in system. I don't get a lot of pundits sayingt "Ozil was exactly what United need" - we might need a creative player, but not in that position, we need a player who can play deeper.
 
Arsenal now seem to have quite a talented midfield and forward line, perhaps one of the best in the country in terms of first choice. All they lack now is strength in depth in that department and decent cover at the back. Ozil seems to have catapulted them back into favourites for the top four ahead of Spurs and Liverpool. Personally I'm glad as I like to have Arsenal competative.
 
I think we can do better than just scraping top 4.

This team is very together and has a lot of ability. I don't think we're going to overhaul everyone, but I'd like to see us finish ahead of one of United, Chelsea and City.
 
tumblr_mt0n30JeIB1qi532yo1_500.gif
 
Disappointing for Arsenal that. Should still beat Sunderland fairly easily though
 
Says the guy who spent something like 118m pounds.

£108m, spread over 7 players, thus an average of £15.5m per player, but this has no bearing on AVB's comments concerning Ozil.

Basically AVB is right, you did spend heavily on someone who plays in positions where Arsenal were already pretty well served. You'd have been much better off spending such cash on a striker and a defender.

Yes, Ozil is an upgrade on whoever he replaces, but not good value in terms of extra bang for your buck compared to what you already had.
 
£108.5m, spread over 7 players, thus an average of £15.5m per player, but this has no bearing on AVB's comments concerning Ozil.

Basically AVB is right, you did spend heavily on someone who plays in positions where Arsenal were already pretty well served. You'd have been much better off spending such cash on a striker and a defender.

Yes, Ozil is an upgrade on whoever he replaces, but not good value in terms of extra bang for your buck compared to what you already had.
 
Fantastic touch and assist to Giroud, quality.