Shinji Kagawa

Status
Not open for further replies.
If a player is so completely reliant on the players and the system then he needs to have a look at himself.

There's no doubt that the way we have played this season is not very conducive to Kagawa's style of football but that still does not excuse the number of times he completely goes missing in games. He needs to exert more influence on games no matter what the system.

Right now he isn't good enough to start for us and is not doing much to stake his claim either.

I would say the same to Paul Scholes on the left flank for England.

Playing on the left for Dortmund or Japan is possible because of the system but in this United set up I can see why he struggles. A prime Scholes would probably have done fine on the left had England played like Japan.
 
None of it is the players fault?
Oh it's partly his fault for not asserting himself more and taking command of games, but he's hardly ever had a run of games under moyes. The little run he did get seemed so forced from moyes because everyone was bothering him about it and since he was only decent then, he's gone back to the bench. He's been out of favour since the day moyes came to the club and it's pretty evident. Very hard for a player to shine when he knows there's very little chance he'll play in the next game, even if he does well.

There's no doubting he's a class player, some people on here overrate him but he's still a quality player who is still young, and when he leaves us everyone will see how good he is. It's going to be a case of "why couldn't he shine in the premier league?", when really, it's down to the style of football we've played so far and him not being given a fair chance.

Also the position thing is also a valid excuse, and it ties into the style if play. Sure he can play on the left if it's a fluid style with quick passing, and lots of movement, but that's not the way we play unfortunately. He's never been a player who will take on 2 or 3 players and then look to whip the ball in, and frankly I wouldn't want him to be doing those things. I would much rather see United play a quick, fluid, passing game and he'd shine anywhere you put him if we did. So you can't blame him for being a little ineffective on the left when he's quite clearly completely opposite to our style of play (that we've played for most of the season). Also it's a little unrealistic to expect him to become a top class winger. I mean what happens to Rooney when he plays out on the left? There's really no difference. Put silva in our team and he'd struggle as well, just like mata won't be as effective as he could be in our team unless we change our style.
 
Last edited:
If a player is so completely reliant on the players and the system then he needs to have a look at himself.

There's no doubt that the way we have played this season is not very conducive to Kagawa's style of football but that still does not excuse the number of times he completely goes missing in games. He needs to exert more influence on games no matter what the system.

Right now he isn't good enough to start for us and is not doing much to stake his claim either.
"Have a look at himself" :lol:

I don't think he's that rigid. The way we've set up is almost completely the polar opposite of what suits him, and I reckon that would be an uneasy situation for a lot of players. Could he have done better this season? Sure he could. And he's obviously suffering from a lack of confidence too so I'm not suggesting it's all system related, but I think it's important to see things in perspective rather than damning a player and stuffing him into some "needs tailor made team" box without appreciating that this isn't a 2 plus 2 equations and many things play a part.
 
He performed well? Ryan Giggs like was he?

Sigh.

From what I know, Scholes played on the left for England in a flat 4-4-2. Second, Paul Scholes is not an attacking midfielder and a completely different player to Kagawa so your comparison is void.
 
I know it's "in" to love the Bundesliga, but we can all see that the standard in that league is nowhere near the Prem right?

It's not the first time someone from that league has shone at other clubs. See that lad Liverpool loaned for an example.
Yes you're right. The mighty premier league is the best league in the world by far and all the others just aren't very good. It's a wonder that the premier league teams are struggling in the champions league when the overall league is so much better then other leagues.
 
"Have a look at himself" :lol:

I don't think he's that rigid. The way we've set up is almost completely the polar opposite of what suits him, and I reckon that would be an uneasy situation for a lot of players. Could he have done better this season? Sure he could. And he's obviously suffering from a lack of confidence too so I'm not suggesting it's all system related, but I think it's important to see things in perspective rather than damning a player and stuffing him into some "needs tailor made team" box without appreciating that this isn't a 2 plus 2 equations and many things play a part.

Well if he's not that rigid, then maybe some posters on here should stop blaming everyone but Kagawa for his mediocre performances.
 
Paul Scholes is one of the best players I've ever seen. He wasn't good on the left no, but he has literally hundreds of amazing games.

Kagawa played well agaisnt Swansea a month ago.
 
Yes you're right. The mighty premier league is the best league in the world by far and all the others just aren't very good. It's a wonder that the premier league teams are struggling in the champions league when the overall league is so much better then other leagues.

A point made quite succinctly by Roy Keane the other week.
 
Oh great, one of those posts mocking Dortmund/klopp/bundesliga as the current flavour of the month or something similar. The caf didn't seem the same without one of those crappy posts for the last few weeks.
 
Sigh.

From what I know, Scholes played on the left for England in a flat 4-4-2. Second, Paul Scholes is not an attacking midfielder and a completely different player to Kagawa so your comparison is void.
Just like Kagawa plays on the left of a similarly flat formation with similar tactics and no movement off the ball(talking most of the season here)? Any player of his ilk would struggle. Even mata is nowhere near as good as he can be in our system but he's just a world class player and naturally a bit more direct then Kagawa is so it's a bit different. Players like Kagawa, Ozil, silva, etc. need to play in a fluid passing system which offers plenty of off the ball movement. If there isn't, they'll struggle. Just like silva did for a few years, just like Ozil did for the last few months.
 
Yes you're right. The mighty premier league is the best league in the world by far and all the others just aren't very good. It's a wonder that the premier league teams are struggling in the champions league when the overall league is so much better then other leagues.
Manchester United of the 2013/14 season is clearly a case of a standard too high, mate. Stop watching all these hipster leagues. Were 7th best in league awesome.
 
A point made quite succinctly by Roy Keane the other week.
It's like they keep telling themselves they are the best then wonder why they always get outclassed when they play one of the truly top teams. It's not a coincidence. People saw Leverkusen lose 5-0 to united so they automatically assumed the league must be shit, just because Bayer are big game bottlers like spurs this season.
 
The Premier League is the best in the world. It's competitive all the way through.

Bundesliga teams aren't exactly setting the world alight at the moment. I think it's safe to say the quality of the league over there is lower. No matter whose style of football is better.
 
That doesn't even make sense.

It clearly does.

The number of times in this thread Kagawa is completely absolved of all blame in favour of having a go at our system is ridiculous. Fact is he's a very rigid player who needs to play in a certain position in a certain position to get the best out of him.
 
It's like they keep telling themselves they are the best then wonder why they always get outclassed when they play one of the truly top teams. It's not a coincidence. People saw Leverkusen lose 5-0 to united so they automatically assumed the league must be shit, just because Bayer are big game bottlers like spurs this season.

Loads of hype surrounding the EPL. It's a marketing man's dream as those who watch it in North America can plainly see. Terminology culled from the NFL and MLB is now used by commentators, pundits, and the media in general. Sky really got on this particular bandwagon in a big way. Old Trafford on matchdays resembles what goes on at an American football game. The awful mascots, puerile music (United Roads) and the contrived fan participation (posters, plastic flags and other assorted crap). It's canned, packaged up, and sold and, by Jove, they've done a very good job of it. The product, however, sometimes doesn't match up to expectations and I don't just mean what's on offer at United.
 
It clearly does.

The number of times in this thread Kagawa is completely absolved of all blame in favour of having a go at our system is ridiculous. Fact is he's a very rigid player who needs to play in a certain position in a certain position to get the best out of him.
Ah, close minded opinions dressed up as facts. That's always convincing.
 
The Premier League is the best in the world. It's competitive all the way through.

Bundesliga teams aren't exactly setting the world alight at the moment. I think it's safe to say the quality of the league over there is lower. No matter whose style of football is better.

Of course it is worse then the PL. Some of the mid table clubs have a budget that most Bundesliga mid table teams could only dream of. There is no doubt that across the entire league there is more quality in the EPL then in any other league in the world mainly due to the fact that the EPL generates by far the most money as well.
 
Sigh.

From what I know, Scholes played on the left for England in a flat 4-4-2. Second, Paul Scholes is not an attacking midfielder and a completely different player to Kagawa so your comparison is void.

So from what you have posted I take this as your opinion:

  • Man United play fluid football
  • All attacking midfielders should be able to play on the left
  • Central midfielders cannot play wide midfield
  • Kagawa is a player suited to playing down the left flank
Reasons for the first bullet point:

We all know football players move, we know they don't stay stationary and average position differs from game to game therefore characterising a way of playing in terms of a rigid formation is too limited and restrictive. For this reason I assume you mean England employed a system characteristic of the 4-4-2 so not fluid, quick passing, interchanging football with plentiful off the ball motion but instead one reliant on crosses, playing with width and long balls with wide players required to be skilled at beating their man or put in a quality cross from deep. You suggest my point is void because United's system for most of this season is nothing like that employed by England back then. And so you must be suggesting they have been playing a fluid, quick passing, interchanging game with a lot of movement off the ball.

Reasons for the second and third bullet points:

Your suggestion Scholes was far less effective out wide because we was not an attacking midfielder suggests all central attacking midfielders must be effective out wide. If it is conceivable a central attacking midfielder isn't as effective as required out wide then one could understand Kagawa's struggles.

Scholes was a central midfielder that wasn't that effective out wide. You must accept all central midfielders cannot perform to the required level out wide because if there exists those that can then we must question why Scholes did not adapt and perform and perhaps the system and style of play was the reason he couldn't adapt so well.

Reasons for the third bullet point:

You suggest Scholes and Kagawa are completely different players in your defence of Scholes' lack of effectiveness on the left flank. You must therefore be suggesting Scholes isn't a player suited to such a role however Kagawa's 'completely different' style is.

My argument is not void and I reject your opinion that Man United play fluid football, all attacking midfielders should be able to play on the left, there are not any central midfielders that can still do the required job out wide and Kagawa is a player suited to the role on the left. I accept you did not say these points but for your argument to be true you must accept these points, to disagree with these points is then to disagree with your very argument.
 
Sigh.

From what I know, Scholes played on the left for England in a flat 4-4-2. Second, Paul Scholes is not an attacking midfielder and a completely different player to Kagawa so your comparison is void.
We are playing in a 4-4-2 (not exactly the classic 442, but still it is a 442 and Kagawa didn't look to had the freedom of going in middle like Mata has). Scholes at the time was an attacking midfielder too.
 
1. No, I think we've played rubbish football for most of the season.
2. Most modern day AM's can and do start from wide areas. Silva, Nasri, Hazard, Oscar, Mata, Ozil, Iniesta, Isco, Mata, Cazorla and loads more play from the left. He's had the freedom to drift inside as he wishes and affect the game.
3. No, a CM's ability to play wide is not comparable to that of an AM.
4. Yes, if we with a quicker tempo and movement.
 
We are playing in a 4-4-2 (not exactly the classic 442, but still it is a 442 and Kagawa didn't look to had the freedom of going in middle like Mata has). Scholes at the time was an attacking midfielder too.

Scholes is a very different player to Kagawa. More a box to box CM than an AM (where he only played for a single season). We're not really playing 442 either and Kagawa has had freedom in most games, just hasn't done much with it.
 
Scholes is a very different player to Kagawa. More a box to box CM than an AM (where he only played for a single season). We're not really playing 442 either and Kagawa has had freedom in most games, just hasn't done much with it.
He is a No.10 who in all those games he started in the left has sticked to that position for most of the time. We haven't heard Moyes' instructions so we can't be absolutely sure that he didn't had license to drift in the middle, but considering that he hasn't done that - and he likes to play in the middle - it makes me believe that he didn't had the freedom of going in the middle.

Our system is 442. Or at-least it is more close to 442 then to any other system.

I agree that Scholes is a very different player to Kagawa. Neither of them were not, aren't or won't ever be left wingers though. Both of them were required to play there because rightly or wrongly the manager chose to play someone else in No.10/central midfield position. Both of them haven't done well though.

Anyway, I think that Kagawa's problem is bigger than simply not playing in his favoured position. He is a player who excells in short passing and movement, something that at the moment (bar second half of last game) seems alien to us. I also, don't agree with people who think that he has played bad this season. He hasn't. He has been quite good in some games, average in most of them and bad in a few. Not playing for 6 weeks or so and not starting 2 games in a row during the entire season doesn't help him play good though. Would be good to see a single example in world football of a player who had so much limited oppurtunity like Shinji (not playing 2 games in a row in a season, being dropped for 6 weeks or so, getting regularly substituted even when he was playing good and playing always in not his favoured position) who has done better.
 
I know it's "in" to love the Bundesliga, but we can all see that the standard in that league is nowhere near the Prem right?

This is not about Bundesliga vs. EPL here. The latter is obviously stronger as a whole and has a broader top group. This is about Borussia Dortmund and the argument about the league went out of the window, when we marched into the CL final last season. It actually happened even sooner, when we hammered a CL finalist, which should also have won the competition based on performance that year.

Dortmund has furthermore shown in matches vs. an Arsenal in top shape (top of the table at that time) and a City team, which was the reigning champion back then, that they can keep up with the best of the EPL. Put their current team into the EPL and you have a serious Top 4 candidate (something that can´t be said about United right now) and probably also a challenger for the title.

Bundesliga teams aren't exactly setting the world alight at the moment. I think it's safe to say the quality of the league over there is lower. No matter whose style of football is better.

The Bundesliga houses the currently strongest team on the planet and we (Dortmund) have right now a bigger chance of making the quarter finals of the CL than any other EPL team. What is even more telling is that we are capable of doing this despite being unable to field more than half of our best XI in a single match since November.

Leverkusen and Schalke had pathetic displays in the CL, but this has more to do with the fact that the Bundesliga simply only has two top teams (especially in terms of mentality).

Please don´t make this Kagawa argument about leagues or team levels. This is mostly about differences in play styles and set ups and Kagawa´s lack of ability to adapt to that. This is to a point his own fault, but has also to do with the lack of trust Moyes put into the Japanese.
 
Has the argument switched to him being not that good?

Physically he struggles in the league this league is about for the most part about pace and power and he doesn't have the individual quality to make up for what he lacks in that aspect. On top of that we play a system which does not suit him at all. He would be better for City/Arsenal/Everton. I think things went wrong for home when we signed Van Persie. He lacks confidence too, he overthinks in and around the box. It's in his best interest for him to leave as I doubt things will change under Moyes.
 
1. No, I think we've played rubbish football for most of the season.
2. Most modern day AM's can and do start from wide areas. Silva, Nasri, Hazard, Oscar, Mata, Ozil, Iniesta, Isco, Mata, Cazorla and loads more play from the left. He's had the freedom to drift inside as he wishes and affect the game.
3. No, a CM's ability to play wide is not comparable to that of an AM.
4. Yes, if we with a quicker tempo and movement.

1) So you agree Scholes played in a similar system to Kagawa and perhaps the system was responsible not the player.
2) United haven't deployed Kagawa as a LAM but a LM so you think Iniesta and co would perform in this United side as LM.
3) So a CM playing LM is not comparable with a CAM playing LM :lol:
4) You also agree the system is at fault.

Young Pirlo was CAM too, I wonder how he did at LM?
Scholes performed CAM too around Kagawa's age, I wonder he did at LM?

Scholes and Pirlo were better players but they would struggle with Kagawa's role in our system even in their prime. How can they pick out a player when nobody moves? Ryan Giggs would do fine because he would just take everybody on but when you can't do that then things will be difficult.
 
Which is of course backed up by the fact that Moyes has shown throughout his managerial career that two strikers up top is the only way to play, right?

No, its based on the fact he wants his own players and "gives Kagawa games" because "people keep telling" Moyes hes a good player. He'd sign a forward, not specifically a striker and not suddenly make Kagawa a starter in his favoured position.

He's more likely to play Rooney Welbeck than Kagawa behind Rooney.
 
^ I thought the links to Cavani were strange but it would make sense if RVP is leaving in the summer. It seems a lot of people want one of Rooney/RVP to leave in the hope that Mata plays behind the striker but I along with you would be surprised if we didn't bring in a high calibre replacement if we were to let him go.

I still want us to keep RVP though, he is world class.
 
It clearly does.

The number of times in this thread Kagawa is completely absolved of all blame in favour of having a go at our system is ridiculous. Fact is he's a very rigid player who needs to play in a certain position in a certain position to get the best out of him.

it's one poster. Relax.
 
It clearly does.

The number of times in this thread Kagawa is completely absolved of all blame in favour of having a go at our system is ridiculous. Fact is he's a very rigid player who needs to play in a certain position in a certain position to get the best out of him.

He is hardly a rigid player, especially if you consider the fact that he is able to play all over the field. As to get the best out of any player, well that's true for practically all footballers, they usually are best in a given position. Some can do almost as well in other positions. Kagawa has done okay outside of his best position but, that does not make him rigid as you say.

Not many footballers are individually brilliant to just make things happen on their own - Kagawa certainly doesn't fall into the individual type player. Does that make him poor? Not really. So he'll excel more on a team where there is movement - don't tell me you think most of our team wouldn't. I mean you think we really are seeing the best out of Rooney, Mata, RVP with our general pattern of play?

To say that Kagawa will shine when this team starts to play at a quicker pace or with far more movement does not mean anyone is absolving him of not doing better. It simply agrees that he is just not a player that will do well when the onus is on him to make things happen on his own - he is not that type of player. If that makes him just not good enough to some - oh well.

The third goal against West Brom is a good example in my mind of how he can be really influential on a team. You look at very early in the move, how he receives the ball from Rooney, he keeps the ball moving quickly at the same time moving himself centrally to get the ball and then gets it shifted over to the right, all within short spaces. From there the team was able to move straight down West Brom's gut. Kagawa had moved ahead providing an option to the right of Rooney and Fellaini in which the defenders had to pay attention to, opening up the space for Welbeck. In a static system where Rooney has dropped to receive the ball and we've got wide players hugging the touch line that space for Welbeck would not have been there as the 2 central defenders would have been easily been able to cover Welbeck on his own.

Even the 2nd goal, of which Kagawa was not even on the field for, is more of what this team can do and players like Rooney, Kagawa, Mata and RVP can can really cause some problems because there was constant movement and short passes that didn't let the defense settle. Once the defense collapses centrally, we were able to make use of the wide area to better effect.

Kagawa could perhaps do better when given a winger position but, every one and their mother pretty much knows that is not what he is. If he is able to produce as a winger it's a bonus - slating him for not being good enough to be also a winger is just .... well not for me.
 
I know it's "in" to love the Bundesliga, but we can all see that the standard in that league is nowhere near the Prem right?

It's not the first time someone from that league has shone at other clubs. See that lad Liverpool loaned for an example.
That's arguable. Especially if you take the whole of both leagues into consideration
 
It clearly does.

The number of times in this thread Kagawa is completely absolved of all blame in favour of having a go at our system is ridiculous. Fact is he's a very rigid player who needs to play in a certain position in a certain position to get the best out of him.
Have you ever thought that people do this because the system that we play is complete and utter shit? It really isn't fair to judge players like Kagawa, call them shit or flops or whatever when we play in such a system that is completely against their way of playing. We have absolutely no off the ball movement. We pass it around slowly. Most of our players that have played this season for the most part this season are shit technically. They all take ages to pass the ball around. Our primary objective is give it out to the winger to cross it in. How the hell do you think an attacking midfielder like kagawa, Mata, Silva, Ozil, Gotze, or anyone like that, is suppose to look good in those type of tactics? Players like him need to be played in a system where there is off the ball movement, and quick passing. There's no point in blaming them or saying they aren't good enough for United, when they clearly are, they just require United to play the type of football that is suited to a team of our level.

Call that rigid in terms of him only being at his best in a fluid system, but then you can say all players are rigid. Do you think Messi would excel and look anywhere near as good if he were to play for a team who crosses it in the box all the time? Would he feck. He'd obviously still be a world class player, but he wouldn't be anywhere near the same level. Same with Iniesta in our team. Same with anyone.

Anyways, sure you can blame him a little for not asserting himself on games, but him changing his style would be (if I greatly exaggerate it), telling someone like Iniesta to play Stoke City tactics, and then blaming him because he's ineffective. Obviously its to a much lesser extent, so Kagawa should be doing a bit better, but he's never been given a proper chance to show he can adapt. Even when he has been given a chance, you can't say he's done worse then Valencia at all. Young has scored a few goals from range and had a good at the end of December, but that doesn't make me forget all the other shit appearances he's put out. Kagawa has way more talent then either of them and should be getting a lot more chances then they get. It's not like he's been awful either. He's been okay largely when he's played, a few ineffective games, a few good ones, mostly just decent. Nothing special, and you could say okay he hasn't forced his way into the side, but its more of a case of the others all trying their hardest to play their way out of the team, because of how poor they've been.
 
Good little sub appearance for him. For all the people criticizing him, when was the last time he actually played poorly? Was good against olympiacos, and amongst our best players vs Sunderland and Swansea. He's not played much but he deserves to play a lot more, and he just effortlessly slides into a team containing mata, Rooney, and everyone else, whereas the shit wingers look so out of place every time. He's also good defensively, so there's no reason for him not to play more.

Hope he starts vs Liverpool, although I doubt it'll happen.
If Moyes wants him to be involved against Olympiakos, then he has to play a good part of the game against Liverpool. There's no way a player not playing for more than month, with a 10 minutes here and there can be ready and influencing game. He needs game time to build up his match sharpness.
 
The Premier League is the best in the world. It's competitive all the way through.

Bundesliga teams aren't exactly setting the world alight at the moment. I think it's safe to say the quality of the league over there is lower. No matter whose style of football is better.
twigg you're using your own parameters to judge why the premier league is the best in the world when we know that competitiveness doesnt necessarily mean that one league is better than the other. i just feel like your frustration leaves you making these claims that doesnt really have much backing other than your emotions.

how can you say the quality of BL is lower? do you watch BL regularly? or can you also recognise that maybe you're just being biased towards a league you've spent most of your life watching?

Not saying the quality in BL is higher than EPL because it could be lower but how does one measure that and I'm curious how you measure that if you dont watch that many BL games?
 
Last edited:
If Moyes wants him to be involved against Olympiakos, then he has to play a good part of the game against Liverpool. There's no way a player not playing for more than month, with a 10 minutes here and there can be ready and influencing game. He needs game time to build up his match sharpness.
Agreed. I think he might start vs Liverpool as well, or at least he should. He's arguably as good as either Valencia or Young defensively (both are very overrated in that respect, regularly get caught napping and leave their man), and Januzaj has been a bit off form lately. Seeing as our best games this season have come from using a lineup like vs West Brom and Crystal Palace, then Kagawa would be a direct switch for Januzaj, and in the champions league match, he'd be a direct switch for Mata. I just hope Moyes grows some balls and goes for the win in both games, though I can see him going defensive vs Liverpool. Sadly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.