American Cops Doing What They Do Best

What if the person had HIV?
You won't get HIV from someone's saliva though.

EDIT: It's actually possible but extremely unlikely.
EDIT2: Furthermore the life expectancy of someone with HIV in the States is almost as good as a healthy person's.
 
You won't get HIV from someone's saliva though.

EDIT: It's actually possible but extremely unlikely.

Yeah, but fear is often irrational, isn't it? Anyway, it's the only explanation that makes sense to me. Maybe they're all KKK level racists.
 
I think its something other than fear personally. It'll obviously play a large part in some circumstances. But I don't think I'd be particularly scared of someone holding a knife, if me and my pal and countless backup all have guns which we could use should things escalate. I'd be ready to use it, but I wouldn't be so scared I started firing excessively.

I think its part of police culture over there. You shoot a 'perp', everyone pats you on the back afterwards, looks out for you, and everyones a big happy police family. You had the balls to do what you 'had to do'.
 
All of these police shootings paint a rather distortedly morbid picture of life in America, which seems to be fanned by the herd mentality/groupthink culture of the internet.
If people would just shut up about police killings it won't be an issue!
 
Dunno which incident you mean but you know that's a satirical website?
Yea obviously, but race is generally seen as a big issue in these police shootings, hence the 'satire' in that piece.

I'm talking about the homeless guy, the person filming indicates the shooter was a black cop.
 
Yea obviously, but race is generally seen as a big issue in these police shootings, hence the 'satire' in that piece.

I'm talking about the homeless guy, the person filming indicates the shooter was a black cop.

Oh right. Yeah, race is obviously only part of the issue here.
 
There's a video on FB of a cop beating the shit out of a guy in a wheelchair and dragging him out of his chair. A colleague is watching. Does anyone how to post vids from FB here?

Just copy and paste the url.
 
I think its something other than fear personally. It'll obviously play a large part in some circumstances. But I don't think I'd be particularly scared of someone holding a knife, if me and my pal and countless backup all have guns which we could use should things escalate. I'd be ready to use it, but I wouldn't be so scared I started firing excessively.

I think its part of police culture over there. You shoot a 'perp', everyone pats you on the back afterwards, looks out for you, and everyones a big happy police family. You had the balls to do what you 'had to do'.

Good points. I wonder if the puritanical slant that exists in US culture has some influence, too?
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/u...icmst=1409232722000&bicmet=1419773522000&_r=0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A City Where Policing, Discrimination and Raising Revenue Went Hand in Hand

A 32-year-old black man was sitting in his car, cooling off after playing basketball in a public park in the city of Ferguson, Mo. Then a police officer pulled up.

The officer approached him and demanded his identification. He then accused the man of being a pedophile, since there were children in the park, and ordered him out of his car. When the man objected, the officer arrested him and charged him with eight violations of Ferguson’s municipal code, including a charge for not wearing a seatbelt, even though he was in a parked car.

This encounter in summer 2012 in some ways appeared to be exactly how the criminal justice system in Ferguson had been designed to work, according to an investigation of the Ferguson Police Department released on Wednesday by the United States Justice Department. As described in the report, Ferguson, which is a majority black city but where nearly all city officials are white, acts less like a municipality and more like a self-perpetuating business enterprise, extracting money from poor blacks that it uses as revenue to sustain the city’s budget. The efficiency of Ferguson’s system was as striking in the report as the bluntness with which officials acknowledged it.

“Unless ticket writing ramps up significantly before the end of the year, it will be hard to significantly raise collections,” wrote the city’s finance director to the Ferguson police chief in March 2010. “What are your thoughts?”

Three years later, the finance director wrote to the city manager, saying that he had asked “the Chief if he thought the PD could deliver 10% increase. He indicated they could try.”

The revenue-generating enterprise described in the report begins with the police, who, under pressure to “fill the revenue pipeline,” compete with one another to see how many citations they can issue in a single traffic stop. Those cited are then summoned before a court to face fines that city officials boast are among the highest in the region, with hundreds of dollars levied for such violations as “peace disturbance,” “failure to comply” and “manner of walking.” For all three violations, more than nine out of 10 of those cited were black.


For people caught up in this system, the consequences could be devastating. The man arrested in 2012 after sitting in his car told investigators that as a result of the charges against him, he lost a job as a government contractor. An African-American woman who had been periodically homeless was cited once for parking her car illegally. From that ticket, she was twice arrested and spent six days in jail, all while trying to make partial payments on the original fine of $151 and the fees and penalties that accrued. More than seven years and $550 worth of payments later, she still owes $541.

In early 2013, according to one account in the report, a patrol sergeant saw a black man talk briefly to someone in a truck and walk away. The sergeant suspected some type of criminal activity and questioned the man. When the man refused to submit to a frisk, the sergeant shocked him with a Taserrepeatedly, at one point for 20 continuous seconds. In the end, the man was charged with “failure to comply” and “resisting arrest,” the report said, “but no independent criminal violation.”

The report lists one example after another of arrests of African-Americans without apparent justification. In another instance from 2013, a group of black youths were listening to music in a car. Suspecting that they had been using marijuana, an officer arrested them, and some went to jail, for “gathering in a group for the purposes of committing illegal activity.” No evidence of marijuana was found, even after a search of the car.

The report describes a reflexive and gratuitous hostility toward black residents that goes beyond arrests into routine uses of force. Several cases are described in which officers used Tasers against black people for no apparent reason of public safety, including one time when an officer shocked a man for urinating on the prison floor. Every instance in which a police dog bite was reported, the person bitten was black, including, in one case mentioned in the report, an unarmed 14-year-old boy.

But as unforgiving as this system is to the poor black residents, it appears to be far more flexible for the officials who run it, and their friends and family.

Federal investigators found that the judge, the court clerk, the mayor, police supervisors and officials from Ferguson and other neighboring cities — some of whom, the report pointed out, were quick to assert that black residents of Ferguson lacked a sense of personal responsibility — routinely had tickets dismissed for themselves and their friends, pleading “an honest mistake” or suggesting that having a ticket dismissed “would be a blessing.”

“Your ticket of $200 has magically disappeared!” read one email from the court clerk to one friend. “It’s gone baby!” she wrote to another.

Though the federal authorities were shocked by what they found in Ferguson, this system, and the profound distrust it engendered, was not new to those who lived there. One black woman, who was cited for a permit violation after she had called police for help on a domestic disturbance, declared that she would not call the Ferguson police ever again, “even if she is being killed.”

In one instance in the report, a city official expressed unease about the injustice that kept the city afloat. In 2012, a City Council member wrote to other city officials opposing the reappointment of the municipal court judge, arguing that he “does not listen to the testimony, does not review the reports or the criminal history of defendants, and doesn’t let all the pertinent witnesses testify before rendering a verdict.”

The city manager acknowledged the judge’s shortcomings. But, according to the report, he said, “the City cannot afford to lose any efficiency in our Courts, nor experience any decrease in our Fines and Forfeitures.” The judge was reappointed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Serious question to our Americans. Why aren't people going to jail for this shit?
 
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/04/police-killed-people-fbi-data-justifiable-homicides

Academics and specialists have long been aware of flaws in the FBI numbers, which are based on voluntary submissions by local law enforcement agencies of paperwork known as supplementary homicide reports. No law requires local agencies to fill out the reports, and some agencies do not, especially not for officer-involved homicides, according to experts who have studied the issue.

But no accredited source had publicly ventured to claim that the numbers published by the FBI were more than 100% wrong. That’s notwithstanding an unusually public airing of doubts about the numbers by the FBI director, James Comey, in a speech at Georgetown University last month. “It’s ridiculous that I can’t tell you how many people were shot by the police in this country – last week, last year, the last decade – it’s ridiculous,” Comey said.

In an interview with the Guardian following Comey’s remarks, Stephen L Morris, assistant director of the FBI’s criminal justice information services division, acknowledged “holes and gaps” in crime data the bureau publishes.

“We caveat this data – we have been for decades, cautioning individuals and organizations from drawing conclusions from it, because we recognize it is incomplete data, it is disparate data that leaves too many holes and gaps,” Morris said. “That’s been a point of frustration for decades within the FBI.”

But it is unclear whether the public understands the impressionistic nature of the FBI’s crime data. A visitor to the FBI web page presenting the “justifiable homicides” figures, for example, encounters no caveat or disclaimer language of any kind.

Morris indicated last month that the FBI had no plans to change how it publishes its “justifiable homicides” numbers, repeating that the bureau was required by law to report the figures. “I’m not going to characterize them as reliable or unreliable,” he said. A spokesman for Morris declined on Tuesday to offer additional comments on the most recent BJS study.

The deaths referred to as “law enforcement homicides” in the BJS report and what the FBI calls “justifiable homicides by law enforcement” are roughly equivalent, Planty and a second senior BJS official told the Guardian, in part because nearly all homicides by police, if adjudicated at all, are deemed “justifiable”, meaning not criminal.

The homicides that were not justifiable, where a law enforcement officer is found guilty of homicide, there’s no way to identify that,” said Planty. “But from what we know, that number is relatively low.
 
It seems that they don't apply some common sense, logic, and duty of care.

As long as the perpetrator fills in the requirement of lethal force, they will apply lethal force without any additional thoughts and judgement, anything that gets them dead and gets the police out of trouble
 
How about this non shooting one? Jesus!!! This from the Baton Rouge Police department, in the capital of the state of Louisiana.


http://www.sott.net/article/293528-...oman-for-being-raped-by-her-father-as-a-child

Only in Amerika: Cops make parade float mocking a woman for being raped by her father as a child

Disgusting, repugnant, vile, hateful, despicable. These are just a few words that can be used to describe the actions of several of Baton Rouge's finest.

The Baton Rouge police department has launched an internal investigation into the actions of officers who allegedly rode on and helped decorate a float that mocked a woman for being raped as a child; by her father.

The theme of the float was of the Baton Rouge reality show, Sons of Guns. It focused on the daughter of the former television star, Will Hayden. Hayden is currently facing sexual assault charges in East Baton Rouge and Livingston Parishes, after being accused of sexually assaulting his own daughter along with two other victims.

The float was "decorated" with a large photo of Stephanie Ford, the sexual assault victim, with the caption underneath her photo stating, "A face only a daddy could love." Other sayings on the float consisted of things like, "Krewe of Sleazania," "Red Jack It" and "Kiss Me Daddy."

cops-mock-victim-of-child-rape.jpg
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/u...icmst=1409232722000&bicmet=1419773522000&_r=0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A City Where Policing, Discrimination and Raising Revenue Went Hand in Hand

A 32-year-old black man was sitting in his car, cooling off after playing basketball in a public park in the city of Ferguson, Mo. Then a police officer pulled up.

The officer approached him and demanded his identification. He then accused the man of being a pedophile, since there were children in the park, and ordered him out of his car. When the man objected, the officer arrested him and charged him with eight violations of Ferguson’s municipal code, including a charge for not wearing a seatbelt, even though he was in a parked car.

This encounter in summer 2012 in some ways appeared to be exactly how the criminal justice system in Ferguson had been designed to work, according to an investigation of the Ferguson Police Department released on Wednesday by the United States Justice Department. As described in the report, Ferguson, which is a majority black city but where nearly all city officials are white, acts less like a municipality and more like a self-perpetuating business enterprise, extracting money from poor blacks that it uses as revenue to sustain the city’s budget. The efficiency of Ferguson’s system was as striking in the report as the bluntness with which officials acknowledged it.

“Unless ticket writing ramps up significantly before the end of the year, it will be hard to significantly raise collections,” wrote the city’s finance director to the Ferguson police chief in March 2010. “What are your thoughts?”

Three years later, the finance director wrote to the city manager, saying that he had asked “the Chief if he thought the PD could deliver 10% increase. He indicated they could try.”

The revenue-generating enterprise described in the report begins with the police, who, under pressure to “fill the revenue pipeline,” compete with one another to see how many citations they can issue in a single traffic stop. Those cited are then summoned before a court to face fines that city officials boast are among the highest in the region, with hundreds of dollars levied for such violations as “peace disturbance,” “failure to comply” and “manner of walking.” For all three violations, more than nine out of 10 of those cited were black.


For people caught up in this system, the consequences could be devastating. The man arrested in 2012 after sitting in his car told investigators that as a result of the charges against him, he lost a job as a government contractor. An African-American woman who had been periodically homeless was cited once for parking her car illegally. From that ticket, she was twice arrested and spent six days in jail, all while trying to make partial payments on the original fine of $151 and the fees and penalties that accrued. More than seven years and $550 worth of payments later, she still owes $541.

In early 2013, according to one account in the report, a patrol sergeant saw a black man talk briefly to someone in a truck and walk away. The sergeant suspected some type of criminal activity and questioned the man. When the man refused to submit to a frisk, the sergeant shocked him with a Taserrepeatedly, at one point for 20 continuous seconds. In the end, the man was charged with “failure to comply” and “resisting arrest,” the report said, “but no independent criminal violation.”

The report lists one example after another of arrests of African-Americans without apparent justification. In another instance from 2013, a group of black youths were listening to music in a car. Suspecting that they had been using marijuana, an officer arrested them, and some went to jail, for “gathering in a group for the purposes of committing illegal activity.” No evidence of marijuana was found, even after a search of the car.

The report describes a reflexive and gratuitous hostility toward black residents that goes beyond arrests into routine uses of force. Several cases are described in which officers used Tasers against black people for no apparent reason of public safety, including one time when an officer shocked a man for urinating on the prison floor. Every instance in which a police dog bite was reported, the person bitten was black, including, in one case mentioned in the report, an unarmed 14-year-old boy.

But as unforgiving as this system is to the poor black residents, it appears to be far more flexible for the officials who run it, and their friends and family.

Federal investigators found that the judge, the court clerk, the mayor, police supervisors and officials from Ferguson and other neighboring cities — some of whom, the report pointed out, were quick to assert that black residents of Ferguson lacked a sense of personal responsibility — routinely had tickets dismissed for themselves and their friends, pleading “an honest mistake” or suggesting that having a ticket dismissed “would be a blessing.”

“Your ticket of $200 has magically disappeared!” read one email from the court clerk to one friend. “It’s gone baby!” she wrote to another.

Though the federal authorities were shocked by what they found in Ferguson, this system, and the profound distrust it engendered, was not new to those who lived there. One black woman, who was cited for a permit violation after she had called police for help on a domestic disturbance, declared that she would not call the Ferguson police ever again, “even if she is being killed.”

In one instance in the report, a city official expressed unease about the injustice that kept the city afloat. In 2012, a City Council member wrote to other city officials opposing the reappointment of the municipal court judge, arguing that he “does not listen to the testimony, does not review the reports or the criminal history of defendants, and doesn’t let all the pertinent witnesses testify before rendering a verdict.”

The city manager acknowledged the judge’s shortcomings. But, according to the report, he said, “the City cannot afford to lose any efficiency in our Courts, nor experience any decrease in our Fines and Forfeitures.” The judge was reappointed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Serious question to our Americans. Why aren't people going to jail for this shit?

One of the most depressing and outrageous articles I've ever read, and I'm from India.
 
I think it´s going to start coming out that Police Departments all over the US having been doing this for years in minority areas.

I´m still waiting for all the right wing anti government patriots to start sticking up for people of Ferguson against all this big government overreach.
 
I think it´s going to start coming out that Police Departments all over the US having been doing this for years in minority areas.

I´m still waiting for all the right wing anti government patriots to start sticking up for people of Ferguson against all this big government overreach.
They won't, its them that have been critical of the protesters.
 
Yea obviously, but race is generally seen as a big issue in these police shootings, hence the 'satire' in that piece.

I'm talking about the homeless guy, the person filming indicates the shooter was a black cop.
I think the black police are racially biased against black suspects too.

The human mind likes patterns. There are areas where a greatly disproportionate amount of street crime is committed by poor black people. You work dealing with street crime in one of those areas for a while and I think you're at risk of ending up with a subconcious image of a dangerous person, that is black and poor, whatever your race.

Basically what the FBI chief said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31454787

But with some added amateur psychology because talking about it on the internet is more fun than reading the textbook infront of me...
 
They won't, its them that have been critical of the protesters.

I realize they won´t. For all their anti government, small government, fiscal worries etc, the whole right wing and the tea party are the biggest bunch of hypocrites. They love big government and massive spending when it for arms, military, policing, the pentagon, wars, prisons etc etc. And they seem to be especially fond of spending and governing when it is to negatively affect non whites.
 
I realize they won´t. For all their anti government, small government, fiscal worries etc, the whole right wing and the tea party are the biggest bunch of hypocrites. They love big government and massive spending when it for arms, military, policing, the pentagon, wars, prisons etc etc. And they seem to be especially fond of spending and governing when it is to negatively affect non whites.

And abortion. They don't want Government to control your personal choices, as long as it's not vaginas.
 
Nobby, I'm curious why you didn't post the entire context within the link. It's a disgusting act by those involved but post the entire piece so we can view that an investigation is in the process (hopefully so) and other tidbits.

http://www.nola.com/crime/baton-rouge/index.ssf/2015/02/sons_of_guns_mardi_gras_float.html (referenced site within previous link)

I hadn't even heard of the show, or Will Hayden, or Stephanie Ford until this link. She seems to be a bit of an attention seeker like most reality TV shows, which doesn't prove or disprove her claims of sexual abuse. Seems she and her husband, Kris, were arrested a few months ago for an alleged child abuse incident, and her mugshot looks like someone may be dabbling in some drugs.

Has anyone followed the cases?

It's interesting to know the victim chose to "open up" on a televised interview with Dr. Phil. FFS, desire the limelight much?
 
I think the black police are racially biased against black suspects too.

The human mind likes patterns. There are areas where a greatly disproportionate amount of street crime is committed by poor black people. You work dealing with street crime in one of those areas for a while and I think you're at risk of ending up with a subconcious image of a dangerous person, that is black and poor, whatever your race.

Basically what the FBI chief said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31454787

But with some added amateur psychology because talking about it on the internet is more fun than reading the textbook infront of me...

It's racial bias and it's a big issue. Not the same as being racist but definitely makes police treat people differently depending on the colour of their skin. To be fair, some police forces in the states acknowledge the phenomenon and are rolling out training to specifically address the issue. Getting cops to recognise their own bias and take it into account when making decisions.
 
Don't know if anyone here read the DOJ's report on Fergusons cops but here are some pertinent highlights:

In our conversations with FPD officers, one officer admitted that when he conducts a traffic stop, he asks for identification from all passengers as a matter of course. If any refuses, he considers that to be “furtive and aggressive” conduct and cites—and typically arrests—the person for Failure to Comply. The officer thus acknowledged that he regularly exceeds his authority under the Fourth Amendment by arresting passengers who refuse, as is their right, to provide identification. See Hiibel, 542 U.S. at 188 (“[A]n officer may not arrest a suspect for failure to identify himself if the request for identification is not reasonably related to the circumstances justifying the stop.”); Stufflebeam v. Harris, 521 F.3d 884, 887-88 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that the arrest of a passenger for failure to identify himself during a traffic stop violated the Fourth Amendment where the passenger was not suspected of other criminal activity and his identification was not needed for officer safety). Further, the officer told us that he was trained to arrest for this violation.

Similarly, in November 2013, a correctional officer fired an ECW at an African-American woman’s chest because she would not follow his verbal commands to walk toward a cell. The woman, who had been arrested for driving while intoxicated, had yelled an insulting remark at the officer, but her conduct amounted to verbal noncompliance or passive resistance at most. Instead of attempting hand controls or seeking assistance from a state trooper who was also present, the correctional officer deployed the ECW because the woman was “not doing as she was told.” When another FPD officer wrote up the formal incident report, the reporting officer wrote that the woman “approached [the correctional officer] in a threatening manner.” This “threatening manner” allegation appears nowhere in the statements of the correctional officer or witness trooper. The woman was charged with Disorderly Conduct, and the correctional officer soon went on to become an officer with another law enforcement agency.

These are not isolated incidents. In September 2012, an officer drive-stunned an African-American woman who he had placed in the back of his patrol car but who had stretched out her leg to block him from closing the door. The woman was in handcuffs. In May 2013, officers drive-stunned a handcuffed African-American man who verbally refused to get out of the back seat of a police car once it had arrived at the jail. The man did not physically resist arrest or attempt to assault the officers. According to the man, he was also punched in the face and head. That allegation was neither reported by the involved officers nor investigated by their supervisor, who dismissed it.

In January 2013, a patrol sergeant stopped an African-American man after he saw the man talk to an individual in a truck and then walk away. The sergeant detained the man, although he did not articulate any reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. When the man declined to answer questions or submit to a frisk—which the sergeant sought to execute despite articulating no reason to believe the man was armed—the sergeant grabbed the man by the belt, drew his ECW, and ordered the man to comply. The man crossed his arms and objected that he had not done anything wrong. Video captured by the ECW’s built-in camera shows that the man made no aggressive movement toward the officer. The sergeant fired the ECW, applying a five-second cycle of electricity and causing the man to fall to the ground. The sergeant almost immediately applied the ECW again, which he later justified in his report by claiming that the man tried to stand up. The video makes clear, however, that the man never tried to stand—he only writhed in pain on the ground. The video also shows that the sergeant applied the ECW nearly continuously for 20 seconds, longer than represented in his report. The man was charged with Failure to Comply and Resisting Arrest, but no independent
criminal violation.

Perhaps the greatest deviation from FPD’s use-of-force policies is that officers frequently do not report the force they use at all. There are many indications that this underreporting is widespread. First, we located information in FPD’s internal affairs files indicating instances of force that were not included in the force files provided by FPD. Second, in reviewing randomly selected reports from FPD’s records management system, we found several offense reports that described officers using force with no corresponding use-of-force report. Third, we found evidence that force had been used but not documented in officers’ workers compensation claims. Of the nine cases between 2010 and 2014 in which officers claimed injury sustained from using force on the job, three had no corresponding use-of-force paperwork. Fourth, the set of force investigations provided by FPD contains lengthy gaps, including six stretches of time ranging from two to four months in which no incidents of force are reported. Otherwise, the files typically reflect between two and six force incidents per month. Fifth, we heard from community members about uses of force that do not appear within FPD’s records, and we learned of many uses of force that were never officially reported or investigated from reviewing emails between FPD supervisors. Finally, FPD’s force files reflect an overrepresentation of ECW uses—a type of force that creates a physical record (a spent ECW cartridge with discharged confetti) and that requires a separate form be filled out. It is much easier for officers to use physical blows and baton strikes without documenting them. Thus, the evidence indicates that a significant amount of force goes unreported within FPD. This in turn raises the possibility that the pattern of unreasonable force is even greater than we found.
 
Nobby, I'm curious why you didn't post the entire context within the link. It's a disgusting act by those involved but post the entire piece so we can view that an investigation is in the process (hopefully so) and other tidbits.

http://www.nola.com/crime/baton-rouge/index.ssf/2015/02/sons_of_guns_mardi_gras_float.html (referenced site within previous link)

I hadn't even heard of the show, or Will Hayden, or Stephanie Ford until this link. She seems to be a bit of an attention seeker like most reality TV shows, which doesn't prove or disprove her claims of sexual abuse. Seems she and her husband, Kris, were arrested a few months ago for an alleged child abuse incident, and her mugshot looks like someone may be dabbling in some drugs.

Has anyone followed the cases?

It's interesting to know the victim chose to "open up" on a televised interview with Dr. Phil. FFS, desire the limelight much?

I think the most glaring thing I left out was that there are 3 women claiming this guy raped them. 3. His daughter maybe was the last, and maybe dabbling in drugs, but strange things happen when you´ve been molested.
 
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/aiyana-stanley-jones-raid/

DETROIT, MI — A Special Response Team shattered a family’s window in the middle of the night, hurled a flashbang onto a couch next to a sleeping 7 year old girl, then charged in and shot her in the head. The hyper-aggressive tactics were made worse by the fact that police had taken it upon themselves to raid both sides of a duplex, when their suspect was only known to reside in one of them.

There are no words.
 
Certainly a lawsuit will be coming from that incident, and rightfully so.

Are there not any kind of civil penalties when police departments get wrong intel and raid (and injure/kill) innocents? If someone returns fire and kills a policeman, is he/she prosecuted?
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Aiyana_Jones

Pretty fecked up when a videographer receives a harsher sentence than the murdering cop.

--Allison Howard, a videographer and photographer with A&E who was also present at the raid, was indicted on obstruction of justice and perjury for allegedly showing a recording of the raid to a "third party".[28][unreliable source?] Federal prosecutors say that Howard had provided false testimony to investigators about the shooting and that Weekley's action were reckless and he had lied to the police in an effort to blame Jones' family for her death.[citation needed] In June 2013, Howard pled "no contest" to an obstruction of justice charge, and the perjury charge against her was dismissed.[29][30] She was sentenced to two years of probation in July 2013 and was fined $2,000.--