De Gea Contract Situation

Do you think David De Gea will sign a new contract at Man Utd this season?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Yes, but he'll still leave by the end of the season


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a big role, FIFA are the one registering transfers, the LFP register the transfer locally and then send it to the FIFA.
Not that. I mean in this deal specifically. Can FIFA rule that the deal was fine and should LFP comply regardless of whatever their stance on the whole situation is.
 
why he is unable to play for us?

you think he is gonna want to sit on the bench for a year? weve got the Euros in the summer he is gonna want to be spains number one.... and he will have to play to do that.
LVG will probably not want to play him

The deal will go through in Jan, which will also mean he cannot play in Europe
 
why he is unable to play for us?

you think he is gonna want to sit on the bench for a year? weve got the Euros in the summer he is gonna want to be spains number one.... and he will have to play to do that.

DDGs fault though, no. He's been offered contracts and not signed them. He can't expect to play for a team he's looking to ditch.
 
Meanwhile Marca is suggesting that Navas wanted last minute changes to his deal and hence things got delayed.
 
Haha, so it's Real that royally fecked up the whole situation. :lol:
:lol:
This is getting even better.
 
This has been a fitting end (or no end) to this saga. Hilarious. The best of all, Spanish press's reactions :D
 
De Gea is still under contract to MUFC. Its not a mess for us at all.

For 12 months. He's not played this season as of yet, his head is in Madrid. You think he can perform at United for 12 months before he fecks off to Spain on a free transfer?

The De Gea situation is a massive feck up for the club. Starting with not tying him down with a contract sooner to not selling him when the writing was on the wall about 3 months ago.
 
how this feck are united at fault? any excuse to bash the board, lvg, woodward and the tea lady.

i bet it's the same cnuts who have spent all summer demanding we not give in to real as well. i don't think it takes a huge leap of faith to see what's happened.

we told real all along it's £30m or he stays. i think de gea knew that which is why he wasn't kicking up a stink. he knew the price, obviously thought it was fair and expected real to sort the rest.

real decided to wait, thinking we'd blink first and get rid of him for a lot less as we wouldn't want an unhappy player stinking the place out for a year, especially one we could get some relatively decent cash for. they finally realised we were actually willing to keep him if they didn't bid 30m and gave us what we wanted, we accepted but they couldn't get their own house in order in time to complete it. they've managed to annoy ubited, de gea and navas in one fell swoop.

if any of you honestly think we'd deliberately fax something off to the wrong number or instead of the signed deal we sent fifa a single a4 piece of paper with the outline of ed's wanger on it, then you have a screw loose. no way would we deliberately sabotage it at the last minute. what would we gain out of it? keeping an even more upset de gea, losing £30m, looking like fools and putting any clubs off dealing with us in future in the process?

if you truly believe any of that then give up supporting us as obviously absolute idiots are in charge of the club and we'll soon sell all our players and turn the ground into a sea side pier.

how could we possibly win? sell earlier for a lot less and then moan about the price? sell later for a lower fee and moan about the price and the time lost? all the while moaning at united for being bullied by madrid, "we're just as big, we should stick to our guns and not be pushed about." "bah gawd. we stuck to our guns and fecked it up, we should know have sold for 5m"

blame us for not sorting this two years ago, he should have had two new contracts by now, but this window? i don't think we could have done much more other than not sign romero and get someone better.

Good post. Hower, the sole fact we entered the deal that late pisses me off. Ed should have told them to go fish.
 
Its far more likely he will just sign for them in January
No, its very unlikely that any deal will happen in January - there are going to be two cup tied keepers.

For 12 months. He's not played this season as of yet, his head is in Madrid. You think he can perform at United for 12 months before he fecks off to Spain on a free transfer?

The De Gea situation is a massive feck up for the club. Starting with not tying him down with a contract sooner to not selling him when the writing was on the wall about 3 months ago.
Yes, I think he can perform professionally enough for whatever part of the season remains. He needs to, to make it to the EURO squad.
 
Sky News reports that Madrid never even handed in the paperwork to UEFA!

I bet their only working fax machine jammed up!

What's "Oh fecking technology. Should not have retired Jesus, our last remaining pigeon last year" in Spanish?
 
I haven't said they weren't incompetent. I have said both teams have botched a situation that should have been easily resolved but has become a big game of who's got the biggest cock.

how do you think united should have played it then? what was the ideal strategy to ensure we got as much money as possible for one of our most valuable assets? other than give them a figure we find acceptable and not deal with them until they bid that, you know, like most clubs do with their players.
 
Not for Utd it isnt

Its a total cluster feck. I dont really care whose fault it is but right now we have a total mess in a very important positon
I don't understand why you're apparently ruling out the possibility that De Gea will now shrug his shoulders, roll up his sleeves and get on with his job, being our keeper, for the rest of the season (or until January). Which would be by far the best outcome for us purely in terms of sorting out our crisis in that position.

What other option does he have? Of course Van Gaal may see it differently... Hopefully he isn't so pig-headed.

For me our keeper situation is a bigger mess if he goes. Now we have time to sort this. Yes it's expensive but in this instance I think it's best for us - certainly from a football perspective.
 
Has nobody ever heard of a file converter, beggars belief that with all the money flying around in football these days and somebody cannot open a document, I wonder how many times that document was clicked on before they called it all in.

A quick google search on 'file converters' and this would have been fixed for 10 euro.

On the flip side what a prank to play, couldn't be more happier that greedy madrid and de gea's recent cosey relationship has been put on ice. The way some posters are reacting on here, is a bit OTT, I like it that we are playing games with Madrid, serves the greedy bully-boys right.
 


This smells a bit off doesn't it?

Madrid hasn't formally asked FIFA to look into the deal. If they were that serious about this wouldn't they have been on the phone first thing in the morning? Its nearly lunchtime on the continent.

Part of me feels like Madrid were never that keen to pay anything for De Gea, and still wouldn't mind just getting a freebie next summer.
 
For 12 months. He's not played this season as of yet, his head is in Madrid. You think he can perform at United for 12 months before he fecks off to Spain on a free transfer?

The De Gea situation is a massive feck up for the club. Starting with not tying him down with a contract sooner to not selling him when the writing was on the wall about 3 months ago.
He'll want to play, and he'll play well for us. The first point-saving save he pulls off all the "embarrassment" that nutters like @Dans feel that we didn't sell him will seem ridiculous.
 
Not that. I mean in this deal specifically. Can FIFA rule that the deal was fine and should LFP comply regardless of whatever their stance on the whole situation is.

That's what I'm telling you, on the international transfer only, it's the FIFA who decides, on De Gea registration it's the LFP who decides if the FIFA allows the transfer.
 
how do you think united should have played it then? what was the ideal strategy to ensure we got as much money as possible for one of our most valuable assets? other than give them a figure we find acceptable and not deal with them until they bid that, you know, like most clubs do with their players.

For a player in his last year who doesn't want to be here I would have asked for a reasonable sum. 15m and I think the deal would have been done in a day.

We didn't though because Woodward wanted to make a name for himself and now we have a situation where we have Sergio Romero as our number 1 and DDG in no fit mental state to play for us, something that might or might not change in time (not that there's much of it), but if it doesn't, then we have taken a massive gamble and massively lost it.
 
Not for Utd it isnt

Its a total cluster feck. I dont really care whose fault it is but right now we have a total mess in a very important positon

You're right about it being a cluster feck. You say you don't care whose fault it is but seem very keen to point the finger at United (a recurring theme for you, since Fergie retired)

I think Woody's overseen a number of transfer market farces and have very little faith in him but this situation really put him in an impossible situation. The player was adamant he wanted to leave and play for Madrid, yet they didn't make a bid until the final 24 hours of the transfer window. We can't sign a replacement until we're sure De Gea is going and we can't be sure he's going until we receive a bid we feel is fair. Then Madrid finally take their thumb out their arse, come to us with a proposal, which we accept and they somehow manage to feck up the paperwork at their end. Incredible. Even their arse-licking publication of choice, Marca, is blaming them for what's happened.

So yes, it's a cluster feck but - for once - this is something you can't be critical of United about.
 
I can't really get behind the logic on here that assumes that even though De Gea has refused to sign a new contract for the last year, if we'd only thought to try a few months earlier he would definitely have signed. Despite Moyes being in charge and despite a lot of reports making out that getting a move to Real has always been his end game whilst at United (signing on with Mendes specifically to get the move, etc).

Hindsight is 20/20 and all that.
 
From where I'm sitting, this messy situation shows how little Madrid cared about completing this deal. De Gea should question how much they really want him. Perez came in late, did not bid strong, and did not make it a priority to put the deal through.

I hope de Gea does think about this. Real Madrid don't see players as players, more like toys, and every year they have to buy a new one to keep themselves entertained. After all the pish that they've fed to Marca about him being desperate to join them they still sat about doing nothing all summer after we told them what our demands were. Instead they played around until the last minute hoping to get the price down so that they would look all powerful and mighty (Real Madrid don't have to pay what others demand, they demand others to sell players to them) all the while knowing that de Gea was probably getting more and more worried as the deadline grew closer. But, no, feck the player's feelings because Real Madrid have to play their little toy buying game for another year.

I hope that's what Dave thinks, and then he decides to sign a ten year deal with us and get a tattoo on his forehead that says "F*ck Real Madrid and f*ck Juventus".
 
Poll added on the homepage for who is to blame - let's settle this once and for all :)

What a cluster feck on all sides this is. This leaves us in a terrible position. De Gea's head is proper screwed now, how can he come back to play for us this season? If he does, can we trust him to be at his best?

Navas would have been a decent replacement but now we're stuck with Romero unless we move on Cillessen right now, but we can't until we get confirmation that the De Gea transfer will go through or not. God knows when that will happen.

Utter shambles :mad:
 
For a player in his last year who doesn't want to be here I would have asked for a reasonable sum. 15m and I think the deal would have been done in a day.

We didn't though because Woodward wanted to make a name for himself and now we have a situation where we have Sergio Romero as our number 1 and DDG in no fit mental state to play for us, something that might or might not change in time (not that there's much of it), but if it doesn't, then we have taken a massive gamble and massively lost it.
And when did your beloved Madrid first make a bid for the player?
 
For a player in his last year who doesn't want to be here I would have asked for a reasonable sum. 15m and I think the deal would have been done in a day.

We didn't though because Woodward wanted to make a name for himself and now we have a situation where we have Sergio Romero as our number 1 and DDG in no fit mental state to play for us, something that might or might not change in time (not that there's much of it), but if it doesn't, then we have taken a massive gamble and massively lost it.
So 15M was your evaluation. I guess that ends the discussion.
 
Good post. Hower, the sole fact we entered the deal that late pisses me off. Ed should have told them to go fish.

depends what he's said all summer to real and de gea. sounds to me like we've been open to the move if the right figure was bid, there has been a load of reports stating we'd want a record bid for a keeper if we were to lose him. if we then went back on that we'd alienate de gea even more and put madrid off dealing with us.
 
I don't understand why you're apparently ruling out the possibility that De Gea will now shrug his shoulders, roll up his sleeves and get on with his job, being our keeper, for the rest of the season (or until January). Which would be by far the best outcome for us purely in terms of sorting out our crisis in that position.

What other option does he have? Of course Van Gaal may see it differently... Hopefully he isn't so pig-headed.

The poster I can't criticise had posted that the club apparently gave him the ultimatum to sign or not play for United again. And people answered his post by saying they liked that stance.
 
All of those people in here blaming United for any of this transfer bollocks and are embarrased for us need to use their brains and think before spouting bollocks.

Only thing we're to blame for is not sorting out his contract sooner. The rest has absolutely nothing to do with us.

As if we don't get enough bashing from the media, we need it from our thick fans too.
 
For a player in his last year who doesn't want to be here I would have asked for a reasonable sum. 15m and I think the deal would have been done in a day.

We didn't though because Woodward wanted to make a name for himself and now we have a situation where we have Sergio Romero as our number 1 and DDG in no fit mental state to play for us, something that might or might not change in time (not that there's much of it), but if it doesn't, then we have taken a massive gamble and massively lost it.

We named a fee and waited for a counter-offer. That's how negotiations work. The fact this arrived 24 hours before the window closes is what fecked it all up. We ended up accepting 22m, so not far off your "reasonable sum"
 
Poll added on the homepage for who is to blame - let's settle this once and for all :)

What a cluster feck on all sides this is. This leaves us in a terrible position. De Gea's head is proper screwed now, how can he come back to play for us this season? If he does, can we trust him to be at his best?

Navas would have been a decent replacement but now we're stuck with Romero unless we move on Cillessen right now, but we can't until we get confirmation that the De Gea transfer will go through or not. God knows when that will happen.

Utter shambles :mad:
ah Niall! De Gea will be grand. Better him than Navas this season.
 
I can't really get behind the logic on here that assumes that even though De Gea has refused to sign a new contract for the last year, if we'd only thought to try a few months earlier he would definitely have signed. Despite Moyes being in charge and despite a lot of reports making out that getting a move to Real has always been his end game whilst at United (signing on with Mendes specifically to get the move, etc).

Hindsight is 20/20 and all that.

Don't talk anymore, you talk far too much sense, it's the club's fault that they didn't get a player to sign a contract he never had any intention of signing ;)
 
So 15M was your evaluation. I guess that ends the discussion.

I can't criticise you, so I won't.

It would have been a solution wouldn't it? As of now, we have no solution and have a bigger problem than we had before (Romero in goal, DDG suffering mental anguish and unfit to play)
 
So 15M was your evaluation. I guess that ends the discussion.
He'll probably demand we just give free transfers to all players from now on so that we don't inconvenience other clubs and "embarrass" him.
 
The poster I can't criticise had posted that the club apparently gave him the ultimatum to sign or not play for United again. And people answered his post by saying they liked that stance.

Are you capable of reading the posts you respond to? He just asked why you don't think it's possible that De Gea knuckles down and gets on with his job. That's got nothing to do with some random rumour I read off the internet, or any else's opinions on that rumour.
 
For a player in his last year who doesn't want to be here I would have asked for a reasonable sum. 15m and I think the deal would have been done in a day.

We didn't though because Woodward wanted to make a name for himself and now we have a situation where we have Sergio Romero as our number 1 and DDG in no fit mental state to play for us, something that might or might not change in time (not that there's much of it), but if it doesn't, then we have taken a massive gamble and massively lost it.

personally i'd be annoyed with 15m, far more annoyed than i am this morning with what's transpired overnight. we paid more than that for ashley young in his last year, and a damn sight more for an ageing rvp who seemingly only had one more year in his crippled legs.

i agree completely about romero, he shouldn't be anywhere near the number one spot.
 
I cant remember being this gobsmacked, its simply staggering :eek:

The only theory that makes any sense is that RM are after a freebie next summer. Navas is in good form so they're in no hurry. I'd love to think we could strong arm De Gea into signing an extension now, just so a) we can tell RM to feck right off and b) he doesnt have to spend 4 months rusting away in the recycle bin
 
DDGs fault though, no. He's been offered contracts and not signed them. He can't expect to play for a team he's looking to ditch.
can't expect too no, but if he works hard then he is by far and away our best goalkeeper ......why on earth would we not play him? he's the second best goalkeeper in the world, its best for both united and De Gea that he gets his head in the right mind set and plays
 
Are you capable of reading the posts you respond to? He just asked why you don't think it's possible that De Gea knuckles down and gets on with his job. That's got nothing to do with some random rumour I read off the internet, or any else's opinions on that rumour.
Surprised at you posting random rumours off the internet - you always act like you're better than that.
 
Somehow SSN's Alan McInally is using the whole debacle to stick it to United, despite acknowledging United have done nothing wrong :lol:
 
Sid Lowe seems to hinting that some deliberate sabotage went on here. Did Madrid decide to lead us on, then deliberately screw up the deal so we get nothing and he signs next summer for them? If the stories about MAdrid not attempting to register him are correct, this would be one explanation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.