The two Irish chaps sitting to my left at the game today missed all 3 goals. Went in early before half time and came out late, and then left well before the end.![]()
Never understood that. Too many folk at games seem to concentrate more in beating queues than actually watching the football they've paid 40 or 50 quid to watch.
Hated going with my step dad when I was a kid. Always had to leave before the 85th minute to beat the traffic.
On an unrelated note; when Pantilimon caught the ball outside the area, is that not usually a red card? Martial (I think) was challenging for that ball. If it had not been caught, he had a fair chance of winning it, with Sunderland's net wide open. I remember Mark Beeney getting sent off for something kind of similar a long time ago. It was against us, and Lucas Radebe had to go in goal.
Not if it takes some of the pressure of Rodgers.![]()
What I'm surprised by is the lack of comments in this thread. We've just beaten Sunderland 3-0. 3 goals, none conceded on a day where City got thumped, Chelsea failed to win again and Liverpool fell over the line to beat struggling Villa.
Not much to complain about, and expressing satisfaction gets boring. "All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way."
So are Newcastle and we couldn't beat them. Great performance today.
first the positives....
- Martial fantastic, strong, fast, good passer and he looks totally at home as our number 9
- good that despite disappointing performance from Memphis he still grabbed a goal
- Rooney despite lumbering a bit looked better as the game went on and liked his link up play in the last 20 mins
- not many centre half players can pass the ball like Blind
- Young again improved our attacking play
- Schweinsteiger again showing why he should be our captain - came on, took control and more attacking than Carrick/Schneiderlein
- Darmian more attacking on left (cos against Sunderland?) and Valencia pushing on gave us better balance
- top of the league!! woohoo
- 4 clean sheets and another 3 goals!
and the negatives
- we were so boring until Blind opened the game up - cool when we are winning but we will draw too many games
- took us about 60 minutes until we really played well - we toyed with Sunderland for long periods after that
- picking Carrick and Schneiderlein is overkill - far too defensively and it was great to see Bastian popping up on the left wing when he came on
- Martial.....far too reliant on this kid at the minute - when he went down in first half I shat myself
- bit disappointed Periera didn't get a run out but I suppose Phil Jones reintegration is more important
Smalling and Blind had nothing to do but I'm sure if they did they would be capable of doing so, and De Gea pulled of a few great saves to keep our lead as strong as it was.
I think it was its not necessarily good football: i.e. both have their place.Watching Gullit on MOTD saying 2 passes goal is good football and 44 passes before a goal is not good football is a bit weird.
Only if it denies an obvious goalscoring opportunity which this wasn't. I agree that Martial would have had a fair chance of winning the ball but that's not the same as a clear scoring chance.On an unrelated note; when Pantilimon caught the ball outside the area, is that not usually a red card? Martial (I think) was challenging for that ball. If it had not been caught, he had a fair chance of winning it, with Sunderland's net wide open. I remember Mark Beeney getting sent off for something kind of similar a long time ago. It was against us, and Lucas Radebe had to go in goal.
Just because we weren't smashing the ball at the Keeper or Post doesn't make us boring IMO. The idea is too get the first goal and take the game away from Sunderland. We control the game before that, after a while, sunderland players will become tired and numb which will open the gates. Running around pointlessly is not football. I don't see us drawing many games with the way we are playing.
Yeah that's what I'm thinking. It's like we're playing super defensive midfield and 4 strikers, and our game plan is to make the opposition tired and then finish those few chances that occur.IMO we were boring and it wasn't due to us not 'running around pointlessly' which is a bit silly to suggest
We just weren't creative, weren't attacking with much purpose, hadn't worked their keeper and didn't look like scoring
Sunderland had actually probably fashioned a better chance with that one De Gea saved with his legs
If you think the tactic is to simply focus on tiring teams out rather than trying to score it's a pretty stupid one IMO
Yeah that's what I'm thinking. It's like we're playing super defensive midfield and 4 strikers, and our game plan is to make the opposition tired and then finish those few chances that occur.
If it's working is as effective as any tactic obviously, but I think this team hasn't reached its half potential.
It also might be that we're just saving energy.
Just because we weren't smashing the ball at the Keeper or Post doesn't make us boring IMO. The idea is too get the first goal and take the game away from Sunderland. We control the game before that, after a while, sunderland players will become tired and numb which will open the gates. Running around pointlessly is not football. I don't see us drawing many games with the way we are playing.
Watching Gullit on MOTD saying 2 passes goal is good football and 44 passes before a goal is not good football is a bit weird.
I agree. I like the gungho football, but people have to remember that we had some magnificent defences in those days. Last season the defence was decimated by injury and this season there is still some disruption due to injury and bedding players in. If we had played gungho last season we likely would have lost more games.I think I'm in the minority here, but I'm starting to like the way we're playing. Sunderland weren't posing much of a threat and were trying to time waste from the off, but we were patient, kept the ball well and the goals eventually came. If anything, we should have had more than three.
At first I kind of missed the gung-ho United of old. Now I'm starting to think if we have the lion's share of the ball, rarely concede, and start scoring three every game... well, that'll just have to do.![]()
I kind of understand his point of view though, we are guilty of making an awful lot of monotonous passes in our own half and sideways at times. Yes that goal against Southampton was a nice goal but not all of the passes made in the passage of play were of any significance in the move.
Firstly, congratulations on the win. On the whole, you deserved it. Not even the most hardened Sunderland fan like myself expected us to get anything out of but I do have a few things to note.
- We were unlucky to go into half time 1-0 down. There was a little bit of time wasting going on, not something I like to see but I accept it is now an important tactic in football. There was never 4 minutes of time to be added. 2 or 3 but never 4. That rankles a bit.
- I thought United were poor, we defended OK in the first half. Your class showed through on occasions but nothing over the top that made me think "oh bloody hell, we could be on to a hiding here." Rooney's goal was extremely fortunate. It was poor defensive player from us but if you look at it, had Cattermole not pushed Rooney onto the ball then I think Pantilimon would have got a hand to it.
- To all those saying we were unambitious, I suggest you look again. We did have a few chances. Lens went through and shot at De Gea when had he picked his head up Borini was standing ready for a easy shot at goal. Van Aanholt and I think it was Borini had shots saved by De Gea. If we had held on to half time, there's every chance the game could have been different.
- Smalling finally looks to be growing into the top class centre half that Fergie knew he could be. As an England fan, I hope both him and Jones continue to perform at the top winning Premier Leagues and company
To be fair, there were a few injuries in the first half wasn't there? Martial went down for a period of time, and a Sunderland player did as well (might have been a 3rd long stoppage, but can't rightly remember). That coupled with the time wasting probably took it to 4 minutes.
I general I didn't think your lot were quite as terrible as I'd predicted... still not great though, l think there's a major lack of quality in your side, particularly at CB (Kaboul?!) and up front... as I'm not confident Borini is anywhere near good enough to lead a line.
Thought Cattermole also had an excellent first half, but faded badly in the second.
Borini and Martial were down for a few minutes each, should of been 5 in my opinion.There was never 4 minutes of time to be added. 2 or 3 but never 4. That rankles a bit.
Haha, apologies, for some reason I thought you were questioning why the other poster thought he didn't look vulnerable by saying he played well... I thought you didn't know what vulnerable meansYes..I thought Darmian was great.
It's gone now but I thought 2 or 3 minutes were enough. Kaboul was OK in the first half with O'Shea although he never seems to learn from his mistakes. He's not good or quick enough to try and Nick the ball from strikers yet he constantly tries to do it and gets caught out of position time and time again. I think Borini will score goals, as will Defoe and Lens providing we continue to create chances but Advocaat needs to tweak his system as we have nobody to hold the ball up. Thought Cattermole was excellent for 47 minutes but then switched off letting Mata go for the first goal and then bundling Rooney into the ball for the second.
As you say, he faded in the second but I expected nothing less as United grew and controlled the game.
Mike Jones