I can't argue with any of the questions you mention in the first paragraph. Spurs have a very good team, and you'd probably struggle to choose more than two or three positions in which they would need to upgrade on. I will give you that. The foundations to build on this season is right there for you, and Potch has done a wonderful job.
With that being said, you have been winding up many fans in this thread/forum for a number of months. The only thing I said was that Spurs' best chance to win the title was this season - you can't deny that you and Leicester were rather fortunate at Chelsea's massive feck up, City's inconsistency and United's lingering plague - (I'm leaving out Arsenal's bottling because it happens every year). It doesn't seem as if you appreciate that and are being blissfully ignorant to that fact.
Nevertheless, you often defend some comments against Spurs by just regurgitating the same comment that Spurs finished above United. Very well but have you seen the state our current manager is in? Leicester have destroyed Chelsea in league table terms this season, but that doesn't mean the former is vastly superior to Chelsea in terms of status or future progression...
Banter aside - I have not been engaged in winding anybody up, or not unless you translate as "winding up" - which some posters apparently do - a willingness to challenge the many ridiculous and ill-informed claims that are sometimes made on here about Spurs. Or take, for example, my prediction the season before last, that Spurs would finish above United (I even had a small bet with a Mod about it). I was bombarded with accusations of WUM, told that Spurs had no chance etc etc ... just as I'm always usually told that Spurs have no chance (we apparently had no chance of making it out of the CL group stage, then no chance of making beyond the first knock-out round).
You say, "you can't deny that you and Leicester were rather fortunate at Chelsea's massive feck up, City's inconsistency and United's lingering plague". Isn't that just an excuse-laden way of saying that, rather then being "fortunate", both Leicester and Spurs have played better football, were more consistently good and have better balanced, more cohesive and more hard-working squads (not to mention having a number of talented players) than any of the other teams you've mentioned? In other words, aren't Leicester and Spurs in the top 2 league positions not through luck, but simply because they've been the best teams this season?
For me, your view is part of the wider denial that's taking place: that Spurs and Leicester have just been lucky and that the established top 4 'elite clubs' will doubtless next season re-assert their supremacy (even tho' it's been shown earlier in this thread that the notion of a settled top 4 has been a myth for several seasons now, and actually has had an average 25% churn).
You mention City's inconsistency, but that's not down to bad luck, it's down to a flaw which they may or may not be able to fix. And maybe their squad is not as good as some think - after all, Spurs this season took them apart with a 5 -1 aggregate score line.
You cite Chelsea's "massive feck up". But again, there's no bad luck involved .... maybe their squad just finally reached the point where the cracks - e.g. several aging players and some players who perhaps want out - could no longer be papered over.
You cite United's "lingering plague", but can all the blame can be laid at the managerial door? Perhaps United's squad simply isn't that good these days. Of course that can change, but it's far from guaranteed. Many United fans think that when Mourinho arrives he'll fix it all - but will he? You could just as easily have another summer of huge squad upheaval/churn, meaning that changes won't have time to bed in sufficiently quickly, all surrounded by a perhaps at times unpleasant media circus, with reports of dressing room divisions and so on.
You say: "Leicester have destroyed Chelsea in league table terms this season, but that doesn't mean the former is vastly superior to Chelsea in terms of ... future progression..." I agree, it doesn't necessarily mean that, but it
might mean that, at least for next season. I wouldn't rule it out.