padr81
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 12,217
- Supports
- Man City
People writing extreme articles about your club is something you have to deal with when you become a big club. It's just the way it is.
This x1000, I don't think the bias is near as bad as alot of BM make it out to be and I think alot of City fans are just tetchy about criticism cause we went from being the lovable losers to not liked winners if that makes sense.
But we have to be honest we are going to get more stick than United because simply United have biggest fan base and are the most popular club. I think it suits the media to make City the bad guys when United are the worlds arguably biggest club. It creates a good media dynamic of the old traditionalist club who have always been successful having a hard time while their city rivals who used to be their whipping boys have sold their soul and become the bad guys to kick United while they are down. It makes sense when United fans bring alot more clicks and buy alot more papers than City fans simply because media need revenue.
But its not been near the amount of bias or deliberate tearing down BM thinks and reporters are just calling it as they see it with their maybe slightly traditionalist coloured glasses (United, Arsenal, Liverpool) etc... Its human nature to be biased against something that's come to take down what you love and I think City's rise has hit Liverpool and Spurs fans more than United because of CL qualification. Everyone needs a scapegoat for their own clubs failures and City's lotto win just happens to be it. United fans for what its worth seem to be more honest about it being their own teams and clubs doing than those other clubs who can't see their own faults.