Ban
New Member
Don't tell me the accountant, aka the guy who isn't supporting United but is really worried about our spending, is back?
Charlie Austin managed 18, Yaya Touré got 20 from midfield.
Why do the mods tolerate Glaston?, all his posts are either wum posts, or posts putting down Utd in some way. Most users would get banned for that.
It would not. Please take a look at our financial situation before posting in the future.
you win. EPL is a joke. If Ibra doesn't score 25 goals, I'm going to hate on him, make fun of his stupid nose, and deride his existence. All thanks to you.
How would you describe it after he just scored like 50 in Spain?
Who said it was a joke?
The joke is anyone outside of England thinking Harry fecking Kane is a better player currently the Zlatan.
Are you saying that our wage bill is only 1/3 of our total income? Because I remember in the Fergie years the objective was to keep it to 50%. If it's now between 33% and 50%, we are actually doing better than we were.I have. £150+m including wages is well over one-third of your total income (£395.178m) in your last published annual accounts (filed October 2015). Yes, your income has increased since then, but even so ...
Yes the payments and wages would be spread out into the future, but this comes on top of massive net spending on additions to your last title winning squad ... much of which also involves future payment commitments. Cumulatively this all adds up. Chickens come home to roost.
Sterling and Sturridge or Messi and Neymar, not to mention all the players behind. The top two in Spain are way ahead of most of the other teams in Europe let alone there own league. Are you now going to start comparing Kane with Suarez as well? I have my personal opinion of Kane, rightly or wrongly, time will tell, but comparing him with some of the worlds best strikers over the last five years is frankly ridiculous, Im starting to think you are taking the piss, if you are serious **face palm**
I have. £150+m including wages is well over one-third of your total income (£395m) in your last published annual accounts (filed October 2015). Yes, your income has increased since then, but even so ...
Yes the payments and wages would be spread out into the future, but this comes on top of massive net spending on additions to your last title winning squad ... much of which also involves future payment commitments. Cumulatively this all adds up. Chickens come home to roost.
You forgot that all of Suarez' goals were freekicks or open play goals in 13/14. That's right, 0 goals from penalties because Gerrard took them. He could have had 40 goals in the PL alone if he took the pens too.How would you describe it after he just scored like 50 in Spain?
Your obsession with United finances is disturbing.I have. £150+m including wages is well over one-third of your total income (£395m) in your last published annual accounts (filed October 2015). Yes, your income has increased since then, but even so ...
Yes the payments and wages would be spread out into the future, but this comes on top of massive net spending on additions to your last title winning squad ... much of which also involves future payment commitments. Cumulatively this all adds up. Chickens come home to roost.
he doesn't take all the penos in Spain. messi takes most, if he misses, Neymar does, and if one of them is on a hattrick, then they take it.You forgot that all of Suarez' goals were freekicks or open play goals in 13/14. That's right, 0 goals from penalties because Gerrard took them. He could have had 40 goals in the PL alone if he took the pens too.
Personally I think there is more sense in that post than the talk about Kane. I think Dele Alli can go on to be a world class player comparable with Pogba talent wise in a few years. But people saying comparing Kane to Ibrahimovic, even a 34 year old one is just patheric.
Outmuscled? For a player they don't really want? By a club that's playing in the EL next season and whom they'll have helped to bounce into massively overpaying for Pogba? I'm sure they'll be crushed.
Lets assume this straming pile of a post is somewhat accurate. What would the almighty Spurs transfer v income ratio be?I have. £150+m including wages is well over one-third of your total income (£395m) in your last published annual accounts (filed October 2015). Yes, your income has increased since then, but even so ...
Yes the payments and wages would be spread out into the future, but this comes on top of massive net spending on additions to your last title winning squad ... much of which also involves future payment commitments. Cumulatively this all adds up. Chickens come home to roost.
Any ways he's saying Pog will cost £150m including wages, not our total wage bill.It would not. Please set fire to yourself before posting in the future.
Are you saying that our wage bill is only 1/3 of our total income? Because I remember in the Fergie years the objective was to keep it to 50%. If it's now between 33% and 50%, we are actually doing better than we were.
You know when someone talking like that on the high (no trophy to show yet), imagine the meltdown when SHTF. It would be comedy gold, so worth the wait.Why do the mods tolerate Glaston?, all his posts are either wum posts, or posts putting down Utd in some way. Most users would get banned for that.
No, I'm saying that spending £150m+ on Pogba alone (fee + wages) would be well over one third of your total income in your last published annual accounts.
why hasn't that fat piece of shit Mino thrown a chair yet? Get on it! I'm sleepy.
We pay it all to Raiola and he gives Pog some pocket money.We pay 5 years of wages at once? Mental business idea from us.
I really don't see it. He flits in and out of games, does some flashy things, but disappears when it's put up to him. Sure I'd like us to sign him as he's better than what we have, but he is completely overrated in my honest opinion. And I think the fee does matter. It's not my money, but if spending an extraordinate amount of money on a player if it means not signing others or selling good players, then I think it's madness.
José could mould him into a super player but in his current state, he isn't really that good. Sissoko looked better and not for the first time.
Sissoko was box-to-box. Pogba was a deep, deep, deep defensive anchor.
One man's wum is another man's partisan. And there have been so many embarrassments - both on and off the pitch - in recent years that we've become fair game for anyone capable of semi lucidity. You need to be big enough to accept it. He's away from home after all.Why do the mods tolerate Glaston?, all his posts are either wum posts, or posts putting down Utd in some way. Most users would get banned for that.
Oh ffs, I am out of here. Pogba will be just fine. Also, its done, so support the lad![]()
THIS !!!Amazing, Isn't it?
You'd swear football doesn't exist outside England.
Oh ffs, I am out of here. Pogba will be just fine. Also, its done, so support the lad![]()
The Rooney debate is just what ABU's say to make them feel better (like Glaston). If anything, as Alli played with Rooney, Rooney had to play really deep, while Alli would just run around freely but ineffectively. With Pogba, his qualities suggest that he's a much better box to box and playing him in CDM limits his output massively.Love how having Rooney in the side effected Kane and Alli but Pogba playing out of position as a DM...