Don't forget about the Stock Exchange. People love to bring that up.What do you think has been the biggest myth in this thread?
- That transfers are never announced on weekends?
- That Di Marzio said the deal will be announced within 48 hours?
- That Pogba has been on holiday for at least double the time of every other player, who played at the Euros?
Whilst I don't want to get into a debate about who is or isn't 'world class' if we look purely at players who have actually moved this summer (i.e. there can be no debate about their availability or about their price):- Real Madrid
- 3 world class players for the same money.
Is it a myth or not?
I've seen loads of chat about players who didn't play much, but no facts on where other players who were involved all the way through are right now. I believe all of these played in all 7 matches:
Hugo Lloris
Bacary Sagna
Laurent Koscielny
Patrice Evra
Blaise Matuidi
Antoine Griezmann
Dimitri Payet
Rui Patricio
Joao Mario
Cristiano Ronaldo
Nani
Ricardo Quaresma
Is it a myth or not?
I've seen loads of chat about players who didn't play much, but no facts on where other players who were involved all the way through are right now. I believe all of these played in all 7 matches:
Hugo Lloris
Bacary Sagna
Laurent Koscielny
Patrice Evra
Blaise Matuidi
Antoine Griezmann
Dimitri Payet
Rui Patricio
Joao Mario
Cristiano Ronaldo
Nani
Ricardo Quaresma
Whilst I don't want to get into a debate about who is or isn't 'world class' if we look purely at players who have actually moved this summer (i.e. there can be no debate about their availability or about their price):
Sane £37m
Gungogan £26m
Kante £36m
These three come in at a shade below £100m
Personally, I'd still rather have one Paul Pogba but just sayin'
That's where I differ from most in this thread.,we could have gone for and signed all three of those players by now. And they'd all be perfect for us. Instead we have wasted our time and probably our money too on Pogba. This displeases me.
Is it a myth or not?
I've seen loads of chat about players who didn't play much, but no facts on where other players who were involved all the way through are right now. I believe all of these played in all 7 matches:
Hugo Lloris
Bacary Sagna
Laurent Koscielny
Patrice Evra
Blaise Matuidi
Antoine Griezmann
Dimitri Payet
Rui Patricio
Joao Mario
Cristiano Ronaldo
Nani
Ricardo Quaresma
Only one player matters and that's Evra because he plays for the same team. And he is in holiday.
Did some actually claim he wanted City before usHe's read the papers that said he wanted Madrid first, Barca second, City third and then us because nobody else could pay the money![]()
That's why football is so great - it's all about opinions and you are entitled to yours as much as me, or anyone else.That's where I differ from most in this thread.,we could have gone for and signed all three of those players by now. And they'd all be perfect for us. Instead we have wasted our time and probably our money too on Pogba. This displeases me.
Sané: very raw
Gundogan: will he ever get to his best form again?
Kanté: 1 very good season. Will be difficult to replicate.
Kanté I would have liked here, the others meh...
It's only boring if you obsessively follow it.meh this saga is boring now![]()
That's why football is so great - it's all about opinions and you are entitled to yours as much as me, or anyone else.
Getting those three, for example, would obviously enhance our squad greatly. I think we are in need of a superstar, a talisman, call it what you will, of Pogba proportions. I think we have been lacking this in recent years, in fact since Ronaldo left.
I'd rather have him arrive properly rested and miss a few games than get here a few weeks back having barely had any break at all meaning he'll be playing almost two years without downtime.And only Evra and Pogba play in Serie A. Which starts later than other leagues, right?
Having said that, nobody is forcing Pogba to stay on holiday with Evra. If he knows he is definitely playing for a PL team next season it is a little strange that he's not decided to get some training under his belt at the same time as players like Koscielny, Sagna and Lloris.
Yep, the "Squawka" head Journalist Greg Stobart still says even now City was his first choice before us, but City wouldn't spend the money. Pretty hilarious.Did some actually claim he wanted City before us![]()
All you have done there is name 3 players.Whilst I don't want to get into a debate about who is or isn't 'world class' if we look purely at players who have actually moved this summer (i.e. there can be no debate about their availability or about their price):
Sane £37m
Gungogan £26m
Kante £36m
These three come in at a shade below £100m
Personally, I'd still rather have one Paul Pogba but just sayin'
A pacy right winger with bags of potential, a dynamic attacking midfielder who we could nurture/rotate and lasts years player of the season in Kante. Great business by our rivals in my opinion.
Instead we've a 34 year old striker, a raw CB and a bit of a punt in Miki. And NO sign of Pogba, who I don't rate anyway.
That's where I differ from most in this thread.,we could have gone for and signed all three of those players by now. And they'd all be perfect for us. Instead we have wasted our time and probably our money too on Pogba. This displeases me.
We wouldn't get those three players at those prices though would we?
Take sane at £37 million, that is for city alone. If we were in a bidding war with city for the player, that could easily be a £50 million player. The same with Kante. It is not a zero sum game.
Well I don't see Pogba holding a Manchester United shirt do you???Di Marzio is 4 out of 4 with us (Jose, Ibra, Mkhi and Pogba) so to say he spouts BS, is BS.
A pacy right winger with bags of potential, a dynamic attacking midfielder who we could nurture/rotate and lasts years player of the season in Kante. Great business by our rivals in my opinion.
Instead we've a 34 year old striker, a raw CB and a bit of a punt in Miki. And NO sign of Pogba, who I don't rate anyway.
Added bold above. Your squad would have looked much better with both of them. Both would get in your current first 11..Sané: very raw
Gundogan: will he ever get to his best form again? If he does he is far better than any of your midfielders. Worth the risk..
Kanté: 1 very good season. Will be difficult to replicate. It won't at all. It's clear that's his level - he's not young (as such).
Kanté I would have liked here, the others meh...
But I keep reading on here money is no object to United?
A pacy right winger with bags of potential, a dynamic attacking midfielder who we could nurture/rotate and lasts years player of the season in Kante. Great business by our rivals in my opinion.
Instead we've a 34 year old striker, a raw CB and a bit of a punt in Miki. And NO sign of Pogba, who I don't rate anyway.
Di Marzio didn't promise that though?Well I don't see Pogba holding a Manchester United shirt do you???
A pacy right winger with bags of potential, a dynamic attacking midfielder who we could nurture/rotate and lasts years player of the season in Kante. Great business by our rivals in my opinion.
Instead we've a 34 year old striker, a raw CB and a bit of a punt in Miki. And NO sign of Pogba, who I don't rate anyway.
How is Miki 'a bit of a punt' but Sane and Gundogan aren't? One is very patchy and is always angling to move on, the other one has a long-term injury. Both riskier than Miki.
Well I don't see Pogba holding a Manchester United shirt do you???
Don't waste your time, eventually he'll get arm ache from moving the goalposts so much and he won't be able to type any more.That is not the argument though is it? The argument seems to be that those three would be a better way to spend £100 million. Reality is you would not get the three for £100 million if we were bidding against city and chelsea for them.
If the argument now is we can just pay and get what we want, then why is the fee for pogba such an issue?
That is not the argument though is it? The argument seems to be that those three would be a better way to spend £100 million. Reality is you would not get the three for £100 million if we were bidding against city and chelsea for them.
If the argument now is we can just pay and get what we want, then why is the fee for pogba such an issue?
Yep, the "Squawka" head Journalist Greg Stobart still says even now City was his first choice before us, but City wouldn't spend the money. Pretty hilarious.
Don't waste your time, eventually he'll get arm ache from moving the goalposts so much and he won't be able to type any more.
Henrikh Mkhitaryan is not a punt. Just because posters don't overly recognise the name or haven't seen many of his games doesn't deny the fact that he has proven his technical and goal scoring ability in a top European league and top European competitions.Miki's a punt but the two players he outperformed in the same league are "great business"?
How have we wasted money on Pogba? He's not even played a game yet.That's where I differ from most in this thread.,we could have gone for and signed all three of those players by now. And they'd all be perfect for us. Instead we have wasted our time and probably our money too on Pogba. This displeases me.
He said the deal will be done with in 48 hours did he not?? And that imo is Paul Pogba at carrington and announced as a Manchester United player am I right?Di Marzio didn't promise that though?