As I understand it the vote is about the terms of exit not whether we exit or not.
Brexited | the worst threads live the longest
- Thread starter Silva
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
As I understand it the vote is about the terms of exit not whether we exit or not.
Experts? Didn't we all decide we were sick of those and anyway they're all basically Nazi scientists?
I cant see MPs voting against their constituents tbh. Political suicide.
So . . .
Through his own ineptness and failure to control his party Cameron has set the country on the path to turbulent economic times as well as potentially reducing the power of the Royal Prerogative.
The biggest troll of all time?
Through his own ineptness and failure to control his party Cameron has set the country on the path to turbulent economic times as well as potentially reducing the power of the Royal Prerogative.
The biggest troll of all time?
This is fun.
Trying to get assurances is prudent whether you're a Brexiteer or Remoaner? It's win-win really, unless you're a leave whatever the outcome I don't care Brexiteer, in which you probably are a bigot anyway.
What is the majority required in parliament?
And in constituency terms Brexit was a landslide.
No idea! Simple majority?
I wish these Remoaners would stop talking down Britain.
Joke Country
I find it slightly hilarious that considering how much effort Nick and his ilk have spent in here and elsewhere arguing that this is all about parliamentary sovereignty they're now incredulous that the very body they want to hand ultimate power to gets to have a say in the matter.
This sovereign parliament is dominated by Remainer MPs who haven't given a damn about the views of their constituents for years. I have no doubt, none whatsoever, they they will seek to harm our negotiating position and dilute Brexit. Every piece of delaying they enact will only worsen the uncertainty which exists. I don't even want to think about my Hargreaves Lansdown account at this moment.
I was unsure about the wisdom of general election before, but this ruling has prompted me to reconsider such.
The Breidiots can't win in their own court let alone get a good deal in Brussels. That's another thing that David Dumby Davies hasn't taken in consideration
I can see SNP and Lib MP's on a matter of principal voting against the government - I can also see Labour probably having some massive infighting and comrade clusterfek managing to turn it into a massive own goal but them still finding a specific point they can disagree with the government enough to vote against it - not in principal but in practice... I can see the situation in Northern Ireland being one where they dont feel there is enough gsafeguarding in place and voting against - it come down to if enough of the London Conservative MP's will tow the party line - and remember brexit was not popular in London...
Some fudge will happen and it will get through - but it probably wont be as quick as the government would like... not sure it will lead to an election but of I was May I think thats the sensible call - given the state of labour she would walk a workable majority - it would give her a more credible mandate and it would allow her 5 years to sort it out as the timeline at the moment is tight and you will either get another election not long after brexit or if the article 50 negotiations take too long then possibly in the middle of it.
But will MPs really vote against their constituents?This sovereign parliament is dominated by Remainer MPs who haven't given a damn about the views of their constituents for years. I have no doubt, none whatsoever, they they will seek to harm our negotiating position and dilute Brexit. Every piece of delaying they enact will only worsen the uncertainty which exists. I don't even want to think about my Hargreaves Lansdown account at this moment.
I was unsure about the wisdom of general election before, but this ruling has prompted me to reconsider such.
Yeah and british people voted him in and created this farce we are seeing now
May is looking less like Thatcher and more like the evil witch of the West whose surrounded by her flying monkeys
I agree, think they will probably squeeze it past. Labour isnt united enough to get its act together and will probably be split. Bolded bit is so true.
I'm convinced that you are Juncker.
Lots of childish insults in here today
Agree. We should stick to facts and exposing people's hypocritical opinions in an adult way.
coming from someone who keeps calling remainers - 'remoaners'
When it coems to EU related matters in particular, where is the historical basis to trust Remainer MPs?
Let us suppose that Yes had won the Indy referendum in 2014, and a court then told Scotland that unionist Westminster MPs had the power whittle down the outcome to a lesser status of autonomy, would that be received well?
Last edited:
Apparently so, chief:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...ty-campaign-starts-today-see-it-say-it-sorted
That poster's a bit too reminiscent of Nazi propaganda for my liking.
I wonder who voted that remainer MP
Do you really believe that the EU will take these idiots seriously?
They don't take France seriously, so they are definitely not going to take the UK seriously after that. Also it confirms the suspicion that a lot of continentals had for a long time that the UK were purposely working against the EU and continental Europe in general.
Are your investments in foreign currencies? Does that explain why you're not bothered about the fall in the pound/ effects of a hard Brexit?This sovereign parliament is dominated by Remainer MPs who haven't given a damn about the views of their constituents for years. I have no doubt, none whatsoever, they they will seek to harm our negotiating position and dilute Brexit. Every piece of delaying they enact will only worsen the uncertainty which exists. I don't even want to think about my Hargreaves Lansdown account at this moment.
I was unsure about the wisdom of general election before, but this ruling has prompted me to reconsider such.
Where's the historical basis to trust any MP? Why would they suddenly be trustworthy after Brexit?
Why in your analogy is the court a 'unionist' court and not a Scottish court? This wasn't the decision of a European Court (although the hilarious possibility of the government appealing to a European Court for permission to ignore Parliament is still tantalisingly on the cards) but a UK one.
I think that they take France more seriously then these pack of amateurs who went kicking a hornet's nest while hoping that lovely puppies will come out instead. Look at them. Most of them have resigned, had turned against one another or have vanished in obscurity. Farage had even been spotted in the German embassy while working on his second passport while a remainer PM have given the task to clean the mess the leavers had created with their lies. The EU will leave them to flounder in darkness only to offer them a take it or leave it deal which will be heavily stacked towards the EU.
Regarding your last part. Its a known thing. Even the Brits admit that and joke about it. A unified and strong Europe was never in the UK best interest
Last edited:
Kussenberg just suggested May should call an emergency vote ASAP on article 50
Probably a sensible shout before labour can agree a unified (or as unified as they can manage these days) stance
Probably a sensible shout before labour can agree a unified (or as unified as they can manage these days) stance
I am convinced that the European commission, UKIP and Boris are all running accounts that post here.....
- "It's not about foreigners, it's about sovereignty"
- British judges make decision that Britain's elected parliament must vote on Article 50 in accordance with British law.
- British judges make decision that Britain's elected parliament must vote on Article 50 in accordance with British law.
its undeniable that ignorance (including xenophobia) had been a driving force to Brexit. There again when I use Breidiots Im referring to the Brexit politicians who had been showing, time and time again, that they have no clue of how the world around them works. I mean how can you call someone who think that its possible to make a deal with individual EU countries or the other guy who think that's a jumbo deal with Turkey is possible when the latter country is in the custom's union?
It does look like it.
But I think that the reality is that despite all the talks about EU citizens not caring about the EU, whether we are against or for the EU, we care a lot.
Would be hilarious if they the government had to refer this judgement to the European Courts
It would yet another case of remainers sorting the problems caused by irresponsible Brexiteers
These tweets are crazy, I don't know a single democracy that doesn't require the vote of the parliament when it comes to international treaties and most of the time the qualified majority is used.