OnlyTwoDaSilvas
Gullible
If you're judging him by his goals alone then yeah, you have a point about the SPL.
However, his all-round game is pretty brilliant for a 20 year old and he also managed 3 goals in the CL. This kid apparently turned down Arsenal to move to Celtic for first team football and Rodgers got Suarez to phone Dembele to personally speak to him about working under Rodgers etc. That's great lengths to go to, to sign a just turned 20 year old kid. It's also worth noting that he made his debut with Fulham at 16 and already back then, he was being linked with big clubs.
Nearly all of the major clubs around Europe are monitoring and scouting this kid and as I have previously said, Zidane has taken time out to personally praise him and say that he thinks he will be a fantastic player. It's also worth repeating that he has also managed to break into a talented France U21 side and has scored 4 in 4.
If you take his SPL goals in isolation, then you are clearly missing the whole picture and haven't really followed his career to-date. If you watch this guy play - it's clear as day, like it was with players like Larsson and Van Dijk in the past - that he's a brilliant talent that will no doubt excel at a bigger club and have a very fine career. The hype is completely warranted imo, and any comparisons between the likes of Boyd and Griffiths are both lazy and non-relevant. I mean, Dembele done better than Griffiths managed to do in the Championship despite being 18-19 at the time.
Decent analysis, but I think it's clear that you're not allowed to rate a Celtic player until after Southampton have bought them.
Forster, Wanyama and Van Dijk were all 'at their level' in the SPL, according to many. LvG didn't pick Van Dijk for the NT so he must be shite. Wanyama is a clogger. Forster failed at Newcastle etc. Then they come to the Premier League and continue on an upward trajectory and their critics will pretend that he never played for Celtic, or that they rated him all along.
Stick to the script.