Is Mou still 'The Special One' for you all?

Status
Not open for further replies.
But are we comparing this team with title challengers, are we expecting that?

If'd we'd converted just 4 of the draws in home games we dominated into wins (say Burnley, Stoke, Boro and WBA) then we'd be 3 points behind Chelsea. So we're not exactly talking a massive gulf in performances. With a slightly beefed up strike force that would have been very possible.
 
We all knew Mourinho has his flaws. There was always going to be baggage that comes with his divisive personality. Despite these issues, he's been a winner and his system, way of working and management of players has proven successful in terms of trophy hauls. We can argue all we want, and sure there are plenty of concerns and valid points with the way he manages his players. However, he has a proven pedigree to be a winner with his management style. We'll just have trust him and hope like in the past he again proves successful.
 
You post like a child sometimes. "Pathetic" "Lost your minds". Get a grip ffs. If you want to see stuff that fits the bill see your posts when LVG was in charge. You were the least patient chap around.

I'm actually very patient. I was with LVG and I am with Mourinho. I have repeatedly said the latter deserves time to get it right. What some don't understand is that being patient and giving a manager time can coexist with being critical of the manager for getting poor results and having a failure of a season. I never said that Jose needs to be sacked if his first season is poor.

Coming on to those players, yes footballers do take time at times adapting to a new league which is why I am happy to give them time. But that doesn't mean José doesn't deserve a metaphorical slap around the ear after he's spent 150 million pounds and still has us woeful in attack and potentially missing out on CL football. Also, it's not as if players don't come to the league and immediately perform either. Ibra has, as have many before. Mkhitarian hasn't looked like he's struggling with the league either. Its just that team isn't working properly as opposed to individuals finding the league's nature hard. So its very different from vidic and evra not doing well because of themselves. That's possibly the case with Pogba who often creates his own problems but either way, we've got far better quality in attack than our goal output suggests and the manager has to be held accountable.

:drool:
 
Kanchelskis, Sharpe, Cantona, Giggs, Hughes
vs
Beckham, Cole, Yorke, Giggs, Blomqvist
vs
Giggs, Tevez, Berbatov, Rooney, Ronaldo,
vs
Martial, Rashford, Mata, Ibrahimović, Mkhitaryan (I've even left out Rooney and Lingard to be kind)

Care to spot the odd group? Our attacking resources are no-where close to being good enough.

People need to get real about what it takes to be world class. We need very talented players, able to play to the maximum of their capacity, on a regular weekly basis. Maybe some of the current lot will dramatically improve but until we get genuine, reliable world class players, dont expect reliable world class results.

I sympathise with Mourinho. Until he has the genuine tools required, we can whinge as much as we want, but it isn't 'his fault'
You are comparing our current squad with SAF's best teams. In his final season, he had:

Van Persie, Hernandez, Rooney, Welbeck, Kagawa, Young (who played more than Nani)

Again, before the season started, the general opinion around here was that top 4 was a minimum, and that with the new signings, we should have been at least challenging for the title. Now you are moving the goalposts because of hindsight, and you are comparing our present squad with SAF's best. The thing is, he won a lot more than just 3 titles.
 
We all knew Mourinho has his flaws. There was always going to be baggage that comes with his divisive personality. Despite these issues, he's been a winner and his system, way of working and management of players has proven successful in terms of trophy hauls. We can argue all we want, and sure there are plenty of concerns and valid points with the way he manages his players. However, he has a proven pedigree to be a winner with his management style. We'll just have trust him and hope like in the past he again proves successful.

Pretty much what many said about LvG.
 
I get the actual comparison, but not the point you are trying to make. Cantona, Yorke, Cole were in their prime. So was Rooney-Ronaldo-Tevez in 2008. Now you are talking 2 youngsters and 1 just past his prime player....with a new manager to boot. It just cannot be a direct one-to-one comparison. I think Martial and Rashford can go on to have careers as good as any of the other players you mention.

I listed groups of players from SAFs great teams: 1994, 1999 and 2008. Think of those players during those periods and compare that to what we have now.

Its an illustrative example on how Mourinho does not have the quality required to win the league right now. Some of our players may improve, but that affects the future only; right now, they are a handicap. Mourinho is being expected by some to do 'much much better' despite not having the required players.

I have done this as a rebuttal to posts which claim Mourinho should be challenging for the league with the squad he has. The quality of our squad is not at the traditional level required to win league titles, so Mourinho does not yet have a realistic chance. The fact that we have invested so much funds in past 4 years does not change that fact.
 
If'd we'd converted just 4 of the draws in home games we dominated into wins (say Burnley, Stoke, Boro and WBA) then we'd be 3 points behind Chelsea. So we're not exactly talking a massive gulf in performances. With a slightly beefed up strike force that would have been very possible.
That's exactly my line of thinking.
 
You are comparing our current squad with SAF's best teams. In his final season, he had:

Van Persie, Hernandez, Rooney, Welbeck, Kagawa, Young (who played more than Nani)

Again, before the season started, the general opinion around here was that top 4 was a minimum, and that with the new signings, we should have been at least challenging for the title. Now you are moving the goalposts because of hindsight, and you are comparing our present squad with SAF's best. The thing is, he won a lot more than just 3 titles.

2013: Van Persie, Hernandez, Rooney, Welbeck, Kagawa, Young, Nani in 2013
Vs
2017: Martial, Rashford, Mata, Ibrahimović, Mkhitaryan, Rooney Lingard

Why don't you tell me which set of players has better talent, able to perform to that talent, on a weekly basis?
 
Are we seriously going to compare LvG with Mourinho? It's absurd if people make these comparisons.

Last seasons we finished 5th, this season it looks like we'll finish 5th as well. All this 'if only we beat Burnley/Stoke/Accrington Stanley' at home also applies to any manager. You had no problems comparing LvG to Moyes when many (including me) felt it was absurd to compare.

You just need to understand that you were entrenched in your position of opposing LvG. People have a similar attitude towards Mourinho now.
 
If'd we'd converted just 4 of the draws in home games we dominated into wins (say Burnley, Stoke, Boro and WBA) then we'd be 3 points behind Chelsea. So we're not exactly talking a massive gulf in performances. With a slightly beefed up strike force that would have been very possible.
Im struggling, like really really struggling why some are finding this so difficult to grasp.

I'm hoping its trolling because of utter boredom. Otherwise, well I don't really want to say :nervous:
 
2013: Van Persie, Hernandez, Rooney, Welbeck, Kagawa, Young, Nani in 2013
Vs
2017: Martial, Rashford, Mata, Ibrahimović, Mkhitaryan, Rooney Lingard

Why don't you tell me which set of players has better talent, able to perform to that talent, on a weekly basis?
If you are comparing them on reputation and how good they are (on paper) that's one argument. If you are comparing them based on performance then it's just a complete tautology and utter nonsense. You should make your mind up on that.
 
If'd we'd converted just 4 of the draws in home games we dominated into wins (say Burnley, Stoke, Boro and WBA) then we'd be 3 points behind Chelsea. So we're not exactly talking a massive gulf in performances. With a slightly beefed up strike force that would have been very possible.
Like these for example. Stupidly dominant unlike last season where we needed the De Gea show every game
Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_00.16.31.png


Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_00.17.20.png

Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_00.16.47.png

Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_19.50.18.png
 
If you are comparing them on reputation and how good they are (on paper) that's one argument. If you are comparing them based on performance then it's just a complete tautology and utter nonsense. You should make your mind up on that.
Performance please.

From what I see, the 2013 group won the title by a country mile. The 2017 group have been 6th best all season and are flirting with 5th right now.
 
Last seasons we finished 5th, this season it looks like we'll finish 5th as well. All this 'if only we beat Burnley/Stoke/Accrington Stanley' at home also applies to any manager. You had no problems comparing LvG to Moyes when many (including me) felt it was absurd to compare.

You just need to understand that you were entrenched in your position of opposing LvG. People have a similar attitude towards Mourinho now.

Hmm. Makes sense. Silly though.
 
Im struggling, like really really struggling why some are finding this so difficult to grasp.

I'm hoping its trolling because of utter boredom. Otherwise, well I don't really want to say :nervous:
Because as any 'if my aunt had bollocks' argument it isn't very persuasive. You might as well say if we drew 4 of the games that we've won (which could have happened) we'd now be 23 points behind Chelsea.
 
Performance please.

From what I see, the 2013 group won the title by a country mile. The 2017 group have been 6th best all season and are flirting with 5th right now.
Then it's a complete tautology and meaningless for that reason.
 
Last seasons we finished 5th, this season it looks like we'll finish 5th as well. All this 'if only we beat Burnley/Stoke/Accrington Stanley' at home also applies to any manager. You had no problems comparing LvG to Moyes when many (including me) felt it was absurd to compare.

You just need to understand that you were entrenched in your position of opposing LvG. People have a similar attitude towards Mourinho now.
It's not just about results. The football on offer last season was some of the worst seen at Old Trafford in my 40 years of going to matches. The players LvG purchased and sold has cost the club many millions. Comparing LvG to Moyes is also daft. Personally, I can't remember ever comparing Moyes with LvG.
 
@fishfingers15

We're still suffering from LvG's transfer dealings.
 
Performance please.

From what I see, the 2013 group won the title by a country mile. The 2017 group have been 6th best all season and are flirting with 5th right now.
See thats why your second question confused me. From your original post, by putting up SAFs great teams you made it seem like our current team is so much inferior. Which in fact it probably was, given that one of them had a ballon d'or Ronaldo and a prime Rooney. I was just pointing out that SAF still had much success with lesser teams, he oversaw three major transitions after all. The man is a master motivator, and no doubt he would have gotten better out of the likes of Rashford for me.
 
Because as any 'if my aunt had bollocks' argument it isn't very persuasive. You might as well say if we drew 4 of the games that we've won (which could have happened) we'd now be 23 points behind Chelsea.
The flaw in your argument is we have always been the better team in all of those games we drew. I can't remember games we have won in which we were fortunate.
 
Last edited:
It's not just about results. The football on offer last season was some of the worst seen at Old Trafford in my 40 years of going to matches. The players LvG purchased and sold has cost the club many millions. Comparing LvG to Moyes is also daft. Personally, I can't remember ever comparing Moyes with LvG.

I have no allegiance to a manager. I learned the hard way after Moyes. It was not funny or engaging to see posters ripping each other out because they don't agree with their viewpoint because of a manager. It was so bad that people were willing the club to lose a match for the 'greater good'. It only heightened after LvG. For a guy who stood steadfast with Moyes, I was more than surprised that you were laying into LvG because of 'style of play' and many in this forum hold you in high regard as a poster.

I can only say that everybody spends money. Mourinho's signings cost a lot of money, like LvG. I can only say that while subjectively it looks like we are playing better football, we don't have points or goals to show for it. Another reason it's probably best not to take the 'it's just the finishing guys, we'll be ok as long as we trust Mourinho' at face value. It would be stupid to fire Mourinho because he didn't get us at least 4th and it would be equally naive/idiotic to say it's down to the previous managers. Essentially, posts like this one below :D


@fishfingers15

We're still suffering from LvG's transfer dealings.
 
As expected things are not going perfectly - my main complaint is the throwing of players under/out of the bus.
His last departure from Chelsea was down to discontent among players and staff and i hope we are not heading in the same direction.
He needs lessons from LvG on how to get the best out of younger players, which he certainly knows how to do with the more mature ones.
I was against his coming to OT - I've been pleasantly surprised in some ways and found him unfortunately true to form in others.
50:50 for me right now.
 
Whatever.
Must be so torturous for you to support our club. Why do you do it to yourself?
Anyways, have fun.
What a fatuous remark. No, it isn't torturous for me to support our club. It's reading your posts that's a real struggle though (but not quite torture).
 
Like these for example. Stupidly dominant unlike last season where we needed the De Gea show every game
Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_00.16.31.png


Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_00.17.20.png

Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_00.16.47.png

Screen_Shot_2017-04-05_at_19.50.18.png

I don't understand xG but yeah, those four will do. Or Arsenal, Bournemouth and West Brom. Feck it, there's not many draws in that run we didn't completely dominate. Maybe Liverpool, Boro and Everton?
 
I don't understand xG but yeah, those four will do. Or Boro, Arsenal, Bournemouth and West Brom. Feck it, there's not many draws in that run we didn't completely dominate. Maybe Liverpool and Everton?
xG basically measures how much an average team would be expected to score across a match. In order to calculate it, you take the probability of scoring for each shot taken in the match and you add them all up together. For instance, if a team had two shots in a match and the expected value of a goal for each one was 0.2 and 0.3, then the xG total for the team would be 0.5. For further clarification, they calculate the expected value of a goal for each shot by quantifying from where exactly the shot was taken and other factors. For instance, imagine 10 players in 10 different matches take a shot from 6 yards out. If 8 of the players score from that exact position, then the xG when taking that shot is 0.8.

However, you have to be able to interpret the xG values. I one Team A has 1.4 and Team B has 1.1, do you say that Team A deserved to win. I generally interpret it as such:
  • xG lead by 0.5 to 1.4 = 1 goal win
  • xg lead by 1.5 to 2.4 = 2 goal win
and so on and so forth...
 
I have no allegiance to a manager. I learned the hard way after Moyes. It was not funny or engaging to see posters ripping each other out because they don't agree with their viewpoint because of a manager. It was so bad that people were willing the club to lose a match for the 'greater good'. It only heightened after LvG. For a guy who stood steadfast with Moyes, I was more than surprised that you were laying into LvG because of 'style of play' and many in this forum hold you in high regard as a poster.

I can only say that everybody spends money. Mourinho's signings cost a lot of money, like LvG. I can only say that while subjectively it looks like we are playing better football, we don't have points or goals to show for it. Another reason it's probably best not to take the 'it's just the finishing guys, we'll be ok as long as we trust Mourinho' at face value. It would be stupid to fire Mourinho because he didn't get us at least 4th and it would be equally naive/idiotic to say it's down to the previous managers. Essentially, posts like this one below :D
Statistics, fan forums, many pundits, ex-players were in agreement with my line of thinking with LvG. I was just much quicker to call him out. :D
 
See thats why your second question confused me. From your original post, by putting up SAFs great teams you made it seem like our current team is so much inferior. Which in fact it probably was, given that one of them had a ballon d'or Ronaldo and a prime Rooney. I was just pointing out that SAF still had much success with lesser teams, he oversaw three major transitions after all. The man is a master motivator, and no doubt he would have gotten better out of the likes of Rashford for me.

Got it.

But even SAF's lesser teams, like 2013, had better attacking resources than Mourinho has has so far this season. You can argue he could have coached more out of them, but I don't this thats true.
 
I don't understand xG but yeah, those four will do. Or Arsenal, Bournemouth and West Brom. Feck it, there's not many draws in that run we didn't completely dominate. Maybe Liverpool, Boro and Everton?

Neither did I, but @Rawls took the time to explain it to me. Accurate statistical analysis which provides quantitive evidence to what we see.
 
There are some fickle fans in here. They demand immediate success, but at the same time, demand that Jose respect the club's tradition of bringing through youth players.

We have 3 young players in our attack - Rashford, Martial, and Lingard, (plus Pogba also is relatively young) and they are just not ready to carry the team through pressure situations.
 
If'd we'd converted just 4 of the draws in home games we dominated into wins (say Burnley, Stoke, Boro and WBA) then we'd be 3 points behind Chelsea. So we're not exactly talking a massive gulf in performances. With a slightly beefed up strike force that would have been very possible.
This is fair enough to a point. But every club has their own little sob stories about what might have been if certain moments had developed differently.
 
This is fair enough to a point. But every club has their own little sob stories about what might have been if certain moments had developed differently.

Agree with that. If Chelsea had started the season in the form they're in now etc etc.
 
Im struggling, like really really struggling why some are finding this so difficult to grasp.

I'm hoping its trolling because of utter boredom. Otherwise, well I don't really want to say :nervous:
To be fair to some, they may be struggling because it didn't happen. It is mostly Ifs and buts.

It is not to say at least hopefully we can build on it and get better next season.

Until then, it is all ifs and buts and people can rightly go on with the actual facts and results.

IF we won against Westham last season, LVG could still be the manager.
 
This is fair enough to a point. But every club has their own little sob stories about what might have been if certain moments had developed differently.
At the same time filing every instance where 'fortune' did favor them as no more than their due.
 
This is fair enough to a point. But every club has their own little sob stories about what might have been if certain moments had developed differently.

Definitely. That's not really my point, though. I'm not saying we deserve to be any higher up the league right now. We deserve to be where we are, no ifs buts or maybes. Luck evens itself out, every club hits the woodwork, referees feck over everyone equally etc etc etc

I was actually arguing that had our squad been marginally stronger (e.g. Rooney upgrade) there's a very good chance we'd still be in the title race. Completely hypothetical but does show we're not miles off the pace, despite having options up front that aren't a patch on what we normally had in the Fergie era.
 
Definitely. That's not really my point, though. I'm not saying we deserve to be any higher up the league right now. We deserve to be where we are, no ifs buts or maybes. Luck evens itself out, every club hits the woodwork, referees feck over everyone equally etc etc etc

I was actually arguing that had our squad been marginally stronger (e.g. Rooney upgrade) there's a very good chance we'd still be in the title race. Completely hypothetical but does show we're not miles off the pace, despite having options up front that aren't a patch on what we normally had in the Fergie era.
It's grounds for hope at least.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.