Absolutely. David Miliband couldn't even win the leadership election and he'd have made sure the Tories didn't have a majority and we'd still be in the EU. Corbyn has won it twice so logic dictates that the Tories will cease to exist as a party and not only would Brexit be stopped but the rest of the EU will apply to join the United Kingdom.Like Corbyn is going to kill it nationwide?
Rest of the EU - apart from Scotland.Absolutely. David Miliband couldn't even win the leadership election and he'd have made sure the Tories didn't have a majority and we'd still be in the EU. Corbyn has won it twice so logic dictates that the Tories will cease to exist as a party and not only would Brexit be stopped but the rest of the EU will apply to join the United Kingdom.
Rest of the EU - apart from Scotland.
This is like the twitter polls again.Absolutely. David Miliband couldn't even win the leadership election and he'd have made sure the Tories didn't have a majority and we'd still be in the EU. Corbyn has won it twice so logic dictates that the Tories will cease to exist as a party and not only would Brexit be stopped but the rest of the EU will apply to join the United Kingdom.
Shoud be a poll on twitter about the use of Trident. Most people on twitter couldn't even spell armageddon. Still, it's not the end of the world.This is like the twitter polls again.
If by it you mean the momentum vote then yup he has... Pretty sure it will cripple the party in the general though.Corbyn has won it twice.
So are baseless conspiracy theories on blame good or bad?If by it you mean the momentum vote then yup he has... Pretty sure it will cripple the party in the general though.
Anyway it needs to happen to finally force the party to split / become relevant
... A pro Brexit momentum party and a pro remain centrist one would see the best solution and probably inevitable when he secures the worst return on mps since ww2 (no doubt the corbynistas will blame Blair somehow)
I'm kinda meh on Khan. A lot of hype surrounding him but he comes across as a bit...empty, maybe? Might just be me. On the other hand, I don't mind Chuka. Spoke a fair bit of sense on Brexit etc.
He's not an MP and isn't standing for election. Whilst in theory that might not stop Labour picking him as Leader the press will have a field day with it. I think its naive to think Sadiq Khan's ethnicity and religion wouldn't be a problem for a huge part of the country too as much as it disgusts me to write that.
That's fair enough but he's literally not a communist. Also(you don't have answer if you don't want to)but is there any policies of Corbyn's Labour that you disagree with ? The policy aren't particularly far left or radical.
Can it just be noted that these two sentences were posted in this grouping?Call it egoism but Im sick to the teeth with JC's best mates calling a tube strike every couple of weeks. Some people actually have to work for a living.
F-f-f-ree markets. Erm...communism. Chairman May!http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39685106
A cap on energy bills.
It is interesting that when EM put this forward the Tories attacked it as undeliverable and now it is supposedly going to be in their manifesto.
They'll promise anything, as long as they get to retain power.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39685106
A cap on energy bills.
It is interesting that when EM put this forward the Tories attacked it as undeliverable and now it is supposedly going to be in their manifesto.
You haven't mentioned what policies you disagree with. What about Free school meals, more bank holidays, a anti austerity plan for the economy, upping the minimum wage, supporting the NHS. Do you disagree with any of these policies ?He appeased antisemitism and he was very naive regarding the trident. He's also too much in the unions pockets for my liking. Call it egoism but Im sick to the teeth with JC's best mates calling a tube strike every couple of weeks. Some people actually have to work for a living.
However that's not important. The important thing is that JC is un electable material which means that one of the most powerful nations in the world is currently working on a virtual dictatorship. I've worked against that in Malta when our own version of JC was head of the MLP, Id work against that in the UK.
You haven't mentioned what policies you disagree with. What about Free school meals, more bank holidays, a anti austerity plan for the economy, upping the minimum wage, supporting the NHS. Do you disagree with any of these policies ?
Also for the unions of course Corbyn is close to the unions, it's the LABOUR party. Mate I don't want to have a dig at you but you don't sound particularly Left wing at all.
This is what's worrying, he invokes highly polarised views. He unquestionably has a lot of supporters who sincerely think he'd be a great Prime Minister. But there are people who hold the same strength of feeling against him (and not just Tories and Ukippers). The election will be a test of which group is greater in number.
The Tube strikes is a despicable act, lead by a bunch of spoiled kids who hold a monopoly.
Call it egoism but Im sick to the teeth with JC's best mates calling a tube strike every couple of weeks. Some people actually have to work for a living
Hospitals services in the UK are like 1 star hotels with too few people employed to make sure the customer get a shit service
The trolleys in the corridors are pretty swish though.Fixed that for you
I believe they even have Corridor nurses now, like you see in war zones in 3rd world countries. Envy of the world.The trolleys in the corridors are pretty swish though.
Striking for better work conditions, job security and rights
Something you have been totally 'For' previously, these people have to work too, its quite a selfish attitude you have there.
Would you rather those working people were decimated like teachers and nurses have been?
The trolleys in the corridors are pretty swish though.
Id rather see them get on with our work. Their salary/conditions is quite competitive. Surely there's no need for a strike every couple of months
You don't get to determine that their work conditions are greatthey have great working conditions and certainly don't need to strike every 2 months. Whom do you think they are hurting by doing so? It certainly not hurting those rich enough not to need to work
They don't?
They do and the ones suffering because of it are the workers
You don't get to determine that their work conditions are great
You sound so Tory sometimes
You don't half talk a lot of bollocks.
Or maybe i am a person whose experienced enough to know how the world work. If technology improves enough to have them all fired then rest assured that they wont find any sympathy from the public. Thats what happens when you abuse from your position
So who do you think would suffer from those strikes?
The people and families of them who are going without pay.
Thats the most stereotypical right wing way you could have responded to that...
They'd get more sympathy then any banker that gets fired, from me anyhowOr maybe i am a person whose experienced enough to know how the world work. If technology improves enough to have them all fired then rest assured that most people in the uk would want that technology to be introduced in the uk. They certaintly wont find any sympathy from the public. Thats what happens when you abuse from your position